Jump to content
Create New...

Diognes56

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Diognes56

  1. It looks mean, I will give it that, but it could look better. The body looks like a Mazda and the nose looks like a 240SX and new Audi had an upside-down baby. Definitely not for everybody. David
  2. *UPDATE* In al fairness, and others that have read the articles posted can verify, none of the articles say anything about it being an "artistic rendering" or photochop of what the car may look like. Now that I have been able to look through the "Project Tempest" website, and was unable to locate the picture, I agree. Also, I found this ARTICLE on a MG-Rover enthusiast website, in which Professor Bhaskar says: Hope this clears everything up. David
  3. It is not a chop that I know of. Project Tempest More Info Even more info David
  4. I hope this means something :), other than that we are reading to much into it of course :( . Of course, there are still those rumors about a RWD Chevrolet sedan coming and that there will be a wagon variant (BelAir and Nomad or Caprice / Caprice Wagon) floating around, and that would be awsome. David
  5. It would be cool, but I am not holding my breath. David
  6. I love the new Z06, I want to touch it's fun bits :) . David
  7. Needs lowered, but otherwise I like it :) . I wonder if they will have a SRT version :) . David
  8. The Wrangler, is well ...... definitely a Jeep Wrangler. I want them to make the Gladiator, people keep showing it, but I don't see anybody making it :(. David
  9. And??? I hate the way that thing looks too. Sorry man. David
  10. I say ,"good, don't let the door hit you on the way out." I wasn't a huge fan of the styling, performance wasn't great, and the price was insane. If you want a $50,000 2 seater sports car, buy a Corvette, this is the same reason the Thunderbird failed. David
  11. I agree. They have been doing really well for themselves. They still don't make anything I would buy, but it is starting to seem that it is only a matter of time before they do. As far as the Accent goes, looks pretty good. Ford better be working on the next Focus. David
  12. Are they trying to make Subaru "fit in" now? I kind of like the Blitzen, but it seems like they are trying way to hard to fit in with the Audi crowd. David
  13. The only one of those that I like at all is the "EVO X". The sides are to plain, when compared to the nose, and either need to be more aggressive or the nose needs toned down. Also the nose kind of looks like it put it's Audi/VW costume on upside down. D:5 just needs to be crushed. David
  14. There are some cool elements of the design (mainly I like the headlights), but as a whole I think it is nasty. David
  15. New Austin Healey? Maybe! Source: http://www.jalopnik.com David
  16. Another article: HERE Official Website: http://www.fiskercb.com/ They look pretty sweet, but they are not really my thing, which doesn't mean much since I couldn't afford one anyway. David
  17. Yeah, looks like they might be headed in the right direction. Supposedly they are trying to get back to being a value brand. Recent article: HERE David
  18. :lol: You must have posted this while I was looking for more info, seems like you found what I was looking for :lol: . As for VW's twin-charged motor (atleast the one I know about) it puts out 170hp out of a 1.4L. Full artlice: HERE David
  19. I ran across this earlier today on Jalopnik. I wonder if there is any truth to it. I would be very angery if VW got a sporty 2X2 before Chevy does :angry: . David
  20. Full Article: http://usautonews.auto123.com/en/info/auto...spy?artid=49397 I just saw this thing, and all I could think was "Chrysler is buying into Big Bad Beetle Borgs?". David
  21. Definitely a big improvement. David
×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings