Jump to content
Create New...

motownr

Members
  • Posts

    62
  • Joined

  • Last visited

motownr's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. How ironic that GM is once again having to run the numbers on the cost of closing down a brand. It's not well known, but at the time of Old's demise, GM corporately owned more than 50% of all Saturn franchises. They had the chance to give these Saturn points to their Olds dealers, and save the cash while increasing the market coverage of Saturn. What did RW decide to do? Slide the Saturn points to GM's corporate pets (often dealer development types with zero credentials), and leave the Olds dealers to go and buy import stores with GM's cash. Saturn got stuck with limited coverage, GM's worst managers, and some truly marginal dealers. Here we go again... It's hard for me to see how GM can further consolidate the brand channel short of outright sales of the brands and not incur massive financial liabilities to the impacted dealers.
  2. Is it confirmed that the Traverse is +4"? The Chevy mouthpieces at McCormick didn't think it was true. Can anyone confirm?
  3. I had the pleasure of getting some time with a nearly identical car (in that devastating red) this past weekend. While it certainly is stunning in the metal, I can't help but wonder about the positioning of this vehicle. At $45K+ for a loaded example, Cadillac is competing with some awfully tempting import nameplates. I wonder about the ability to put current CTS drivers into the new car: from what I've heard, the new car prices out quite a bit higher per month than the outgoing model. Yes, it's a major leap forward, but abandoning existing customers is something that GM can't begin to afford. Finally, does anyone else see the 300C/SRT8 as a viable alternative? More exclusive (SRT) or more affordable ©, and certainly more spacious. A thought.
  4. Agree 100%: Given the way things are going, I HOPE we get a few interesting years.
  5. "According to conversations I've had with an insider, part of the Challenger program includes linking its development to a second product...this may be it." Thanks for the info--Hemidakota has posted that Chrysler is getting a Cuda, which could also be your second product. Agree with the fact that CG--like Ford and GM--is rushing to consolidate platforms. Which is why the SWD sedan off the LX/LY has always made so much sense to me: a unique offering into a huge segment where CG is hopelessly overmatched. They love to talk up the Sebring, but it's not doing anything in the market.
  6. Nassau is the 2nd LX to use the Challenger's shortened wheelbase. They're going to keep the Brampton plant running full speed thru model changeovers.... You have some insight on this? There's a lot of debate as to whether CG is going to spin a SWB sedan on the LY. The 'bring is another loser for them, and the LX remains a good product. A smaller, slightly cheaper RWD/AWD offering would work well. The folks at CG won't comment--you know something?
  7. Unlike Nissan, GM has not forgotten how much it relies on its dealer body to sell product. And, to a large degree, the dealers like and respect Wagoner. Ask any dealer that sells both Nissan and GM if they'd like to see Ghosn take over--bet you'd have a hard time finding many. The dealers hate Ghosn like you wouldn't believe..... York may be instigating change, but I doubt that Ghosn is really the guy anyone wants heading GM.
  8. As part of an organization that has sold both GM and Nissan products for decades, I'd say give this idea a few months to simmer: my guess is that you'll see that this is as much a cry for help from N-R as it is a ploy by Tracinda to create change at GM. Ghosn is, IMO, totally overrated as an executive: Nissan NA is in shambles, with massive HR problems, nervous dealers, and no clear path to either joining Honda and Toyota at the top of the import market, or fighting off Hyundai at the lower end. OTOH, GM is clearly making progress; it's been slow, and certainly there's a ton still to do, but the trend is clear. Ghosn wouldn't last long dealing with either the UAW or the dealers; he's all stick, no carrot. Anyone remember a guy named Ron Zarella? How about Jac Nasser? Ghosn is a cheaper, coarser, copy. Great discussion!
  9. GM may very well be in a wind-down of BPG via simple dealer attrition...notice how Saturn nicely overlaps the whole channel? Or how Chevy and Caddy nicely bracket it? In regard to your comment on Kia: driven a Hyundai or Kia lately? We have both of them--they compare very favorably to the GM (and CG, frankly) products we sell. Yes, that includes Buick. As well noted by someone: buy a domestic, get legacy costs. Buy an import, get product features. Sad, but noticably true.
  10. Jeesh...drop the Torrent? Do you hate poor Pontiac? I think the Torrent--like all of Pontiac's rebadges--needs to be differentiated from the Nox...after all, doesn't BMW have a sporty trucklet in the x3/5s? It is staggering how GM has managed to get so many different--and competing--engines into so few compact SUVs. Good post by you.
  11. Evok: Thank you for balancing the discussion. Keller is well-regarded among people in the industry and has been for many years.
  12. I agree...and wonder what CG is planning to circumvent being outflanked by GM, which has the GMT900s for the true BOF buyers, and the forthcoming Lambdas for the mainstream unibody crowd. If GM prices the Lambdas aggressively, I think they will make some significant inroads at the expense of Jeep. The lousy fuel economy of the 3.7 and the 4.7 in the Cherokee lineup are looming liabilities in the world of $3 gas and competitors that can deliver 20+ mpg on the highway.
  13. Predictions on how it'll be before DCX fixes the snout on this ugly bastard? CG has WAAAY too much corporate ego riding on this to let it fail. My guess it that by NAIS 07 we'll be seeing a new front fascia more along the lines of the Rallye concept PLUS an up-power version of the 2.4 that pumps out 220 bhp w/ AWD. Other guesses?
  14. I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it for myself. Big rigs like this need diesels or V8s. Full stop.
  15. The comments regarding the Commander not being fully baked are well taken: I drove a 3.7L version over 300 miles one day this week.....low rent interior and abysmal fuel economy...would you believe 14.7 MPG in almost all hwy driving? Fix the dash, stuff in a small diesel when the clean fuel regs take effect, and they might have something....if not, why bother? Wasted opportunity.
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings