Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

El Kabong

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,099

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by El Kabong

  1. El Kabong
    I personally think the GT350 will be a bit quicker in the quarter mile and possibly better-braking. Now, once the 1LE package shows up that may wind up being different again. And let's not forget the LT4. Because LT4.
  2. El Kabong
    To be honest I'm a bit shocked they got out of the game. But it looks like a segment ready-made for them.
  3. El Kabong
    Probably give certain Benz roadsters some grief
  4. El Kabong
    How could you tell? Ford refuses to allow timing gear on it. Based on 0-60 estimates it will be life and death to keep up with the SS. Not exactly a lot to show for 50 grand plus, is what I'm saying
  5. El Kabong
    Sure, Kreskin Now... This Ram SUV. If it was my call I'd start off with a Tahoe-length wheelbase.
  6. El Kabong
    Hey Burnt Valve: I cannot help it that you just got pantsed. I didn't tell you to out yourself as a troll. You just did. Now. Ram SUV. Nice upside in a weak segment. Shall. We. Continue.
  7. El Kabong
    Actually, I was looking over old tests of the 392 Challengers. Some of their numbers are pretty comparable to the Mustang's. If you're looking for a bit more practicality and still want respectable numbers...
  8. El Kabong
    Look. Bottom line: YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHO I WAS REFERRING TO. Reason being: I decided to try and play nice. There were PLENTY of brands it coulda been. I made good and sure of that when I posted what I posted. Then you decided to put words in my mouth. Because all you're here to do is force a one-brand agenda. We all know what's what. Now we all use that knowledge for our own ends Edit: the downvote is just further proof of your agenda
  9. El Kabong
    Now. Ram SUV. Lotsa upside in a segment full of low-hanging fruit. Shall we continue
  10. El Kabong
    So, Kreskin plays the semantics game. You're just disappointed that my post didn't involve your brand of choice.
  11. El Kabong
    On topic, please! Now, Camaro. Utter dominance. Like, better to compare it to ATS-V than Mustang dominance. Shall we continue
  12. El Kabong
    Oh, for sure the Challenger is the better road trip car for space. I've been in the back seat of a Challenger, it's actually livable.
  13. El Kabong
    Then why speak plural ( fossilized platforms ) if talking about Nissan?Why you save quote, man? All you're doing is saving proof that you were putting words into my mouth. That's trolling, no ifs, ands, or buts.Also, Toyota platform? Kinda ancient too, wot? Yeesh
  14. El Kabong
    It would appear that this was a test of automatic cars, since the article refers to the extra gears the Camaro has over the Mustang. Good to know, that
  15. El Kabong
    Why, thank you kind sir. Actually, if you were referring to the C/D article, you could possibly scan and post some more-I'm sure it would be quite instructive. But only if you want to. I'm sure the whole thing will be available online soon enough.
  16. El Kabong
    Uh... did you ever think I, like Drew, was referring to the Nissan? LOL@troll dragging brand of choice into argument
  17. El Kabong
    You don't have to wait see. It just destroyed the dog Mustang. Again.
  18. El Kabong
    Good to know. So if they do an LT4 version I can expect it to get even better FE numbers? And check out the size of that fuel tank. Guess they just chose a different priority for packaging instead of truly having less room. T The bigger gas tank is a trade off for the less than useless trunk. I haven't seen such a useless trunk since my last MR2. Of course, that's not the primary goal with this car or any pony car but it would be nice to have a larger opening for it. It's not that bad a trunk. Besides, the back seats are good parcel shelves.
  19. El Kabong
    Yes, well. Whatever. So, Car and Driver basically gave all the good feels to the Camaro. I think if you look at the performance charts that the Mustand had a slightly lower c/g (which they promptly squandered in the handling) and was a bit quieter under full throttle (uh... yay?). But that's it. Man. Ford needs to get back in the game ASAP. After all, it was about this timeframe in the LS smallblock's lifetime that GM gave it a power boost...
  20. El Kabong
    Good to know. So if they do an LT4 version I can expect it to get even better FE numbers? And check out the size of that fuel tank. Guess they just chose a different priority for packaging instead of truly having less room.
  21. El Kabong
    Clearly you never checked out the first pic. According to C/D there WERE no shortcomings. It was a massacre.
  22. El Kabong
    The acceleration numbers appear fairly consistent with MT: a half-second advantage to 60 for the Camaro, increasing to seven-tenths in the quarter. Braking shows a similar advantage. And the Camaro even got better rated AND observed FE numbers. Excellence of Execution.
  23. El Kabong
    No links yet. But a coupla VERY telling pics:
  24. El Kabong
    Because we're lazy. That's why.
  25. El Kabong
    Randy Savage: wrestling entrepreneur.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search