Jump to content
William Maley

Lexus News: The Uncertain Future of the Lexus GS and IS

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, balthazar said:

Ideally, mainline brands in 2020 (Chevy, Ford, Nissan, Mercedes, etc) should build 2 sedans, small & mid-sized.
The luxury brands should build mid- and full-size.
 

See my other post, but the 2 of the top 3 selling luxury vehicles in the USA are small sedans, with a mid-size crossover being the 3rd.  And the XT5 is up there too, a mid-size crossover.  Look at CTS and CT6 sales or Continental sales, all dead in the water, Infiniti Q70 and Lexus GS, dead in the water with one foot in the grave.  The only full size luxury car that consistently sells over 1,000 units a month is the S-class, and most of the mid-sizers struggle to hit 2,000 a month unless it is a an E-class or 5-series.  Disregarding small luxury cars is a horrible idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

That is odd because the top 3 selling luxury products in the USA last year were the Lexus RX, 3-series and C-class.  And small sedans as a segment were about flat last year...
...I am not buying into people don't want small cars...

3-series was down 16% vs. 2016 (70K > 59K) while the 5-series was up 25%.
MB CLA was down 20%. The bottom is falling out of small 'lux' sedans, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, regfootball said:

 

with regards to GM and the sedan market in the USA

 

Cadillac:

ATS was a great idea but it had less space inside than it should have.  And so unless there is a huge need in another market for a compact Cadillac (CT3) I think they don't need one for 2020.  I do think that any future compact Cadillac could be flexible on a RWD vs FWD chassis depending on execution.

Upcoming CT5 IMO is likely to be in a slot between what we traditionally have considered CTS sized and STS sized.  At a minimum the interior needs to have more accommodations than the now current CTS.  But not much more, if any, larger physically.

CT6 of course will continue and is 'large enough' I think.  My only thought on CT6 size is it could be wider by a couple inches inside. 

If cadillac were to add a range topping sedan, it should be more to create a splash with a new design theme or to really break the mold.  For example.... Something Escala like, CT6 sized or larger, or something with a hatch.  Or something sexier than a Tesla  (or all of that).

The CT6 is either replaced by the new design or coexists with it.  The CT6 is the old persons Caddy in that scenario then, and the new design is the young persons large caddy.

Buick

I still like the idea of a Verano but admit it doesn't have the sales legs anymore.  I do think since the Regal sportback is the entry Buick 'sedan' now, it is just fine for that, but they nice to watch prices and redo the packaging for greater value and equipment.

Since the LaCrosse exists, in 2020 I have no issues with it carrying the large sedan torch for Buick, but I do think interior improvements and similar value and packaging propositions are in order.  With fewer sedan buyers, this car really should be increasing sedan market share based on value and ride comfort.  

I really do think the Avenir could have rebooted the large sedan market at accessible price, and if they did that for 2020 (pipe dream) I would endorse it and might even sign on for it 'replacing' the LaCrosse unless the Lacrosse were repackaged to move downscale some and replace the Impala.

 

 

Image result for buick avenir

 

 

Chevy

I still see the Cruze sedan being needed even if it is selling fewer copies.  This is a class of car for entry level new car buyers.  Cruze should grow a bit to be a size clone to match Civic if they redo it.

Malibu needs to continue in this catch all midsize segment.  However, if Impala is discontinued then Malibu needs to increase some in size and offer more flexible packages to allow for larger engine choice easier etc.

I think the Impala can literally continue in its current body 2-4 more years (with an interior redo), or it could be axed if Buick were to take on those sales with the LaCrosse.  If in 2-4 years sedans rebound then they can redo the Impala.  But i think the Impala name right now may be better off transferred to some kind of sexy large crossover which doesn't seem to be the sort of thing GM is capable of.

If the LaCrosse or Avenir or combo of LaCrosse and Avenir could pick up lost Impala sales then it may be ok to kill the Impala.  Then sedans really do become more of an effective niche with a Buick tag on them IMO.

 

 

 

Cadillac is supposed to get a small car, so they would have a 3 sedan line up, I don't see any reason for a car bigger than the CT6, which already has the footprint similar to the Escalade, that is a big vehicle, and the CT6 isn't lighting up any sales charts, why make something bigger.  If you want to load up content and make it nicer and more expensive great.  CT5 is already testing, we'll see in a year or two what it is.

Chevy I feel becomes the Cruze and Malibu, I can't see the Impala surviving Sedan-ageddon.  Unless they downsize the Cruze to like 176 inches long, and make it replace the Sonic and be competition for the Accent, Versa, and cars like that.   Then make the Malibu 185 inches long, sort of like Pontiac Grand Am size where it is a little bigger than a Corolla or Civic but similar price point and then make the Impala like Honda Accord size, or current Fusion size of 195 inches long.  I prefer that plan because you keep the Impala name plate and you keep an entry level car.

Buick I think its possible they have no sedans past 2020.  If they do, then I imagine it would be a larger mid-size, in between the current Regal and Lacrosse, those 2 can merge into one product.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

I don't see any reason for a car bigger than the CT6, which already has the footprint similar to the Escalade, that is a big vehicle...

Simple- the CT6 isn't large enough to be the final range topper from Cadillac.
And 204-in isn't 'large', it's just larger than the mid-size cars. A Rolls is 227".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, balthazar said:

3-series was down 16% vs. 2016 (70K > 59K) while the 5-series was up 25%.
MB CLA was down 20%. The bottom is falling out of small 'lux' sedans, too.

2017 sales volume in the US, (China and Europe could be a whole other story)  These are the top sellers from each brand

Lexus RX: 108,307

BMW 3+4 series:  99,083

MB C-class: 77,447

Cadillac XT5: 68,312

Audi Q5: 57,640

Acura MDX 54,866

Infiniti Q50: 40,749

And as honorable mentions, the RDX, E-class, GLE and Lexus ES and NX all topped 50,000 units.   So of the top 12 you have 3 small sedan, 2 mid-size sedan, 3 small crossover, 4 mid-size crossover.  The MDX is the biggest thing on this list, if I were a luxury brad I wouldn't be pouring money into full size product, unless it is something like an Escalade or S-class that is a cash cow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, balthazar said:

Simple- the CT6 isn't large enough to be the final range topper from Cadillac.
And 204-in isn't 'large', it's just larger than the mid-size cars. A Rolls is 227".

I suppose Cadillac could do a Phantom or even Ghost sized car for $150,000 but who is going to buy it?  I just can't see them finding a business case for something like that.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so you want to combine model lines into 1 total.

BMW has a 2-dr, 4-dr and conv in the 4-series, and (2) 4-drs and a wagon in the 3 series. That's 6 body styles. I don't know/care if all 6 were there in 2016, but in 2017, combined, those two lines fell 7%.

But the 3 is no longer the small sedan at BMW- that's now the 2-series (2-dr, conv, and wagon) plus I assume you'll want to add in the 1-series (4-dr hatch) to be consistent.

2 series alone was down 24% last year and is only running at 28% of the volume of the 4-series. The demand is weak at best. Add to the pot the much thinner margins at the bottom end and ask yourself why a lux brand would want to wade into the mucky shallow end of the lake.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

I suppose Cadillac could do a Phantom or even Ghost sized car for $150,000 but who is going to buy it?  I just can't see them finding a business case for something like that.  

I know you're super literal, but try and follow the big picture.
There's a LOT of room between 204" and 227"- that's all I'm saying.

CT6 sold 10,5xx units in the US in '17, which was up 15% over '16 (tho I think '16 was the ramp-up year, right?) That's still positive growth. Thru March, the CT6 ticked up another 3%, still positive growth on a high margin product. If it were showing a 16% or 20% drop, I'd have to look at the bottom line WRT recommending it's continuation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, balthazar said:

I know you're super literal, but try and follow the big picture.
There's a LOT of room between 204" and 227"- that's all I'm saying.

CT6 sold 10,5xx units in the US in '17, which was up 15% over '16 (tho I think '16 was the ramp-up year, right?) That's still positive growth. Thru March, the CT6 ticked up another 3%, still positive growth on a high margin product. If it were showing a 16% or 20% drop, I'd have to look at the bottom line WRT recommending it's continuation.

But the CT6 is a 2 country car, USA and China, so we are talking like 20k units a year and that is with a $56k starting point. If they go over $100k, how much demand is there for a Cadillac at that price point?  The E-class outsells the CT6 about 5-1,  CT6 also sells a bit like an Audi A6 in the USA, if you put a Cadillac in the $100k+ range and is outsold 5-1 the way the S-class outsells the A8, then you are talking like 300 cars a month maybe, another 200 or so in China.  There isn't a lot of volume to be found.

I think they are better off with an SUV above the Escalade if they want to do a $100,000+ vehicle.  

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still standing here talking, and now you're way across the cornfield talking at the sky.

We were talking size, now you're wrapped up in price. All I said is, there's room above the CT6 in size at Cadillac. Do I prefer 10,000 CT6 per year, or 100,000? 10,000 every time, as long as it's profitable.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the CT6 continuing to grow volume, particularly after the XTS goes away. By then the new will be gone and they will have a greater percent of the lesser msrp cars. And Cadillacs always sell at discount. It won’t be new anymore so I see them repacking the CT6 to sell in greater volume once the XTS dies and a lot of the development cost of the CT6 is skimmed off the first couple model years. It will become more accessible like a DTS was. You’ll have a bunch that sell with the 3.6 at cheap price and they’ll make money on the twin turbo 6 and 8

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, smk4565 said:

That is odd because the top 3 selling luxury products in the USA last year were the Lexus RX, 3-series and C-class.  And small sedans as a segment were about flat last year, while mid-size sedans dropped and large sedans got crushed.  Small crossover is the fastest growth segment.  So I am not buying into people don't want small cars, people deemed the CR-V and Rav4 too big so they had to get products smaller.   I don't see Honda or Toyota putting out stuff bigger than the Pilot or Highlander due to demand for big vehicles, and Toyota has let the Sequoia die on the vine because there is no point dumping money into a dinosaur that CAFE will kill off.

You completely blew past the word "CARS" and assumed everything small is a "car".

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, balthazar said:

OK, so you want to combine model lines into 1 total.

BMW has a 2-dr, 4-dr and conv in the 4-series, and (2) 4-drs and a wagon in the 3 series. That's 6 body styles. I don't know/care if all 6 were there in 2016, but in 2017, combined, those two lines fell 7%.

But the 3 is no longer the small sedan at BMW- that's now the 2-series (2-dr, conv, and wagon) plus I assume you'll want to add in the 1-series (4-dr hatch) to be consistent.

2 series alone was down 24% last year and is only running at 28% of the volume of the 4-series. The demand is weak at best. Add to the pot the much thinner margins at the bottom end and ask yourself why a lux brand would want to wade into the mucky shallow end of the lake.

BMW does that goal-post moving all the time.  They like to claim they have 76 models, but they count the 3 body styles of 3-series and 3-body styles of 4-series as a single sales number.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, smk4565 said:

But the CT6 is a 2 country car, USA and China, so we are talking like 20k units a year and that is with a $56k starting point. If they go over $100k, how much demand is there for a Cadillac at that price point?  The E-class outsells the CT6 about 5-1,  CT6 also sells a bit like an Audi A6 in the USA, if you put a Cadillac in the $100k+ range and is outsold 5-1 the way the S-class outsells the A8, then you are talking like 300 cars a month maybe, another 200 or so in China.  There isn't a lot of volume to be found.

I think they are better off with an SUV above the Escalade if they want to do a $100,000+ vehicle.  

The E-Class is used as a taxi, that's where a huge bulk of the volume comes from. It is the Crown Vic of Europe. It is the Caprice of China.

CT6 doesn't get used as a taxi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, regfootball said:

I see the CT6 continuing to grow volume, particularly after the XTS goes away. By then the new will be gone and they will have a greater percent of the lesser msrp cars. And Cadillacs always sell at discount. It won’t be new anymore so I see them repacking the CT6 to sell in greater volume once the XTS dies and a lot of the development cost of the CT6 is skimmed off the first couple model years. It will become more accessible like a DTS was. You’ll have a bunch that sell with the 3.6 at cheap price and they’ll make money on the twin turbo 6 and 8

I think you're half right.  I do see them increasing in volume, but not by discounting it.  With the extremely handsome update to an already handsome car coming, I doubt they'll feel the need to discount the car any.  They will increase volume simply by moving mid-range XTS buyers  to CT6 (base AWD XTS is only $3k less than base CT6 AWD), and base XTS buyers will either step up to CT6 or down to CT5.  XTS V-Sport ($71,490) buyers will feel quite comfortable in a CT6 Premium Luxury 3.0TT AWD ($68,290 before any options).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i guess when i mentioned the discounting i sort of was thinking there would be a greater inventory supply of the 70k +/- versions instead of the insane 90k versions, LOL

 

and then the dealer discounts etc is another 10 grand off.

Edited by regfootball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, balthazar said:

I'm still standing here talking, and now you're way across the cornfield talking at the sky.

We were talking size, now you're wrapped up in price. All I said is, there's room above the CT6 in size at Cadillac. Do I prefer 10,000 CT6 per year, or 100,000? 10,000 every time, as long as it's profitable.

So you want a car that is 10 inches longer than a CT6 at like $75k?  They are going to run into the same product overlap problem they now with sedans.  They would have to go to $100k to clear the CT6 V8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

The E-Class is used as a taxi, that's where a huge bulk of the volume comes from. It is the Crown Vic of Europe. It is the Caprice of China.

CT6 doesn't get used as a taxi

And yet the E-class still has more status or brand appeal than a CT6.  They have had E-class taxis for 40 years and that hasn’t hurt Mercedes image one bit.  The huge volume keeps the dollars rolling in to support Daimler’s massive R&D budget.

13 hours ago, regfootball said:

I see the CT6 continuing to grow volume, particularly after the XTS goes away. By then the new will be gone and they will have a greater percent of the lesser msrp cars. And Cadillacs always sell at discount. It won’t be new anymore so I see them repacking the CT6 to sell in greater volume once the XTS dies and a lot of the development cost of the CT6 is skimmed off the first couple model years. It will become more accessible like a DTS was. You’ll have a bunch that sell with the 3.6 at cheap price and they’ll make money on the twin turbo 6 and 8

Agreed, I could see the CT6 being Cadillac’s Dodge Charger/Challenger.  You advertise the high trim V8 model but in reality 80-90% of the sales are the base V6 with little equipment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

And yet the E-class still has more status or brand appeal than a CT6.  They have had E-class taxis for 40 years and that hasn’t hurt Mercedes image one bit.  The huge volume keeps the dollars rolling in to support Daimler’s massive R&D budget.

Agreed, I could see the CT6 being Cadillac’s Dodge Charger/Challenger.  You advertise the high trim V8 model but in reality 80-90% of the sales are the base V6 with little equipment.

Er... no.  Most CT6s are sold at least mid-level.  Dealers don't even stock the base 2.0T, it is by order only. 

The E-Class has more status here because it was never used as a taxi.  It has no particular status in the EU.  Europeans understand it can be optioned up nicely, but they are just as likely to get into an orange/beige one and driven to the airport.  The vast majority of E-Classes in Europe are not privately owned... just like the Crown Vic here.  Germans buy german vehicles.  This isn't rocket science.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

So you want a car that is 10 inches longer than a CT6 at like $75k?  They are going to run into the same product overlap problem they now with sedans.  They would have to go to $100k to clear the CT6 V8.

Why not start it at like 90-95k? I mean at this size we're talking ultra premium type of vehicles so they shouldn't cheapen out anywhere on a vehicle like that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, smk4565 said:

 The E-class outsells the CT6 about 5-1,

http://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/en/instance/ko.xhtml?oid=32692930&ls=L3NlYXJjaHJlc3VsdC9zZWFyY2hyZXN1bHQueGh0bWw_c2VhcmNoU3RyaW5nPTIwMTcrbWVyY2VkZXMtYmVueitzYWxlcyZzZWFyY2hJZD0xJnNlYXJjaFR5cGU9ZGV0YWlsZWQmYm9yZGVycz10cnVlJnJlc3VsdEluZm9UeXBlSWQ9NDA2MjYmdmlld1R5cGU9bGlzdCZzb3J0RGVmaW5pdGlvbj1QVUJMSVNIRURfQVQtMiZ0aHVtYlNjYWxlSW5kZXg9MCZyb3dDb3VudHNJbmRleD01&rs=1

This is the global report of which in 2017 the E-Class sold 350,000 units world wide of which China and India more than doubled E-Class Sales of the extended length version to services and Europe picked up on buying the extended length E-Class again in services.

Services is hidden code for Taxis / limo driving. 

Did they sell a ton of E-Class? YES

Did it outsell CT6? YES

Is it sold heavily into fleets? YES

Comparing CT6 to E-Class is an Apple to Orange comparison if you go by price or total sales as CT6 is not fleet sold that anyone is aware of. E-Class is FLEET SOLD.

So do you want the girl that is passed around to everyone or the Princess?

I take the Princess, aka CT6.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Er... no.  Most CT6s are sold at least mid-level.  Dealers don't even stock the base 2.0T, it is by order only. 

The E-Class has more status here because it was never used as a taxi.  It has no particular status in the EU.  Europeans understand it can be optioned up nicely, but they are just as likely to get into an orange/beige one and driven to the airport.  The vast majority of E-Classes in Europe are not privately owned... just like the Crown Vic here.  Germans buy german vehicles.  This isn't rocket science.

But the 2.0 is gone for 2019.  so the 3.6 sort of becomes the base level.  there will probably be a fairly even split of 3.6 vs 3.0tt.  to make up that 90+ % of CT6 sales.

the 2.0t CT6 will become collectibles.  and will be selling cheap at auctions.  Non snow state buyers will get a nice used 2.0t RWD for midsize chevy money in about 1-3 more years.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the 2.0 is gone, but that won't effect sales since no one was buying it or even stocking it. Don't expect a price drop for the 3.6  except that there will be a RWD 3.6 available, so an option delete credit there. I'm wondering if the 2.0t will continue in China though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Yes, the 2.0 is gone, but that won't effect sales since no one was buying it or even stocking it. Don't expect a price drop for the 3.6  except that there will be a RWD 3.6 available, so an option delete credit there. I'm wondering if the 2.0t will continue in China though.

Considering the stupid displacement tax they have, I would totally think they would keep the 2.0T 4 banger going for China.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      Like it or not, crossovers are becoming the de facto choice for many buyers and automakers are responding. There is now a wide variety of crossovers available: From large three-row models to small, compact vehicles perfect for urban environments. The latter is what we’ll be focusing on this review with the latest entrant into subcompact luxury crossover class, the 2020 Lexus UX 200 F-Sport. It’s a late arrival to the class, but as I found out with the Volvo XC40 last year, that isn’t a bad thing. So how does the most affordable Lexus model stack up to the competition?
      Crossover or Hatchback on Stilts?
      It feels odd to think of the UX being more of a hatchback with a taller ride height than a crossover, but allow me to make my case. To start, the overall shape reminds me more of the Toyota Corolla Hatchback than the NX and RX crossovers. The roofline is a perfect example as the shape is similar to Corolla than any Lexus crossover. Second is when you get inside the UX. You may think that you step up to get inside, but it’s the opposite. The lower position might cause you to think that you lose out on the visibility gain with a higher ride height, but that isn’t the case as you have excellent visibility around most of the vehicle. The rear is difficult to see out of due to the thick pillar and it is recommended to order the optional backup camera.
      The UX 200 does make its presence known to everyone due to some bold design choices. Upfront lies the latest iteration of Lexus’ spindle grille along with some deep cuts in the bumper to give the model an aggressive attitude. The side profile features unique sculpting on the doors and the roof steeply raked towards the back. A vibrant color palette such as this orange on my tester only adds to the bold ideal.
      A Small, Premium Interior
      Lexus has mostly nailed the UX’s interior appointments with soft-touch materials featuring stitching on the dash, metal-like buttons for the climate control system, and contrasting stitching for the seats. The only part which slightly ruins this luxury feeling is the cheap-feeling door panels. Leatherette upholstery is used on the seats and it feels quite nice when sitting on them. F-Sport models get heavily bolster front seats which may make some larger people uncomfortable. Power adjustments for the front come standard on all UX models and allows both driver and passenger to find a comfortable position.
      The rear seat is quite snug for two people, while three is severely pushing it. Legroom can range from ok to non-existent if a tall person happens to be sitting upfront. Headroom is decent for most people, even with the optional sunroof. Cargo space is about average for the class with 21.7 cubic feet with the rear seats up. A tall lift-over height does make it a pain to load heavy items into the vehicle.
      Infotainment System is Better, But Still Frustrating
      The base infotainment system is a 7-inch screen, while a larger 10.25-inch screen is available as an option. Controlling each screen is Lexus’ Remote Touch system. The touchpad controller is unwieldy because you need to pay attention to the screen while making a selection. Otherwise, you’ll end up selecting a different function or setting than what you had originally aimed for. Lexus has added a touchscreen to the recently refreshed RX for 2020 and I can only hope this appears on other Lexus models down the road.
      One change that will be a welcome relief to Android users is that Lexus has added Android Auto compatibility to the system, bringing Lexus in line with most competitors with offering this and Apple CarPlay.
      Mediocre Performance Except In Fuel Economy
      Under the hood of the UX 200 is a 2.0L inline-four producing 169 horsepower and 151 pound-feet of torque. This is paired with CVT and front-wheel drive. If you want AWD, then your only option is the UX 250h which pairs the 2.0L with a hybrid system. The 2.0 really struggles at high speeds as evidenced by a 0-60 time of 8.9 seconds. Competitors in the class are at least are a second or two quicker. The engine also has a noticeable drone that appears when you are accelerating hard. But around town, the 2.0 feels quite punchy with excellent get-up and minimal fuss.
      Where the UX does well is in fuel economy. EPA figures are 29 City/37 Highway/33 Combined for the UX 200. My average for the week landed around 31 on a 60/40 mix of highway and city driving.
      I’m wondering if the UX could fit the 2.5L four-cylinder from the Toyota Camry. It would improve overall performance with a slight hit to fuel economy.
      Surprising Handling Characteristics
      Going for the F-Sport version like my test vehicle will net you a revised suspension setup. Going around bends, the UX shows little body roll and quick reactions. The only item that falters is the steering which feels very rubbery and doesn’t encourage enthusiastic driving. For normal driving duties, the UX’s ride quality is on the complaint side with a few bumps making their way inside. I do wish Lexus had done more to keep tire noise from coming inside, especially at highway speeds
      The Price Is Right
      With a starting price tag of $32,300 for the base UX 200, this makes it the most affordable model in the class. It also happens to be very good value as it comes with the Lexus Safety System+ 2.0 as standard. This suite of active safety features includes forward-collision warning, automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and automatic high beams. The UX 200 F-Sport seen here comes with an as-tested price of $41,285 and that’s with the optional navigation system, windshield deicer, heads-up display, and power tailgate. To get something similar on the competition, you’ll need to spend a few extra thousand dollars.
      The 2020 UX 200 makes a very compelling case for itself in the subcompact luxury crossover class. This is due in part to its low price and a long list of standard equipment. A competent handling package in the F-Sport and decent fuel economy figures help bolster the model further. But there are areas Lexus needs to address, primarily the engine and infotainment system. The good news is that Lexus has the necessary solutions to both these issues in the form of the infotainment system from the RX and borrowing the 2.5L four-cylinder from the Camry. It would move the UX from being somewhere in the competent class to one that can compete for class honors.
      Disclaimer: Lexus Provided the UX 200, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2020
      Make: Lexus
      Model: UX
      Trim: 200 F-Sport
      Engine: 2.0L 16-Valve DOHC VVT-i Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: CVT, Front-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 169 @ 6,600
      Torque @ RPM: 151 @ 4,800
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 29/37/33
      Curb Weight: 3,307 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Miyawaka, Fukuoka, Japan
      Base Price: $40,260
      As Tested Price: $41,285 (Includes $1,025.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      Navigation System with 10.3-in Color Multimedia Display - $2,200.00
      F-Sport Premium Package - $975.00
      Power Rear Door w/Kick Sensor - $600.00
      Premium Paint - $595.00
      Parking Assist, Rear Cross Traffic Alert w/Braking - $565.00
      Blind Spot Monitor - $500.00
      Head Up Display (HUD) - $500.00
      Heated F Sport Steering Wheel w/Paddle Shifters - $150.00
      Windshield Deicer - $100.00
      Wireless Charger - $75.00

