Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Oracle of Delphi

Holden cuts workforce after GM cancels programs

41 posts in this topic

Holden sheds contract jobs as GM abandons global rear-wheel drive vehicle projects

By TERRY MARTIN 2 September 2008

GM HOLDEN is shedding an unspecified number of contract design and engineering positions following parent General Motors’ decision to abandon work based on the Australian-developed global rear-wheel drive architecture.

After another tumultuous week for Australian vehicle manufacturing, during which 240 fresh job cuts across three automotive component suppliers and Kenworth Trucks were announced – less than a week after Ford declared that 350 jobs would be slashed at its Geelong and Broadmeadows plants – GM Holden has revealed to GoAuto that contract positions were being terminated on an ongoing basis until it reached the “appropriate level to meet the revised workload”.

The cutbacks commenced some weeks ago.

“There’s been a number of global programs either cancelled or put on hold,” said GM Holden spokesman John Lindsay.

“Because we do global work through our global design and engineering (operations), essentially what we’ve been doing is reducing our workforce to the appropriate level to meet the revised workload.

“What we’ve been doing is approaching our contracted staff, and those who aren’t required we’ve been letting them go. So that’s an ongoing process at the moment.”

Mr Lindsay refused to divulge the exact number of positions being cut but confirmed that no permanent positions had been affected. He said the contract terminations would continue “until we’ve got the right balance and mix of skills that match the workload that we have”.

GoAuto sources have indicated that the staff cuts are extensive and have had a dramatic impact on operations.

“We haven’t been giving out any numbers on this because basically it’s ongoing,” Mr Lindsay said. “But essentially we scaled up to match the projects we were getting from global (head office) to cope with that – and we did that with contract staff, which is why we do have contract staff – but now with those reductions, we’re scaling down appropriately.

“It’s something we’ve done before – and part of our normal business practice … I wouldn’t want to put a specific time (frame) on it, but it’s something that we’re working through at the moment.

“We have to make sure that we have the right skills mix. There will be some contractors that have the skills that we still require, even with the reduction in the current workload. So we’re working through that,” he said.

The rear-wheel drive centre of excellence for the GM world, Holden was known to have been in the running to develop the replacement for the Buick Lucerne sold in North America, while GM was also understood to have considered building the next-generation Chevrolet Impala on the Holden-developed RWD architecture.

Mr Lindsay refused to comment on the global programs that have been canned and/or shelved. However, overseas reports have suggested that stringent fuel consumption standards in the United States have forced GM to abandon plans to create both the Lucerne and Impala using Australian-sourced design and engineering.

Furthermore, US industry journal Automotive News this week reported that design work for a number of GM brands outside North America was being transferred to Detroit in response to US vehicle programs being delayed or cancelled, which in turn has freed up US designers for other projects.

It cited the Impala and “an unnamed Buick sedan” as examples, and quoted GM design vice-president Ed Welburn, who said: “We have had a couple (of) studios where some projects have been cancelled. We have other studios that are totally overloaded. We just need to level that work around the globe.”

Studios believed to be swamped with design work are those working on GM’s new-generation small cars, in particular the Opel R&D centre in Germany and GM Daewoo Auto & Technology in South Korea.

“They can’t handle it all,” Mr Welburn said. “So some of that work will be done in North America.”

GM spokesperson Mike Albano was also quoted as saying that GM’s design centre in Warren, Michigan, was expected to eventually handle work for two vehicle architectures. He declined to identify those platforms, but said: “We have some work being shifted in process for small, subcompact (vehicles), that kind of category. I certainly could foresee more car programs coming into Warren as the market changes.”

Mr Lindsay insisted that design work at Holden was not being channelled into an overseas studio.

“The projects that have impacted us are ones that have either been cancelled or delayed – they were not projects being moved from here to elsewhere,” he said.

Link: http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mellor.nsf...A2574B800160D68

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is GM will be pulling even more design work from Holden in the weeks and months ahead and sending it to Detroit. If I were Holden, I would be very concerned.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad. Zeta was one of GM's few decent platforms...actually, the only GM platforms I care about are Zeta, Sigma, Kappa, the Corvette and the rumoured Alpha. The good stuff..

Edited by moltar
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha plans/designs have been moved out of OZ at Cadillac's insistence and moved to North America.

Hmmm....

So that long post that I made a LONG time ago about Cadillac lobbying for Alpha appears to be at least half correct?

I'm fine with that. I mean, I want Holden to continue to have it's independence, but it's nice to see something other than trucks and Y-Bodys being developed here.

Maybe GM can engineer a lighter Zeta, or a hybrid of Zeta and Sigma. Or even a Sigma II for large cars.

EDIT: I still don't understand why Zeta can't be utilized for SOMETHING... Large cars, trucks, anything? And since it can't be used for anything, that leads me to question if Holden should be in charge of developing RWD. Not that I'm anti-Holden, but seriously, there has to be some logical reason why Zeta can't be used. Is it just too heavy? Will it not meet safety requirements as a truck? Does GM just not want to launch the cars in a softening market? Why?

Edited by FUTURE_OF_GM
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm....

