Jump to content
Create New...

Diognes56

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Diognes56

  1. Man I wish my issue of PHR would hurry the heck up and get here . David
  2. Missed the show , but from the pics others have posted that is going to be one slick Cadillac . David
  3. They had one at NAIAS also. It looked good. David
  4. I just got back from NAIAS on Monday and I had a great time. I hope you guys enjoy it just as much as I did . David
  5. My votes: Camaro - Build it Challenger - build it F3R - BAG & BURN IT C30 & Roadjet - Bag them both Imperial - Double bag it Rapide - Refused to vote since I could not vote to bag it (I like other Aston Martins but have no use for this car). David
  6. I just saw the newest (that I know of) issue of Wheels Magazine. It is not the issue they show on their web page. Anyway, it has an article about the VE and shows it "uncovered" (it could be a chop, but I haven't been able to read the article yet. It looks right though). It looks sweet, I want one :) . I will post up some stuff when I get off of work :) , or somebody else can if they have it. David *EDIT* Just found this pic of the cover.
  7. I am getting used to the roofline, I still don't totally like it, but it is growing on me. I think the rest of the car is great though. I hope it gets the powertrain that it is rumored to be getting :) . David
  8. In a few years, my next vehicle may be a Magnum or Charger ex-police car. Of course this depends on how well they hold up, and what GM is offerring at that point. I have owned three 9C1 Caprice ex-police cars and they have been great for me, and I haven't even had one of the 94-96 LT1 Caprices. Right now, these seem like a nice alternative. David
  9. I will be there :D . I do not know what to expect at this point, but I have high hopes. David
  10. I feel the same way about the Impala, Monte Carlo (though the V8 SS versions are a step in the right direction), the Malibu, what they did to the Nova in the 80's. They might not be (or have been) bad cars, but they do not deserve their names. Nice chop Bimmer, I definitely would have preferred seeing that on the road than the current "Monte Carlo". I am not sure why they didn't offer that in the first place :( . David
  11. No, he is saying that in '98 GM took over production of the SS's (built them on the assembly line) instead of having SLP "build" them (by converting/modifying Z28's). The RPO code for the SS was WU8 from 98-02 (it was R7T for the 96-97 SS's). Options could be ordered from SLP, using code Y2Y, and only then did SLP do anything to the 98-02 SS's. You had to have a SS (WU8) to get the SLP options (Y2Y) and many SS's did have SLP options, that (along with SLP building the 96-97 SS's) is why many believe that SLP built the 98-02 SS's. David
  12. I am still skeptical, I would love for it to be true but at this point I am just waiting for Detroit. David
  13. My Dad's 3800 5spd '96 Camaro was fun (when I got to drive it), gets good gas mileage, and has been reliable for us :D . David
  14. I FINALLY saw a Solstice recently on the highway, and it definitely stood out. I saw a MX-5 at the Mazda dealership and well, it looks like something aliens would use on cows. David
  15. MMMMMMmmmmm 6L80E :wub: . They also use them in the STS-V and XLR-V. I want one in my '56 :D . David
  16. I think Grand Am fits the G6. I would like to see a Tempest or LeMans, but they should be the base model of the GTO. David
  17. Unfortunately I have to agree, that thing looks mean. I wonder if Mitsubishi will be bad that Nissan stole the "X" nose though. Anyway, it should be interesting to see how it translates into reality and to see what kind of specs it ends up with. David
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings