Jump to content
Get the Cheers & Gears App! ×
Create New...

What would I be getting myself into?


Recommended Posts

So it looks like maybe a 4th car on the horizon as soon as this summer over here....

Short Listed to 1996-1999 DeVille or 1995-1999 Aurora...

I've got to ask, I've heard some things about the N* and Aurora V8 that cast doubt on durability. I know that they can sometimes burn alot of oil, but what else is your experience with these cars... Do you think that If I found a DeVille with like 70K Kms... that It would be wise to buy... or is the G-Body a better idea?

Another thing is the gas... Could I get away with 89 octane in these cars, or 87 Octane with an Octane/Quality Additive?

Also, if I was to get a K-Body Deville, or Aurora what things would I want a mechanic to check out before a purchase?

Edited by vonVeezelsnider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hijack :hijacked: your thread, but I'd be interested in hearing what people have to say about the Northstar V8 that came with in the 1993 Cadillac Allante...

That's okay, It's almost the same question :lol:

But, Afterall, you can hijack anything you want, right :admin: ...

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The oil burn issues were corrected by ~97 and my car simply drips oil, not burn it for an altogether different reason. If you were to look for an Aurora, I'd limit it to '97-'99. Those years have the best features as well as the most suspension and engine tweaks done thoughout the years. Avoid '95s if you can. Don't get me wrong, a '95 can treat you very well, but that year simply had the most problems of them all, one being a transmission solinoid issue. Plus, some of the preventative maintenance things can be tricky to scan because of they OBD-I/II hybrid system.

Over time, you'll learn to do some of the light maintenance things yourself and though a transverse layout, the Aurora 4.0 is rather simple for certain things.

I would personally choose an Aurora over a DeVille because of the ride quality, uniqueness, and the simple fact that some Cadillac parts cost more by very virtue of being a Cadillac. But don't let that dissuade you because I am an neo-radical Auroraphile. :D The DeVille Concours offers a very high-quality ride and rather sharp looks.

For fuel, I tried a few tanks of 87 once. I got poor mileage, weak acceleration, and by the time the car seemed to get 'used' to the lower octane, I decided it wasn't worth it for the performance tradeoff. Stick with 91/93. If you don't think that is a financial committment you want to do in the long run, then don't consider the cars. They really do get the most out of higher octane.

Inspection-wise, for the Aurora, check the transmission shift quality. Is it smooth? Is the fluid fresh? Check the engine temperature. Does it stay around 200-230 in hot conditions? If so, its fine. If it exceeds that, could be a not-good sign. Check the load-leveling suspension. Check the oil pan gasket for leaks. Other than that, just the basics - make sure everything works, etc. Oh, and despite what anyone tells you, the SES lamp is hardly ever 'just a bad O2 sensor don't worry doesn't need fixing.' Its likely a misfire if its blinking or a bad sensor under the hood if its steady. Most of the time its an easy fix, but get it scanned anyway for free at PepBoys or Advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Fly....

We're talking purely hypothetical here at this point... It'd be a weekend car and wouldn't put much mileage on it so I don't think Premium would be that bad of a financial commitment... The 2000+ DeVilles that were okay to run on Octane 87 appear to be more troublesome anyways... So I'll limit it to 1997-1999 DeVille/Aurora...

Did the mileage ever stabilize on 87 octane? What kind of economy drop did you experience with the Aurora on '87? I don't care as much about acceleration... Do you think I could get away with one Premium, then One Plus/Regular Tank or 2 Regular Tanks to a Premium (I'm half Scottish, and I can pinch a mean penny) It's not about the money though... I could afford to fill it with premium the whole time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question.... If I purchased this car, should it be serviced through a good indie mechanic or the dealership, cost and service wise... I've been tempted with the Cavalier, but it's just the city car so it's not a big deal... I found this good mechanic that my Grandpa used to use and I've been itching to try him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be honest in saying I never really experimented much with fuel mixtures. My two 87 tanks averaged around 13mpg, down from an average of 19-20mpg. It just wasn't worth the twenty-cent disparity between 87 and 93 that we have down here. Most people with Auroras may have tried it once, but never stick with lower octanes. 91 or 93 all the way.

As far as maintenance, I've had much of the work done by my local Superior/Goodyear garage. Some things within the block are proprietary and some mechanics simply don't have some of the tools, but I haven't encountered this yet. Ask him first if he services Northstars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be honest in saying I never really experimented much with fuel mixtures. My two 87 tanks averaged around 13mpg, down from an average of 19-20mpg. It just wasn't worth the twenty-cent disparity between 87 and 93 that we have down here. Most people with Auroras may have tried it once, but never stick with lower octanes. 91 or 93 all the way.

As far as maintenance, I've had much of the work done by my local Superior/Goodyear garage. Some things within the block are proprietary and some mechanics simply don't have some of the tools, but I haven't encountered this yet. Ask him first if he services Northstars.

Ouch!

15c. per liter isn't worth that, premium it is. I'll ask when I have him look @ the timing chain on the Cavalier...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make sure the previous owner did not use regular oil in the motor. (as was the case with my 97 STS) <_<

It calls for Mobil-1, it has to be SYNTHETIC, never ever swithc back. Had I known that I would have not

bought my 97 STS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ I know so many people who got screwed (or screwed themselves) by buing a car which was switched over to full synthetic and then at a later change had normal oil put in it. Synthetic is great stuff but if you go back to normal oil afterward all your seals in the engine are shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 31 Guests (See full list)

  • The Jeep Gladitator gets a gentle refresh for 2024

    Jeep is understandably reluctant to mess with success, and the Jeep Gladiator has been one of the brand's greatest success stories in the last decade.  So when it came time to give the Gladiator a nip-tuck, Jeep went in with the gentlest of hands. The biggest visual update is a refresh of Jeep's iconic 7-slot grille, windshield-integrated trail-ready stealth antenna, and seven all-new wheel designs. Inside is a redefined interior with more technology and amenities, including available 12-wa

    Jeep

    GMC Upsizes the Acadia for 2024; New 2.5L Turbo-4

    GMC caused a stir in 2016 when it downsized the Acadia in 2017 from its previous near-Yukon length. That downsize brought the Acadia down to be inline in size with the contemporary Jeep Grand Cherokee.  In the years since, the Grand Cherokee has grown and GMC is matching that with the 2024 GMC Acadia. Inches matter in this class and in that the Acadia gains (back) 10.6 inches in length and 3.2 inches in height. That equates to 80% more space behind the third row and 36% more space behind th

    GMC

    Cadillac Refreshes the CT5 with an Updated Look for 2025

    Today at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Cadillac unveiled the refreshed Cadillac CT5 sedan.  CT5 retail sales have been on an upswing of late, increasing over 35%.  In a time when sedan sales are stagnating or disappearing entirely, Cadillac's positive numbers have given hope that the luxury sedan market isn't quite dead yet. The refresh of the CT5 begins with the exterior. A new larger, bolder grille is flanked by new vertically stacked headlamps and Cadillac's sign

    Cadillac


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we notice you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search