Jump to content
Create New...

Escape up, Wrangler down in crash tests


Recommended Posts

Harry Stoffer

Automotive News

August 20, 2008 - 12:15 am ET

WASHINGTON -- Crash tests of eight small crossovers and SUVs produced clear winners and losers, says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group for auto insurers.

The institute gave its "top safety pick" label to four vehicles that got "good" scores in all test categories: front impact, side impact and rear crash protection. They are the Volkswagen Tiguan, Mitsubishi Outlander, Nissan Rogue and Ford Escape.

The results also apply to the Escape's siblings, the Mercury Mariner and Mazda Tribute, and the hybrid versions of all three models, the institute said.

The institute assigns test scores of good, acceptable, marginal and poor. Getting lower, mixed scores were the Suzuki Grand Vitara, the Jeep Patriot and Wrangler, and the Chevrolet Equinox -- plus the Chevy's twin, the Pontiac Torrent.

The tested Tiguan and Escape were 2009 models. Other rated vehicles were 2008 models.

In a statement, institute President Adrian Lund singled out the Escape for significant improvements.

But he rebuked the Wrangler. "We've rarely seen a vehicle go in the wrong direction and get a worse rating after it has been redesigned," Lund said.

The Wrangler was tested without optional side airbags. It got the only "poor" rating in the latest round of tests, for the side-impact crash.

Otherwise, Lund applauded the industry for big safety gains, especially by adding side airbags and electronic stability control to vehicles.

The institute's frontal crash is at 40 mph into the corner of a barrier. For the side crash, the institute drives the nose of a trucklike object into the test vehicle at 31 mph. Seats and head restraints are evaluated for the rear-crash score.

The institute's latest results were made public today. Full details are at http://www.iihs.org .

Link: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti...p;rssfeed=RSS33

Edited by Pontiac Custom-S
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, there's quite a difference...

equinoxzr6.jpg

tiguanhg7.jpg

The Escape has slowly but surely improved over the years. When it first came out in 2001, it was rated "marginal" in the front crash; in 2005, it improved to "acceptable"; and now for 2009, it's finally a "good."

The new Chrysler cars - Patriot, Caliber, Avenger, Sebring - all have good "bones" (all have good structural ratings), and they're only let down by inadequate supplemental restraints. This seems to reflect the rest of their vehicles well - all of them have strong fundamentals but lack that attention to detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings