Jump to content
Create New...

Drew Dowdell

Editor-in-Chief
  • Posts

    55,845
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    523

Everything posted by Drew Dowdell

  1. The advantage Tesla has is they can send a software update to the cars to fix the brake issue. Honda or DeLorean can't do that.
  2. Indeed.... the key is that an HCCI engine cannot run in that mode all the time. It only runs in HCCI mode under light loads... put too much fuel/air mixture into the cylinder and then things don't work right. The big issue GM was having when it was working on it back in the Saturn days was the transition from HCCI to normal spark ignition. The engine worked fine in either mode, but it was the switching of modes that was less than graceful. Even then, I think that Aura would only run in HCCI at stead speed from 35 - 55 mph, but don't quote me on that.
  3. Do you know how many curse words I invent when I have to do an oil change on my CR-V? It is an utter mess with oil dripping on everything. It gets on the CV joint, it gets on the lower control arm, it gets on the exhaust, it gets on me. the Amateur you're talking about is Honda right? I mean, only a newbie would design an oil filter mount in a spot where any (and I do mean any) leak would drip right onto the exhaust manifold output. For added benefit, it also manages to leak onto the CV boot while you're doing an oil change. Ask me how I know. It was to lube up your.. CV boot... Every X thousand miles you get 1/4 of your suspension lubed up. It's actually a great idea. lol No I think he may have been talking about Porsche's being amateurs.. They don't even know how to build an ICE without the car burning to a crips! I don't know which has been around longer regenerative braking or the internal combustion engine but one of them has been around a long time. Porsche should never sell cars again if they can't build 1 measly engine without it burning to the ground.. "amateurs building cars" ... (the puke guy is just funny to me) The puke guy is the reason we had to enforce a limit on the number of emoticons in a single post a few years back. Imagine dozens and dozens of puke guys on your screen all puking in unison.
  4. Those are on the book profits. Being able to sell 90k Regals in China means being able to sell 30k Regals in the US and 75k Insignias in the EU. It gives the auto makers volume they otherwise wouldn't have. Buick in particular.
  5. the Amateur you're talking about is Honda right? I mean, only a newbie would design an oil filter mount in a spot where any (and I do mean any) leak would drip right onto the exhaust manifold output. For added benefit, it also manages to leak onto the CV boot while you're doing an oil change. Ask me how I know.
  6. The very latest generation of Mazdas have fantastic FANTASTIC interiors. The CX-3 far far exceeds it's class and would put an Audi Q3 to shame. Easily best in class. I sat in the new CX-9 in LA and it is every bit as good as these press photos suggest. Drew, is that nav screen move up and down into the dash? Looks like it could. Don't know. I tweeted the Mazda PR guy to ask.
  7. And yet, you're still losing more in absolute dollars. Again, the XTS could devalue to ZERO and you would still lose less money than 2 years in an S-Class. Here is a 2013 S550 4matic with night vision and surround view. It was probably around $115k new and it is being offered for $62,995 used... which means the buyout was in the high to mid-$50k range. It's only got 22k miles and is certified, so it's a screaming deal against a brand new S-Class. But that also means that some combined group of people (buyer, dealer, MB Finance) ate about $57k in depreciation over 2 years.... will a 2 year old $57k CTS V6 with 22,000 miles be worth more than zero dollars you think?
  8. They don't feel slow because they pull hard. Off the line is fast.
  9. The very latest generation of Mazdas have fantastic FANTASTIC interiors. The CX-3 far far exceeds it's class and would put an Audi Q3 to shame. Easily best in class. I sat in the new CX-9 in LA and it is every bit as good as these press photos suggest.
  10. Does Mazda even want a V6 anymore though? If they are the most efficient lineup, like Drew said, then they're probably content with a family of 4's. They'd probably prefer to boost a 4 banger rather than throw in a heavier V6 because they put so much emphasis on driving dynamics. Afterthought: I completely forgot about the CX-9. To me, that would be the only application for a V6 in their lineup. Everything else can be done with an I4, boost or n/a. The CX-9 is getting a boosted 2.5 liter 4-cylinder with 250 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. No need for a Pentastar. Well, there ya go then! lol Also, How large is the CX-9? Is it Explorer side? or more like an Edge? It's a 3-row SUV, right? So I assume it's larger, more Explorer-like. Per their web site, CX-9 has a wheel base of 113.2" with an over all length of 200.6" then a width of 76.2" and height of 68" and ground clearance of 6" Ford Explorer has a wheel base of 112.8" and an over all length of 198.3" then a width of 78.9" and height of 71.0" and ground clearance of 7.8" That's the current one.
  11. Does this not come back to bite a company in the books when they have to take the hit or write off? I'm sure they still make a profit on the cars. But keeping the prices high gives the appearance of being expensive. SMK: "Oh, I just leased a new S-Class, it cost $118k"... Me:"Yeah, but you're only paying $1,500 a month for 24 months with $7k down on a car worth $55k when the lease is up, you didn't really pay for a $118k car".... SMK: "But I have an S-Class" ..... me: "Whatever makes you happy" In the luxury classes, things that are priced expensive are just profit centers, they don't usually cost the manufacturer anywhere near what they charge. The S-Class Sport Package is priced at $5,900... but there is no way it costs MB anywhere close to that for a different front plastic bumper and an upgrade from 19"s to 20"s.
  12. Does Mazda even want a V6 anymore though? If they are the most efficient lineup, like Drew said, then they're probably content with a family of 4's. They'd probably prefer to boost a 4 banger rather than throw in a heavier V6 because they put so much emphasis on driving dynamics. Afterthought: I completely forgot about the CX-9. To me, that would be the only application for a V6 in their lineup. Everything else can be done with an I4, boost or n/a. The CX-9 is getting a boosted 2.5 liter 4-cylinder with 250 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. No need for a Pentastar. Well, there ya go then! lol Also, How large is the CX-9? Is it Explorer side? or more like an Edge? It's a 3-row SUV, right? So I assume it's larger, more Explorer-like. Between Edge and Explorer in length, but narrower. Yes it's a 3-row, but I think the 3rd row is rather tight. The advantage of building the platform to only use 4-cylinder engines is that the engine cradle can be smaller and lighter. Making the decision early on to say "no V6 ever" allows them to save weight. They say that the platform itself dropped 287 lbs, but I don't know if that includes the switch from a 3.7 liter V6 to a Turbo-4 or not. If that weight loss is just in the structure, then total weight loss should be over 300lbs, putting it under 4,000 lbs in FWD form. That's a good bit of torque, and at a low RPM, for a CUV under 4k lbs. It should move along smartly.
  13. Not crappy, just not as much excitement as Detroit, NYC, or LA. But still one of the nicest facilities. I guess I have to burst your bubble on this next point. All of the auto shows in the US, even the big 4, are run by the dealership associations. That's why they feel like a new car dealer showroom. The only thing unique about the big 4 is their size and fact that new cars get the sheet pulled off them there. Once in a very rare while, a manufacturer will show something "new" at a show that isn't the big 4. Last year Chevy did the debut of the Colorado Trail Boss at the Cleveland Auto Show and Ram did a presentation (but not a debut) of the Ram Rebel.
  14. Buying an S-Class (but most lease anyway), you lose an entire E-Class in depreciation in the first two years. Even if a brand new Lincoln Continental had 100% depreciation in 2 years, you'd still lose less money. But that's why nearly all S-Classes are leased. MB eats the depreciation with relatively cheap leases compared to the price of the car. It's a back end subsidy that lets transaction prices look much higher.
  15. Does Mazda even want a V6 anymore though? If they are the most efficient lineup, like Drew said, then they're probably content with a family of 4's. They'd probably prefer to boost a 4 banger rather than throw in a heavier V6 because they put so much emphasis on driving dynamics. Afterthought: I completely forgot about the CX-9. To me, that would be the only application for a V6 in their lineup. Everything else can be done with an I4, boost or n/a. Why waste R&D dollars on a V6 wen you can go Hybrid for the CX-9 and use a turbo 4 plus a decent electric motor. Better yet, use their I4 N/A as a generator and go with a pure electric AWD power train. Make the CX-9 like the Volt. Pure EV for the first 80 miles and then generator driven. Interesting you mention this as we should see such a setup on the new Town and Country available in a few months. The thought on the 880 that Chrysler is touting about the T&C's intro is 8 passenger and either 80 MPGE or 80 miles on straight electric power. Also, the T&C is going to offer an AWD system with electric motors powering the rear wheels so it doesn't effect the stow and go seating. Oh, I think someone said something about them needing hybrids earlier too. Actually the more I think about it, with a turbo 4 family, a new high tech plug in hybrid system, and the available new rwd platform appearing in the Alfa, why do they need a partner again? They don't need a partner, they need to dump the vampire brands that are sucking blood out of the money makers.... but Sergio likes to keep the Vampires as pets.
  16. Okay, just to be clear, each event is brand specific. Buick is going to have the "extra" car that is currently unknown. It could be anything from just the new Verano which we've already seen in China to a Riviera concept. It is very unlikely to be the new Enclave, though it would be interesting to intro the Envision and Enclave together. But it is a Buick event, so no non-Buicks will be shown there. GMC is showing the Acadia. Cadillac isn't showing anything. I'm sure Chevy will be showing the Bolt, and I'm told Cruze Hatch is also going to be there. That doesn't leave enough time during the 20 minute Chevy press conference to be introing a ZL-1 or Zora or Z28. Those are cars that get a dedicated presser.
  17. Does Mazda even want a V6 anymore though? If they are the most efficient lineup, like Drew said, then they're probably content with a family of 4's. They'd probably prefer to boost a 4 banger rather than throw in a heavier V6 because they put so much emphasis on driving dynamics. Afterthought: I completely forgot about the CX-9. To me, that would be the only application for a V6 in their lineup. Everything else can be done with an I4, boost or n/a. The CX-9 is getting a boosted 2.5 liter 4-cylinder with 250 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. No need for a Pentastar.
  18. Bet they had to ride it hard to hit a mid eight 0-60, Plus some of the competition is a full sec faster to the same mark...... 8 speed in the 2.0 accounts for some manuf cost difference but it's still a bunch more even setting that aside. By early fall there should be a lot of leftover 2.0's on lots with healthy rebates. Am I talking to a wall here? The engine upgrades at other manufacturers are priced about the same or higher and the Malibu comes with some nice features standard that you need to pay more for at Hyundai, Honda, and Toyota. Malibu 2.0T = $28k, Sonata 2.0T = $28k, Accord V6 = $30k, Camry V6 = $32k, Mazda 6 = Not Available, Passat V6 = $36k, Ford SE 2.0T = $27k... The Malibu 2.0T is one of the least expensive engine upgrade options among its peers, so your continued ranting about the cost of the Malibu 2.0T just makes you look silly. And you want GM to price the 2.0T for the same price as the 1.5T just because they're both 4-cylinders? Do you not know how value added pricing works? Another thing you keep forgetting is that Car Play and Android Auto are both standard even in the most base model Malibu which means you effectively can have NAV without having to move up to much more expensive trims. That's a $700 to $2000 "give" from Chevy right there across the lineup. I've used Car Play, and it is superior to a built in NAV in just about every way possible. The maps are always up to date, it uses Siri's voice recognition engine, it gets traffic updates faster, it responds faster... there isn't a built in NAV system out there that can beat it. I assume that once I try Android Auto, which is compatible with Waze, that my feelings on that will be the same. So, yeah, I'd have no problem taking a Malibu 2.0T for $28k when the $28k options at nearly every other manufacturer come with less powerful engines and no NAV systems.
  19. If the Chinese stock market didn't have that circuit breaker to stop trading after a sudden 7% drop and the Chinese central bank hadn't put the equiv of $200 billion into the market the next day, we'd be having a very different conversation today.
  20. Well again... something like that, GM rents out a whole facility and throws a big party. They have rented out a big facility and are throwing a big party to show us Envision (which we've already seen) and highly likely another Buick concept or production car. If they had a big Camaro or Corvette announcement, they wouldn't be wasting the facility on the Envision. The last Z/28 came out in NYC. Chevy is going to be showing the Bolt and a Cruze Hatch most likely.
  21. I suspect the Zora may debut at Cobo. I kinda doubt it. Something like that would be a big event and Chevy has two other cars debuting. There's no way they'd fit something like the Zora into the 20 minutes they have allotted along with the two others. If they did it at an off-site, William and I would have gotten invites (like we did for Buick this year and last, and for Stingray)
  22. Is that $45k before or after the giant discounts on the S-Class?
  23. "under 9 seconds" could very well be a lot like the 8.7 seconds the old Malibu 2.4 would do. Which is fine for drivers in this class. If you want a bit faster, the Hybrid is actually faster than the base model by about a second.
  24. Looking like a cross between a Kia Soul and a Range Rover or Volvo XC90, Kia released a teaser for a surprise concept they will be showing next week at the Detroit Auto Show. This could signal Kia's return to the large SUV segment after the less than stellar sales of the 2009 - 2011 Kia Borrego. Kia says the concept will feature state of the art health and wellness technology and a new direction for Kia's design language. Little else has been released at this time. The Kia SUV concept will be officially unveiled at 2:15pm eastern time on January 11th. Stay tuned to CheersandGears.com for all of your 2016 Detroit Auto Show coverage View full article
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search