Jump to content
Create New...

PRoth

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PRoth

  1. It's about damn time. Now they just need to convince the UAW that they need to make cuts in benefits and pensions. Make their health care match non-union positions. Kudos on the executive pay cuts. -P
  2. Which is why the "Friends and Family" discount was so great. Add in a $500 discount for military (current and former). It was too good to pass up. Bought it through a Fleet/Internet sales rep. Actually came down from Seattle, since they didn't have a color we wanted. 2 days later we're in the TSF going up Archers Trail, through Can Opener, and some others. People looked twice at seeing a Jeep with temp tags on the trails. Niiice. -P
  3. I'll have to disagree with you to a degree. Yes, for some, income can play into it. But for me, in the Oregon/Washington area, a Hummer has no place offroad. They're too big for most of the real trails here. Same reason you won't see alot of LWB Jeeps/Blazers/Broncos out here. No room. Most Hummer owners though, will flaunt price/income as the reason they're not on the trails (We Jeepers are too poor to afford them). I haven't been in a Hummer, but I have been in a M998. It is a very capable vehicle. However, I have issues with it's bastard truck-based offspring that live off it's stellar reputation. From the huge wall-sized blind spots, to the lackluster engines, it's all about the bling. -P
  4. Dang. You're missing out on all the good Jeep Vs. Hummer arguments out there. FWIW: Jeep originated as a military vehicle in the '40s. Any relation to the '85 M998 (H1) only exists due their both being placed in to service by the Army. I see the military HMMWV's as a necessity to replace several other aging platforms, doing all tasks very well. -P
  5. Sorry, hate to be a wet blanket. There's SUVs, Cars, Trucks and Jeeps. Jeeps will always have a lead when it comes to off-road capability. The worst jeeps are better than most "other" offerings. Example: H1 = $140K, H2 = $60K, H3 = $32K. Expensive yes? Offroad capable? Marginally (with the exception of the H1). Compare that to a Jeep Rubicon, $27K. The Rubicon is far more of a trail worthy vehicle and cheaper, smaller, more nimble. Sorry. The Hummer brand is for egotistical, penis-measuring morans who are easily separated from their money. They're buying into "image" more than off-road worthiness. To them, it's all about the "bling". -P //Uses his Rubi off road ///Has scratches to prove it
  6. GM's Holden brand already has an Elky.... called the Ute. Would be easier to make LHD than making a new car from a newer platform.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings