Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • balthazar
    balthazar

    Trivia Tuesday, March 17 2015

      Happy St. Patrick's Day, now get guessing for Trivia Tuesday!!

    Happy St. Patrick's Day, now get guessing!!

    1.) What type of brake is this & what production car was it found on?

    8_zpsgqbori0w.jpg

    2.) How were this Olds and this Mercury legally involved with each other?

    57Oldshearse_zpsl7mrr39s.jpg

    7_zpscxnokoeg.jpg

    3.) The 1969 Mercury Cyclone SPoiler II was built in versions honoring which 2 famous racers?

    4.) Which of these early auto brands was NOT an actual intended/production car?

    Long Silent

    McQuestion

    Fear Naught

    Schluderschimdt

    Schworm

    Skiddoodler

    5.) Which of these state names was NOT featured on an early proposed or built auto brand?

    Massachusetts

    Pennsylvania

    Kentucky

    California

    Delaware

    Indiana


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    #2)  Some sort of lawsuit between Mercury and Comet coach builders over the name Comet. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ahhh; close enough! Ford bought the right to use the name from the Comet Coach Company in 1959, causing Comet to rename their entity to the 2 partner's surnames: Cotner-Bevington. C-B was the 'go to' coach builder for Olds' chassis'd professional cars.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    #4 - Schluderschimdt
    Schworm?

     

    I honestly do not understand the question #5

     

    5.) Which of these state names was NOT featured on an early proposed or built auto brand?

     

    How early? Do you mean a state where no brand that was proposing to build or built vehicles in?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ #4 is correct; Schluderschmidt is a fictitious brand.

     

    Don't you just LOVE LOVE LOVE the brand name 'Skiddoodler'?? 

    I can't stop finding ways to work it into my around-house banter since learning it a week ago. 

    If their tagline wasn't "Scoot around in a Skiddoodler'… well, it's no wonder the brand didn't make it; marketing. Cause they had the name LOCKED DOWN. :D

     

    - - - - -

    Question #5 rephrase :: which of these state names was NOT a proposed car brand name.

    Hint; it's a trick question.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In the brake picture, I've been trying to glean as much info as I can.  I see what appears to be a sway bar and some sort of control arm.  I see what appears to be an oil pan, and it is either red, orange (if it is orange, it is probably a Chevrolet product) or iron oxide-colored.  I see a coil spring and a totally tubular shock absorber on a full-frame vehicle, along with an old bias-ply tire on the other side.  Final answer:  Buick or Pontiac finned drum.  The fins were for brake cooling to try to dissipate fade.  Since it is a five-lug, I am going with Buick, just because.  And from what I remember, Buicks were known for having good brake systems for the day, 50s-60s.

     

    Full disclosure:  I did google "Pontiac finned drum brake photo" and "Buick finned brake drum photo".  :AH-HA:  Not saying I'm correct, just got me intensely curious.

    Edited by ocnblu
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ocn : nice detective work, very thorough. You're way off tho. ;)

     

    Z : You are correct on #3. You missed the hint on #5 tho. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ocn : nice detective work, very thorough. You're way off tho. ;)

     

    Z : You are correct on #3. You missed the hint on #5 tho. 

    :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    DD- #5 is correct. Actually, my list was 12 auto brands named after states, and I'm positive there were more.

     

    - - - - -

    That just leaves Question #1….

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ooooooooo!

     

    No.

     

    Is such a thing a real thing?

     

    Yes, the regenerative braking system used by hybrids and plug-ins work on that principle.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    #1 - I googled enough to find the answer.  The term I googled for was "enclosed disk brake"... which is what it looked like to me.

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ausco_Lambert_disc_brake

     

    The Ausco-Lambert disc brake[1] is an unusual brake where an axially-expanding shoe assembly is sandwiched between two linked rotating discs. It may be thought of as an "inside out" disc brake: instead of pads pinching a disc, the pads expand inside a hollow disc.

     

    http://www.moparmax.com/columns/magnante/ix_3-7.html

     

    post-51-0-91536400-1427120553_thumb.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    b…b…but googling is CHEATING.

     

    ;)

     

    That is correct of course. The Ausco Lambert disc brake was standard equipment on the '50-54 Chrysler Imperials… on all four corners. They were optional on other series, also. These were the first disc brakes on a American production car.

    They mess with the 'car brain' because they obviously look like drum brakes.

    (I say 'obviously', tho I wonder if any here perhaps have never seen a drum brake in person…)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That is good work by DD and history by BL of the A-L brakes. Any reason why this design didn't continue and evolve?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Likely the option price ($400 on other Chryslers) played a factor when a brand new '54 Bel Air coupe was $2061
    Imagine a brake option today that cost $4500 (one-fifth the cost of $23,000 vehicle).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Yup. The Canadian Premiers and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (just before his resignation and our elections) decided to retaliate and target Red states because of tariffs and most importantly, the 51st state rhetoric. So...whiskey production and headquarters are mostly at Red States.  So off came the American booze from our Province owned and run liquor stores.   Jack Daniels CEO laughed at that as he said Ontario and Canadian liquor sales is but a mere 1 or 2 percent of Jack Daniels sales. Then he realized that his product is OFF the phoquing shelves and then he complained foul game play... But its definitely fine when his President declares annexation towards Canada...   Its OK for tariffs...  Maybe Jack Daniels might not be suffering too much, but the smaller Kentucky distilleries are in danger. Some are filing for bankruptcy. 9 billion dollar industry and one man has destroyed it.   Not too forget the tourism industry.   New York, Maine, Florida, Nevada and even California is feeling the pinch when Canadians decided to give Americans the middle finger.   Red States or even Blue...  When Trump STILL threatens annexation and most Americans are oblivious of that fact, never you mind empathy towards us Canadians...the middle finger and avoidance of anything American is a proper response from us Canadians. What is even sadder, American rights and freedoms are being stripped and yet not push back from American citizens.  THAT is just UNACCEPTABLE.   Fight for your rights people. Soon you wont have any.        Big Three CEOs and accountants keep begging Trump to ditch the tariffs. He wont ditch them.  He wants to control the Canadian steel and aluminium industry.  He cant and wont be able to.  For many reasons.  But he will destroy the American automotive industry waaaaaay before the US gets a smidgen of Canada's industry which will be a moot point at that juncture.  And Im afraid the damage is already done world wide.  Who in the phoque will buy GM, Ford or even Tesla EVs when the WORLD is hatin' on the US???!!! When the Chinese EV industry is already engulfing the planet with really affordable EVs...
    • @oldshurst442 You are so right about the auto industry. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/whitmer-told-trump-in-private-that-michigan-auto-jobs-depend-on-a-tariff-change-of-course/ar-AA1Kd8Y9?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=5ad67b9cbe604a80b8b7a0853d63f085&ei=75 Since Trump returned to the White House, Michigan has lost 7,500 manufacturing jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In this story, you have this, but it is only a matter of time: Detroit Axle, a family-run auto parts distributor, has been one of the more vocal companies in Michigan about the impact of the tariffs. The company initially announced it might have to shut down a warehouse and lay off more than 100 workers, but later said it would be able to keep the facility open, at least for now. The fact is Idiot47 seems to think he can issue a statement and the next day all those jobs will appear and all work just fine. Fact is even with saying manufacturing must be done here, it will take years to build the factories, line up supplies and start building the products. Nothing can just happen overnight, but Idiot47 does not understand that.
    • Guess in this case my news feed was right as I have not read the story yet, but saw about the proclamation to remove all U.S. booze and return it. Taking away a market from the U.S. companies, one would hope would get these idiot CEOs to wake up and stop supporting Idiot47.
    • Sorry to hear that. 58 is young.  Too young to pass away.  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search