Well, let's see. An Aston Martin Rapide will set you back $199,950 to start, has basically the same interior the DB9 has had since 2004. Is full of build quality issues, cheap switchgear, Volvo bits, an of course horrendous ergonomics.
A BMW 7 Series has an interior the looks like the 5 Series...that looks like the 3-Series...that looks like very other BMW over the last 20 years.
The Mercedes S-Class can massage your butt in 40 different ways but the interior design is hardly stunning.
The Audi A8 interior looks pretty much the same as the old one's interior did. In fact I had to double check to make sure this was the new one.
The Rolls Royce Ghost was designed by a man who used rounded off Lego blocks as his inspiration.
In fact the only interiors that do anything at all for me is the Continental Flying Spur's, which is very nice but hardly bespoke...what with much of the switchgear and electronics taken from the VW parts bin.
The Maserati Quattroport which looks nice enough, but the black plastic and sea of buttons doesn't look befitting of a luxury sedan starting at nearly $122,000
The Jaguar XJ's, which is pretty conservative but nicely detailed.
And the Porsche Panamera's interior which I actually like a lot.
But unfortunately is the interior of a car that looks like a van rear ended a 911.
So I think this:
...more than favorably compares. Even if it doesn't have all the bells and whistles Audi, BMW, and Mercedes have, it looks properly luxurious with plenty of tech, and the materials which make it up are unique to all of its competitors.
Of course interior preference is a matter of taste, but most of what I just posted are pretty sedate looking in comparison.