Jump to content
Drew Dowdell

Ask Me Anything: 2020 Hyundai Palisade AWD

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Robert Hall said:

Maybe he was referring to the new Tesla Roadster due in the future.  Supposed to have outrageous statistics...like 0-60 in less than 0 seconds or something... 😁

Right the new Tesla, and it has rocket thrusters and like 7,000 lb-ft of torque.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, smk4565 said:

The tri-motor Cybertruck would win a tug of war against a Super Duty F350, probably with ease due to the electric motors.   In fact, I bet the Tesla Roadster would win a tug of war with an F350.

It all comes down to traction and a dually F350 will weigh more with more traction. Both make plenty of torque. 

An 8500lb F350 would toss around the lighter Cybertruck.

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15105555/2015-ford-f-350-super-duty-v-8-diesel-4x4-test-review/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

 

And the whole “made in the USA” schtick is fake outrage when one realizes that they are posting said outrage on a device NOT made in the USA. And do you think the folks who work at the many foreign car plants in this country give two $h!s about where the money ends up? No. They are getting paid and putting THEIR money back into the economy. Now apply your “Made in the USA” motto to everything you own and then realize how asinine it sounds when you realize how hypocritical you are. 

Many things are made in many places.  Commerce is complex.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

Many things are made in many places.  Commerce is complex.

That it is and that is exactly the point Captain America fails to see when he tags on foreign companies.

 

“Oh my god! This Korean owned SUV is made in...GASP...Korea! And that German car over there Is made in Germany! Wtf is this nonsense? Oh and look, there’s a domestic car that’s made in...Mexico! Oh the horror!

 

Its a world market and that means choices from all over the globe. If domestic fans want people to buy only domestics, then go ahead and say that capitalism is BS too because that kind of thinking is why so many industries have failed over the decades. 

19 hours ago, USA-1 said:

Aaaaaaand....this was easy to find. Anything else you need help with Errol Hassol? 😂

 

985348799_DrewD.takeonHyundaiPalisade.thumb.JPG.1512c78db4660cc6bce0716b92e5c5b1.JPG

Two things. I said on THIS thread and just because Drew says it doesn’t mean it’s 100% factual. He is merely giving his opinion and it sounds like that remark was meant as more tongue in cheek but hey, if you need him to help validate your endless copying claims while ignoring the fact that everyone is doing it these days, then bless your fragile little ego. 
 

(Goes back and looks at the XT6 and sees Audi cues on that front end but doesn’t post endless and pointless diatribes about how Cadillac is ripping off the Germans). 

Edited by surreal1272
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, global economy and marketplace.  My Jeep was built in Detroit but I think the Pentastar V6 was built in Mexico and the transmission in Germany.   My iPhone, iPad and Mac were probably built in China.   My Samsung HDTVs probably in SK....my sister's Chevy in SK.    Stuff is sourced from many locations.  That's the reality of the modern world.  

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Way left field with what I was talking about. Many fail or refuse to see the difference like Errol Hassol with products like TV's or smart phones where you don't have a choice in where it's made or assembled, which is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking cars, specifically this Hyundai CUV, that's fully made and assembled in Korea, the Japanese do it as well as the Germans obviously. Of course I know parts and pieces to many vehicles are made in other countries, I'm talking about having a choice between a car manufacturer being a Domestic U.S. based manufacturer where the money feeds our economy or a Foreign made and assembled make like this Korean CUV. For example the Chevrolet Corvette (engine and transmission included) that is developed in the U.S. by American engineers and assembled here in Bowling Green, Kentucky and shipped all around the world. So GM engineers have a job and Bowling Green workers have a job as well and people from here and all around the world feed the beast, (U.S. GDP) and subsequently strengthen our economy when they buy one, same can be said with many other GM makes and models as well as Ford and FCA. Where did all the pride in American Made go?! Yes, many things are still made here which is awesome and I for one buy American Made whenever I can!

South Korea would still be a third world country like NoKo without our great country feeding them and their economy and they know it.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, surreal1272 said:

That it is and that is exactly the point Captain America fails to see when he tags on foreign companies.

