Drew Dowdell

As long as i can get super cruise and the 400 mile battery in the trailboss, I think that’s the one I’ll go for.

I changed the title to add "EV"... because Kia is definitely not the first to market a full-size SUV. But that said, they've already missed the boat on the EV criteria as well. The Rivian R1S is on sale now and can carry 7 passengers. There's also a solid possibility there will be a production Traverse EV (or equivalent vehicle) debuting in the next 10 months.

And it’s stupid that manufacturers, not just Nissan, do stuff like this. Lincoln dropped AWD in the Nautilus for the final 2 years of production. Chrysler/Dodge dropped AWD in V8 Models of the LX cars after 2015. GM dropped AWD in the diesel Equinox/Terrain for its final years. Doing that doesn’t increase sales.

Most vehicles don't need the cooling capacity provided by gaping mouths we see on vehicles today. Trucks and SUVs that can tow, sure. But If you notice all the SUVs/CUVs with sub-5,000 lbs tow ratings with these massive grilles, most of the grille is false. (Explorer, Traverse, Acadia, etc.). Aurora got all the cooling needed for a DOHC V8 just from the scoop at the bottom of the car. There's no way a tiny 1.5T in a GMC Terrain needs this much grille real estate to keep cool.

If I hit the Powerball, I'm totally doing an Aurora EV conversion in black like the one above.

The slight difference on this one, that was not so much a grille insert, that was a styling homage to the Toronado of the day and years prior. It's a dropped header panel and wide, thin grille opening that traces roots to the Toronado from 73 - 92, which itself harkens back to the Cord. That Calais was envisioned to be a semi-luxury compact to compete with the import onslaught from Acura, Lexus, and Infiniti. It was Roger Smith's wisdom of "make sure there's a cheap version so we sell a lot of them" that ruined the prestige.

Sure, but so do the Teslas The Teslas are just marginally smaller. I'm not saying that we should build to the same exact specifications a 1998 Integra.... just that grille-less design can be much more attractive than what Tesla is doing. The only one I like styling-wise is the S, and that would be only if I couldn't pick from any other brand.

Regarding Tesla's blandness. They are trying to get away from some of the traditional elements and decorations we have on cars, but somehow they still fall short. There is some excellent grille-less design out there. Styling 25 years ahead of its time. Imagine if this came out with an electric powertrain in 2023! Oldsmobile would have been lauded as a trendsetter. Ditto You want a sports coupe? We've got your sports coupes. If someone buys a car based on looks, I don't think there will be a lot of demand for abandoning the hood-cabin or hood-cabin-boot design. You'll get a few people buying an appliance that the i3-Bolt-Leaf shaped vehicles will be fine for, but the rest of us (who aren't buying crossovers) want the traditional 2 or 3-box design. If you build it that way, you tend to want a "face" on the car, even if an open grille isn't necessary. Four cars with grille-less design and they have more styling personality than every production Tesla made... combined.

I‘m leaving the pics in the article unfixed for now. The company that makes this software is using this post to diagnose the underlying problem that caused this to happen. I have an open ticket with them.

We lost a bunch of posts due to a database crash this afternoon. Sorry... I'm trying to keep this site together at the moment.

Gettin muddy but still time for a beauty shot!

The reason they were zippy with 90 horsepower was that they were made of paper they were so light. Get in an accident, and they wouldn't bother extracting you. They'd just send the whole wreck to the junkyard and have you turned into a cube of steel and bury you that way. Say what you will about the Encore and the Sonic on which it was based, they are incredibly safe vehicles. The whole platform was one of the safest GM ever built. But that's why the Encore, shorter than any of the cars you listed, clocks in at 3,358 lbs .. probably 1,300 lbs more than most of those cars.

It's a much deeper philosophical debate, but I side with @oldshurst442 on this one. People are too caught up in the rat race of just trying to keep their heads above water financially in this economy (everything since 1980, not just the last few years).

There's nothing fun about driving most of the time anymore.... that's probably why. What's the point of some high-powered coupe when you're just going to be stuck behind some semi-truck or a dolt in a Corolla in the left lane with their blinker on? I have gotten pretty aggressive of late of high-beaming people who park in the left lane at slow speeds. The driving skills have really dropped, especially since covid started.

Largely why we upgraded from the Encore to the 300C. We needed the space for hauling his elderly parents around and the Encore couldn't cut it in that department. I am glad we went back to a sedan. Ironically, we didn't take any hit in fuel economy. We got 17ish/30ish in the Encore and we get 17ish/30ish in the 300C. Still, the size of the Encore was a nice convenience for zipping around the city.

It's about picking the right tool for the job. When one is driving Pittsburgh -> Philly -> NY -> Connecticut -> Rhode Island -> Maryland -> Charlotte -> Pittsburgh in the matter of a week and a half like I was regularly doing, an "exciting" vehicle gets tedious to deal with. That kind of mileage, through that kind of traffic, on that kind of schedule, it's all about comfort and economy. Sure, I was getting mileage reimbursements, but that meant I wanted to keep my MPGs high, and I'd make a profit off of it. Rolling that same route in an Avalanche I'd lose money. At the time we bought it, I was making those long-distance trips often. Albert had a 60-mile r/t commute. We wanted quiet comfort. Same reason we have the 300C now. I buy things with 2 wheels for the thrills.

Buick's quiet tuning is a real and noticeable thing. The Encore and Encore GX have active noise cancelation that really works. Buick was the first in their respective classes to offer it and Toyota and Chevy don't. It makes the OG Encore a calm place to be.

I kinda like it. I see it as the natural evolution of the original Encore that I and Albert both liked. Our only issue with the Encore was the size and the power. There are times, while I'm wheeling an Avalanche through suburbia, that I really miss the Encore. For a one or two-person travel car, it was fantastically comfortable for what it was. For someone who had to do a lot of driving travel by himself, the Encore was a great solution. I haven't driven the current-gen Encore GX, but I suspect if they kept the weight in check, the increase in horsepower plus the 9-speed auto probably makes this tolerable. Not fast, just tolerable. That said, I bought my Encore as a 2013 in 2012, and it was as top-shelf loaded as you could get without getting chrome wheels... and 11 years later, the Avenir model is slightly less money MSRP. (Mine was $34,9 for a Premium AWD) So they definitely kept prices in check.

They already have a 280hp/258lb-ft version of this engine in the Arteon. They're just fiddling with the peak numbers from that for the Atlas; giving it more torque at a lower RPM is good for a heavy vehicle like this, but moving the peak torque down the curve cuts off the max horsepower number.

I've done an Edge 2.0T v an Explorer 2.3T... so pretty close. And yes, there was a difference. I felt like I was spinning the hell out of the 2.0T to keep up with Texas traffic. The 2.0T is a lot smoother though, so Ford could get away with it.

Highlander also has a hybrid version for more power, and the Highlander Turbo 4 has almost half a liter on the VW. It may not sound like a lot, but there is a significant power delivery difference between a 2.0T and a 2.4T, even if max output is similar. The problem for the Atlas is that drivers will constantly be in the boost to keep this thing moving. This is a refresh of the model on the existing platform, and the current Atlas is a heavy crossover. It will likely post an EPA increase over the V6, but I'm betting real-world fuel economy will be poor, just like the Kia SUVs with the 4-cylinder turbo and the older Acura RDX.

Yesterday was the first nice day we've had in a loooong while with sunny weather and 70 degrees, and the cars were out for it. I was on the motorcycle, so I couldn't snap pics. I spotted: Early 70s Delta Eighty-Eight Convertible Mid-80s Buick Grand National 90-91 Seville STS in red and gorgeous condition, lookin like this but the brighter red they offered: Subaru SVX Early 80s Ninety-Eight Old Beetle convertible original Toyota MR2

That was the point

The individual brands are still calling the shots on Advertising, is seems.

It was an intel, but it’s optical 10g port