Jump to content
Drew Dowdell

Ford News: Ford Cuts V8 Production

Recommended Posts

Ford said that it would be cutting a shift from its Essex Engine Plant in Ontario starting in October.  Ford says the move will "better align with consumer demand".  The likely cause? Ford F-150 buyers are shifting more of their purchases away from the 5.0 liter V8.

F-150 buyers have a choice of 5 engines when selecting a truck, the 2.7-liter Ecoboost, the 3.3-liter V6, the 3.5-liter Ecoboost, and now a 3.0-liter PowerStroke Diesel, all in addition to the 5.0-liter V8, and the customer mix appears to be skewing towards the smaller displacement engines.

The cut in shifts will not result in job cuts as those workers will be transitioned to another engine plant to build the 7.3-liter engine due to be installed in the 2020 Ford Super Duties. That transition will happen in November of this year. 


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes sense especially as Ford starts to develop the F150 on the Rivian based skateboard concept and the V8 is replaced by Torque Electrics.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dfelt said:

Makes sense especially as Ford starts to develop the F150 on the Rivian based skateboard concept and the V8 is replaced by Torque Electrics.

I think this is more about immediate need than anything 4 to 5 years in the future. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Ford starts with the V6 and charges extra for a V8 (normal) and even more for the EcoBoost 4cyl and even more for the EcoBoost V6.  Is it just me, or are Ford truck buyers being milked for illusory fuel efficiency gains here?

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As the proudly satisfied owner of a 2016 F-150 SuperCab with the 2.7L EcoBoost V-6, I totally understand the drifting away from V-8 engine optioning by Ford truck buyers.  This smallest of engines in the F-150 line-up is always right there under one's right foot, with a turbo'ed 325hp and 350 lbs/torque offering plenty of acceleration and oomph. Perhaps more impressive, however, is the fuel economy. Every mixed-driving tankful nets me right around 22mpg, and on straight hwy driving I'll do 26mpg. Hard to complain, and hard to covet a V8 when getting this sort of performance from a V6....

 

Edited by garnermike
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what the take rate for V8 trucks would be if they weren't practically a spacial order option these days.  The last time I was at my local ford dealer finding a new V8 truck was like where's Waldo.  When people go shopping they cant buy what isn't available.  The take rate for V8s may be higher if Ford actually made them more available IMO.  I just did a quick search, of the sea of new trucks at a dealer by me there is 4 with the 5.0.   You cant buy what you cant find.  

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no need for v8s when the v6 turbo does just as well. the expedition and navigator prove that.

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/15/2019 at 11:22 AM, Potluck said:

no need for v8s when the v6 turbo does just as well. the expedition and navigator prove that.

Mustang might well become the only regular production Ford with a V8. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that Ford is cutting V8 production is a reflection of CAFE realities (at least until BEVs become superior). 

I would make one modest proposal: do not quash all the torque.  GM made a huge mistake by providing a V6 with relatively little real torque.  I say that as one who owns a Lucerne with a 3800 V6.  I read elsewhere in these forums that the GMC Terrain also lacks power (i.e. torque).  That (I hope) got fixed with the 2018+ models given that the engines are even smaller now.  I do hope that Ford ensured that their V6 engines are NOT the weak, no torque variety that seem to plague more than a few carmakers.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/15/2019 at 11:22 AM, Potluck said:

no need for v8s when the v6 turbo does just as well. the expedition and navigator prove that.

The turbo just replaces the extra 2 cylinders and the volume air displacement...

The added weight that comes with the required turbo plumbing and the needless complexity and the extra moving parts of the turbo itself just seems contradictory to me when people say: "no need for v8s when the v6 turbo does just as well."  

Oxymoron is what it is... because a turbo V6 requires a lot of complexity just to replicate what a naturally aspirated V8 does quite easily...with its eyes closed and its hands tied behind its back type deal...

I dont get the OVERengineering solution...I really dont. 

 

 

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sick of hearing about how smaller displacement TURBO engines do an equal or better job than their higher displacement, more cylinder counterparts...

Its like the more we repeat this bullshyte the more we will believe it?

 Smallish displacement turbo V6s do NOT do an equal or better job that equal horsepowered and torqued naturally aspirated V8s do.

Small displacement turbo 4 cylinders do NOT do an equal or better job that equal horsepowered and torqued naturally aspirated V6s do.

On paper, it seems that the smaller displacement turbo engines do an equal or better job...but in reality they dont.  

All it is, its just a compromise between the two.  Whatever the manufacturer wants to favour one over the other. 

To bypass some BS CAFE emissions standard.

A forced induction application on an engine should be considered as a COMPLIMENTARY power adder and helper...NOT as a REPLACEMENT...

Like I said above...repeat a lie long enough, we will eventually believe in that lie...

Edited by oldshurst442
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On May 3, 2019 at 1:19 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

I think this is more about immediate need than anything 45 years in the future. 

Is Ford really looking that far ahead?

 

 

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing wrong with the turbos (though I question just hoe much abuse that they can really take) But, I also realize most folks don’t know how to care for a turbo either, (try to take care of the one in my Nox)

That said, there should be more V8s for those who still want simple, traditional power in their truck. I already know what Ford is doing....the 5.0 will be completely gone within a year or two.

Darn shame that they can’t give the the best of both worlds.....choice is a good thing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, daves87rs said:

.the 5.0 will be completely gone within a year or two.

I've heard rumors of a new 4.8 replacing it.. No clue if there is any accuracy behind it though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the big online car mags will be coming out with a story soon about how great the F-150 Limited with the 3.5 Ecoboost performed while towing a 4,500 lbs boat.   The caveat is that it only got 7.3 mpg while doing it and 9th and 10th gear get locked out in tow mode to make sure the turbos keep spinning high. 

Nothing Eco about that.

The same mag got 12mpg out of a 6.3 Escalade pulling a similar load. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

One of the big online car mags will be coming out with a story soon about how great the F-150 Limited with the 3.5 Ecoboost performed while towing a 4,500 lbs boat.   The caveat is that it only got 7.3 mpg while doing it and 9th and 10th gear get locked out in tow mode to make sure the turbos keep spinning high. 

Nothing Eco about that.

The same mag got 12mpg out of a 6.3 Escalade pulling a similar load. 

I actually think that's more impressive by the Escalade than disappointing in the 3.5. 

I've watched quite a few videos on trucks towing(saying that sounds quite absurd of me LOL) and they don't seem to care about the mpg hit because there is so much power there available and it doesn't need to sit at 6000rpm to do so. 

Usually when TFL(like them or hate them, they try to be as consistent and accurate as they can) tows, all the trucks are within 1mpg of each other towing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

One of the big online car mags will be coming out with a story soon about how great the F-150 Limited with the 3.5 Ecoboost performed while towing a 4,500 lbs boat.   The caveat is that it only got 7.3 mpg while doing it and 9th and 10th gear get locked out in tow mode to make sure the turbos keep spinning high. 

Nothing Eco about that.

The same mag got 12mpg out of a 6.3 Escalade pulling a similar load. 

So I bet the Turbo Boost had that engine at 6000 or more RPM while the Escalade was cruising along at 1800 to 2000 rpm getting that 12 mpg. I have towed many a boat with my Escalade and always get between 12 to 14 mpg depending on if I go local or drive over the pass.

Would not want a Turbo for hauling for nothing compared to my V8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, dfelt said:

So I bet the Turbo Boost had that engine at 6000 or more RPM while the Escalade was cruising along at 1800 to 2000 rpm getting that 12 mpg. I have towed many a boat with my Escalade and always get between 12 to 14 mpg depending on if I go local or drive over the pass.

Would not want a Turbo for hauling for nothing compared to my V8.

I just re-read the discussion thread... it was spinning at 2,500 rpm at 70mph in order to keep the spools fed. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I just re-read the discussion thread... it was spinning at 2,500 rpm at 70mph in order to keep the spools fed. 

So only a 500 to 700 rpm difference, yet that 7.3 mpg to 12 mpg is big time failure IMHO. They might as well offer a Hybrid option to enhance the pulling and keep the MPG higher. Thank you for following up on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

Add a hill or elevation to the mix and the turbo engine will put some distance between the two. 

Yeah, the Turbo does have more pull, and that article will mention it I'm sure.  It's just how much gas it sucks in the process. 

19 minutes ago, dfelt said:

So only a 500 to 700 rpm difference, yet that 7.3 mpg to 12 mpg is big time failure IMHO. They might as well offer a Hybrid option to enhance the pulling and keep the MPG higher. Thank you for following up on this.

That's what boost does.  That's how they're getting that amount of power out of a 3.5 liter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ccap41 said:

Add a hill or elevation to the mix and the turbo engine will put some distance between the two. 

