Jump to content
Create New...

Ghost Dog

Members
  • Posts

    553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ghost Dog

  1. Tru-Flex is where things are going.

    http://www.autofieldguide.com/articles/030401.html

    As for technology, as we take C-Flex [a programmable body shop tooling system that replaces body style-specific tooling and related equipment. It allows multiple body panels (floor pans, deck lids, hoods, engine compartments, etc.) to be welded with the same set of programmable tools and robots. Model specific tooling is not required.] and move it to Tru-Flex [a body shop enhancement that features a flexible underbody marriage assembly system and utilizes both C-Flex and multi-robot cooperative welding]

    But even so, it's limited by parts and component availability.

    While a Vehicle in Digital could in some ways be built at any Tru-Flex plant.(In theory) the parts and components may not be readily available.

  2. Heavy lifting remains in Delphi-UAW talks

    http://today.reuters.com/investing/finance...ELPHI-LABOR.XML

    Bankrupt auto parts supplier Delphi Corp. (DPHIQ.PK: Quote, Profile, Research) and its major union may have negotiated a sweeping buyout for blue-collar workers, but a full labor settlement still faces major obstacles, industry analysts said on Wednesday.

    The risk for at least some kind of disruption to production remains fairly high, with Wednesday's announcements leaving unresolved potentially contentious questions about wage rates, benefits, pensions and plant closings, these analysts said.

  3. When a Corporation has to Resort to "Agressive Accounting" To create the Mirage that the Company is doing well, thats Bad Management. The Aggressive accounting the Big Dividends. Its Been all about Illusion at Gm.

    Instead of Business.

    If GM had been using conservative accounting. Banking money for thier liabilities.Holding back Dividends. Not throwing money down the drain with offshore investment,Fiat Saab,........

    The Company would be much better off.

  4. I myself think the Government should step in and Take over GM. I think the FASB should set forth stringent Straight arrow accounting guidelines specifically for GM. And I think the PBGC should have Full authority over all GM transactions.

    I think GM has been so mismanaged that nothing short of a Government take over will " Set Things Right "

  5. Howes of the Detroit News thinks its going nuclear.

    http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artic...190373/1148/BIZ

    Close of business" Friday was the deadline for parties to file motions that would be heard in the April 7 omnibus bankruptcy hearing in New York. By missing the deadline, the attrition deal won't be heard until later in the spring, though a deal could still come at any time.

    Net effect: A long-awaited plan to winnow the hourly work forces of GM and Delphi will be delayed further. And the chance that a bigger sweeping deal won't be concluded before Delphi's March 30 deadline virtually guarantees Delphi will ask Judge Robert Drain the next day to begin the process to set aside its union contracts.

    I Guarantee they walk. As soon as word comes down.

  6. The Bad news is'nt over yet.

    GM also said it would delay filing its annual report with securities regulators because it had mistakenly accounted for cash flows from a mortgage subsidiary of GMAC called ResCap. It will also restate results from 2000 to 2004 due to ResCap.

  7. GM raises 2005 loss by $2 billion

    DETROIT (Reuters) -- General Motors on Thursday said its 2005 loss was $2 billion deeper than previously reported due to charges related to factory job losses, its finance arm GMAC and the bankruptcy of former subsidiary Delphi Corp.

    GM also said it would delay filing its annual report with securities regulators because it had mistakenly accounted for cash flows from a mortgage subsidiary of GMAC called ResCap. It will also restate results from 2000 to 2004 due to ResCap.

    The massive loss for 2005, revised to total $10.6 billion, represented almost 85 percent of the current market value of the top U.S. automaker as of the close of trade on Thursday.

    At $18.69 per share, the loss was also just shy of GM's closing price at end December after a year-long slide that cut the stock's value by more than half.

    Because of the delay in filing GM's revised annual report, it was impossible to know how the increased charges would affect the $16.8 billion in cash GM's auto operations held at end December.

    Shares in GM closed on Thursday at $22.22 and have gained almost 16 percent this month on signs that the company was making progress in its turnaround efforts. In after-hours trade the stock slipped about 1 percent to $22.

    One analyst said it was encouraging that GM had raised its estimate of the cost to resolve problems at Delphi since that could suggest a resolution that would avoid a crippling strike.

    GM said its mortgage-related accounting problem would not change reported net income, but could change its statement of cash flows at ResCap, GMAC and the parent company.

    GM said it expected to file its annual report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within the next two weeks.

    MORE COSTS FOR JOB LOSSES

    Among the revisions, GM said it was taking a $1.7 billion charge as it shuts factories and lays off workers, up from an initial $1.4 billion for that sweeping restructuring.

    The Detroit-based company, which remains the world's No. 1 automaker by revenue but ranks No. 8 by market value, has been slashing costs and cutting capacity as it adjusts to the loss of market share to Asian rivals in its core U.S. market.

    The increased charge added $300 million in costs that GM said it expected to incur once its current contract with the United Autos Workers union expires in September 2007.

    Under the current union contract, idled factory workers are able to collect salary and benefits in a costly program known as the JOBS bank. GM has not disclosed the number of workers in that program, but union and analyst estimates put the total at over 7,000.

    GM said it was in talks with the UAW to reduce that number through a cost-saving program of buyouts and early retirement.

    GM also said it was increasing the estimate of its exposure to former subsidiary Delphi Corp. to $5.5 billion before taxes from an earlier estimate of $3.6 billion.

    It said that its total exposure could be as high as $12 billion, but would probably be much lower if a three-way deal including Delphi and the UAW could be clinched.

    Absent such a deal, Delphi CEO Steve Miller has said he would ask a federal bankruptcy judge to void the supplier's existing labor contracts, setting the stage for a strike that could cripple GM.

    J.P. Morgan analyst Himanshu Patel said in a note last month that a work stoppage at Delphi could cause GM's U.S. operations to grind to a halt and cost it some $5 billion in cash a month.

    For that reason, GM's recognition of a higher cost for Delphi could actually be read as a positive development, said Erich Merkle, of auto tracking firm IRN Inc.

    "This sounds good," Merkle said. "We've felt all along that GM would have to provide some kind of early retirement or other buyouts. Obviously, they're raising cash for something."

    When GM spun off Delphi in 1999 it guaranteed the pensions and benefits of the union workers.

    GM said in its statement that a further revision to its estimate of Delphi-related expenses was possible before it filed its annual report, expected by the end of the month.

    http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti...ct=newsletter08

  8. a GM bankruptcy would be the final deathnail in the UAW's coffin. GM will finally be able to compete.

    Its just Silly. Who Buys GM vehicles. Fleets , Employees, Retirees thier families, and a very Few General public. The anger that would erupt among all those loyal GM Buyers longterm would take a generation and a half before bygones would be bygones. Short Term no one would buy from an automaker in Bancruptcy. America would Simply wholely Embrace Toyota. GM vehicles would be a Periah on the sales Floor.

    And on top of it GMs debts and liabilities are so massive. Restructuring would be out of the Question. If GM goes Bancrupt. Its an Auction.

  9. It looks like they are not going to use the euro engines but will use the heavier NA cast iron pushrod 3.5 litre V6.  This will mean a definite change in the suspension and balance of the car.  I am afraid it will not drive with the same dynamics as the euro version.

    Not really valid. The Aura is Bigger with a longer WB then Vectra.

  10. Whether GM declares bankrupcy or not the UAW is gone. Make no mistake about it. The retiree benefits will probably be slashed too either way.

    Thinking about the other divisions does make the prospect of the parts being greater than the whole interesting - for an ever so brief moment only.

    Thats Laughable. You know the only way down that road is nuclear. GM would be left a parceled off bit player.

    GMAP would be taken over by SAIC entirely. GMNA would cease to Exist. GME would be propped up by the local governments short term. GM South America/ Africa would be sold off.

    There's no Surving the Nuclear option for GM.

  11. http://today.reuters.com/news/articlebusin...eid=&cap=&sz=13

    GLOBAL DIESEL OFFENSIVE.

    Separately, the trade publication also reported that GM is planning a global diesel offensive starting in 2008 that would include launching new diesel engines in the United States, where the technology has found few fans compared to Europe.

    "We are developing right now two highly modern diesel motors that won't just fulfil the Euro-5 emission standards, but (also) the more stringent Bin-5 regulations in the USA," an unidentified GM manager told Automobilwoche.

    It plans to introduce a 2.9 liter V6 and a 4.5 liter V8 that will gradually be used in almost all sport utility vehicles, pick-ups and large sedans in all GM brands and all markets.

    Should the biggest U.S.-based carmaker roll out models with diesel engines on a large scale in the United States, then German carmakers that have specialized in the more fuel-efficient powertrain technology may be able to make greater inroads into the local market.

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings