Jump to content
Drew Dowdell

Chrysler News: FCA and PSA are in Merger Talks

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, balthazar said:

Its not like platforms are weak, or lacking crash performance design, or ride poorly (platform is a strictly minor factor in that), or are still using decades-old suspension, or ANYTHING like that. And the other issue is that the SOP here is a ‘clean sheet’ redesign. All that says is the previous one they advertised & sold for years is garbage.

We’re way past the need for completely new platforms for the same brand/ model.


When a midsize car weighs 4,380 lbs. like the 2019 300 it's time to replace or heavily update, that's a tank in today's standards. https://g.co/kgs/8Brhaj

The fullsize 2019 CT6 weighs at most 4,470 lbs. in loaded AWD Blackwing V8 form. https://g.co/kgs/ifidiZ

That's latest tech. to old tech. platform design.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 300 is a full size.  The wheelbase is only a couple inches shorter than the CT6.  It just has shorter overhangs.   In fact, the wheelbase is about 9 inches longer than the full size Impala.  The weight is fine.    

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Robert Hall said:

The 300 is a full size.  The wheelbase is only a couple inches shorter than the CT6.  It just has shorter overhangs. The weight is fine.  

It's considered midsize, see link above. Nowhere near the size or room inside of a CT6, I've driven both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, USA-1 said:

It's considered midsize, see link above. Nowhere near the size or room inside of a CT6, I've driven both.

Never seen it referred to as a midsize.   Always seen it classified as full size. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

Never seen it referred to as a midsize.   Always seen it classified as full size. 

Think it's a tweener, but technically a midsize. Definitely smaller than a CT6 fullsize.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

300 wheelbase : 120", overall length : 199"
CT6 wheelbase : 122", overall length : 205"
Certainly close enough to appeal to the same shoppers.
I don't remotely care what the Environmental Protection Agency arbitrarily classifies their respective interior cubic space as.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

The 300 is a full size.  The wheelbase is only a couple inches shorter than the CT6.  It just has shorter overhangs.   In fact, the wheelbase is about 9 inches longer than the full size Impala.  The weight is fine.    

Can't compare FWD wheelbase to RWD wheelbase cars. Always shorter in FWD form with the transaxle being pushed back near qtr. panel/door gap.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, balthazar said:

300 wheelbase : 120", overall length : 199"
CT6 wheelbase : 122", overall length : 205"
Certainly close enough to appeal to the same shoppers.
I don't remotely care what the Environmental Protection Agency arbitrarily classifies their respective interior cubic space as.

Me neither, but this isn't the EPA stating the class of car it's all the automotive experts. https://g.co/kgs/8Brhaj

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, USA-1 said:

Can't compare FWD wheelbase to RWD wheelbase cars. Always shorter in FWD form with the transaxle being pushed back near qtr. panel/door gap.  

What are you talking about? Both the CT6 and 300 are RWD. 

If you look under the specs tab on this page, you'll see the EPA classifies the 300 as a "Large Car".  It's not mid-size.

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=40610

The CT6 uses exceptionally expensive lightweight tech in order to achieve that weight.  It weighs less than an AWD 3-series... are you saying the 3-series is out of date too?  The CT6 (like the Avalon) is an anomaly on the weight scale, you can't really judge the whole class based on the CT6 alone.  Most of the 300's direct competition is right around the same weight give or take 100 lbs. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The FWD was in reference to the Impala, which is also a full size model, but with a rather short wheelbase.  (XTS has the wheelbase IIRC)

Edited by Robert Hall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

What are you talking about? Both the CT6 and 300 are RWD. 

If you look under the specs tab on this page, you'll see the EPA classifies the 300 as a "Large Car".  It's not mid-size.

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=40610

The CT6 uses exceptionally expensive lightweight tech in order to achieve that weight.  It weighs less than an AWD 3-series... are you saying the 3-series is out of date too?  The CT6 (like the Avalon) is an anomaly on the weight scale, you can't really judge the whole class based on the CT6 alone.  Most of the 300's direct competition is right around the same weight give or take 100 lbs. 

Did you see where Robert compared the fullsize Impala which is FWD? That's what I'm talking about. 

"In fact, the wheelbase is about 9 inches longer than the full size Impala." 

Edited 2 hours ago by Robert Hall
 
Exactly, current high tech. with high strength steel, aluminum, magnesium and other light weight metals to cut weight and increase mpg's. 3 Series isn't even the same class and you know that. I'm talking about the same class of cars. Also, the 3 Series is huge for it's class now, not the E36 3 Series of yore. 
8 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

The FWD was in reference to the Impala, which is also a full size model, but with a rather short wheelbase.  (XTS has the wheelbase IIRC)

Yep, same wheelbase and platform for Impala, LaCrosse and XTS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, but they aren't going to spend that money on a car that retails for $29,995 base.  In order to get the CT6 tech, it's gotta be priced high.  Not even the CT4 and CT5 have the weight saving tech. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

What are you talking about? Both the CT6 and 300 are RWD. 

If you look under the specs tab on this page, you'll see the EPA classifies the 300 as a "Large Car".  It's not mid-size.

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=40610

The CT6 uses exceptionally expensive lightweight tech in order to achieve that weight.  It weighs less than an AWD 3-series... are you saying the 3-series is out of date too?  The CT6 (like the Avalon) is an anomaly on the weight scale, you can't really judge the whole class based on the CT6 alone.  Most of the 300's direct competition is right around the same weight give or take 100 lbs. 

So a "Large Car" is between midsize and fullsize then? Like I stated earlier it's a tweener. I never said it wasn't a large car, but it's not as large or roomy as the CT6. CT6 is definitely on a whole nother level and a much better car.

Edited by USA-1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

So a "Large Car" is between midsize and fullsize then? Like I stated earlier it's a tweener. I never said it wasn't a large car, but it's not as large or roomy as the CT6.

 

Large car is synonymous with full size,  the 300 is  a full size that is smaller than the CT6...there are variations within the full size category, always have been...just like in olden days how a GM C-body was bigger inside and out than a B-body.   Both were full size platforms.

And I wasn't comparing the 300 w/ the CT6 in terms of price or content;  just that they are both full size sedans, as is the Taurus, Merc S-class, Impala, LaCrosse, XTS, Avalon, 7-series, etc...all different price points and content levels and dimensions...

Edited by Robert Hall
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

So a "Large Car" is between midsize and fullsize then? Like I stated earlier it's a tweener. I never said it wasn't a large car, but it's not as large or roomy as the CT6. CT6 is definitely on a whole nother level and a much better car.

Large car is Full size. I'm not saying it is as big as a CT6, but the CT6 is just a larger full size car. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

Large car is synonymous with full size,  the 300 is  a full size that is smaller than the CT6...there are variations within the full size category, always have been...just like in olden days how a GM C-body was bigger inside and out than a B-body.   Both were full size. 

I was talking on a technical basis. Go to the rental counter they will completely confuse people on the size of cars and what they think is a compact, midsize or fullsize.

Edited by USA-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, USA-1 said:

I was talking on a technical basis. Go to the rental counter they will completely confuse people on the size of cars and what they think is a compact, midsize or fullsize haha.

Rental car companies use invalid size categorizations. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Drew Dowdell said:

Large car is Full size. I'm not saying it is as big as a CT6, but the CT6 is just a larger full size car. 

I was being facetious, you just can't hear me lol. I know that all fullsize cars aren't exactly the same size, just like fullsize trucks dimensions are slightly different. 

1 minute ago, Robert Hall said:

Rental car companies use invalid size categorizations. 

I know, it's so annoying when you know they're wrong and want to tell them that a Chevy Malibu is not a fullsize car haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

I was being facetious, you just can't hear me lol. I know that all fullsize cars aren't exactly the same size, just like fullsize trucks dimensions are slightly different. 

I know, it's so annoying when you know they're wrong and want to tell them that a Chevy Malibu is not a fullsize car haha.

I always find it irritating w/ rental car companies that I have to specify a 'premium' or 'standard' size to get an actual full size car.   Though on more than one occasion they didn't have a full size car in stock and I've ended up with a Tahoe, Yukon or Escalade...  though I don't mind those.  

Edited by Robert Hall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Robert Hall said:

I always find it irritating w/ rental car companies that I have to get a 'premium' or 'standard' size to get an actual full size car.   Though on more than one occasion they didn't have a full size car in stock and I've ended up with a Tahoe, Yukon or Escalade...

Yep, that's why I like National Emerald Isle just pick one that's big enough whether a fullsize SUV/CUV or Large Premium car and go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, USA-1 said:

Yep, that's why I like National Emerald Isle just pick one that's big enough whether a fullsize SUV/CUV or Large Premium car and go.

Yeah, much the same as Hertz #1 Club Gold.. I just reserve by category and pick one from the row..   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a National guy myself.  Been Executive Elite with them for years... I can pick almost anything on the lot. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I'm a National guy myself.  Been Executive Elite with them for years... I can pick almost anything on the lot. 

National rocks :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've stuck w/ Hertz the last 5 years or so...used to use Enterprise when I lived in Phoenix, had an Enterprise location about a mile from my house, used to rent from them for long weekends to drive over to So Cal to escape the vile summer heat...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Robert Hall said:

I've stuck w/ Hertz the last 5 years or so...used to use Enterprise when I lived in Phoenix, had an Enterprise location about a mile from my house, used to rent from them for long weekends to drive over to So Cal to escape the vile summer heat...

Our Summers make you a real man 💪🏻😐 😎 It's a dry heat just turn the AC up for July and Aug. the only brutal months really. Pretty nice today it was 70 today 50 for low. Fall is awesome here. Really hard to beat AZ weather 9 - 10 mos. out of the year, you know that.   

So. Cal for an escape from the heat? There are times they are just as hot as The Valley especially this last Summer. I travel there often for work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      Fiat Chrysler is bringing a slew of concepts to the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas that all feature some sort of electrification.
      The centerpiece of their display will be the 2020 Airflow Vision concept.  While not specifically branded as a Chrysler, the Airflow Vision does take the name of a full-size Chrysler model produced from 1934 - 1937.  FCA calls it a "sculptural design concept" that envisions the next generation of premium transportation.  The interior user experience is designed to be captivating. FCA put a lot of work into showing a sophisticated appearance that can be personalized and customized to individual needs. 
      The cabin offers multiple interfaces, one behind the steering wheel, two on the center console, one for the front passenger, and two more for the rear passengers. Information can be shared between the screens by swiping.  The interior is said to be the same size as the Chrysler Pacifica Plug-in and has a flat load floor. In spite of all that room, it only has 4 seats set up in a lounge chair fashion to maximize legroom, shoulder room, and storage space for each passenger. Premium suedes and leathers, along with ambient lighting make the ride a first-class experience. 
      The exterior of the Airflow Vision has an aggressive stance with bodywork reaching almost to the ground. The wheels hint at the use of electric motors, but no powertrain information was provided.



      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Fiat Chrysler is bringing a slew of concepts to the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas that all feature some sort of electrification.
      The centerpiece of their display will be the 2020 Airflow Vision concept.  While not specifically branded as a Chrysler, the Airflow Vision does take the name of a full-size Chrysler model produced from 1934 - 1937.  FCA calls it a "sculptural design concept" that envisions the next generation of premium transportation.  The interior user experience is designed to be captivating. FCA put a lot of work into showing a sophisticated appearance that can be personalized and customized to individual needs. 
      The cabin offers multiple interfaces, one behind the steering wheel, two on the center console, one for the front passenger, and two more for the rear passengers. Information can be shared between the screens by swiping.  The interior is said to be the same size as the Chrysler Pacifica Plug-in and has a flat load floor. In spite of all that room, it only has 4 seats set up in a lounge chair fashion to maximize legroom, shoulder room, and storage space for each passenger. Premium suedes and leathers, along with ambient lighting make the ride a first-class experience. 
      The exterior of the Airflow Vision has an aggressive stance with bodywork reaching almost to the ground. The wheels hint at the use of electric motors, but no powertrain information was provided.


    • By Drew Dowdell
      In a discussion about their pending merger, Fiat Chrysler revealed that the combined company's future vehicles in the small to mid-size range will be built on two of PSA's platforms.  The reasoning behind it is that PSA's platforms are more modern than FCA's which first debuted in 2003. They are also capable of a wider range of propulsion methods like electrification that are harder to incorporate into the aging platform that FCA is using.  
      The smaller of the two platforms, PSA's CMP, launched last year is found under the Peugeot 208, 2008, DS 3 Crossback and the new Opel Corsa.  The larger platform is called EMP2 and launched in 2016.  It underpins the Peugeot 3008, 5008, 508, DS7 Crossback, Citroen C5 Aircross, and Opel Grandland. Both of these platforms could become the basis for new Jeep, Dodge, and Fiat models. The first possible FCA model to debut on one of these platforms is likely to be a small crossover for Alfa Romeo, due out in 2022.
      On the other hand, the Ram trucks and larger Jeep models will continue to use technology developed by FCA.  The next generation Jeep Grand Cherokee is already well into development and the forthcoming Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer are set to go into production in early 2021. 
      The primary question mark remains around the larger Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger and Challenger, and Chrysler Pacifica. 

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

    • dfelt  »  A Horse With No Name

      Welcome back, so happy to see you back. You were missed!  
      · 0 replies
    • Robert Hall

      Reality is complex
      · 1 reply
    • ocnblu

      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
      · 0 replies
    • trinacriabob  »  balthazar

      It's not possible to message you.  At least, it wasn't possible to do that last summer.  So I'll post it here.  I had a crazy layover back in June at PHL ... for about 8 hours ... and wondered how far into NJ you were from Philly.  What I did is get the PHLash day pass and did the self-guided tour of Center City before heading back to the airport.  I stayed too close to the center because of time. I actually wasted time by going into South Philly.  I wanted to venture out onto the Main Line and see Villanova.  That rail line was included on the pass I bought.  I had to manage my time because of the late afternoon flight to the Coast.  Cheers.
      · 1 reply
    • Drew Dowdell

      Merry Christmas!
      · 1 reply
  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...