Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Mazda To Launch HCCI Engine For 2018 Mazda3

    Sign in to follow this  

      Mazda could be the first automaker to launch a production HCCI engine. Key word, 'could'

    Homogeneous charge compression ignition or HCCI engines are a unique prospect - use compression to ignite gasoline, like in a diesel vehicle. This allows for better fuel economy and lower emissions. A number of automakers have built prototypes and said they would be putting them into production down the road, but it has never happened. That may change in the near future.

    The Nikkei Asian Review reports that Mazda will be launching an HCCI engine for the 2018 Mazda3 (Axela in Japan). This will be part of Mazda's second-generation of SkyActiv technologies to improve fuel economy. According to the report, the engine could give certain Mazda3 models a fuel economy figure of 30 kilometers per liter (about 71 mpg on the U.S. cycle). The report doesn't say if this is for city, highway, or combined.

    Can Mazda do it or will it be like the others and not appear? We'll be watching to find out that answer.

    Source: Nikkei Asian Review

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Wow!   Congrats on Mazda if they can make this work.  GM was working pretty hard on it pre-bankruptcy, but I guess development got tossed during that unpleasantness. 

    Furthermore... this is what will doom diesel.  Diesel like fuel economy with gasoline engine power characteristics with gasoline level exhaust emissions.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, William Maley said:

    The diesel isn't out yet.

    I am talking about the mess they had when they launched it in Europe and then pretty much had to stop everything to work on issues and with multiple missed dates of when it was coming to the US. I doubt it will really show up.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Really wanting them to be successful with this. If they have a wide range of being able to do this, awesome, if not, hopefully they have 8-10Speed auto's to make the best use of that range.

    also, if it really is 70mpg.... i bet it would be on a "suburban" test. 30% better than what our "highway" figure is is ~52mpg.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Wishing Mazda all the best, their Diesel sure did not work out for them.

    That's a different unit than what we're getting in the States.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A number of other outlets are reporting that this engine will not have spark plugs at all....... I highly highly doubt that to be the case. HCCI has such a narrow range of being able to run effectively that you would never want to run it as a standard automotive engine.  I could see running a "pure" HCCI engine as a regenerator for an EV where the gasoline engine is never connected to the wheels, but even then the cold starts would probably be pretty rough. 

    Most likely, this engine will still have spark plugs. It will use the spark plugs during startup, idle, and heavy acceleration, and then switch to HCCI mode when cruising or accelerating under light throttle. This is where the huge efficiency gains will be. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really hope they pull it off.

    Their current Skyactive technology is probably the most efficient NA on the road,  Would be great if they actually can do this.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Does this type of engine produce as much torque as a diesel?  If not, I think diesel will still have a home in trucks and larger vehicles because that's where you really need the power.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    27 minutes ago, Paolino said:

    Does this type of engine produce as much torque as a diesel?  If not, I think diesel will still have a home in trucks and larger vehicles because that's where you really need the power.

    No, it wouldn't have diesel like torque. It's also unlikely able to be turbo-charged, though I am not certain on this point. It might be possible to turbo an HCCI engine as long as the turbo and HCCI mode aren't running at the same time.

    The driving characteristics of this would be just like any other Mazda 4-cylinder. When you get on the highway and are cruising at steady speed, the HCCI mode would come on and you'd get your great fuel economy then.  Under hard acceleration, it's just another 4-cylinder. 

    As far as trucks, there's no reason they couldn't do an HCCI V6 or V8... cylinder count doesn't really matter.  But it would still be just a gasoline V6 or V8 with the same power you'd expect currently.... only you get much better fuel economy on the highway. 

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    No, it wouldn't have diesel like torque. It's also unlikely able to be turbo-charged, though I am not certain on this point. It might be possible to turbo an HCCI engine as long as the turbo and HCCI mode aren't running at the same time.

    The driving characteristics of this would be just like any other Mazda 4-cylinder. When you get on the highway and are cruising at steady speed, the HCCI mode would come on and you'd get your great fuel economy then.  Under hard acceleration, it's just another 4-cylinder. 

    As far as trucks, there's no reason they couldn't do an HCCI V6 or V8... cylinder count doesn't really matter.  But it would still be just a gasoline V6 or V8 with the same power you'd expect currently.... only you get much better fuel economy on the highway. 

    What is your reasoning for saying a turbocharged HCCI engine may not be feasible? Turbo diesel engines use compression ignition. Is the difference in pressure the problem?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, cp-the-nerd said:

    What is your reasoning for saying a turbocharged HCCI engine may not be feasible? Turbo diesel engines use compression ignition. Is the difference in pressure the problem?

    I can't say that I'm knowledgeable enough to be sure. However, the way diesel and HCCI burn fuel are different, so just because diesel can do it doesn't mean HCCI can. The video I posted above has a section that explains the different flame fronts and why HCCI is different in that regard.

    The thing is, it is unlikely that any HCCI engine would be in HCCI mode all the time. So the engine could still be turbocharged and just only use HCCI when there is no boost going on.

    *IF* Mazda engineers figured out a way to make HCCI work while the turbo was providing boost, that would be possibly the biggest engine development achievement of the last 60 years.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thought there isn't a reason why diesels couldn't have HCCI "mode"....?

    if a turbo could be used in HCCI.. couldn't it just be used as a preheating of the charge?  could a variable "displacement" intercooler be possible, thus able to modify approximate temps based on boost?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Isn't the current HCCI issue the problem of having whacky ignition timing with gasoline when you run such high compression ratios....

    What if....what if....this is a opposed piston engine? 

    Apparently one major automaker is actually tooling up to build a 4 cylinder opposed pistion engine.

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By William Maley
      When Kia revealed the new Soul to the U.S. in 2018, they announced that the EV would be arriving sometime a year later. 2019 came and the automaker announced that the Soul EV had been pushed back to 2020. A few months later, the launch date was pushed to 2021. Now, an internal source at Kia's U.S. office has revealed to Roadshow that the Soul EV isn't coming at all.
      According to the source, a number of factors played into this decision. Some of the factors such as limited supply of batteries and motors, along with increased demand for the model Europe were used to explain the last delay. Also, the Soul EV has independent rear suspension. The standard Soul doesn't, which would make the EV more expensive to bring to the U.S. and add complexity. 
      Adding fuel to the fire, Kia has removed any mention of the Soul EV on their U.S. consumer and media sites. There is also no mention of the Soul EV on the EPA site. Previously, the vehicle was mentioned with a range of 243 miles.
      When reached by Roadshow, a Kia spokesperson said they haven't heard anything about the Soul EV being canned for the U.S., but did confirm they have "no pending plans to introduce before 2021 at the earliest."
      We'll keep you posted on this story.
      Source: Roadshow

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      When Kia revealed the new Soul to the U.S. in 2018, they announced that the EV would be arriving sometime a year later. 2019 came and the automaker announced that the Soul EV had been pushed back to 2020. A few months later, the launch date was pushed to 2021. Now, an internal source at Kia's U.S. office has revealed to Roadshow that the Soul EV isn't coming at all.
      According to the source, a number of factors played into this decision. Some of the factors such as limited supply of batteries and motors, along with increased demand for the model Europe were used to explain the last delay. Also, the Soul EV has independent rear suspension. The standard Soul doesn't, which would make the EV more expensive to bring to the U.S. and add complexity. 
      Adding fuel to the fire, Kia has removed any mention of the Soul EV on their U.S. consumer and media sites. There is also no mention of the Soul EV on the EPA site. Previously, the vehicle was mentioned with a range of 243 miles.
      When reached by Roadshow, a Kia spokesperson said they haven't heard anything about the Soul EV being canned for the U.S., but did confirm they have "no pending plans to introduce before 2021 at the earliest."
      We'll keep you posted on this story.
      Source: Roadshow
    • By William Maley
      During a recent fireside chat with Bank of America, Ford teased a new 'Whitespace' product due in the 2021MY. What could that product be? Muscle Cars & Trucks speculates this may be a smaller pickup truck.
      We've been hearing rumblings about this since 2018 when Automobile Magazine first brought this to light. This truck would be the replacement for the Brazilian market Courier, last sold in 2013. It would be based on the C2 platform that underpinned at the time the new Focus for markets outside of the U.S. Fuel would be added to the fire a year later when Jim Farley, Ford's president of global markets dropped this,
      Since then, a trademark filing for Maverick by Ford has appeared, possibly giving us a name for this new model. Plus, dealers were shown this model earlier this year where it earned an enthusiastic reception.
      This model could have a starting price of around $20,000 or so when it launches. Stay tuned.
      Source: Muscle Cars & Trucks

      View full article
  • Posts

    • For those wondering about the Ward's Auto article - https://www.wardsauto.com/vehicles/cadillac-lyriq-pricing-expected-under-75000  
    • Not to mention how long has Benz been “showing off” the delayed EQS lineup? Funny how that gets sidestepped by the resident Daimler fan. 
    • ‘glass domed hood, big n littles, tach up high: 
    • A lot of good facts here and with all the low 3 liter V6s and 4.3s in both V6 and V8 form, it's easy to get them confused and/or forget them. I had forgotten.  There was a 3.3 V6 in the downsized Malibu because, that same year, they put out a 3.2 V6 (196 c.i.) for equivalent Buick products, such as the Regal and the Century.  I knew someone who had this engine in a hand-me down in a 2-door Regal, and he said it was reliable, economical, but had no oomph. It was great that Chevy's downsized full-sizes kept the inline 6 because the engine bay had room for it.  I believe 231s were available in the BOP full-size base cars.  I think, in that era, I'd opt for the inline 6 over the 231. I don't know what the 4.4 V8 was based on, which was also found in Malibus and Monte Carlos. 4.3s by Chevrolet can be confusing, since they made them as V6s and V8s.  Both were excellent engines.  The 4.3 V6 (Vortec) was sliced off from a Chevy 350.  Who'd have thought that this engine was a slam dunk for 300,000 miles?  A few Astro van drivers have told me that their 4.3s would not give up the ghost.  I think that, in that era, the 4.3 V6 (~ 262 c.i.) with simple TBI was better than the 231 c.i. V6, even if the 231 had gone even firing.  And, yes, it showed up in the 1985 MY model year.  I had the opportunity to drive a RWD Monte Carlo (bucket seats and console!) coupe with that engine in the NYC area and the extra ~ 30 hp (if I recall) came in handy for short ramps and getting out of the gate after paying a bridge toll. The 4.3 V8 was a de-bored 5.0 (305 c.i.) V8.  It showed up for the 1994 MY in RWD form but only stuck around for a few years.  If in excellent condition, the purr that they make is music to the ears.  It also can go the distance ... just hope the Optispark ignition control doesn't give out, which can be costly.  For some reason, the smaller GM V8s have nice, quiet exhaust notes and I like quiet running cars. Also, in the late '70s, Chevy had some batches of 305s and 350s that had premature camshaft wear problems.  I knew a few people who had problems with them.  That definitely skewed me towards Olds designed V8s.  However, with all of that behind them, I would gladly drive a car powered by the L99 engine (4.3 Chevy V8) that the thread discusses.  
    • Great photo!  It's good fun to take random photos of random animals when they show up.  I was getting gas in Orlando FL on a humid night and a little green frog had made its home in one of the slots in the steel column holding up the canopy over the gas pump island.
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. haypops
      haypops
      (74 years old)
    2. jhonmartin
      jhonmartin
      (31 years old)
    3. Lance Truthhammer
      Lance Truthhammer
      (36 years old)
    4. Munson05
      Munson05
      (46 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...