So that long post that I made a LONG time ago about Cadillac lobbying for Alpha appears to be at least half correct?

I'm fine with that. I mean, I want Holden to continue to have it's independence, but it's nice to see something other than trucks and Y-Bodys being developed here.

Maybe GM can engineer a lighter Zeta, or a hybrid of Zeta and Sigma. Or even a Sigma II for large cars.

EDIT: I still don't understand why Zeta can't be utilized for SOMETHING... Large cars, trucks, anything? And since it can't be used for anything, that leads me to question if Holden should be in charge of developing RWD. Not that I'm anti-Holden, but seriously, there has to be some logical reason why Zeta can't be used. Is it just too heavy? Will it not meet safety requirements as a truck? Does GM just not want to launch the cars in a sodtening market? Why?

The problem with Zeta is that it's just too damned heavy. This was THE BIG ISSUE with it from the beginning. Even with the former GMX284 and 282 programs. Those cars were coming in hundreds of pounds over target - as did the Camaro.

Before CAFE and $4 gas, GM felt that it could squeak by, even with too much mass. No longer. For Zeta, the handwriting is on the wall. Right now, I'm putting all of my hopes into Alpha.

Edited by Chazman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTW, AFAIK, Alpha was ALWAYS going to be developed in North America.

I had heard different. And Holden showing an Alpha concept (READ: the closest thing to Alpha that has been shown) kinda hinted Oz too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This makes me sick to my stomach... kind of like

when you eat some bad seafood. Disgusting.

Shame on you GM.

$4/gal might have killed or maimed the Zeta

platform, but the 12 years GM wasted with

ZERO mainstream RWD product I can never

forgive them for.

Who knew, that cherry-maroon 1996 Impala

SS that I sat inside of as a kid back in the

spring of '96 was going to be the LAST RWD

sedan from Chevrolet for over a decade!?

I'm so damn mad I could spit fire. :angry:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who knew, that cherry-maroon 1996 Impala

SS that I sat inside of as a kid back in the

spring of '96 was going to be the LAST RWD

sedan from Chevrolet for over a decade!?

I'm so damn mad I could spit fire. :angry:

Actually, could it be the '96 Impala SS is the last NA RWD Chevy sedan ever? It sounds like their NA line is going to stay all FWD...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, could it be the '96 Impala SS is the last NA RWD Chevy sedan ever? It sounds like their NA line is going to stay all FWD...

Correct.

So my options are:

1.) Grab straight razor, down the street, not across.

2.) stop giving a damn and continue to drive

1950s & 1960s classic RWD hardtops for the

rest of my life, and buy a used CLK500 for

Julie every few years...

Reason number 836,546,502,137 why I just

might forget about the Camaro all together

& concentrate on my lastest life goal:

Obtaining & daily-driving a Pre-War car.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or option 3). Go mainstream and get a Malibu or Camry and quit yer whining... :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or option 3). Go mainstream and get a Malibu or Camry and quit yer whining... :)

Hahhahahahaa!!!!

Moltar made a funny. :lo:

The closest I will EVER come to what you described will

be if and when I buy a new of used (5th gen.) Camaro

& complete; (or, prob. have a professional perform) the

B-pillar delete & rear window regulator install.

B-pillars are the devil's playthings. :5thgen:

Or, perhaps, do same with the mega-sexy CTS-coupe.

Then again, why not just buy a C.A.R.S. '69 Camaro

hardtop shell, and install a LS1 or some other cheap

motor after buying the rest of the car out of the

Classic Industries/year one catalogs.

SERIOUSLY, for the same $35,000 that buys you

some piece of garbage Lexus of Acura FWD sedan

four door, you can have a timeless classic that is

also a practical daily driver.

--

Edited by Sixty8panther
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had heard different. And Holden showing an Alpha concept (READ: the closest thing to Alpha that has been shown) kinda hinted Oz too.

No doubt in my mind that the Torana concept was the spark which conceptualized Alpha.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had heard different. And Holden showing an Alpha concept (READ: the closest thing to Alpha that has been shown) kinda hinted Oz too.

They competed hard for the Alpha project, but Cadillac and GME, were having none of that.

Edited by Pontiac Custom-S
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The competed hard for the Alpha project, but Cadillac and GME, were having none of that.

So any word on which brands will be getting Alpha models? Besides Cadillac....not Holden, then?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So any word on which brands will be getting Alpha models? Besides Cadillac....not Holden, then?

I'm told Chevy and Buick.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm told Chevy and Buick.

Interesting..6th gen Camaro perhaps.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They competed hard for the Alpha project, but Cadillac and GME, were having none of that.

Cadillac and GME are a real pain in the ass.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey, I'm innocent, I was on vacation when all these decisions were made.

uh huh, sure. :suburban:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They competed hard for the Alpha project, but Cadillac and GME, were having none of that.

And why would GME care again?

Unless it's to benefit Cadillac in Europe. But I thought you guys HAD a luxury car division?!?!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cadillac and GME are a real pain in the ass.

Well....

GM has lower the bar for Cadillac, so naturally Pontiac and everyone else has to follow suit so that Cadillac doesn't look dumb(er)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0