 

“Oh my god! This Korean owned SUV is made in...GASP...Korea! And that German car over there Is made in Germany! Wtf is this nonsense? Oh and look, there’s a domestic car that’s made in...Mexico! Oh the horror!

 

Its a world market and that means choices from all over the globe. If domestic fans want people to buy only domestics, then go ahead and say that capitalism is BS too because that kind of thinking is why so many industries have failed over the decades. 

Two things. I said on THIS thread and just because Drew says it doesn’t mean it’s 100% factual. He is merely giving his opinion and it sounds like that remark was meant as more tongue in cheek but hey, if you need him to help validate your endless copying claims while ignoring the fact that everyone is doing it these days, then bless your fragile little ego. 
 

(Goes back and looks at the XT6 and sees Audi cues on that front end but doesn’t post endless and pointless diatribes about how Cadillac is ripping off the Germans). 

Again trying to change the subject to all vehicles of all makes and models to run from the fact that this precious Hyundai that you love to defend "they are nicer than you think" is ALL Korean. You can't even admit it when the proof is right in front of your face. Drew was being serious because we have serious conversions unlike your long winded rants of "fanboy" stalking BS, talk about a fragile troll ego. 🤣

You definitely need glasses because the XT6 with obvious Cadillac signature design cues front to back that follow the whole Cadillac line looks nothing like an Audi anywhere on it. :dizzy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Drew Dowdell

Palisade or XT6? 

39 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

You definitely need glasses because the XT6 with obvious Cadillac signature design cues front to back that follow the whole Cadillac line looks nothing like an Audi anywhere on it.

The XT6 is most certainly a signature Cadillac, FWD Chevy at the heart of it. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

Hey little sidekick he was comparing Escalade originally now switched to XT6 looking like an Audi to change the subject for obvious reasons. And @Drew Dowdell and I were talking about the Escalade. 

Well, I'm comparing similarly sized vehicles in an overlapping class. 

And yeah, more often than not, @surreal1272 and myself are disagreeing on things... We're as much sidekicks as the Yankees and Red Sox. 

I guess a common .. uhh .. thing .. can unite anybody. ;)  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

Well, I'm comparing similarly sized vehicles in an overlapping class. 

But that LED piping! They are just ripping Cadillac off! Only GM is allowed to that! Don’t you see man?

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a big fan of Korean twins looks.  However, i have seen XT6 closely recently and it looks boring and pedestrian as hell.  I think Koreans have more character than the newest Caddilac.  It is a shame really.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ykX said:

I am not a big fan of Korean twins looks.  However, i have seen XT6 closely recently and it looks boring and pedestrian as hell.  I think Koreans have more character than the newest Caddilac.  It is a shame really.

It’s shameful that a Hyundai catches the eye more than a Cadillac but GM made their choice with the XT6 and have to live that stigma. It’s more than nice enough on the inside but about as exciting on the outside as 1970s Volvo. Hoping the next Escalade doesn’t share that same bring look. 

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, USA-1 said:

Denial is a MF'er...

Go and do a little research on the site. You'll find out how much we're sidekicks. 

Regardless, it's pathetic any Cadillac is even being compared to a Hyundai, not even a Genesis. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

Go and do a little research on the site. You'll find out how much we're sidekicks. 

Regardless, it's pathetic any Cadillac is even being compared to a Hyundai, not even a Genesis. 

Stating on your own that "surreal1272 is not a GM hater" in past posts makes it pretty clear, but it's cool no worries everyone needs a buddy, just choose wisely because...ugh.

Since Genesis doesn't have a CUV, then yes, that would make sense that they aren't brought up in this post. The pathetic part is it's Hyundai that is comically trying to compete and compare to Cadillac, and it's a poor execution at that. That's why @Drew Dowdell chimed in to agree that they are trying to emulate "riff" on Escalade, he hears from and talks to manufacturer reps in the automotive field to be much more in the know. 

GM has an XT7 RWD/AWD CUV based off the CT6 Omega platform planned as well, the XT6 is just a filler for now.

image.png.5e6ba34e1b7898bc2521531bcde5a074.png

Edited by USA-1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can almost guarantee nobody representing Hyundai has ever publicly stated they are emulating anything Cadillac, and there's no reason to do so. Cadillac is making less and less competitive vehicles and Hyundai and Genesis are quickly rising. 

I don't believe they have an XT7 coming until I see it. It's been said they're trying to cut costs over at Cadillac and that's why the XT6 is on a FWD platform instead of Omega, like it was originally planned. That's also why the CT5-V isn't getting the new 4.2, nor Escalade. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

I can almost guarantee nobody representing Hyundai has ever publicly stated they are emulating anything Cadillac, and there's no reason to do so. Cadillac is making less and less competitive vehicles and Hyundai and Genesis are quickly rising. 

I don't believe they have an XT7 coming until I see it. It's been said they're trying to cut costs over at Cadillac and that's why the XT6 is on a FWD platform instead of Omega, like it was originally planned. That's also why the CT5-V isn't getting the new 4.2, nor Escalade. 

Yet, it's clear that they are "trying" to emulate Escalade, just like they try to emulate MB, Acura and dare I say Infiniti with design cues in the G80 and G90. I know other manufacturers copy some cues here and there from competitors, but Hyundai is pretty blatant about it. 

Yes, there are GM top brass bean counters who need to be slapped upside the head with some of the decisions they make. Yes, Omega was going to underpin the XT6. Most likely worried about cannibalizing the Escalade sales, especially with a new one being released mid to late next year.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/29/2019 at 3:16 PM, ccap41 said:

I can almost guarantee nobody representing Hyundai has ever publicly stated they are emulating anything Cadillac, and there's no reason to do so. Cadillac is making less and less competitive vehicles

Yeah not competitive, because the Escalade has dominated the fullsize segment for basically the entire 20 years since they came out in '99.

The CT4 and 5 just came out so you have no merit in stating that they aren't or won't be competitive.

ATS and CTS were very competitive as well and sold pretty well, XT5 has been a very competitive CUV and one of Cadillac's top sellers behind Escalade, also the new XT4 has been highly lauded by automotive journalists who have tested it and it's selling really well.   

Edited by Drew Dowdell
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This vehicle has all the features that people want at a lower price. I don’t know what product planners at other makes are thinking, they’re pretty myopic just catering to their existing customer bases. This thing is out there for sure but it has the essence of premium ness that even Buick or some previous Lincolns like the MKT struggle to offer...at the right price. And then Denali is just a chrome package so how can this thing’s lopsided front be any worse?

Edited by Suaviloquent
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Suaviloquent said:

This vehicle has all the features that people want at a lower price. I don’t know what product planners at other makes are thinking, they’re pretty myopic just catering to their existing customer bases. This thing is out there for sure but it has the essence of premium ness that even Buick or some previous Lincolns like the MKT struggle to offer...at the right price. And then Denali is just a chrome package so how can this thing’s lopsided front be any worse?

SOOOO agreed.

Moral of the story, do every detail right, market it, show it, let people experience it, and keep the price point to a "wow, really?" point that keeps the demand up.

Palisade and Telluride right now continue to get converts from "higher" brands right now, and with demand, after a test drive, many continue to pay MSRP without blinking.

Not "wait, an Enclave is $63k? Huh?"

If only other brands could keep that picture going...

These are good. I like parts of both. The polish of the Palisade more, but the look, the less bubble gone bubble on a bubble front end, and actual gear shifter of the Telluride. BUT, like the option packaging of the Palisade more.

Edited by caddycruiser
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/27/2019 at 6:26 PM, smk4565 said:

Is it better than a Telluride?  Palisade and Telluride seem to be the top 2 full size crossovers on the market right now.   I assume the V6 is enough for 90% of the people that buy this, but always wonder if a turbo V6 would sell, perhaps not to this crowd, maybe on the Genesis version.

I guess question 2 is should they make a bigger one to go after Ford Expedition and Tahoe?

I think this and the Telluride are so darn close that it really comes down to aesthetics and how much you like the interior of one over the other.  The interiors of both are very well done and show a lot of thoughtful small features.   The V6 in this never feels out of breath and the 8-speed is more than happy to downshift as much as needed to give you the power you want.  Would a Turbo V6 be faster? Sure, but I don't think anyone would really need it unless they were towing with it regularly.

Should they make a bigger one?  Yes, but they've probably reached the limits of size on this unibody platform. They'd probably have to move to BOF. 

On 11/27/2019 at 10:00 PM, riviera74 said:

So when does the Genesis version come out?  No automaker can live on cars alone these days.

The Genesis version will be RWD rather than the FWD this is. Totally different platform.

Could they get away with a Genesis version of this?  Probably. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/29/2019 at 1:10 PM, ccap41 said:

@Drew Dowdell

Palisade or XT6? 

The XT6 is most certainly a signature Cadillac, FWD Chevy at the heart of it. 

Palisade I think.  Palisade has a smoother ride, just as much power, and a better finished interior... plus a lot more tech for the price. 

2 hours ago, caddycruiser said:

SOOOO agreed.

Moral of the story, do every detail right, market it, show it, let people experience it, and keep the price point to a "wow, really?" point that keeps the demand up.

Palisade and Telluride right now continue to get converts from "higher" brands right now, and with demand, after a test drive, many continue to pay MSRP without blinking.

Not "wait, an Enclave is $63k? Huh?"

If only other brands could keep that picture going...

These are good. I like parts of both. The polish of the Palisade more, but the look, the less bubble gone bubble on a bubble front end, and actual gear shifter of the Telluride. BUT, like the option packaging of the Palisade more.

I'm quickly used to the gear selector in the Palisade. I find it especially easier when doing a 5 point turn like I need to when getting the thing out of my driveway.  The only reason to go to the Enclave over this is raw cubic feet.  If you need the extra space, the GM twins or the Pilot are there.  But as a luxury vehicle, this out-Enclaves the Enclave. 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I took this out on the battlefield of Black Friday shopping.  It has a surprisingly tight turning radius for such a big vehicle which makes it easy to park.  The automatic cruise control and lane centering make highway driving a breeze,  I just set the cruise to 65 mph and the Palisade tracked whatever the car in front of me was doing.  I only needed to use the brakes on the final pull into the mall parking lot. 

Getting up and into the Palisade is a bit of a jump. It could use running boards.  Lowering the third row happens electronically at the touch of a button and the seat lay flat. 

The digital dash is awesome, and I find myself using the turn signal even more than I normally would just to get a view of what is beside me. 

And yes, I do think the light pipes both back and front riff on the Cadillac vertical light scheme. I wasn't saying that tongue in cheek.  The interior riff somewhat off of Benz with the wide dual displays.

The Koreans are trying to develop their own styling, but some of it still is a homage to other brands. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

I took this out on the battlefield of Black Friday shopping.  It has a surprisingly tight turning radius for such a big vehicle which makes it easy to park.  The automatic cruise control and lane centering make highway driving a breeze,  I just set the cruise to 65 mph and the Palisade tracked whatever the car in front of me was doing.  I only needed to use the brakes on the final pull into the mall parking lot. 

Getting up and into the Palisade is a bit of a jump. It could use running boards.  Lowering the third row happens electronically at the touch of a button and the seat lay flat. 

The digital dash is awesome, and I find myself using the turn signal even more than I normally would just to get a view of what is beside me. 

And yes, I do think the light pipes both back and front riff on the Cadillac vertical light scheme. I wasn't saying that tongue in cheek.  The interior riff somewhat off of Benz with the wide dual displays.

The Koreans are trying to develop their own styling, but some of it still is a homage to other brands. 

That very last sentence there is key. Were too derivative of other makes for years? Yes. Are they much less of that now? Also yes. Regarding the display, yes it is similar to Benz but if they would have done like everyone and slapped on a gigantic iPad in the center, they would been copying dozens. You can’t win either way. These days they are no more guilty of copying someone than any other make. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Drew Dowdell--And thanks for clearing up the light piping issue. My apologies for misreading intent. Having said that, your description of it comes off as a more honest and objective evaluation as opposed to the "Koreans are nothing but foreign junk that copies everyone" diatribes that polluted this thread. I personally don't think its that big of a riff but I can see some similarities. That does not change my stance on the fact that Hyundai and Kia are not unique in the borrowing of styling cues department. Thank you again for clarifying.

Edited by surreal1272

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

Palisade I think.  Palisade has a smoother ride, just as much power, and a better finished interior... plus a lot more tech for the price. 

I'm quickly used to the gear selector in the Palisade. I find it especially easier when doing a 5 point turn like I need to when getting the thing out of my driveway.  The only reason to go to the Enclave over this is raw cubic feet.  If you need the extra space, the GM twins or the Pilot are there.  But as a luxury vehicle, this out-Enclaves the Enclave. 

And there you have it...precisely. Great real review.

While everyone here continues to talk in circles about "stolen styling cues", they miss the point...these utes out-Enclave the Enclave. One of many examples. Credit where its due.

Such a competitive 7 seater market. All the better for every buyer, as long as they keep brand blinders off, and just try everything. "I'm better...no you're not...yes I am" segment worth test driving all.

 

Question...I've forgotten from my travels, and rentals. Does Hyundai/Kia side blind spot alert actually beep?

On, and you signal, beep that is. Still baffling why that's so different brand to brand.

Edited by caddycruiser
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Social Stream

  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      I’ve driven my fair share of Challengers on both extremes - from the standard V6 to the high-performance SRT and Hellcat models. But I never had any time behind the wheel of the R/T with its 5.7 V8. That changed in the summer when a bright orange Charger R/T Shaker was dropped off for a week. This allowed me to ask a question that has been sitting in my head for some time: Is the R/T the best bang for your buck in the Challenger family?
      The Shaker sets itself apart from other Challenger models with the use of a ‘Shaker’ scoop that prominently pops up from the hood. There is also a blackout treatment on several trim pieces and wheels that make it look even more imposing on the road. Along with the scoop, the Shaker package does add a new cold-air intake seated right in front of the driver’s side corner. This addition should boost the output of the 5.7L HEMI V8 (372 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque when paired with the eight-speed automatic. But FCA’s spec sheet doesn’t say anything about the Shaker Package adding more oomph or not. When you first start up the R/T Shaker, it makes presence known with a deep and loud exhaust note. I had to do a double-take the first time as I was wondering if I was given either an R/T Scat Pack or a Hellcat by mistake. While it may lack the high power numbers of the 6.4 and supercharged 6.2 V8s, the 5.7 is no slouch. 60 mph comes in at just over five seconds and power is seemingly available at any speed. My tester came with the optional Performance Handling Group that adds upgraded springs, sway bars, and a set of Bilstein shocks. This does improve the handling by a fair amount with less body roll. But it doesn’t feel nimble due to a curb weight of around 4,158 pounds. The steering has a quick response, but there is a noticeable lack of road feedback. If you want your muscle car to have some handling, consider the Camaro or Mustang. Nothing new to report on the Challenger’s interior. It still has the angled center stack, retro-inspired gauges, and easy to use UConnect infotainment system. The seats are where the Challenger loses some points as it feels like you’re sitting on top of cinderblocks. The Shaker package is surprisingly good value, adding $2,500 to the base price of the R/T which begins at $34,295. But you’ll need to be careful on the option sheet, or you’ll end up with something quite expensive. My tester came with an as-tested price of $46,555, which is $300 more than an R/T Scat Pack Widebody with the 6.4 HEMI V8.  The Dodge Challenger is getting up there in age and sadly cannot compete with the likes of the Camaro and Mustang in terms of handling. But Dodge is still able to offer a lot of performance in the form of the R/T. With a potent V8 engine, old school styling, and different packages like the Shaker to make your Challenger stand out, the R/T is possibly the best value and well-rounded model in the lineup. Disclaimer: Dodge Provided the Challenger, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Dodge
      Model: Challenger
      Trim: R/T
      Engine: 5.7 HEMI VVT V8 Engine
      Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic, Rear-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 372 @ 5,200
      Torque @ RPM: 400 @ 4,400
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 16/25/19
      Curb Weight: 4,158 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Brampton, Ontario
      Base Price: $34,295
      As Tested Price: $46,555 (Includes $1,495.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      "Shaker" Package - $2,500.00
      TorqueFlite Eight-Speed Automatic Transmission - $1,595.00
      Performance Handling Group - $1,495.00
      Driver Convenience Group - $1,295.00
      Power Sunroof - $1,295.00
      UConnect 4C Nav with 8.4-inch Display - $1,095.00
      Alpine Sound Group with Subwoofer - $995.00
      Shakedown Graphics - $495.00

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      I’ve driven my fair share of Challengers on both extremes - from the standard V6 to the high-performance SRT and Hellcat models. But I never had any time behind the wheel of the R/T with its 5.7 V8. That changed in the summer when a bright orange Charger R/T Shaker was dropped off for a week. This allowed me to ask a question that has been sitting in my head for some time: Is the R/T the best bang for your buck in the Challenger family?
      The Shaker sets itself apart from other Challenger models with the use of a ‘Shaker’ scoop that prominently pops up from the hood. There is also a blackout treatment on several trim pieces and wheels that make it look even more imposing on the road. Along with the scoop, the Shaker package does add a new cold-air intake seated right in front of the driver’s side corner. This addition should boost the output of the 5.7L HEMI V8 (372 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque when paired with the eight-speed automatic. But FCA’s spec sheet doesn’t say anything about the Shaker Package adding more oomph or not. When you first start up the R/T Shaker, it makes presence known with a deep and loud exhaust note. I had to do a double-take the first time as I was wondering if I was given either an R/T Scat Pack or a Hellcat by mistake. While it may lack the high power numbers of the 6.4 and supercharged 6.2 V8s, the 5.7 is no slouch. 60 mph comes in at just over five seconds and power is seemingly available at any speed. My tester came with the optional Performance Handling Group that adds upgraded springs, sway bars, and a set of Bilstein shocks. This does improve the handling by a fair amount with less body roll. But it doesn’t feel nimble due to a curb weight of around 4,158 pounds. The steering has a quick response, but there is a noticeable lack of road feedback. If you want your muscle car to have some handling, consider the Camaro or Mustang. Nothing new to report on the Challenger’s interior. It still has the angled center stack, retro-inspired gauges, and easy to use UConnect infotainment system. The seats are where the Challenger loses some points as it feels like you’re sitting on top of cinderblocks. The Shaker package is surprisingly good value, adding $2,500 to the base price of the R/T which begins at $34,295. But you’ll need to be careful on the option sheet, or you’ll end up with something quite expensive. My tester came with an as-tested price of $46,555, which is $300 more than an R/T Scat Pack Widebody with the 6.4 HEMI V8.  The Dodge Challenger is getting up there in age and sadly cannot compete with the likes of the Camaro and Mustang in terms of handling. But Dodge is still able to offer a lot of performance in the form of the R/T. With a potent V8 engine, old school styling, and different packages like the Shaker to make your Challenger stand out, the R/T is possibly the best value and well-rounded model in the lineup. Disclaimer: Dodge Provided the Challenger, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas
      Year: 2019
      Make: Dodge
      Model: Challenger
      Trim: R/T
      Engine: 5.7 HEMI VVT V8 Engine
      Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic, Rear-Wheel Drive
      Horsepower @ RPM: 372 @ 5,200
      Torque @ RPM: 400 @ 4,400
      Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 16/25/19
      Curb Weight: 4,158 lbs
      Location of Manufacture: Brampton, Ontario
      Base Price: $34,295
      As Tested Price: $46,555 (Includes $1,495.00 Destination Charge)
      Options:
      "Shaker" Package - $2,500.00
      TorqueFlite Eight-Speed Automatic Transmission - $1,595.00
      Performance Handling Group - $1,495.00
      Driver Convenience Group - $1,295.00
      Power Sunroof - $1,295.00
      UConnect 4C Nav with 8.4-inch Display - $1,095.00
      Alpine Sound Group with Subwoofer - $995.00
      Shakedown Graphics - $495.00
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Model Sales
      Vehicle
      Dec-19
      Dec-18
      2019 YTD
      2018 YTD
      Accent
      2,311
      3,830
      25,628
      29,090
      Elantra
      18,720
      15,076
      175,094
      200,415
      Ioniq
      1,164
      1,275
      19,574
      15,076
      Kona
      6,678
      8,319
      73,326
      47,090
      Nexo
      15
      8
      267
      44*
      Palisade
      5,654
      0
      28,736
      0
      Santa Fe
      10,350
      11,347
      127,373
      117,038
      Sonata
      7,105
      8,705
      87,466
      105,118
      Tucson
      11,224
      15,384
      137,381
      142,263
      Veloster
      712
      1,161
      12,849
      10,871
      Venue
      787
      0
      1,077
      0
       
