Jump to content
Create New...

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/08/2020 in Posts

  1. This reminds me; anyone seen the tow rating for the C8 ? ~
    2 points
  2. Im with Balthy on this. No need to do 442 nomenclature. For several reasons too, not JUST what Balthy said. What he said is but 3 reasons. 1. First and foremost. Oldsmobile is no longer a brand. A 442 is NOT a Chevy, nor a Buick. I would NEVER want a Cutlass/442 branded any other way other than Oldsmobile...so... 2. Just not necessary. No marketing gain, especially when many folks dont remember what a 442 is, at best. And at worst...dont know ANYTHING about it. 3. I dont mind your definition of an electric 442. Im not going to be that fussy about it not being a 4 barrel carburetor, 4 speed manual trans and dual exhaust on a big cubed V8 because Oldsmobile themselves did one on the Quad 4 of it being 4 cylinder, 4 valves/cylinder, dual camshafts. About that...although it was a quick car in comparison to what was offered in the late 1980s early 1990s, and compared to what a muscle car 442 was in the 1960s and early 1970s, and that Quad 4 Calais 442 was probably a better 442 than the G-Body 442 was... Both G-Body and Quad 4 442s lacked the menacing presence of the originals. Like Balthy said. Enough is enough. Let the 442 rest in peace. Now...I would take a Cutlass body shell and I would marry it to a Tesla...or better yet...GM EV skateboard platform complete with batteries and motors and create my own 442. THAT is what I would do if I was trying to restore a far too gone Cutlass barnyard find. with no engine and the like. But for GM...let Cadillac and Chevy create new legends.
    1 point
  3. It's just not necessary, and I fail to see what marketing gain there would be. It's especially egregious given the '4' in '442' specifically meant a specific internal combustion V8. 442 has seen more than 1 revival; all paling against the original. Perhaps 'enough is enough' there.
    1 point
  4. I see you're still maintaining the 15-year time buffer in your infrequent pics, Bill. A+ for consistency. - - - - - Nice SS. Customer of mine has a '70 Malibu coupe done up as a SS, tho it retains the Malibu beltline trim. Crate 350/4-spd. Says he wants to sell it this year, so I'll give him a hand with that/there'll be some pics.
    1 point
  5. Nope, he sold it. I am sure he regrets it. He still has two Chevelles though, a '68 Ivy Gold Malibu coupe originally a 307/PG car, and a '66 Malibu coupe, which he's showing signs of re-doing.
    1 point
  6. Me standing next to my brother's numbers matching 1970 SS 454, about 15 years ago. I still have that coat.
    1 point
  7. If only the Bolt had thicker seats and a different dash...
    1 point
  8. Ocnblu, upon hearing that cars would soon no longer have wood spoke wheels ~
    1 point
  9. This is a factory hood ornament, and you all know the brand. What original car is this?
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search