Jump to content
Create New...

trinacriabob

Members
  • Posts

    11,294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    145

Everything posted by trinacriabob

  1. I hope that we'll be better equipped to deal with this crap and not alter how we live our lives. It never ends. I also hate the term "bucket list." I probably use the term "to do list" more. I recall that AF had 3 nonstops a day from Montreal to Paris, all on different wide bodies. You might get on either a 747, a 777, or an Airbus 340! I once flew from YUL to Paris on the evening 747. It was a fantastic experience. I got to sit upstairs. I didn't even ask for that. I got upgraded. Then, the flight is less than 7 hours. Then, based on the direction of the take-off, I got to see the Oratory, Mont-Royal, Centre-Ville, and the river from my window. I only wish I had had a better camera. AF does not plan to put the A 380 back into service. And, if they did, I doubt they'd use it for Montreal. I was scheduled on an AF A 380 from Atlanta to Paris, and connecting onward to Italy, in June of 2020. Obviously, they cancelled the trip and put the miles back into my account. I was counting the days for the trip ... and to fly on that behemoth.
  2. Why do I feel like I'm watching the beginning part of "Live and Let Die?" They can't do stuff like that anymore. Not P.C. But my friends and I sure liked it. - - - - - On a different note, some good news for plane buffs: You can realistically fly on an Airbus 380 in the near-term future. And you don't have to be flying Emirates, Singapore, or Qantas to do so. British Airways has it on the MIA-LHR (London Heathrow) schedule. You don't need to be going to London (and I wouldn't necessarily want to, since they drive on the wrong side of the street and it can be hazardous to cross the street with an American frame of mind), but you can take it elsewhere to Europe. I thought it might be back on the JFK-LHR route. Instead, they are running several 777s a day on that route.
  3. As far as the kits, some of the over-the-top heavily padded vinyl roofs and altered window schemes because of them, and some Cadillac interiors like one called "Maharajah" cloth in the mid-'70s, I'd agree. If we're talking a pared down and tasteful Regal S/R coupe or Cutlass Salon coupe, with sport wheels and gauges inside, I disagree. NOT ok: VERY ok: I'm only speaking for myself: when we've gone from a market where I couldn't decide what to buy because there were so many options to a market where I don't know what I want to buy next because I don't like anything, that's a real downer.
  4. The money they want for it is also an insult, especially since it's so far from being stock.
  5. I don't know about this one ... https://classics.autotrader.com/classic-cars/1976/chevrolet/monte_carlo/101541727
  6. The cleaning up of the downsized Monte Carlo First try - 1978 NO - I felt they had blown it ... compared to the other downsized GM A-body intermediates - - - - - Second try - 1980 MAYBE - the front end is definitely an improvement, as are the nicer taillamps in the rear, but the over-the-top fender sculpting remains - - - - - THIRD TRY - 1981 to 1987/1988 YES - this is finally somewhat of an attractive vehicle - less is more - and, with the eventual base 4.3 Vortec TBI V6 (and about 30 extra hp) over the 231 c.i. V6, it might get the nod.
  7. Yesterday - Thanksgiving day: Saw a purist current-gen base Dodge Charger - red exterior, black interior - pulling out of a diner (couldn't take a photo). I realized you don't see many of the base RWD model. Most have a spoiler, some decal options, and whatnot. Today: Saw a metallic mint green Monte Carlo coupe ('83 or '84, based on the color) going the other way on the freeway (couldn't take a photo). It was in damn near perfect condition. (How the '81 refresh helped that model, with oversized headlamps and exaggerated sheetmetal sculpting prior to that.) - - - - - December, and the official start of winter, are not too far away now.
  8. Q: How much did the pirate pay for his earrings? A: A buck an ear.
  9. Did you hear about the semi that crashed into the median on busy (insert name or number of major freeway near you)? No. It was carrying boxes and crates of Vicks. . . . There was no congestion. .
  10. I think Toyota will do fine, but could do better ... numerically. Their product, which felt and, even smelled, "different" from American cars a long time ago now offers a feel that Americans can feel at home with in no time. However, what puzzles me, is how, when other automakers - VW, SEAT, Hyundai, Kia - are making their sedans and coupes more attractive, Toyota's are becoming uglier.
  11. Yep, new habits ... or stick to resolutions that I always put off. Happy Thanksgiving.
  12. Happy Thanksgiving to the folks of C&G. Give thanks for whatever you have to be thankful for. In most cases, we underestimate or underappreciate when it comes to this sort of thing. At the very least, 2021, thus far, has better than 2020. We can be thankful for that. Enjoy the day and the long holiday weekend.
