Drew Dowdell

wow... all the GM hating stirred up from one false report....

You can build a car on <a target='new' href="http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=bNmabRVW4/E&offerid=97888.10000837&type=3&subid=0" >www.CarsDirect.com</a><IMG border=0 width=1 height=1 src="http://ad.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/show?id=bNmabRVW4/E&bids=97888.10000837&type=3&subid=0" > to find out the invoice price plus available rebates in your area.

Full disclosure, C&G gets a kickback if you contact a dealer through the above link.

I think the idea that the ATS coupe was on hold came from an over eager reporter.

The CTS will be moving up in size a bit. I can definately see room for a CTS coupe and and ATS coupe. Think 3-Series coupe and 6-series.

I think we should hold off on the "best American compacts ever built" title for the Dart until it is.. you know... built.

It looks great on paper and in pre-production form, but it isn't rolling down the production line yet.

Oldsmoboi, was that your faucet she was talking about or are you just saying that yours does this also?

Either way, I do have bad feelings about the long term impact fracking does to the ground and I suspect we will see in 5 to 10 years medical problems from all this. Then the gov will step in and shut it all down.

I have "city water", so this will never happen to me and I am not in a fracking area yet. I live in a "green" town that places a high priority on natural conservation and keeping waterways and aquifers as pollution free as possible. So I doubt there will ever be fracking in my town... they wouldn't even let Progressive Insurance take out a wooded area along the highway for a claims adjustment center.

The thing is, I didn't move to a "green" town intentionally. I just happened to find an amazing deal on a house (no really, I stole this place) and liked the look of the neighborhood.

All that said. I support going slower with fracking and making sure the drilling companies clean up their messes.

Coming from one of the few here that like the 500, this is.....unattactive. Stll it's kind of the spiritual successor to old Colt Vista wagon, a no-nonsense people mover. It has a place I'm sure, but not in my garage.

Not really, the Colt Vista was larger, had 3 rows of seating, and 4wd.

A 500 Gucci edition? What is this? A 1970s Lincoln? What's next, a Civic Cartier? A Mazda 2 Valentino? Maybe a Vera Wang Pruis?

There is absolutely nothing "premium" about the original A-Class beyond the sticker hood ornament

another good looking little egg.... but a bit more "family"

FWD?

yeah... I got that..... I mean the other conferences and other brands

Edit: We already know that the MCE Acadia will be there.

I'll be uploading preview pictures as the media events occur with full albums to follow later.

Think of all the money you'll save. Just start dumping it into a "next car" savings account.

I don't think it is "zealotry" to expect my faucet won't explode.

There are Zimmers and Tiffanys with more luxurious build quality than that.....

90% of that dashboard is lifted right out of the JC Whitney catalog.

I picked up my Amtrak tickets today to get me to Chicago courtesy of CSpec.

Everyone should thank CSpec for chipping in for the train tickets.

So speculate on each press conference, what is each one going to be about?

Well there you go doubters, the Escalade is NOT going Uni-body.

GMC should make rear engined supercars too then....

I'll be following up with another take on this car next week. Though I think the end result may be similar.

The problem is not with electric cars. The problem is with the completely unnecessary and ill timed push to make hybrids and electrics "mainstream". The open market will determine the price of gasoline. The price of gasoline will determine when alternatives will become attractive.

There is no shortage of fossil fuel, at least not enough to justify switching to alternatives -- not now not in the coming few decades. This is especially so given that we have lots of domestic oil, gas and coal, it is just that we are refusing to tap them because a gang of environmental zealots are in position to derail any sensible energy policy and push idiotic concepts like a "green" economy.

There is no problem with the Volt as a vehicle. Yes, it is an overly expensive and economically impractical vehicle catering a niche of buyers who desire a 40 mile plug-in range, the ability to extend that using an ICE, believe that somehow the perceived environmental contributions or that the electric driving experience is worth the price tag. But, there is a market niche for it and it can be tapped for profit. That's fine. What is not fine is to expect it to sell 60,000~100,000 copies a year and planning the project's economics around that assumption. There is nothing wrong with the Segway either, but there is something very wrong about the irrational presumption that it'll be as commonly accepted as the bicycle!

Some of the things that those "environmental zealots" are fighting are things like their kitchen faucets lighting on fire from methane getting in their water and the ground being poisoned by highly carcinogenic chemicals that end up in the water supply during the fracking operation. BOTH of which have been documented with increasing frequency here in Pennsylvania. I have a picture of a deer that was shot near one of the fracking sites in PA that is far too graphic to post here, but it is absolutely covered with softball sized cancerous tumors.... almost to the point of being something you'd see on The Simpsons.

Fracking is just getting started here in PA and already the problems it can cause are showing up in each location.

You're ignoring the EV driving experience. There's no practical economics in a Camaro, either, yet owners love the car regardless. Same story with the Volt: it's fun to drive with a seamless powertrain, zero NVH, and distinctive appearance -- attributes that even wacko climate change-denying nutjobs can appreciate.

I am pretty sure there is a niche there. But a niche is just that, a niche. There is a niche in very light, very cramped and extremely well handling cars like the Elise too. But until the vehicle has mainstream economics and practicalities it will not be anything more than a niche.

I have nothing against electric vehicles. In fact, I absolutely believe that electric cars are the future. Their time will come when oil, gas and coal eventually become scarce enough that the economics of the alternatives naturally become competitive. When that time comes, it won't be wind, solar or farmed ethanol powering the human ciivilization. Hydrogen, being the lowest density gas or the coldest liquid in the universe, won't be the distribution medium either. It will be nuclear generation with electrical distribution. A natural consequence of that will be electric cars. When combustible liquid fuel becomes $500 a gallon, a 40 mile range, a $30K battery pack or 1500 lbs of storage cells suddenly become not so inconvenient. I am totally convinced of that eventuality.

I just do not believe that government should be in the business of forcing a premature and economically foolish transition to electric vehicles, especially by taking money from one tax payer to subsidize the believes and habits of another. Fact is the Earth still has plenty of oil, gas and coal. Being sufficiently plentiful and accessible, these sources represent the most attractive sources of energy for the next 40 ~ 80 years. Heck, there is plenty of potential sources of oil, gas and coal within the USA which we should aggressively and exhaustively explore and extract. Beyond that, we need to look at where the uranium and plutonium are, and secure access to that diplomatically or militarily. I am not interested in dubiously green and exhorbitant energy. I am interested in plentiful and affordable energy. I am not interested in global leadership in "green" technology. I am interested in security of current and future energy supply.

Americans are a stubborn lot and won't change until after some cataclysmic event and even then do it half assed.

Believe in climate change or not. Believe in peak oil or not. There are two issues that the Volt addresses that cannot be denied; Air pollution and energy security. Both valid concerns of the government.

The Volt addresses both. In terms of air pollution, the Volt uses less gasoline per user mile than any other car out there save the total electrics like the Leaf and Tesla. I phrased it that way specifically to avoid the "well it only gets 37 mpg on a cross country trip" straw-man. In typical usage, Volt owners are going thousands of miles on a single tank of gas. Before you bring up the coal aspect of it, because there is an environmental aspect to the Volt, the users are more likely to select renewable energy for their power in areas where people have supplier choice. 20% of this country is powered by nuclear, so you could just as easily say that the Volt is as well.

In terms of energy security, you yourself have pointed out that the engine in the Volt can be just about anything that provides rotational power... be it diesel or a Wankel or a natural gas piston engine. What the Volt does is remove the need for "ultra responsive, quiet, smooth" gasoline engines as a requirement for a vehicle. The engine in the Volt could be an extremely slow to respond Sterling engine powered by burning puppy dogs for all the driver cares because the electric side of things addresses all drivability and responsiveness concerns.

The point is, by freeing up what provides the rotational power to the generator, you also create an enormous flexibility as to what fuels it. As CSpec is so fond of pointing out in another thread, Natural Gas is the new "oil" in this country. The Volt can be converted to a NG specific engine by GM and the driving characteristics of the car don't change one iota.

That flexibility is an important first step in assuring our own energy security.

Lincoln (the entire line) outsold the discontinued Ranger by 78 units.

Ford Motor Company U.S. Sales Increase 7 Percent in January; Focus, Escape, Explorer Drive Growth

• Ford Motor Company U.S. sales in January totaled 136,710 vehicles, a 7 percent gain compared with January 2011; retail sales increased 8 percent
  
• Focus contributed to 30 percent of Ford Motor Company sales growth in January, more than any other vehicle in the Ford product lineup. Focus sales were 14,400 vehicles, up 60 percent – the best January Focus sales performance since 2003
  
• F-Series sales of 38,493 vehicles, up 8 percent. Ford has more than 75 percent share of the retail V6 full-size pickup market and most fuel-efficient full line of pickups on the market
  

DEARBORN, Mich., Feb. 1, 2012 – Ford Motor Company U.S. sales totaled 136,710 vehicles in January, a 7 percent increase versus year-old levels. The Ford brand totaled 131,589 vehicles in January, making it the best January sales month for the Ford brand since 2008.

“January started off with solid sales versus year-ago levels,” said Ken Czubay, Ford vice president, U.S. Marketing, Sales and Service. “Ford saw the same solid month, with smaller vehicles in higher demand. Escape continued its record-setting run, and Focus set the pace for car sales in California, Texas and the Southeast.”

Ford brand grew small car, utility and truck sales in January versus a year ago. Focus small car and Escape utility combined provided 49 percent of Ford Motor Company volume growth in January. With 17,259 Escape vehicles sold, it was another best-ever January for Escape, topping last January by 24 percent. Sales of the Ford Explorer totaled 9,966, a 36 percent gain versus strong year-ago results.

The Ford F-Series, America’s top-selling vehicle for the past 30 years posted January sales of 38,493 vehicles, representing an 8 percent increase. EcoBoost-equipped F-150s represented 42 percent of retail sales in January, providing Ford a retail F-150 V6 engine mix (EcoBoost V6 and Ford’s 3.7-liter V6) of 54 percent for the month.

January 2012 Ford Sales Data

View full article