DetroiterinFL

* Not sure if this is in a bad spot so I put it here and in the hummer forum. ...Thanks! I loved the "Monster" commercial for the H3 and went to the official site today to find that Jennifer (Godzilla) has her own url that is about everything and nothing, all at the same time. Cambell E. or whichever design house that was responsible for not only the ad, but this mock webpage really hit it on the head with this one! http://www.hummer.com/monsters/index.html http://www.jenniferlovestherobot.com/ love that music smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif Kevin

I loved the "Monster" commercial for the H3 and went to the official site today to find that Jennifer (Godzilla) has her own url that is about everything and nothing, all at the same time. Cambell E. or whichever design house that was responsible for not only the ad, but this mock webpage really hit it on the head with this one! http://www.hummer.com/monsters/index.html http://www.jenniferlovestherobot.com/ love that music Kevin

jesus im surrounded by idiots. later; i visit cheersandgears for something other than debate so you guys have a good one.

carbon dioxide from a sigh....ok ok thats kinda ridiculous dont u think. thats on a totally complete level that doesnt even compare to what im referring to. pops what do u mean hydrogen is limited? if u mean hydrogen as a fuel ur kinda right but still not. Petroleum products? What are you talking about; we have extracted it from sources primarily like water and nucleur waste. hell; we even have used waste matter and left over by-product from the oddest sources like cheese. But i totally agree with you on the point of reducing pollution; its a must. however its also critical to keep in mind the future and what the future will use for fuel====oil is taking its bags and leaving soon! oooh, btw Joe i meant to add this about the stations. for instance, here in orlando where im at currently we have 2 shell stations that pump gas/hydro.

ill make this fast joe. we do have hydrogen stations in many spots....ya probably just havent seen any in your area. you may know that we have binds with shell gasoline, ok. so for instance we have multiple Shell gas stations that pump both gasoline and hydrogen fuel. the hydrogen is in both the gas and liquid form; which as i said in my last post we(GM) only use the gas form.

Also the price is a subject purely based on speculation. However it is safe to assume that the price wouldn't be at all comparable to gasoline prices. I understand that it is hard to back this claim so I can imagine the looks I may get. For isntance: Hydrogen, as a fuel is everywhere and it is not owned by anyone. Hence the extraction of hydrogen into a usable fuel should not be confined to being a source actually owned by someone(like the cartels owning the oil.) I know it's a bit ignorant on my part to claim that hydrogen fuel would be free from any sort of monopoly.but...

For isntance; the Sequel(Our third generation fuel cell vehicle) has three tanks onboard. Each tank has a range of a 100 miles approximately. SO you can do the math. Technically the mileage isn't anything much different than nowadays except that the technology is meant for things other than mileage. The efficiancy and enviromental aspects are the main points....that and the fact that our comsumption of oil is catching up with us; 75 years or less of burnin' that fossil fuel.

Hit me with a stick if I'm wrong; the fuel cell doesn't use a flame to create a combustion. Therefore the process wouldn't release any carbon-dioxide as a waste; only water. I suppose that the article was referring to another fuel cell system; such as Ford's attempt to create a fuel cell that uses liquid hydrogen.....within a combustional system. Only liquid hydrogen can be actually ignited, hence a greenhouse gas being produced. General Motors is solely interested in the use of gaseus hydrogen as fuel. Unlike the liquid form, gaseus hydrogen cannot be ignited; hence the fuel cell's chemical reaction within the PEM.