Jump to content
Drew Dowdell

Karma News: 2020 Karma Revero Gets Updated Battery And Regenerator

Recommended Posts

Karma Automotive is preparing to release the 2020 refresh of the Revaro.  The current car uses GM's 2.0 liter 4-cylinder as a regenerator to charge the 21.4 kWh battery while underway. The battery then powers a pair of electric motors in the rear that produce a combined 403 horsepower letting the Revero dart to 60 in just 5.4 seconds. Range in full EV mode is about 37 miles, so says the EPA.

teaser-for-2020-karma-revero-debuting-at-2019-shanghai-auto-show_100695320_l.jpgIn a press release, Karma has announced that the the refreshed Revero will now move to a 1.5 liter BMW 3-cylinder to support a new, more powerful NMC lithium-ion battery pack.  The rear drive unit is being replaced as well with a new twin-motor rear drive module.  In the 2020 car, naught to 60 will drop by nearly a full second to 4.5 seconds. 

The refreshed Revero will sport updated body work to go along with its technological upgrades. 

Karma will be unveiling the 2020 Revero at the Shanghai Motor Show on April 16th along with two other concepts. 
 

2020 Karma Revero Teaser (Click to Enlarge)

Related:

 


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to hear, how about actual production. We have yet to see anything since the ownership change. I wonder when they actually will start building auto's for sale?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Nice to hear, how about actual production. We have yet to see anything since the ownership change. I wonder when they actually will start building auto's for sale?

They go into production in a few weeks and will be on sale by the summer. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is this company still around?  It was a cool looking car in 2012 or whenever it came out, but that is old news.  And who really wants to pay top dollar for some unheard of brand with a parts bin car when  you can buy a Tesla or one of a dozen German luxury cars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Some would say the Tesla was a cool looking top-dollar car from an unheard of brand when it came out in 2012 or whenever.

But I think it's the potential shake-up / unseating of the Germans fraternal triplets that Tesla (& perhaps Karma) that's the threat. MB/BMW's electric efforts to date have been pathetic and they are a decade behind Tesla.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Karma was a viable company they wouldn't have to buy their engine off BMW.   I feel like they are buying BMW i8 powertrains and putting it into an old sedan shell they have and trying to sell it.   This company seems less viable than Saab was 10 years ago.

As for the Germans they have plenty of EV's coming, and the market really hasn't demanded them yet.  Tesla is a bit of an anomaly, with how quickly they were able to find success.   I do think EV is the future, but won't hit it big until the 2025-2030 time frame.  Karma is no Tesla.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of F-d up metric is that?
Let's see : 'If Rolls Royce, Ferrari & Jaguar were viable companies, they wouldn't have to have bought their transmissions off of General Motors.'

How's that work for you?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, balthazar said:

What kind of F-d up metric is that?
Let's see : 'If Rolls Royce, Ferrari & Jaguar were viable companies, they wouldn't have to have bought their transmissions off of General Motors.'

How's that work for you?

Well BMW bought Rolls.  Ferrari is viable due to their price point and merchandise sales.  Jaguar has bled money from one owner to the next.

Those were all established brands though.  Fisher went bust, Karma will do the same.  Why would buyers trust a brand that might not be able to honor a warranty or be in business for repairs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, smk4565 said:

If Karma was a viable company they wouldn't have to buy their engine off BMW.   I feel like they are buying BMW i8 powertrains and putting it into an old sedan shell they have and trying to sell it.   This company seems less viable than Saab was 10 years ago.

As for the Germans they have plenty of EV's coming, and the market really hasn't demanded them yet.  Tesla is a bit of an anomaly, with how quickly they were able to find success.   I do think EV is the future, but won't hit it big until the 2025-2030 time frame.  Karma is no Tesla.

That's some faulty logic there. They are attempting to be an all electric company eventually, so why put money into developing and building a gas motor when there are plenty out there that can be bought.  The BMW choice give an air of premiumness to it... but they would have been suited equally well with something from Honda Motor Company. 

The market hasn't demanded EVs? Telsa is 1/3rd of the entire luxury sedan market at this point. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, smk4565 said:

...BMW bought Rolls.  Ferrari is...  Jaguar has...
Those were all established brands...

What's worse- a established brand having to go to it's competition to source components/parts, or a start-up doing so?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

That's some faulty logic there. They are attempting to be an all electric company eventually, so why put money into developing and building a gas motor when there are plenty out there that can be bought.  The BMW choice give an air of premiumness to it... but they would have been suited equally well with something from Honda Motor Company. 

The market hasn't demanded EVs? Telsa is 1/3rd of the entire luxury sedan market at this point. 

Then why not just build EV’s?  

I am all for EV’s and I think what Tesla has done to get market share and not use the old dealer model and all that is great.  Part of the Tesla appeal is you are buying the future, that luster may wear off when a lot of people have autonomous EV’s.

I don’t see Karma building a better car than Tesla, Audi or Mercedes, so what is the point, especially with the $100k type money they will want for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who saw a start-up in a repurposed GM plant with a rebadged Lotus eventually upseating the c-class in sales??

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw a fairly new C-Class this morning and the lug nuts were rusty. Makes one wonder about the tag "Best or nothing at all!" I wonder if this marketing ever comes to mind when they cut corners on quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hey...this body shell is still sexy AF.  I like the Model S and all, but the Model S is really showing its age right about now.  The Model 3 is fresher. Even if its smaller and similar looking to the Model S, the Model S is long in the tooth the design department. And that is even if you like the Model 3 design or not...

But the Karma Fisker/Revero still looks good.   Both came out about the same time, non?

 

The new body shell  would be a great idea for Bob Lutz to use and update his company's model for a Blackwing V8.  

Or really go medieval and ditch GM and get a Hellcat crate engine. Or really really go bat$h! crazy and get the Hellephant crate engine for it...

But I wished the Revero was a 100% battery electric vehicle more than anything less at this point...

 

 

 

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      As we wrote late last month, the Jaguar XJ is about to use up one of its nine lives. The big cat gets euthanized next month without a direct replacement ready for market.  However, we also told you that the cat will be back, possibly as an electric vehicle next time.  At an investor meeting Jaguar confirmed that to be true.
      Jaguar is working on a new Modular Longitudinal Architecture (MLA) platform for use under the next XJ and for the next Range Rover.  The flexible platform is capable of being used in electric, plug-in hybrid, or mild-hybrid configurations.  It is also being designed to be very light weight, eventually to be used to replace all five of the platforms that Jaguar Land Rover uses.  Jaguar Land Rover hopes to increase profits by reducing the number of architectures.  Jaguar does plan to continue to develop the I-Pace platform which is unrelated to MLA.
      The XJ's direct replacement will launch first as a electric model with a predicted range of 292 miles using a 90.2 kWh battery. Later, 6-cylinder models (likely the new inline-6 recently shown in Range Rover) will become available.  The 292 mile range in the XJ would rival the Tesla Model S and Porsche Taycan.
      For those who prefer a plug-in hybrid, the MLA platform will use a 13.1 kWh battery giving an estimated EV range of about 31 miles. Mild-Hybrid versions get a belt-alternator-starter setup to give a small electric boost at start.
      Also on the MLA platform will be the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport. Both names currently offer plug-in hybrid versions, but the new MLA platform could enable the Range Rover to be available in an all electric version.  Land Rover has not yet confirmed this to be the case.   The Range Rover would come first with the Sport following close behind in 2021.
      All of this comes in the background of huge job cuts at Jaguar after a record $4.6 billion loss.

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      As we wrote late last month, the Jaguar XJ is about to use up one of its nine lives. The big cat gets euthanized next month without a direct replacement ready for market.  However, we also told you that the cat will be back, possibly as an electric vehicle next time.  At an investor meeting Jaguar confirmed that to be true.
      Jaguar is working on a new Modular Longitudinal Architecture (MLA) platform for use under the next XJ and for the next Range Rover.  The flexible platform is capable of being used in electric, plug-in hybrid, or mild-hybrid configurations.  It is also being designed to be very light weight, eventually to be used to replace all five of the platforms that Jaguar Land Rover uses.  Jaguar Land Rover hopes to increase profits by reducing the number of architectures.  Jaguar does plan to continue to develop the I-Pace platform which is unrelated to MLA.
      The XJ's direct replacement will launch first as a electric model with a predicted range of 292 miles using a 90.2 kWh battery. Later, 6-cylinder models (likely the new inline-6 recently shown in Range Rover) will become available.  The 292 mile range in the XJ would rival the Tesla Model S and Porsche Taycan.
      For those who prefer a plug-in hybrid, the MLA platform will use a 13.1 kWh battery giving an estimated EV range of about 31 miles. Mild-Hybrid versions get a belt-alternator-starter setup to give a small electric boost at start.
      Also on the MLA platform will be the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport. Both names currently offer plug-in hybrid versions, but the new MLA platform could enable the Range Rover to be available in an all electric version.  Land Rover has not yet confirmed this to be the case.   The Range Rover would come first with the Sport following close behind in 2021.
      All of this comes in the background of huge job cuts at Jaguar after a record $4.6 billion loss.
    • By Drew Dowdell
      BMW is studying ways to give its performance M-Division special models not based on any current or former BMW.   BMW has already apparently decided which class of car the models will be in, but will not reveal details on it just yet.  Multiple concepts are being studied. 
      The comments came from Markus Flasch, BMW's head of in-house tuning.  Further up for debate is whether the models would be internal combustion or electric or a blend of both. Whichever form they take, the M cars would "fit our character.... a combination of precision, agility, and luxury", though they would not necessarily be positioned above the M8.
      Having standalone models would help BMW's M-Division better compete with Mercedes-Benz AMG

      View full article
  • My Clubs

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...