Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

eBay Dreaming...

Sixty8panther

By Sixty8panther
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Sixty8panther Newbie

Sixty8panther

Posted
Posted

Posted Image

Love that H.O. :lovey:

Posted Image

This car speaks to me... I love it. Even for 1937 it's very unique.

1937

Posted Image

Bizzare but very interesting.... I'd love to own this Caddy! NOt as much as I'd love a V16 though.

1938

Posted Image

Another rare classic.... that grille is so unconformist, I love it!

1939

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sixty8panther Newbie

Sixty8panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Not a big fan of the shortstar.

This is a big heavy car... should be pushed not pulled and it needs at least the 4.0L No* either way. All these Auroras are is the next-gen. LSS that got rebadged last minute when the 2nd gen. Aurora was canned when Buick decided the Rivirea was going to sleep wiht the fishes. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flybrian Newbie

Flybrian

Posted
Posted

Not a big fan of the shortstar.

This is a big heavy car... should be pushed not pulled and it needs at least the 4.0L No* either way. All these Auroras are is the next-gen. LSS that got rebadged last minute when the 2nd gen. Aurora was canned when Buick decided the Rivirea was going to sleep wiht the fishes. :(

It wasn't quite 'last-minute,' but these were destined to be Antareses, not Auroras. Though I haven't personally driven one, I wouldn't expect the 215/230 3.5l Shortstar to have any issues with the '01 Auroras; 205/230 3800s do fine in the LeSabre, Bonnie, and Park Ave. Also, the 2nd-gen Auroras were about 200lbs lighter than the Classics

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobo Apprentice

bobo

Posted
Posted

That Aurora at the Lexus dealer has been on eBay for several months now. I've driven both the Aurora 3.5 and 4.0. There's no question the 4.0 has more power, but the 3.5 is not unreasonable. The Aurora also loses a couple of hundred pounds with this engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sixty8panther Newbie

Sixty8panther

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Maybe I should have clarfied... I think owning a Northstar is expensive enough even with the 300 horsepower and a smooth V8... having 3/4 of that power and smoothness in a package that's about 9/10 as expensive to maintain is not worht it IMHO. I'd rather have the 3800 if I can't afford a V8.

I'm not a big fan if V6s in general. Much prefer an Inline-6 over a V6. The 3800 though is a special engine indeed.

Edited by Sixty8panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings