Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Ford Plans Downtime At 5 North America Plants

      To help cut down inventory on some of their models

    Ford will be temporarily shutting down production lines at five of their North American plants to help cut down on the inventory of slow-selling models.

    According to Automotive News, Ford will be shutting down both of their plants in Mexico. The Cuautitlan assembly plant, which is home to the Fiesta will be down for three weeks. Hermosillo which builds the Fusion and Lincoln MKZ will take a two-week break. In the U.S., Flat Rock (Mustang and Continental) and the Transit production line at Kansas City will also be down for two weeks. Michigan Assembly in Wayne will be down for just a week. It is unknown when the shut downs will begin.

    "We are continuing to match production with customer demand, as we always do, and we are on track for our dealer inventories to remain at planned levels by year-end," a Ford spokeswoman said in an email.

    At the start of this month, Ford had an 87-day supply of Fusions, 103-day supply of Transits, 111-day supply of Mustangs, and a 162-day supply of Continentals. Automakers try to shoot for a 65 to 70-day supply of vehicles.

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Reuters

    Edited by William Maley

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    “Planned downtime”. The words we are looking for here are “temporary layoffs”. 

     

    And 162 days for the Continental? Holy crap! That’s not good for a car that’s been out barely a year. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Totally makes sense, the auto's that many are not buying are in glut mode, so stop productions, sell through hoping to minimize rebates to maximize profits and then start back up once inventories fall.

    I have to questions if the 1,2 & 3 week shutdowns is enough though since the sales of those types of auto's are falling like a rock especially as we go into fall and with Winter. I would think getting to a 45-60 day inventory would be best.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, surreal1272 said:

    “Planned downtime”. The words we are looking for here are “temporary layoffs”. 

     

    And 162 days for the Continental? Holy crap! That’s not good for a car that’s been out barely a year. 

    That is not good at all....!

    Got to drive an Audi A5 at the last Autocross, one of the MINI Cooper guys had it out on coil overs and sticky tires.

    I am falling hard for European cars at the moment, although I still love American and Asian iron.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Being proactive in controlling supply is a good and bad thing.  

    It certainly can be a PR nightmare, but better to temporarily halt production of some of their models and suffer the slings and arrows.

    But, since i believe Ford is one of the most proactive manufacturers in a number of ways it makes me more confident in them.

    And it would be good to have context looking at some of the supply numbers.  For instance, although a 162 day supply of Continentals is probably not 'great' news, I wonder what the count is for some of its competitors?

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    162 days??? So there are 5 Continentals sitting on lots? 

    Selling one every 32.4 days is kinda scary for a CEO who signed off on a billion dollar investment. :P 

    10 hours ago, FAPTurbo said:

    if it's not moving, it should be called the lincoln constipation

    This Car needs an Enima! :o

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    That is not good at all....!

    Got to drive an Audi A5 at the last Autocross, one of the MINI Cooper guys had it out on coil overs and sticky tires.

    I am falling hard for European cars at the moment, although I still love American and Asian iron.

    I loved driving my brother's A5 (was an 11model).  Kind of wish I had bought it.  It was a blast to drive and was the first years they offered the Z 8 speed auto. 

     

    Welcome to the new reality of car sales. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    That is not good at all....!

    Got to drive an Audi A5 at the last Autocross, one of the MINI Cooper guys had it out on coil overs and sticky tires.

    I am falling hard for European cars at the moment, although I still love American and Asian iron.

    No question about the Audi's!  

    A client of mine bought an A4 and it is definitely a great little (not so little anymore actually) car.

    Of all the German makes, Audi's interiors are the best from an aesthetic and ergonomic standpoint too.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I expect more coming. Everyone hyped the hurricane was going to help folks get new/used cars, but I am pretty sure 100% had either basic coverage or none at all-so you are not going to see 100% replacements either. And Ford has been slumping for a while.....

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/21/2017 at 7:20 AM, lengnert said:

    Being proactive in controlling supply is a good and bad thing.  

    It certainly can be a PR nightmare, but better to temporarily halt production of some of their models and suffer the slings and arrows.

    But, since i believe Ford is one of the most proactive manufacturers in a number of ways it makes me more confident in them.

    And it would be good to have context looking at some of the supply numbers.  For instance, although a 162 day supply of Continentals is probably not 'great' news, I wonder what the count is for some of its competitors?

    I really really really really really really really really really dislike it when people blame GM and Ford for poor planning in terms of inventory.  They are the only two full like manufacturing companies for vehicles in the US.

    A huge thank you to lengnert for a very rational post.

    On 9/21/2017 at 12:58 PM, ccap41 said:

    FD7527CA-541E-4400-A983-117463814F4E.jpeg

    C58F5193-227A-4179-A6B9-AE5C82F6BE18.png

    The crusher will be very busy.

    On 9/20/2017 at 10:41 PM, FAPTurbo said:

    if it's not moving, it should be called the lincoln constipation

    On 9/20/2017 at 10:41 PM, FAPTurbo said:

    if it's not moving, it should be called the lincoln constipation

    Well, most of them are long, black and slow moving so there is at least a slight resemblance to the results of constipation.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/21/2017 at 9:58 AM, ccap41 said:

    FD7527CA-541E-4400-A983-117463814F4E.jpeg

    C58F5193-227A-4179-A6B9-AE5C82F6BE18.png

    Yes they are all totaled by insurance companies, but we do not know if they will all get replaced. Also, I wonder how many will end up back in the Title Ghost pool and end up out of state after being dried out as a low miles car sold to some unsuspecting person because of the title wash.

    Buyer beware!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    32 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yes they are all totaled by insurance companies, but we do not know if they will all get replaced. Also, I wonder how many will end up back in the Title Ghost pool and end up out of state after being dried out as a low miles car sold to some unsuspecting person because of the title wash.

    Buyer beware!

    Yeah, it worries me a bit. Was looking into a older Cruze (15-16) to run in our fleet while we save for a larger SUV (really don't want to lease one), and compacts used are pretty cheap right now. Would like a southern one (no rust), but I worry it could be a flood car....

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, daves87rs said:

    Yeah, it worries me a bit. Was looking into a older Cruze (15-16) to run in our fleet while we save for a larger SUV (really don't want to lease one), and compacts used are pretty cheap right now. Would like a southern one (no rust), but I worry it could be a flood car....

    Cruze is probably cheap enough to buy new with incentives.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/22/2017 at 11:48 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    Cruze is probably cheap enough to buy new with incentives.

    Kinda...new even with rebates are still 17-18k

    15-16 models can be had around 10k with some pretty low miles......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/25/2017 at 8:23 AM, A Horse With No Name said:

    That is impressive low cost for that car!

     

    That's what I thought....but no one really wants them around here...local dealership has a 16 Limited LT with 12k for like 11.5k.......

    Helps I like the old style Cruze too....:)

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/26/2017 at 1:39 PM, daves87rs said:

     

    That's what I thought....but no one really wants them around here...local dealership has a 16 Limited LT with 12k for like 11.5k.......

    Helps I like the old style Cruze too....:)

    It does help indeed....your older Chevy's are not going to run forever.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    It does help indeed....your older Chevy's are not going to run forever.

    Unless you want them too. :) Course maybe convert the powertrain to something a bit more fun too. :P 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • At 2.12 and 0.95 cu.ft for the Audi and Jag's frunk respectfully is a non-issue for the Lyriq not having a frunk. Maximizing the back trunk space as what the GM guys are saying for the Lyriq and the reason why they did it that way by-passing the need for a frunk sounds like marketing BS, until you realize that Audi and Jag's frunk space is nonexistent...   To which GM's words then kinda make sense as the Lyriq does in fact offer more room back there.   Frunk space is kinda expected though, for EVs, so there is that... Tesla Model X for a comparison as Tesla is the benchmark....   https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modelx/en_us/GUID-91E5877F-3CD2-4B3B-B2B8-B5DB4A6C0A05.html     Cargo Volume Table 1. 5-Seater Cargo Volumes Area Volume (liters) Volume (cubic ft) Front trunk 183 6.5 Behind first row, second row folded flat 2,410 85.1 Behind second row 1,050 37.1 Maximum total cargo volume with driver and front passenger 2,593 91.6 Maximum total cargo volume with 5 passengers 1,233 43.5 Table 2. 6-Seater Cargo Volumes Area Volume (liters) Volume (cubic ft) Front trunk 183 6.5 Behind first row, second row in max cargo position, third row folded flat 2,431 85.8 Behind second row, third row folded flat 935 33 Behind third row 425 15 Maximum total cargo volume with driver and front passenger 2,614 92.3 Maximum total cargo volume with 6 passengers 608 21.5 Table 3. 7-Seater Cargo Volumes Area Volume (liters) Volume (cubic ft) Front trunk 183 6.5 Behind first row, second row folded flat 2,314 81.7 Behind second row, third row folded flat 957 33.8 Behind third row 425 15 Maximum total cargo volume with driver and front passenger 2,497 88.2 Maximum total cargo volume with 7 passengers 608 21.5       The Lyriq's cargo space is plentiful and it would seem like an engineering choice to favour rear space over the use of a frunk.  Is it a sound engineering choice? Possibly yes as the powertrain bits need not be crammed.   Is it a sound MARKETING choice? Time will tell as many folk really dont understand engineering choices all to well...   Nor do they seem to care.  If they want a frunk, they WANT a phoquing frunk... 
    • Lyriq Chief Engineer, Jamie Brewer, recently explained to GM Authority that the team decided to prioritize rear cargo space over two separate cargo areas. Thus, the 2023 Cadillac Lyriq will have a larger traditional rear storage area. In fact, according to Brewer, that enables the Lyriq to boast the “largest cargo volume in its competitive set.” That made us wonder what, exactly, is the Lyriq’s competitive set. According to Cadillac spokesperson, Katie Minter, it consists of the Audi e-tron and Jaguar I-Pace. “Lyriq is aimed at customers that are looking for a luxury SUV with outstanding styling, ride and handling and seamlessly integrated technology. In this instance, we’re looking at vehicles such as the Audi e-tron and Jaguar I-Pace,” Minter told GM Authority in an emailed statement. So then, Lyriq has a maximum cargo volume of 60.8 cubic feet behind the first row seats and 28.0 cubic feet behind the second row. When compared to the Audi e-tron and the Jaguar I-Pace, the Lyriq does offer more space in the back. 2023 Cadillac Lyriq Cargo vs. e-tron I-Pace   Cadillac Lyriq Audi e-tron Jaguar I-Pace Rear cargo volume behind second row (cu. ft.) 28.0 28.5 25.3 Rear cargo volume behind first row (cu. ft.) 60.8 56.5 51.0 Frunk cargo volume (cu. ft.) N/A 2.12 0.95 Total front & rear cargo volume (cu. ft.)* 28.0 30.62 26.25 * With second row seats upright However, both the e-tron and the I-Pace feature frunks (2.12 cubic feet in the e-tron, 0.95 cubic feet in the I-Pace respectively), allowing the e-tron to have slightly more total cargo volume (combined frunk and rear cargo area). https://gmauthority.com/blog/2021/05/heres-why-the-2023-cadillac-lyriq-doesnt-have-a-frunk/  
    • That's probably a better worded way to put it. It's a missed opportunity.  They're all liquid cooled at this point and I can't imagine Ford and Tesla are having battery cooling issues, at least I haven't heard of any yet and I've watched a fair amount on the Mach-E and know somebody with a pair of Teslas in Nevada.  I don't believe lack of cooling has ever been a factor in an EV catching fire. It's always something shorting and sparking with poor connection(s) somewhere.  I'd also like to learn why. They have to have a good justification, I know they're not a bunch of idiots who "didn't think of it".  I just don't want the press release answer of "we needed the space for packaging". 
    • Hummer EV (and Silverado EV) are much bigger and truckular...so they have a lot more space underneath for the dirty bits.   The Lyriq isn't a high riding 4x4, so it has to use space for the electric motor(s), power brake system, HVAC, radiator, etc under the hood...
    • Ive read that the Lyriq has a 5 link suspension system front and back.  Maybe that suspension set-up limits the space for the Lyriq?
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bobo
      bobo
      (54 years old)
    2. loki
      loki
      (39 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We  Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...