Jump to content
Create New...

randrand60

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

randrand60's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Well, I'm hoping this one off design stays that way. Car manufacturers must learn that clothing designers never are able to translate those skills to the automotive sector - BMW did a few "one offs" like that before with its 3 series and the results were horrid to say the least. I see the attempt she made with the car seats - good attempt, however, it ended up looking like my grandpa's E-z chair recliner with the pattern... Car people, lets get some car people!......... rand.
  2. No, typical GM stupidity. Nothing new here unfortunately.
  3. No use for profanity for having caps on by accident. I Like his comment though, other than the "design" being better in the Ford interior... ahhh, what am I paying premium for if a vehicle 1/2 the price beside me LOOKS better inside????? You tell me it takes this many years for redesign and this is what I get? Please look back at the previous quotes by GM interior desingers, and I paraphrase "You think the Ford Truck interiors are something, well they didnt take it far enough, we did". Gentleman you are all fired. Then again the shareholders have been watching GM bleed from one fiasco to another: Fiat, A billion dollars for plastic on Opel Saturns, and the list goes on. Still, Wagoner sits on the board saying "I finally got it" Yep, you finally got it, be a long day before I buy one of your products (although going out this weekend to get a corvette). Typical GM - never learns from its mistakes. Most of these comments on this board simply say - WOW what an improvement. Well, it certainly does not put them in front of the SUV market. Anyways, a moot argument here. I've given up on GM other than the odd odditties that somehow on occasion squeeze out a homerun, ie. the Corvette (see above) or the Solstice sisters. Good luck GM, you will need it.
  4. TYPICAL GM DISSAPOINTMENT. TALK ABOUT UNDERWHELMING! THE EXTERIOR, WELL LETS SAY KNOW ONE WILL NOT MISTAKE IT FOR THE NEW GM TRUCKS - OTHER THAN A FEW MODIFICATIONS (YEAH YEAH GM CORPORATE BOYS WILL GO ON HOW PANELS HAVE CHANGED, DONT SHARE ANYTHING, BLAH BLAH, TELL THAT TO SOMEONE WHO BELIEVES IT). CAN SPOT THAT MULE A MILE A WAY. THE INTERIOR - IT DOESNT EVEN BEAT TODAYS COMPETITION MUCH LESS THE FUTURE TRUCKS AND SUVS COMING DOWN THE PIPE,COUGH, TOYOTA. EVER SAT IN A ROVER, TOUREG, THOSE BEAT IT HANDS DOWN IN THE LAYOUT AND MORE IMPORTANTLY THE QUALITY OF TEXTURES AND MATERIALS. SORRY GM BLEW IT AGAIN, BIG TIME, AND THIS IS WHY YOU CANCELLED ZETA TO DEVOTE MORE TIME TO THIS PROGRAM. THE SHAME. IVE SERIOUSLY GIVEN UP ON GM, AND WACTH THE MARKET SHARE CONTINUE TO SLIDE BOYS - NOT A WARNING, BUT A FACT. NO MORE BELIEVEING WE HAVE THE PRODUCT! WE HAVE THE PRODUCT! SPEECHES. DO YOU KNOW WHY GM WAS KING OF THE MARKET BEFORE? BECAUSE THEY LED, AND DID NOT FOLLOW - AND THIS IS WHAT THESE TRUCKS ARE, SAFE, MIDDLE OF THE PACK MULES. SORRY. IM GETTING MY T-SHIRT DONE NOW WITH THE FOLLOWING WORDS: BOB LUTZ KNOWS crap! RAND. PS FOR THE GUY WHO BELIEVES THE CADILLAC INTERIOR IS BETTER THAN THE FORDS (AND I AM NOT A FAN OF FORD) YOURE OUT TO LUNCH AND NO BETTER THAN ALL THE OTHER APPEASERS FOR GM WHO ARE NOT BEING HONEST, OR SIMPLY DONT KNOW BETTER, BECAUSE...THE FORD INTERIOR BLOWS AWAY THE CADDY'S - WHATS WITH THE COLUMN SHIFTER! IM IN 2006 NOT 1956!
  5. I live in Toronto, have a daily subscription to the Toronto Star, and avoid reading the WHEEL section (where the article was front page) since they are anti GM biased, as well have no concept of what a good vehicle is. You slap on a Toyota badge or Honda, they do cartwheels. If its GM, well, nice try GM but aint good enough.... As someone said above, Kenzie is an old sloppy man who writing skills are on par as his dress code. Rand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings