Maybe I didn't use the right words. It's overly supple and overly assisted in parking lots and when driving slowly on smaller streets. It does not communicate much when there are lots of thick walls next to small roads and farms right beside me! After renting it, I read a review and it said that it doesn't corner or track very well, and that started getting annoying last night.
I drove a Citroen C3 here somewhere between 2019 and 2021. I believe I reviewed it. First, I couldn't believe how smooth it was. It handled well in parking lots and was surprisingly smooth and agile on the highway, too. It's not like you get two times the smoothness because the car costs two times as much. I have a friend who went for civil engineering at ASU. He said that they used the same textbooks, for the most part, that they did at Berkeley. So, with Berkeley being so much more prestigious, and with a much lower acceptance rate, it's not like you get two times a better civil engineering education there. So my point is that for twice the money, the increase in drivability is not a ratable or linear relationship. I've come to see that the extra money in this BYD is all about the many bells and whistles that take about a week to learn. It's not that impressive on the highway and on rougher roads. I sort of like it on nicely asphalted urban streets at lower speeds and it has been getting respectable fuel mileage.
I liked zooming around in that Citroen C3 with the side "Air Bump." I had asked them for a smaller car instead and they told me that if it had to be automatic, it had to be this one.