Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • G. David Felt
    G. David Felt

    EV Voltage, Does it make a difference?

      Electric vehicles (EV) are the rage globally and as such, the question that comes up is simple. What is the voltage of the OEM EV platform, and does it make a difference?

    Every automotive original equipment manufacturer (OEM) has their own platform, or they have signed an agreement with another OEM to use their EV platform.

    The following chart lists all of the current North American Automotive OEMs and the platform details that they have released.

    Snag_195829b.png

    While there are a few oddball platform voltages such as the Toyota/Lexus/Subaru platform with a 355-volt system or the Lucid with a 924-volt system, the bulk of the OEM auto manufactures have gone with a 400-volt or 800-volt system. Many of these OEMs are already planning or have moved to an 800-volt platform such as Tesla with the production start of their Cybertruck that is based on an 800-volt system running a 48-volt electrical system compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) autos that run a 12-volt system to run electronics while burning gas or diesel. 

    While the chart above pretty much answers the question of what is the voltage as of today for every North American OEM platform, this still leaves the bigger question of does the voltage make a difference?

    In short YES, voltage does make a difference in how the battery pack of an EV charges.

    The transition of moving from 400-volts to an 800-volt EV charging system offers the following advantages:

    • Weight savings
    • Enhanced performance
    • Increased efficiency and charging power

    The largest drawback if you consider this a drawback is the need to convert existing charging stations to support the higher 800-volt specification and the need to redesign electrical components to support the higher voltage system. Lucid has one such platform as they say it can handle over 1000-volts though it is officially rated at 924-volts.

    The current leaders of an 800-volt architecture are as follows:

    • Porsche
    • Audi
    • Hyundai
    • Genesis
    • Kia
    • Volvo
    • Polestar
    • Bentley
    • Lamborghini
    • Tesla Cybertruck only

    What makes up an EV Charging system? For this I use a diagram from the ev charger design website.

    Fig-1-electric-vehicle-charging-technology_REV3.png

    The basics are pretty simple that make up the EV charging system:

    • Battery
    • Motors
    • Controller
    • Sensors
    • Wires
    • Electrical paraphernalia

    As one can see above in the diagram you have two types of charging, DC fast charging which is a connection right into the battery pack delivering the largest and fastest charge possible. Second is the AC Charger, this can be from level 1 or 2 public chargers or from your own place of living, home, condo, townhouse, apartment and goes through an on-board controller and then into the battery pack.

    Now that we have covered the basic of an EV charging system, let's take a look at what makes up the charging of a battery system. Charging of a battery system breaks down into a simple 4 stage system.

    • Stage 1 Constant Current - Voltage rises at constant current
    • Stage 2 Saturation charge - Voltage peaks, current decreases
    • Stage 3 Ready mode - Charge terminates
    • Stage 4 Standby Mode - Occasional topping charge

    ChargingStages.jpg

    As the battery cells get saturated with power, the current drops off and this is why charging slows down as the battery pack fills up.

    DC Fast charging will power up the battery pack till it reaches a preset charge level that is usually set by the EVs built-in software and then charging stops, and nothing is ever added as to why some public charging stations including Tesla stations now charge for connections that are not charging to an auto as they want to free up the charger for other EV users.

    AC charging will charge up a battery pack to full but has the ability to sense if the battery level drops to top off the battery pack. This comes in to be very useful in extreme hot or cold environments where the battery pack needs to either be chilled or warmed up. End result is when you go to leave in your EV, you always have a full battery pack, based on the setting of the EV software. This could be 80%, 90%, etc. that you the end user chooses.

    400-800.jpg

    800-volts is the future replacement for the current 400-volt systems in use by the majority of auto OEMs. So what does this 800-volt system get us?

    • Faster charging power
    • Performance enhancement
    • Efficiency
    • Weight reduction

    End result is that the 800-volt system reduces the amount of time it takes to charge a battery pack, getting one on the road that much faster. This equates to the minimal time it takes to fill a gas tank in a traditional internal combustion engine auto.

    Currently the average gas fill-up takes approximately 5 minutes per the U.S. government.  This in comparison to the average charging time of an EV:

    • Level 1 charging can take 2 to 3 days @ 110 volt
    • Level 2 charging can take 7 to 15 hours @ 240 volt
    • Level 3 charging can take 15 to 45 minutes to reach 80% state of charge on a current 400-volt system

    The charging information above is based on a 60kWh battery pack from empty to full (80%) using a 7kW charging point. This can for level 1 and 2 change based on each EVs built in controller speed. See the chart above for controller charging speed by OEM.

    If the EV built in controller was to handle 14kW, then the Level 1 charging time would be 1 to 1 1/2 days. Level 2 charging would be 3 1/2 hours to 8 hours. Reduced even further the higher the controller kW is capable of handling.

    Faster DC charging also allows for EVs to have smaller battery packs (weight reduction) when you can quickly charge up the battery pack allowing for reduced battery pack size. Even with the average commute of auto owners being between 30 to 50 miles, range anxiety is an issue that has been blown up in the media depending on each media's agenda in support or against EVs. This is where weight increases have come from as people tend to have come to feel having 300 miles of range is a must in an auto.

    This also brings up the future of Solid-state batteries that in early prototype have shown to be four to ten times energy dense as current lithium-ion batteries. This allows the OEMs to then reduce the overall size of batteries, thus reducing weight of an EV.

    Another benefit that comes with 800-volt battery packs is the ability to charge in serial or parallel mode. This multi-charging system allows ease of working with all formats of 400-volt or 800-volt charging stations.

    Per a Harvard research release, solid-state batteries will dramatically reduce charging times. Researchers have proven that Solid-state lithium batteries can last 20 years with minimal degradation while recharging in minutes. They used the example of a 110kW battery pack that would be equal to today's 60kW lithium battery fully charging in only 10 minutes at 800-volt and could be reduced even further if charging was pushed to 1,200-volts or higher.

    Here we end up with smaller battery packs and faster charging by using 800-volt systems, add in solid-state batteries and you end up reducing the size and weight of the battery along with speeding up charging times.

    Yes, there are plenty of writeups showing the pros and cons of 400-volt to 800-volt with the biggest con being that money has to be spent by the companies to upgrade their auto design, components, etc. to handle the higher 800-volt charge, yet if they want to be competitive, then they cannot sit on the sidelines.

    End result is faster charging for all with an 800-volt system over the 400-volt systems allowing for a far superior experience by end users.

    Auto EV Platform Info 2023.xlsx


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    As Porsche has just proven, with superior charging controller on board and cutting the re-charge time in half both at the DC chargers and at home, having a proper onboard controller capable of 19 kW or more will make people very happy with EVs.

    Those OEMs that are not putting a proper controller into all their EVs will suffer.

    I am looking at you GM 19.2 kW controller in the Cadillac and then as you move on down slower controllers with Chevrolet getting a pathetic 9.2 kW controller.

    Stellantis with your new STLA platform for full size 800V has a pathetic 7.2 kW controller for home charging, Toyota with a pathetic 6.6 kW for their EVs, the list of those late to the EV party is showing their disdain with slow charging controllers on their EVs.

    11 kW should be the bare minimum with top end 22 kW since the difference becomes 8 hours of home charging versus 4 hours between these two controllers.

    ALL EVs should have the fastest possible onboard charging controller for best experience at home.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • As the not so good book says, Money is the root of all sorts of evil.   Yes How aggressively do you mountain bike and what tire do you use? I don't really mountain bike but am starting to ride some nasty places, need more aggressive treads on on of my bikes. 
    • As far as politics go, the US still sucks! Phoque the US.      The US is too stupid to understand the little things, let alone the BIIIIG things in life.  ALWAYS shooting themselves in the foot.  Literally too. https://www.espn.com/blog/new-york-giants/post/_/id/58206/ten-years-later-how-plaxico-burress-shooting-unraveled-nfls-best-team   I am embarrassed by being on the same continent as you American phoques.   
    • It would be quite foolish to do a Canada/US fight with hockey.  1.  Although there are more American teams in the NHL, always has been, the American population is greater than Canadian. 10 times more greater, the NHL STILL is predominantly  Canadian born players.  Approx 42% in 2025 versus the approx 30% of American players. 2. The best of the NHL players ARE Canadian.  While other nations may have a prolific player here and there, like an Ovechkin, Russian, who happens to be the GOAT in goal scoring as of last year, or a Lane Hutson, a rookie American defenseman playing for Montreal who is poised to be one of the best defenseman in the NHL in his time eventually,  consistently the best players ARE from Canada.    While the Stanley Cup will probably be awarded to an American team again this year, the best player, the Captain of the team and the coaches are probably going to be ALL Canadian not to mention that the make-up of the team WILL  be  Canadian majority by a % of at LEAST 50%.  The rest of the team will be a hodge podge of other nations. A couple of Nordic Europeans, a couple of Russians and a couple of Americans.   Baseball...baseball is a sport to make fun of Canada with.  Basketball too.  Although there are quite a few Canadians that are shining in the NBA.  Talk is that Montreal is in the talks of getting a NBA team.   It helped that 2 prominent players on opposing teams in the finals were from Montreal.   Make fun of Montreal and/or Canada that we cant support any other sport other than hockey. Its fair.  Make fun of Toronto ALL you want.  I will probably join you. But to try to get my goat on hockey will never work...    PS.  Jim Montgomery is from Montreal.  He went to my high school.  Or I went to his as he is a couple of years older than I.  I probably saw him in the hallways, but I do not remember him.   I played on the high school hockey team. He did not. He probably wasnt interested as he played for city leagues. I did not. 
    • GOALTENDERS #50 Jordan Binnington (G) 32 1993 Richmond Hill, ON, CAN 6'2" 172 L 26/27 $6,000,000 #30 Joel Hofer (G) 25 2000 Winnipeg, MB, CAN 6'5" 179 L 26/27 $3,400,000 DEFENSEMEN #6 Philip Broberg (D) 24 2001 Örebro, SWE 6'3" 198 L 25/26 $4,580,917 #72 Justin Faulk (D) 33 1992 South St. Paul, MN, USA 6'0" 216 R 26/27 $6,500,000 #17 Cam Fowler (D) 33 1991 Windsor, ON, CAN 6'2" 209 L 28/29 $6,500,000 #51 Matt Kessel (D) 25 2000 Scottsdale, AZ, USA 6'3" 203 R 25/26 $800,000 #23 Logan Mailloux (D) 22 2003 Belle River, ON, CAN 6'3" 212 R 25/26 $875,000 #55 Colton Parayko (D)"A" 32 1993 St. Albert, AB, CAN 6'6" 229 R 29/30 $6,500,000 #75 Tyler Tucker (D) 25 2000 Thunder Bay, ON, CAN 6'2" 205 L 26/27 $925,000 FORWARDS #77 Nick Bjugstad (C/RW) 33 1992 Blaine, MN, USA 6'6" 205 R 26/27 $1,750,000 #89 Pavel Buchnevich (W/C) 30 1995 Cherepovets, RUS 6'1" 196 L 30/31 $8,000,000 #81 Dylan Holloway (W/C) 24 2001 Calgary, AB, CAN 6'1" 205 L 25/26 $2,290,457 #71 Mathieu Joseph (RW/LW) 28 1997 Laval, QC, CAN 6'1" 190 L 25/26 $2,950,000 #25 Jordan Kyrou (C/RW) 27 1998 Toronto, ON, CAN 6'1" 196 R 30/31 $8,125,000 #63 Jake Neighbours (LW/RW) 23 2002 Airdrie, AB, CAN 6'0" 201 L 26/27 $3,750,000 #10 Brayden Schenn (C/W)"C" 34 1991 Saskatoon, SK, CAN 6'1" 201 L 27/28 $6,500,000 #21 Jimmy Snuggerud (RW) 21 2004 Chaska, MN, USA 6'2" 187 R 26/27 $950,000 #70 Oskar Sundqvist (C/RW) 31 1994 Boden, SWE 6'3" 220 R 25/26 $1,500,000 #22 Pius Suter (C/W) 29 1996 Wallisellen, SUI 5'11" 174 L 26/27 $4,125,000 #9 Alexandre Texier (C/LW) 26 1999 Grenoble, FRA 6'1" 194 L 25/26 $2,100,000 #18 Robert Thomas (C/RW)"A" 26 1999 Aurora, ON, CAN 6'0" 187 R 30/31 $8,125,000 #13 Alexei Toropchenko (RW/LW) 26 1999 Moskva, RUS 6'6" 223 L 25/26 $1,700,000 #26 Nathan Walker (LW/RW) 31 1994 Cardiff, GBR 5'9" 187 L 27/28 $775,000 Position: G: 2, D: 7, F: 14Av Age: 27.83 yearsAv Ht: 6'2"Av Wt: 198 lbsCompare with other teams » Total Cap Hit: $94,874,849 Cap data powered by 2025-2026 St. Louis Blues Staff Head CoachJim Montgomery Asst. Video CoachRyan Stacey Team Staff History 2025-2026 St. Louis Blues Captains "C" Brayden Schenn "A" Colton Parayko Robert Thomas
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search