I have not seen that driving around here with Turbo small engines versus big block V8's. My Escalade 6.0 V8 and Durango 5.9L V8 do very well, I usually pulling a trailer just effortlessly move over the mountains around here compared to the smaller engine trucks / SUVs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, dfelt said:

I have not seen that driving around here with Turbo small engines versus big block V8's. My Escalade 6.0 V8 and Durango 5.9L V8 do very well, I usually pulling a trailer just effortlessly move over the mountains around here compared to the smaller engine trucks / SUVs.

It's just science. Turbo engines are superior at higher elevation. They do not lose the roughly 30% power reduction when a mile in the sky like a N/A engine will. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

It's just science. Turbo engines are superior at higher elevation. They do not lose the roughly 30% power reduction when a mile in the sky like a N/A engine will. 

Good point, for places like Colorado and those passes that are hitting above 5000 feet elevation, but I think the main passes here in Washington at 3000 feet I wonder if it really makes any difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      FORD MOTOR COMPANY FOURTH QUARTER 2019 U.S. SALES

       

       

       

      2019

      Q4

       

       

      2018

      % Cha nge

      Year-to-Date

      2019               2018

      % Cha nge

      SALES BY BRAND

      Ford

      568,507

      581,386

      -2.2

      2,310,494

      2,393,731

      -3.5

      Lincoln

      33,355

      28,307

      17.8

      112,204

      103,587

      8.3

      Total vehicles

      601,862

      609,693

      -1.3

      2,422,698

      2,497,318

      -3.0

      SALES BY TYPE

      Cars

       

       

      63,400

       

       

      107,491

       

       

      -41.0

       

       

      349,091

       

       

      486,024

       

       

      -28.2

      SUVs

      208,387

      217,343

      -4.1

      830,471

      872,215

      -4.8

      Trucks

      330,075

      284,859

      15.9

      1,243,136

      1,139,079

      9.1

      Total vehicles                                             601,862       609,693          -1.3             2,422,698      2,497,318          -3.0

      FORD BRAND

      Fiesta

       

       

      7,315

       

       

      15,212

       

       

      -51.9

       

       

      60,148

       

       

      51,730

       

       

      16.3

      Focus

      0

      13,078

      N/A

      12,480

      113,345

      -89.0

      C-MAX

      0

      213

      N/A

      38

      6,683

      -99.4

      Fusion

      32,137

      48,636

      -33.9

      166,045

      173,600

      -4.4

      Taurus

      769

      6,988

      -89.0

      9,924

      28,706

      -65.4

      Police Interceptor Sedan

      88

      1,762

      -95.0

      3,427

      7,382

      -53.6

      GT

      42

      24

      75.0

      229

      126

      81.7

      Mustang

      17,124

      14,223

      20.4

      72,489

      75,842

      -4.4

      Ford Cars

      57,475

      100,136

      -42.6

      324,780

      457,414

      -29.0

      EcoSport

      14,051

      16,038

      -12.4

      64,708

      54,348

      19.1

      Escape

      47,587

      62,178

      -23.5

      241,388

      272,228

      -11.3

      Edge

      37,621

      35,184

      6.9

      138,515

      134,122

      3.3

      Flex

      6,147

      4,150

      48.1

      24,484

      20,308

      20.6

      Explorer

      48,083

      56,316

      -14.6

      168,309

      227,732

      -26.1

      Police Interceptor Utility

      3,201

      8,385

      -61.8

      18,752

      33,839

      -44.6

      Expedition

      24,267

      14,140

      71.6

      86,422

      54,661

      58.1

      Ford SUVs

      180,957

      196,391

      -7.9

      742,578

      797,238

      -6.9

      F-Series

      233,952

      230,312

      1.6

      896,526

      909,330

      -1.4

      Ranger

      33,059

      0

      N/A

      89,571

      0

      N/A

      E-Series

      12,837

      11,387

      12.7

      45,063

      47,936

      -6.0

      Transit

      36,885

      31,331

      17.7

      153,868

      137,794

      11.7

      Transit Connect

      10,208

      8,705

      17.3

      41,598

      31,923

      30.3

      Heavy trucks

      3,134

      3,124

      0.3

      16,510

      12,096

      36.5

      Ford Trucks

      330,075

      284,859

      15.9

      1,243,136

      1,139,079

      9.1

      Ford Brand

      568,507

      581,386

      -2.2

      2,310,494

      2,393,731

      -3.5

      LINCOLN BRAND

      MKZ

       

       

      4,080

       

       

      4,931

       

       

      -17.3

       

       

      17,725

       

       

      19,852

       

       

      -10.7

      Continental

      1,845

      2,424

      -23.9

      6,586

      8,758

      -24.8

      Lincoln Cars

      5,925

      7,355

      -19.4

      24,311

      28,610

      -15.0

      Corsair/MKC

      7,549

      6,971

      8.3

      25,815

      26,241

      -1.6

      Nautilus/MKX

      7,727

      8,687

      -11.1

      31,711

      28,573

      11.0

      MKT

      275

      540

      -49.1

      3,388

      2,324

      45.8

      Aviator

      6,424

      0

      N/A

      8,323

      0

      N/A

      Navigator

      5,455

      4,754

      14.7

      18,656

      17,839

      4.6

      Lincoln SUVs

      27,430

      20,952

      30.9

      87,893

      74,977

      17.2

      Lincoln Brand

      33,355

      28,307

      17.8

      112,204

      103,587

      8.3

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Rumor has it that Ford is working on a V8 powered version of their Ranger Raptor currently sold in overseas markets. Only available in other parts of the world, the current Ranger Raptor is powered by a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder diesel that produces 210 horsepower and 369 lb.-ft of torque, but a report in Wheels magazine says that Ford Australia is working with an external engineering company to swap the 2.0 diesel for a 5.0-liter V8 from the Mustang GT.  The odd thing about this is that the Ranger Raptor 5.0 would be still built with the 2.0-liter diesel under the hood and then later converted to V8 gasoline power.
      Expect power to be about the same as it makes in the Australian spec Mustang GT, a healthy 455 horsepower and 410 lb.-ft of torque. 
      If it all comes together, the Ranger Raptor 5.0 is expected to go on sale in Australia next year, sold by Ford dealers and backed by the full 5-year warranty. For now, the Ranger Raptor remains forbidden fruit to the U.S. no matter what engine is under the hood.

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Rumor has it that Ford is working on a V8 powered version of their Ranger Raptor currently sold in overseas markets. Only available in other parts of the world, the current Ranger Raptor is powered by a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder diesel that produces 210 horsepower and 369 lb.-ft of torque, but a report in Wheels magazine says that Ford Australia is working with an external engineering company to swap the 2.0 diesel for a 5.0-liter V8 from the Mustang GT.  The odd thing about this is that the Ranger Raptor 5.0 would be still built with the 2.0-liter diesel under the hood and then later converted to V8 gasoline power.
      Expect power to be about the same as it makes in the Australian spec Mustang GT, a healthy 455 horsepower and 410 lb.-ft of torque. 
      If it all comes together, the Ranger Raptor 5.0 is expected to go on sale in Australia next year, sold by Ford dealers and backed by the full 5-year warranty. For now, the Ranger Raptor remains forbidden fruit to the U.S. no matter what engine is under the hood.
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The first product to come from Ford's investment into startup automaker Rivian will likely be a Lincoln SUV due to arrive sometime in 2022.  The vehicle will be all-wheel drive and compete against Rivian's own R1S which is priced at $72,500.  The models will share Rivian's skateboard platform, a design that combines the motors, batteries, controls and suspension into a single unit that the body can be built around.  
      The Rivian R1S is a three-row EV crossover with a range of up to 410 miles and will be built in Normal Illinois at a former Mitsubishi plant. It is expected to go into production sometime in 2021.
      There will also be a compact Lincoln EV crossover coming for 2021 that could be built on the same platform that the Ford Mustang Mach-E rides on. 
      EV sales have been tepid so far in the US, but Lincoln is banking on the EVs to be bigger sellers in the Chinese market. 

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The first product to come from Ford's investment into startup automaker Rivian will likely be a Lincoln SUV due to arrive sometime in 2022.  The vehicle will be all-wheel drive and compete against Rivian's own R1S which is priced at $72,500.  The models will share Rivian's skateboard platform, a design that combines the motors, batteries, controls and suspension into a single unit that the body can be built around.  
      The Rivian R1S is a three-row EV crossover with a range of up to 410 miles and will be built in Normal Illinois at a former Mitsubishi plant. It is expected to go into production sometime in 2021.
      There will also be a compact Lincoln EV crossover coming for 2021 that could be built on the same platform that the Ford Mustang Mach-E rides on. 
      EV sales have been tepid so far in the US, but Lincoln is banking on the EVs to be bigger sellers in the Chinese market. 
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...