Jump to content
Create New...

haypops

Members
  • Posts

    1,379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by haypops

  1. PS. They could have used the 2.2L then later the 2.4L I4 as the base Colorado/Canyon Engine instead of the $$EXPENSIVE$$ ALL NEW ATLAS LINE! <_< The ..whole idea of this "topic" was to OPINE!----So thats what I did! :angry:

    [post="49649"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    Well the incremental cost of the four was minimal once they decided on the six and five cylinder models.

    the topic ... to opine on maximizing the outlay for this engine family so I don't understand your angy emoticom unless its meant in humor and the spirit of the season -- Merry Christmas!
  2. The most used and best of the Atlas line is OBVEIOUSLY the STRONG I6!

    <snip>

    Is it good?---YES!---Was an EXPENSIVE completely new Engine line really needed that badly?---((NO!!))

    [post="49605"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    I would argue that the 4 cylinder is the best of the Atlas engines as it is class leading except that arguements about which is better between divergent objects is not fruitful.

    As to your second point .. the whole idea of this "topic" is to minimize the effect of the cost by conjecture as to other uses of the engines.
  3.   The blocks are tall and would have to be modified for the kappa I believe.

    [post="49347"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    I read that the ecotec was unusually compact and light in design, but still what features make the Atlas so much taller as they are both in line dual over head cam engines?
  4. repeat 140 lb. ft.!!!!!!

    [post="49480"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    It wishes that it were 140. According to the Honda web site its 132 @ 5000 rpm. I'm not saying the civic does or does not deserve this piece of shite award. However the Si with its Corolla dash board, boring style, and rubber band band engine may be the least qualified of all civics. Personally I prefer the natural gas civic.
  5. Apparently it didn't work that well- toyota is up to 4 brands now.

    [post="48813"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    Perhaps as sales go up, more brands become advantageous. As total sales drop, the extra brands(thnking GM and VW here) may become a hindrance.
  6. Bean counters ... those guys who we blame for every radio knob that doesn't please us our responsible for the meme that Saturn has lost money every year of its existance (even in 1994 when production couldn't meet demand). Accountants have many tricks. I wonder now that Saturn will be "selling" back to GM its production facility, will they change the claim of Saturns proftiability. Probably not.
  7. Interesting how a 3800 can be mated to a Toyota truck.

    [post="48614"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    If memory serves me correctly, the early 60's toyota 4x4(yes the one that lookslike the upcoming FJ) and Nissan Patrol were actually GM 3/4 ton truck designs that were sold to them.
  8. One of the spring hill employees posted on Saturnfans.com that larger vehicles such as the new croosovers (Lambda) wouldn't be built there because the turns in the aint shop were too tight to allow this. Would zeta be significatly smaller than Lambda? Would the paint shop be changd? So far all the talk is about making the line 1 flexible -- no mention of paint shops.


    Kisber said the plant remains a leader for GM because of its powertrain assembly and its modern paint shop

  9. More is not always better.

    [post="48165"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    I agree about the "spoiled brat" attitude that 300 hp. and more is a necessity of life. My primarry vehicle is an extended cab Sonoma pickup with a 115 hp pushrod engine (God forbid) and I get there eventually. As a matter of fact I would agree with you 110%, if that wouldn't disprove your comment "more is not always better" :):) just being silly.
  10. In 2000 Michael Moore did support Ralp Nader, but in the 2004 election Moore got down on his knees and begged Ralph Nader not to run (don't get all dirty mouthed on me) :) In the 2004 Michale Moore contributed to, supported and endorsed Wesley Clark. Clark did indeed rebuild the motor on his family car himself because of lack of funds. I wonder if Clark's engine troubles were exasperated by the months or years at a time that he would be stationed overseas.
  11. Lot's of venting here and I guess that serves some purpose. However, this is an auto entusiast site. In the run up to the 2004 nomination Michael Moore endorsed the one candidate who rebuilds his family car's engine himself. How many of you even know who it is? I speculate that such an individual would look more understandingly at GM and other auto producers than those candidates that don't rebuild engines themselves.
  12. . Nobody's offered a compelling story as to why the Solstice would be a better choice than the MX5, let alone the Civic, for COTY.

    [post="47588"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    Are there any complelling stories in the automotive industry these days? Isn't the standard line that the use of non-propitory computers and their software, as well as all the contract players like Lotus, etc. mean that there are no loosers today.
  13. I have considered the Inline 6 for the Camaro as it would give it the best 6 made in America .

    [post="47058"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    And the 180 hp 4 cylinder would make a sweet "secretaries"car.
  14. What are the Atlas engines? The TrailBlazer's straight six would be nice to see in a Camaro instead of the predictable pushrod V6...

    [post="46982"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


    As I understand it, the Atlas engines include that 6 cylinder as well as the 180 hp four cylinder and 220 hp five cylinder version as used the the Colorado/Canyon twins.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search