Well, I haven't seen this movie, but I should. Anyway, I'll give it a stab:
Guns are connotatively strong weapons and/or symbols for strength in battle, with battle being a figurative representation for sex, a setting in which two sides come together in a sometimes fierce relation. The guns, two for twice the strength, both pointing toward a central object below, specifically the penis, as men are the primary wearers of bulky belt buckles. Therefore, by pointing two powerful objects at the penis, the male who wears this object is trying to promote his penis as a bold, dynamic force: an immature statement to be made.
Next, by including four individual spaces in the centered crest that only contains stripes and another four that contain only stars, it is clear that democracy and the United States are taken into account, symbolized by their infamous Stars and Stripes. However, there are six figures of women on the same crest again perceiving the one who wears this hefty buckle as a man. Therefore, the male who wears this piece is figuratively placing women before the United States, a bold move that would assume action against the Stars and Stripes. Also, by making such a gesture as including more women and powerful, penis-pointing guns, it is assumed that the man is trying to promote himself as a powerful force with women, presenting the question of whether he's using this as a social mask or if he really thinks of himself as "the man of the sheets."
Lastly, by crowning the crest, the ornament decorating and being most exploited by having been placed in the foreground, the crest is given extra superiority over all other portions of the buckle. Therefore, the man again tries to metaphorically exploit his sexuality as a social issue in his life.
Eh, I could go on about how there are two women nearest the heart and only one nearest the penis and how there are blank spaces between the women, but I simply don't feel like it.