really its wholly inappropriate, where Freidman is directing his energies here. GM's trucks get better mpg than other trucks. the market wants trucks. GM also has a large fleet of 30+ mpg cars. Why are marketing incentives bad?
What sucks is folks will think he is an auto expert and he is far from one.
Going Toyota solves nothing.
Our fault/lack of leadership really lies within our own culture and some government leadership.
I am totally for folks owining fuel suckers if they need them for function. But too many people don't need things like Escalades. I would simply suggest some folks should just give a second thought to maybe downsizing some if they don't need a huge truck.
Aside from that, really where our fault lies is
-lack of energy research and solutions that lead us away form total oil dependence. We should be way out in front of the world in harnessing hydrogen, electricity, solar, wind, biofuels, ANYTHING ELSE! God, if we could recycle urine into fuel for the drive to work, then we should be doing it! If we are going subsidize something, let's become the leader again and make everyone else follow! If we have this big problem in energy, then we need to solve it ourselves.
-refinements in transportation and our daily process of living. I am not a huge mass trasnit guy, because I feel it limits personal freedom. however, I do know that with better and more desirable types of mass transit it could go a long way towards helping cut our consumption. Aside from that, we need to continue to optimize our roadways and urban construction and daily drives to help cut distances, traffic jams, etc.
-funding. we don't use our taxes for what they are for, i.e. roads etc. we need to use the funds meant for transit and roads and safety and techonolgy for that. and we might even need to start pumping more funding into it.
-politics. the politics of oil. the politics of ethanol. the politics of energy creation. the politics of cooperation with other nations.
Friedman is focusing on GM when he should be focusing on real, bigger issues. honestly, his focus on GM goes to show his complete and utter lack of ability to see the issue in its proper context. Sure, GM could help drive our changes, but at the same time, its not a corporation's policy to change society. The market will approve or disapprove of GM's direction. There needs to be a social and cultural and governmental direction and leadership in place to encourage us to go new places into the future. I.E....LEAD US THERE. GM can participate and contribute and benefit from it. But the issues that need to be dealt with are immensely larger than 2 dollar gas and need to be addressed at the highest levels od our society. the fact that Friedman doesn't get THAT shows you ow big of an IDIOT he really is.
Man, that guy must be a pill. I bet his wife is on some sort of meds, having to deal with him all the time.