      Dec-19
      Dec-18
      2019 YTD
      2018 YTD
      Hyundai
      64,720
      65,107
      688,771
      667,634
    • By Drew Dowdell
      My wheels for the week are a 2020 Toyota Corolla XLE sedan. This one is well equipped with Toyota Safety Sense now standard, Toyota Entune with Apple CarPlay, Adaptive lighting system with automatic high beams, headed seats, and a JBL Premium audio system. It is rated for 29 city / 37 highway and we'll be putting that highway number to the test. We will be taking the Corolla to Northern Virginia for the weekend to visit family for the holidays. 
      The XLE differs from the 2019 Corolla SE hatchback that @William Maley recently tested in that it has the 1.8 liter engine instead of the 2.0 liter. This engine puts out 139 horsepower at 6100 RPM and 126 lb-ft of torque at 3900 rpm. About a 30 horsepower deficit compared to the SE.
       In my initial drive, I found the car to be snappy around town, but things got a little raucous when I went to merge onto the highway. Though it is a CVT, it has a fixed first gear. The fixed first gear does take away from the rubber band feeling most CVTs have. I took the Corolla on a set of twisty roads that I take all test vehicles on and the sedan, while no sports car, felt firmly planted and predictable around the curves. 
      One thing that is surprising is the sticker price; $28,084 for a Corolla without even the biggest engine seems quite steep. 
      So while I'm loading up the trunk with Christmas cheer, fire off any questions you have about the 2020 Toyota Corolla XLE.


      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      My wheels for the week are a 2020 Toyota Corolla XLE sedan. This one is well equipped with Toyota Safety Sense now standard, Toyota Entune with Apple CarPlay, Adaptive lighting system with automatic high beams, headed seats, and a JBL Premium audio system. It is rated for 29 city / 37 highway and we'll be putting that highway number to the test. We will be taking the Corolla to Northern Virginia for the weekend to visit family for the holidays. 
      The XLE differs from the 2019 Corolla SE hatchback that @William Maley recently tested in that it has the 1.8 liter engine instead of the 2.0 liter. This engine puts out 139 horsepower at 6100 RPM and 126 lb-ft of torque at 3900 rpm. About a 30 horsepower deficit compared to the SE.
       In my initial drive, I found the car to be snappy around town, but things got a little raucous when I went to merge onto the highway. Though it is a CVT, it has a fixed first gear. The fixed first gear does take away from the rubber band feeling most CVTs have. I took the Corolla on a set of twisty roads that I take all test vehicles on and the sedan, while no sports car, felt firmly planted and predictable around the curves. 
      One thing that is surprising is the sticker price; $28,084 for a Corolla without even the biggest engine seems quite steep. 
      So while I'm loading up the trunk with Christmas cheer, fire off any questions you have about the 2020 Toyota Corolla XLE.

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Reader Rides

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...