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Like it or not, crossovers are becoming the de facto choice for many buyers and automakers are responding. There is now a wide variety of crossovers available: From large three-row models to small, compact vehicles perfect for urban environments. The latter is what we’ll be focusing on this review with the latest entrant into subcompact luxury crossover class, the 2020 Lexus UX 200 F-Sport. It’s a late arrival to the class, but as I found out with the Volvo XC40 last year, that isn’t a bad thing. So how does the most affordable Lexus model stack up to the competition?
      Crossover or Hatchback on Stilts?
      It feels odd to think of the UX being more of a hatchback with a taller ride height than a crossover, but allow me to make my case. To start, the overall shape reminds me more of the Toyota Corolla Hatchback than the NX and RX crossovers. The roofline is a perfect example as the shape is similar to Corolla than any Lexus crossover. Second is when you get inside the UX. You may think that you step up to get inside, but it’s the opposite. The lower position might cause you to think that you lose out on the visibility gain with a higher ride height, but that isn’t the case as you have excellent visibility around most of the vehicle. The rear is difficult to see out of due to the thick pillar and it is recommended to order the optional backup camera.
      The UX 200 does make its presence known to everyone due to some bold design choices. Upfront lies the latest iteration of Lexus’ spindle grille along with some deep cuts in the bumper to give the model an aggressive attitude. The side profile features unique sculpting on the doors and the roof steeply raked towards the back. A vibrant color palette such as this orange on my tester only adds to the bold ideal.
      A Small, Premium Interior
      Lexus has mostly nailed the UX’s interior appointments with soft-touch materials featuring stitching on the dash, metal-like buttons for the climate control system, and contrasting stitching for the seats. The only part which slightly ruins this luxury feeling is the cheap-feeling door panels. Leatherette upholstery is used on the seats and it feels quite nice when sitting on them. F-Sport models get heavily bolster front seats which may make some larger people uncomfortable. Power adjustments for the front come standard on all UX models and allows both driver and passenger to find a comfortable position.
      The rear seat is quite snug for two people, while three is severely pushing it. Legroom can range from ok to non-existent if a tall person happens to be sitting upfront. Headroom is decent for most people, even with the optional sunroof. Cargo space is about average for the class with 21.7 cubic feet with the rear seats up. A tall lift-over height does make it a pain to load heavy items into the vehicle.
      Infotainment System is Better, But Still Frustrating
      The base infotainment system is a 7-inch screen, while a larger 10.25-inch screen is available as an option. Controlling each screen is Lexus’ Remote Touch system. The touchpad controller is unwieldy because you need to pay attention to the screen while making a selection. Otherwise, you’ll end up selecting a different function or setting than what you had originally aimed for. Lexus has added a touchscreen to the recently refreshed RX for 2020 and I can only hope this appears on other Lexus models down the road.
      One change that will be a welcome relief to Android users is that Lexus has added Android Auto compatibility to the system, bringing Lexus in line with most competitors with offering this and Apple CarPlay.
      Mediocre Performance Except In Fuel Economy
      Under the hood of the UX 200 is a 2.0L inline-four producing 169 horsepower and 151 pound-feet of torque. This is paired with CVT and front-wheel drive. If you want AWD, then your only option is the UX 250h which pairs the 2.0L with a hybrid system. The 2.0 really struggles at high speeds as evidenced by a 0-60 time of 8.9 seconds. Competitors in the class are at least are a second or two quicker. The engine also has a noticeable drone that appears when you are accelerating hard. But around town, the 2.0 feels quite punchy with excellent get-up and minimal fuss.
      Where the UX does well is in fuel economy. EPA figures are 29 City/37 Highway/33 Combined for the UX 200. My average for the week landed around 31 on a 60/40 mix of highway and city driving.
