Jump to content
Create New...

Diognes56

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Diognes56

  1. I am going just to see what they DO have there. David
  2. Agreed. The BelAir concept almost made me cry. On a side note. Was the Velite concept loosely based on the BelAir concept? I see quite a few simularities, aside from the fact that the Buick was done better. David
  3. Looks pretty good, seems like they stuck pretty close to the concept B) . I wonder when Rieger Tuning is going to put out a body kit for the '05s. http://www.rieger-tuning.de/en/index.html David
  4. Interesting read. I think things have been moving in a good direction recently and I hope the pieces continue to fall into place. I would like to see GM as the force they once were. David
  5. I am glad the wagon is making a come back, and while I do think that it will replace the SUV for some people (mainly the people that want or need better gas mileage) I agree that they will probably pull more people away from minivans than any other group. As far as why trucks are not being "targeted" as well, IMO that is because both SUV's and wagons are primarily built to be people haulers. Sure they can haul stuff too, and SUV's can tow stuff as well, but they are built to haul people. Trucks are usually built to haul stuff (there are exceptions), stuff that often times would be difficult or completely impossible to fit into a SUV or to a greater extent wagon. My parents have an 1996 Suburban that is primarily used to haul the family on trips (it was that or a cargo van, there are 9 kids in my family). Every time I have needed to use it for something beyond that, like hauling an engine and/or transmission or even just wood, I have to take seats out and put them somewhere and then take special precautions because of the carpeting in the "cargo" area. It is really hard to hoist an engine on an engine stand in and out of the back of a '96 Suburban (I am not sure about other SUVs) and would have been impossible with a wagon. It would have been a lot easier with a truck. Atleast that is why SUVs and trucks are not clumped together in this case. David
  6. That thing has "Jeep Enthusiast Only" (and possibly not even that) written all over it :puke: . David
  7. The nose kind of reminds me of a Saab, but it looks good. It is about time they updated it. David
  8. I wish I could have gone :( . Any pics? avid
  9. You took the words right out of my mouth. David
  10. I like it better than the Mazda RX-8, though I do see plenty of resemblance, and agree that it looks pretty good. I wouldn't buy it, but I wouldn't hate seeing it on the road. David
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings