Intrepidation

Driver's footwell does look kinda narrow.

Um...what side exhuast? This is a Viper.

Hmm.... Nope, I like the new one a lot better. It looks like an evolution of the second gen GC, which was my favorite until now.

I wonder what moltar will think of it?

Won't ague that it's similar, although I think it looks better on the GC. However the only thing that made the Trailhawk's greenhouse stand out was the really wide C-Pillar and the really thin windows. Oh and no B-PILLARZ Plus IMO the whole design was kind of overwrought.

Also, I'll get it out of the way now....since we've already started...it looks like Car A, B C, D, F, H, J, L, M, N, O, Q, R, S, S again, W, X and I see a little Z in there.

I only see "Journey" in the blacked out side glass...I like it. It looks sleeker and visually elongates it. It has much better detailing and a much more muscular look.

I'm going to agree with you. It certainly doesn't look worse than this. Hell this looks more ricey.

Wait...I found one!

What he said.

Oh please, we've all seen way worse than this. At least this work appears to be limited to the front end. And too teh dude, no it doesn't not look like a Viper. I feel insulted for the Viper.

I think the exterior is very nicely done. Lots of attention to detail and how lines flow and interact with each other. It's a much more refined package than any before it. The interior...builds on the design them of the current one but with better integration and it actually looks nice...not cheap.

Please, do tell how it is impossible for Buick to be a stand alone brand with a full lineup, which if this scenario plays it is what would end up happening. Buick would get a full lineup and BPG would become Buick.

Despite always being a unibody vehicle, like many body-on-frame SUVs, the Jeep Grand Cherokee has been largely shown the door by a raft of new crossovers that have played to consumers looking for improved on-road performance. Oh, back when the current WK model was new for 2005, then-DaimlerChrysler made a splash with a new double-wishbone suspension that was better able to soak up tarmac imperfections, but some hardcore brand loyalists felt betrayed because the improved ride came at the expense of axle articulation. Not wanting to risk offending brand acolytes with their new 2011 model, Jeep faced a pair of seemingly divergent goals: Improve off-road ability while making the vehicle more attractive to a wider, street-oriented mainstream audience. In other words, as Chrysler's vice-president of design Ralph Gilles put it to us, Jeep's mission was to "put the 'Grand' back in Grand Cherokee." Let's get this out of the way right now: Both domestic and global auto markets have evolved greatly from the late-Nineties salad days when Jeep once managed to shift 300,000 Grand Cherokees. And while last year the GC sold under a third of that total, it remains a linchpin in the company's operation, particularly as the larger three-row Commander model is not scheduled to receive a replacement. The company's fortunes are incredibly shaky right now, but if it is to survive in any form, products like the GC will still need to be able to shoulder a heavy burden. Does the GC have the muscles for the job? Follow the jump to find out. Jeep's solution to its two-audience conundrum is the model you see before you, and while it shares lots of familiar cues, in the metal it looks at once far more aggressive than the exiting lantern-eyed WK, and ultimately more crossover-like. While it retains iconography like the seven-slot grille, the new headlamps have a meaner look thanks to a furrowed-brow appearance granted by the new hood. Perhaps the most dramatic departure is the profile view, where a new CUV-like tapering greenhouse takes up residence above a dramatically scalloped bodyside graphic. According to Gilles, the door panel indent is so pronounced that the company says they were "one step away from needing a compound hinge" to pull it off. If that profile looks longer to you, that's because it is – the wheelbase has swelled by four-inches, with that extra space dedicated completely to rear-seat passengers (+ three inches) and cargo room (+ one inch). The rear end is all-new as well, with a cleaner license plate surround and more horizontally oriented tail-lamps that emphasize the Grand Cherokee's wider width. Loyalists take note: Your pass-through rear glass has been retained. So, this new model has a longer wheelbase and a more refined, crossover-like aesthetic. How exactly is that going to appeal to the mudpluggers in the audience? Well, Jeep has added a bounty of new off-road minded technology, in addition to new powertrains and a stiffened structure. Starting with the engine choices, the volume model is expected to be the company's new flex-fuel "Phoenix" V6. The variable-valve timing equipped 3.6-liter engine nets 280 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm – a substantial 33% bump in horsepower and an 11% boost in torque over the departing V6. Backed by a carryover five-speed automatic, it is also a more efficient powertrain, with a claimed 11% increase in fuel economy. This new six-cylinder is scheduled to appear in many more products, potentially showing up in seven or eight different applications. Jeep officials expect the V6 to account for more than 50 percent of Grand Cherokee sales, a big switch over the WK GC, which skews more than 75 percent in favor of the V8. Speaking of which, the 5.7-liter HEMI V8 has also been worked on, and it now generates 360 hp and 390 lb/ft of torque. Sizable efficiency gains are also expected, as the variable-valve timed engine will also use the company's cylinder deactivation technology (Multi-Displacement System) more often than in previous incarnations, and the gearbox picks up a sixth cog, as well. Regardless of which engine is selected, total range ought to improve, with Jeep quoting over 500 miles for the V6 thanks to the 24.6-gallon fuel tank (four gallons larger than before). All of that power is nothing without added control, and to that end, Jeep has taken pains to greatly improve torsional stiffness in the chassis, something that both everyday commuters and off-roaders will appreciate. The new structure (based heavily on the Mercedes-Benz ML) has upwards of 5,400 welds, including 53% more spot welds and 42% more arc welds. There's also a further 38% increase in structural adhesive use. The net-net is a chassis that's 146% stiffer – one that Jeep says bests the Toyota Highlander and BMW X5 for rigidity and allows for a maximum tow rating of 7,400 pounds. So... what about that off-road hardware we talked about? During our private walkaround at Chrysler's Auburn Hills headquarters, Scott Kunselman, vice president of Chrysler's Jeep and truck product team was clearly excited to tell us about all of the new off-road gubbins that the company has managed to pack into this new model. While lower-end models make do with a standard steel springs, there is an all-new Quadra Lift air suspension option that allows the driver to dial up ground clearance of up to 11.1 inches to crawl over boulders and downed tree branches. It's exactly the sort of equipment that helps increase the GC's breakover angle despite having a longer wheelbase (a full complement of skid plates is optional). That air suspension can also be lowered to parking height for easier ingress and egress, and if it's anything like Land Rover's air suspension setup, it figures to offer a more accommodating ride in the bargain. Another bit of tech that reminds us of those boys from Solihull is Jeep's new Selec-Terrain system, a rotary controller that comes with models spec'd out with the top-shelf Quadra-Drive II 4x4 system. Selec-Terrain enables users to gird the vehicle's various systems (electronic limited-slip differential, traction control, stability control, two-speed hill-descent control, anti-lock, and so on) for various ground conditions, including Sand/Mud, Snow and Rocks. There is also a default automatic setting, and unlike the blokes at Land Rover, there is also a Sport mode that lowers ride height and allows for a bit more hooliganism before the electronic nannies kick in. Predictably, there are more available creature comforts than ever before, including a much-improved interior with additional space, richer materials, tighter panel gaps, and more available toys. Some of the optional niceties include a mammoth twin-panel panoramic roof, an intelligent remote start (which automatically heats or cools the interior based on outside air temp), a collision warning system, adaptive cruise control, and a blind-spot/rear cross path detection system. On the surface, at least, it looks like Jeep has managed an unlikely feat at the most crucial of junctures – it has seemingly imbued the Grand Cherokee with the credentials necessary to simultaneously court a wider roadgoing audience while giving it the goods to finish the job off road. That Chrysler has given this vehicle a 2011 model year designation while others are still introducing their 2010 lineup is not an error – the embattled automaker needs all the hits it can get right now as it seeks further government relief and help from Fiat. Wheeling out the GC well in advance of its debut in showrooms should only help the company build its case for eventual viability... and that thankless task will clearly be the 2011 Grand Cherokee's biggest obstacle to overcome. Autoblog

This must be a trick question BMW all the way. More luxuy, more features, RWD, superb chassis, and if there was every a timeless BMW this is it.

I'm pretty sure killing off and consolidating dealers will be part of the bankruptcy. On top of that if Buick gets a completely lineup the BPG will just have to become Buick dealers. Also, either way GM will have to come up with new models. Having 3 brands with clear goals makes it easier to design models that don't overlap and are focused. I'm also pretty sure market share is the last thing on their mind. Becoming right size and being able to keep supply in check with demand, and being profitable is much more important than whoring out the most cars that compete with each other to Avis lots. So what should GM do? Keep all of its brands and just continue down the path to oblivion? I think not...not if we want to see any of the company survive.

Sad to say, but assuming Buick gets a full lineup, that makes the most sense and is the easiest to actually do right.

RWD is no issue at all in the winter. G8 all the way!

I see no point in letting Buick just live in China, when it would costr so much to shut it down here and then "reopen it". On top of that, why shut it down when the LaCrosse is only months away? Assuming GM lives that long of course. The LaCrosse looks to finally be the class leading car we were promised over and over.

:useless:

Cobalts drive very well, they are comfortable quiet, and very stable even at triple digit speed. It has more usable space, looks 100x better, and isn't an overall pile of crap. I lived with one for 2 months remember.

I would think that Buick is safest since it is important and profitable in China, which as I recall, is the second largest market. Neither GMC nor Pontiac exist outside of North America. Also, for the most part you can find their products at the Chevy dealership...and the only ones you can't, the Solstice G8 could be moved or discontinued. Of course in an ideal world BPG would actually be one brand made of three divisions. GMC for trucks and SUV/CUVs, Pontiac for a coupel performance cars (G8, Solstice), and Buick for premium cars and one CUV. However that requires money to invest to get the lineups right and advertise...something GM has none of. We could very well end up seeing only Chevrolet and Cadillac, if GM manages to even survive.

REPORT: General Motors in "intense" bankruptcy preparations Unnamed sources are reporting that GM "is in 'intense' and 'earnest' preparations for a possible bankruptcy filing." Follow the jump for more details. http://www.cheersandgears.com/index.php?showtopic=29912

According to an unnamed source speaking with Reuters, General Motors "is in 'intense' and 'earnest' preparations for a possible bankruptcy filing." The report states that GM could be split into two separate entities; one "new" unit consisting of the General's successful brands (read: Chevrolet and Cadillac) and an "old" unit made up of its less-profitable endeavors (Hummer, Saab, Pontiac and Saturn). If the plan is enacted, the all-new GM would assume some of the debt from the bankruptcy (primarily, unsecured debt) and that GM's bondholders would lose a substantial amount of value if the Chapter 11 filings go through. Naturally, neither source wished to be named, so this is all conjecture at this point, but if GM does declare CH11 within the next month-and-half, expect the Feds to step in to avoid the cataclysmic effect on both suppliers and the economy as a whole. Autoblog