  13. Great! Shouldn't the instructions be the other way around, if you catch the gutter-like drift?
  14. I can't believe the one on the left is a 1991. It almost looks like something from the '70s. As for the one on the right, I'm not so sure I like the tall grille with a lot of chrome. I preferred it when Jeep(s) canted their front grilles rearward. It gave them a sportier look.
  15. Really heartbroken over this decision. More so for the Charger than the Challenger. (This would also mean the Chrysler 300 will go away.) So many people have been mulling over what the next ones will be like. I guess this decision spares FCA, or whatever it's now called, from expending engineering and design effort on a new Charger and Challenger, hoping they get it right, and curry favor with these models' prospective buyers.
  16. Spotted in early November. On I-44, between St. Louis and Branson, MO, you see these billboards for a place called Uranus Fudge Factory. "Is this for reals, man?" Well, it is. It's a roadside attraction and a person can get off the freeway and buy candy, kitsch souvenirs, shirts, hats, stickers (all overpriced), and, yes, fudge. Their parking lot was also full. It's a freak show of sorts, but here's a photo of their "police car." I thought the town this attraction is in might have been Uranus, MO, but that's not the name of the town. (There are towns named Mars, Neptune, etc. in this country, but I think most states would skip on naming one Uranus.) @balthazar will probably know the year, make, and model of this car from which the engine and all that have probably been removed.
  17. Not such a big fan of the 1992 through 1999 Bonn(i)e. It was too rounded and one person I know said it looked like either an upside-down boat or bathtub. I definitely liked some versions of the very last-gen Bonn(i)e, which debuted in 2000 and had that unusual but interesting dashboard. I also liked the first FWD Bonn(i)e, which ran from 1987 to 1991, preferring the 1990s models with the block pattern (instead of striped) taillamps. I never warmed up to Pontiac's orange dashboard illumination (at night). I found it annoying. Also, Pontiac seemingly did well in garnering Quebecois customer loyalty over the years, with so many French names across their product offerings. People are going to respond favorably to names that are familiar (and local) to them, such as Tacoma, Biscayne, Park Avenue, Telluride, Texas edition Silverado, and, for Italian buyers, possibly Monte Carlo, even though it is technically wholly surrounded by France.
  18. Classic! (LOL) Good morning ...
  19. Oh, yeah, random thought: One of the funniest people on the planet!
  20. And, as you already know, and for anyone else, no wallets in back pockets and leave the Rolexes and fancy jewelry at home. That's all of Southern Europe, even Paris, and, while I'm at it, New York in North America and all the big cities in South America.
  21. Bingo! Thank you.
  22. Axel Foley just got 2 EXTRA doors.
  23. That would sure beat where I was taking this, and a few other, photos!
  24. EXTERIOR Side view - guess where? Three guesses and the first two don't count Angled front view Angled rear view It took on the two-lane roads nimbly given how narrow its stance looks They did a nice of incorporating the Fusion and Focus design lingo into this smaller, more wedge-like package "Aerial view" of the car INTERIOR Dash, which I think is fairly nice looking for an entry-level car, as seen from the driver's side Dash as seen from the passenger's side Speedometer, tach, and fuel use gauges - temperature is shown by a bar digital readout - steering wheel controls are more spartan than in up-level cars The hutch is funny and sort of "cute" in a weird way - some Andrea True on Bluetooth to motor along to This is the vertical expanse of the center stack and automatic gear lever Kudos for a very simple climate control panel Not too spacious in the rear for tall or big people, but fine for "smaller" people I really liked the visibility out the rear backlite The trunk was very roomy - it's that it's tucked in under the raked roofline - and this has an obvious 60-40 split rear seat MECHANICAL Everything looks accessible and there is even some spare space beyond from where you can see the pavement, with the only thing I couldn't find being a transmission fluid dipstick This has 1.6 liter 4 that is naturally aspirated, was built in Mexico, and fetched 42 mpg on its best, all highway tank of gas The ABS system control box is at the rear left and there is a big cover over what is probably the drive belt There are drum brakes at the rear, behind those respectable looking alloy wheels, and, of course, disc brakes up front That's all, folks - - - - - End of photos
  25. Photo(s) I've forgotten to slot in to their respective month - Pontiac Solstice seen in late August:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search