      I’m wondering if the UX could fit the 2.5L four-cylinder from the Toyota Camry. It would improve overall performance with a slight hit to fuel economy.
      Surprising Handling Characteristics
      Going for the F-Sport version like my test vehicle will net you a revised suspension setup. Going around bends, the UX shows little body roll and quick reactions. The only item that falters is the steering which feels very rubbery and doesn’t encourage enthusiastic driving. For normal driving duties, the UX’s ride quality is on the complaint side with a few bumps making their way inside. I do wish Lexus had done more to keep tire noise from coming inside, especially at highway speeds
      The Price Is Right
      With a starting price tag of $32,300 for the base UX 200, this makes it the most affordable model in the class. It also happens to be very good value as it comes with the Lexus Safety System+ 2.0 as standard. This suite of active safety features includes forward-collision warning, automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and automatic high beams. The UX 200 F-Sport seen here comes with an as-tested price of $41,285 and that’s with the optional navigation system, windshield deicer, heads-up display, and power tailgate. To get something similar on the competition, you’ll need to spend a few extra thousand dollars.
      The 2020 UX 200 makes a very compelling case for itself in the subcompact luxury crossover class. This is due in part to its low price and a long list of standard equipment. A competent handling package in the F-Sport and decent fuel economy figures help bolster the model further. But there are areas Lexus needs to address, primarily the engine and infotainment system. The good news is that Lexus has the necessary solutions to both these issues in the form of the infotainment system from the RX and borrowing the 2.5L four-cylinder from the Camry. It would move the UX from being somewhere in the competent class to one that can compete for class honors.
      Disclaimer: Lexus Provided the UX 200, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2020
      Make: Lexus
      Model: UX
      Trim: 200 F-Sport
      Engine: 2.0L 16-Valve DOHC VVT-i Four-Cylinder
      Driveline: CVT, Front-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 169 @ 6,600
      Torque @ RPM: 151 @ 4,800
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 29/37/33
      Curb Weight: 3,307 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Miyawaka, Fukuoka, Japan
      Base Price: $40,260
      As Tested Price: $41,285 (Includes $1,025.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      Navigation System with 10.3-in Color Multimedia Display - $2,200.00
      F-Sport Premium Package - $975.00
      Power Rear Door w/Kick Sensor - $600.00
      Premium Paint - $595.00
      Parking Assist, Rear Cross Traffic Alert w/Braking - $565.00
      Blind Spot Monitor - $500.00
      Head Up Display (HUD) - $500.00
      Heated F Sport Steering Wheel w/Paddle Shifters - $150.00
      Windshield Deicer - $100.00
      Wireless Charger - $75.00
    • By William Maley
      This week marks my first review vehicle for 2020 - the Lexus UX 200 F-Sport. This one comes equipped with such items as F-Sport exterior package, 18-inch wheels, Lexus Enform with Apple CarPlay  compatibility;  Wi-Fi connectivity, and a 10-way power driver's seat. Options on this vehicle include blind spot monitoring, heated front seats, heated steering wheel, heads-up display, navigation, and a windhield de-icer - the last one being quite important as we had an ice storm roll through last night.
      Power comes from a 2.0L DOHC four-cylinder with 169 horsepower. This is likely the same engine I had in my 2019 Toyota Corolla SE hatchback I reviewed last month. This is paired with a CVT and front-wheel drive. Disappointingly, Lexus isn't offering all-wheel drive on the UX 200. To get that, you need to climb up the UX 250h. 
      For the day and a half I had the UX, I found to be quite nippy around town. Though on the freeway, the engine becomes quite buzzy and you do need to step on it to get some forward momentum. It is also surprising how maneuverable the vehicle is. I was able to snatch a narrow parking space at a popular restaurant with no issue.
      The price-tag on this tester is $42,285 with destination. This surprised me considering how much stuff this vehicle is equipped with.
      So while I put some more miles on and grab some photos, drop off any questions you have for Lexus' smallest crossover.


      View full article
    • By William Maley
      This week marks my first review vehicle for 2020 - the Lexus UX 200 F-Sport. This one comes equipped with such items as F-Sport exterior package, 18-inch wheels, Lexus Enform with Apple CarPlay  compatibility;  Wi-Fi connectivity, and a 10-way power driver's seat. Options on this vehicle include blind spot monitoring, heated front seats, heated steering wheel, heads-up display, navigation, and a windhield de-icer - the last one being quite important as we had an ice storm roll through last night.
      Power comes from a 2.0L DOHC four-cylinder with 169 horsepower. This is likely the same engine I had in my 2019 Toyota Corolla SE hatchback I reviewed last month. This is paired with a CVT and front-wheel drive. Disappointingly, Lexus isn't offering all-wheel drive on the UX 200. To get that, you need to climb up the UX 250h. 
      For the day and a half I had the UX, I found to be quite nippy around town. Though on the freeway, the engine becomes quite buzzy and you do need to step on it to get some forward momentum. It is also surprising how maneuverable the vehicle is. I was able to snatch a narrow parking space at a popular restaurant with no issue.
      The price-tag on this tester is $42,285 with destination. This surprised me considering how much stuff this vehicle is equipped with.
      So while I put some more miles on and grab some photos, drop off any questions you have for Lexus' smallest crossover.

  • Recent Status Updates

    • trinacriabob  »  oldshurst442

      Liking that new av - a CP (Canadian Pacific) 747, IIRC
      · 0 replies
    • dfelt  »  A Horse With No Name

      Welcome back, so happy to see you back. You were missed!  
      · 0 replies
    • Robert Hall

      Reality is complex
      · 1 reply
    • ocnblu

      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
      · 0 replies
    • trinacriabob  »  balthazar

      It's not possible to message you.  At least, it wasn't possible to do that last summer.  So I'll post it here.  I had a crazy layover back in June at PHL ... for about 8 hours ... and wondered how far into NJ you were from Philly.  What I did is get the PHLash day pass and did the self-guided tour of Center City before heading back to the airport.  I stayed too close to the center because of time. I actually wasted time by going into South Philly.  I wanted to venture out onto the Main Line and see Villanova.  That rail line was included on the pass I bought.  I had to manage my time because of the late afternoon flight to the Coast.  Cheers.
      · 1 reply
  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...