Cory Wolfe

It looks decent from the rear, but from the front with the grill being silver... just ruins it for me.

Agreed.

Wow, that is one of the worst interiors I've seen out of a new vehicle. Just horrible. Those gauges...*shakes head* Chrysler seems to be moving backwards, not forward.

Nice. I would have done something different with the ground effects, however. That silver is a bit bright and I always prefered the monotone look anyways. Sweet though.

It's an improvement, for sure. What I still don't understand is why they couldn't have done something with the headlights. It couldn't have cost that much extra as they already changed the hood and bumper cover. Why not the headlights since they are, undoubtedly, ugly and do not flow with the design at all.

Astra, et. all > Focus.

I've never heard of Wawa before... but Sheetz are a deadly infection around here. Dubois, alone, has 4.

NBC/MSNBC.

Happy birthday, Sir.

It's a fun show. I want to be a part of it.. You know, since I could pass for 14 and all.

Hah. Local ad I saw:

Similar body shape, similar greenhouse shape, similar beltline, nearly identical headlight shape. If it weren't for the Cutlass' ribbed cladding versus the Sunbird's flared cladding (ironic) and the black molding of the Subird, they would look even more alike. Agreed about the original M45, though.

They're both very monotone, so you can't use that excuse. As for looking less cluttered, I'll give you that the center stack is, but overall the new one is moreso. Just look at all those extra dash cut lines! Not to mention that the center stack also looks like it fits, unlike the new one.

Am I the only one who thinks the mirror controls are in an odd spot? Anyways, other than that, the goofy looking rear, the huge wheel well gaps, the mismatched front fascia and the cheap center stack... It's looks to be a good car.

If a Cutlass comes along, this shall be fun.

:AH-HA_wink:

Admittedly, yes... but I mentioned another vehicle as well, which, ironically, looks like a baby Cutlass. You can't deny that.

My first Z06 while killing myself on a bike. It has quite the presence, I must say.

Like non-auto enthusiasts notice, which, was your point.

Err... Are you sure you're not blind? There are clearly differences between the grills of the M and G. If anything, the previous CTS, STS, and SRX's grills are more identical. The new CTS and STS grills pretty much are as well.

Take a look at the fronts of most any brand of the same vintage. You'll find the same damn thing. It's called a family resemblence. Most brands have one. Hell, most cars from the '70s, '80s and early '90s look a like regardless of brand. Your old Cutlass Supreme could easily be mistaken for a Grand Prix or even a Sunbird by the aforementioned "mother test". My mom does it on a regular basis.

From what was shown of the new Mazda6, it will easily be the best looking midsizer, which, certainly warrants more than what you were willing to give it credit for. Also, any self respecting auto enthusiast could tell which was the M and the G... With their eyes closed. Similar design theme or not, its easy to see the differences. As for the greenhouse, again, there is absolutely NOTHING similar between it and a Saab. I'm beginning to think that you're delusional.

I'm thinking your biased ass might. The only thing I nearly come to agreement with are the comments about the interior. That Saab comment was just silly... There is nothing remotely similar about it and any Saab. And if one can't tell the difference between an M and a G, I pull the blindness card. Personally, I wasn't much of a fan of the M, but these slight changes improve upon its looks greatly. I especially like the view from the rear now.