Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    56,240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    563

Posts posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. Well, in your example the '49-52, '55 & '59 are non sequiturs, as there was no other size.

    But... point made.

    In parting, we're not here as 'the public'- consumer reports' message board is for them types.

    Here, I would hope we aspire to be a bit better edumakated. ;)

    No other sizes?

    1949CrosleyConvertible-a.jpg

    1955corvette.jpg

    Fry1959NashMetro.jpg

  2. Yep, I agree. A wagon/estate has the same length as its sedan/saloon equivalent, whereas a hatchback would have a shorter rear overhang.

    An A3 sedan without a longer rear overhang would look awfully truncated.

    well... it'd look like a Golf.

  3. I think the Malibu Maxx suffered in the market because of the ugly face (a trait of the sedan as well) but as long as you didn't look at the front, the rest of the car was kind of bulldog attractive. The interior.... well, that was another story.

    The Magnum was most certainly a wagon no matter what Dodge wants to call it. The 300C wagon was called an Estate in Europe. You don't get much more wagon than that without using the actual word.

    Interestingly, both the Commonwealth of PA and Progressive Insurance list our CR-V as a "Honda CR-V Wagon" on the respective identification cards.


  4. Drew Dowdell - January 26, 2012 - CheersandGears.com

    Yesterday on Facebook, Aaron Bragman a new friend I met at NAIAS, and I got into a friendly back and forth over whether the Audi A3 was a hatchback or a wagon. I insist that it was a wagon and Aaron insists it is a hatch. My original position is that the A3 is a wagon because of the third rear window. Aaron says no, it is an identical car to the Volkswagen GTI which couldn't be called anything but a hatch.

    Now before I go on, I'm going to preempt some of the old timers here. For the sake of this argument, we are going to use body style definitions that apply to cars post.. oh... 1980 or so. That means a sedan is a 4-door and a coupe is a 2-door regardless of the existence of b-pillars or not. For the sake of sanity, we are going to leave out anything that would be considered a cross-over..... yes, I'm looking at you BMW.

    gallery_51_134_8108.jpg

    2007 Volkswagen GTI - VW N.A.

    gallery_51_134_5192.jpg

    2008 Audi A3 - Audi N.A.

    Aaron further explains that the distinguishing factor is "...rear cargo room. It should be longer than it is tall. Which is not the case with the GTI or the A3."

    While I begin to agree, I don't think that is the entire answer.

    I started to doubt my "third window makes a wagon" criteria when I realized there were vehicles out there that were most definitely hatches yet still had a third window in the rear. The two examples that immediately come to mind are the Subaru Impreza and the Pontiac Vibe. That defeat in hand, I set out thinking how to define a hatchback opposed to a wagon.


    My next thought was about the slope of the rear of the car, thinking that a more gradual slope could be a hatch and a flat back would be a wagon. That idea immediately got torpedoed by the 1996 Roadmaster with its sloping rear glass and the Chevrolet Sonic hatch or the original GTI with their flat backs.

    I thought more about the Roadmaster as it was one of the last of the true big wagons from back in the day. What if it had been a hatch? What would a Roadmaster hatchback looked like? Had GM built a Roadmaster hatchback, they would have needed to cut the car off just behind the rear wheels! That would have made the Roadmaster hatch much shorter than the sedan; and there in was the answer.

    gallery_51_134_14018.jpg

    1996 Buick Roadmaster Estate

    So, the definitions I came up with are these:

    Wagon - a sedan that had the enclosed passenger area extended around the trunk of the vehicle losing no length in the process.

    Hatchback - A coupe or sedan that had its trunk, truncated, typically losing length.

    Going back to the A3, this definition holds true. We recently ran an article on the potential A3 sedan coming in the next generation. That sedan would end up being 6 inches longer than the A3 5-door that started this whole debate. The Impreza hatch? 173 inches compared to the 180 of the sedan. The Vibe? 171 inches compared to the 178 inches of the Corolla it was based on.

    While there may be some exceptions to the rule, I'm fairly confident that this rule will hold.

    So what do you think dear readers? Is my definition fairly sound?


    View full article

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search