Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Ford Spills the Beans On GT's Power Figures

      How much power is the upcoming Ford GT packing?


    Has it really been two years since Ford introduced the GT? *Looks at calendar* Yep, it has been two years. Since that time, we have been wondering about how much power the twin-turbo 3.5L EcoBoost V6 would produce. Ford has finally revealed the numbers earlier this morning.

    The 3.5L EcoBoost V6 will produce 647 horsepower and 550 pound-feet of torque. Ford hasn't revealed the 0-60 mph time, but does say the GT has a top speed of 216 mph - making the fastest production vehicle done by the blue oval. Dry weight (meaning no fluids) comes in at 3,054 lbs.

    Ford also published lap times of the GT against a Ferrari 458 Speciale and McLaren 675LT done at Calabogie Motorsports Park in Ontario, Canada during development. The times are as followed,

    • Ford GT: 2:09.8
    • McLaren 675LT: 2:10.8
    • Ferrari 458 Speciale: 2:12.9

    Source: Ford
    Press Release is on Page 2


    FORD GT DELIVERS HIGHEST TOP SPEED, FASTEST LAP TIMES ON THE TRACK OF ANY PRODUCTION FORD EVER

    • Assisted by fully active dynamic systems, all-new Ford GT achieves top speed of 216 mph – the highest ever for any Ford production vehicle
    • Strong power-to-weight ratio coupled with the most advanced active suspension system in the segment gives Ford GT the edge in lap times versus the competition
    • Fully active dynamic systems provide optimum downforce, drag and balance at any speed – making the car faster for drivers of all skill levels

    DEARBORN, Mich., Jan. 25, 2017 – Delivering the highest output of any EcoBoost® production engine to date, the all-new Ford GT couples its extraordinary power with impressive aerodynamic efficiency and advanced active dynamics to achieve a maximum speed of 216 mph – making it the fastest Ford production vehicle on the track ever.

    Capable of an exceptional top speed, Ford’s all-new supercar is designed and optimized for track performance to honor its racing heritage. In 2016 development testing, with all contenders track-prepped with new fluids, fresh tires and optimal suspension settings, in identical conditions and with the same driver behind the wheel, Ford GT bested both the McLaren 675LT and Ferrari 458 Speciale at Calabogie Motorsports Park in Canada.

    The numbers speak for themselves:

    • Ford GT: 2:09.8
    • McLaren 675LT: 2:10.8
    • Ferrari 458 Speciale: 2:12.9

    SAE-rated at 647 horsepower and with 550 lb.-ft. of torque, Ford’s new high-output 3.5-liter V6 powerplant produces the most horsepower of any EcoBoost production engine ever, making Ford GT the fastest production car ever to wear the Blue Oval badge. The engine’s wide powerband produces 90 percent of its peak torque from 3,500 rpm.

    “Our expectation has always been that the EcoBoost V6 would perform exceptionally well in the Ford GT – both in terms of power as well as aerodynamic efficiency,” said Dave Pericak, global director, Ford Performance. “We tested and developed this powertrain through the Daytona Prototype race car that ran in IMSA for two seasons, last season racing with Ford GT. We are extremely pleased with how it performs, both on the track and on the road.”

    Ford GT’s dry weight just tops 3,000 pounds, which places the supercar between its two primary competitors, the McLaren 675LT and Ferrari 488. Ford GT’s power-to-weight ratio is 4.72 pounds/horsepower.

    “The Ford GT is all about performance,” said Raj Nair, Ford executive vice president, global product development and chief technical officer. “We achieved considerable weight savings with the carbon fiber architecture. We then reinvested some of that savings into where it counts most – performance, specifically, the active dynamics. The result is an even faster car.”

    The active dynamics systems – for both suspension and aerodynamics – are designed to make the car perform with optimum downforce, drag and balance at any speed, creating a faster setup regardless of driver skill level.

    Ford GT, with no excuses to give, has proven itself time and again, racing to class wins at Le Mans and numerous other tracks in both IMSA and WEC last season. The production Ford GT shares a great deal with the high-performance track version, with advanced aero and suspension features added that take it to another level.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I love this quote, "Blame the GT's anti-lag. "We certainly could have gotten more fuel economy," Nair told R&T, "but we tuned it for horsepower and throttle response." In three of the GT's five drive modes, anti-lag programming kicks in, sending fuel through the engine even when the throttle's closed to keep the turbos spinning. "We completely looked at the performance metrics," Nair told us. "The fuel economy is what it is." "

    :unitedstates:

    Edited by ccap41
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Quote

    Ford also published lap times of the GT against a Ferrari 458 Speciale and McLaren 675LT done at Calabogie Motorsports Park in Ontario, Canada during development.

     

    TSK TSK TSK...

    Im sure Donald Trump will have something to say about that.

    Future testing will have to be performed on AMERICAN GROUND! On American road courses!

    Watkins Glen, Laguna Seca, Willow Springs, Lime Rock...what are those there for?

    Americans and American jobs...

    Im sure he will hit hard with words but will be willing to negotiate...he is a negotiator after all...

    20160807-022641_U1004_M182973_dabe.jpgit

    Watch out Bill, you arent American by blood...

    hqdefault.jpg

     

    THERE....THAT IS MORE LIKE IT!

    He dont like Saturday Night Live I heard....

    66th+Annual+Primetime+Emmy+Awards+TheWra

     

    This bastard is taking away from American jobs..I mean, an American could have invented SNL and those sketches could be satirizing Canadian Prime Ministers instead!

    Oh...back to the Ford GT....

    Yeah...awesome!

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    12 minutes ago, FordCosworth said:

    This beauty dry weight is at least 55lbs too heavy :(

    Agreed, buuuuut... It sounds worth it.

    " "But as we did the simulations and some of the testing with the mules, we thought it was worth reinvesting some of that [weight savings] into the active aero and the active suspension. We were faster by putting the systems in. So we felt it was worth reinvesting it into getting the lap times. We would have been right there on dry weight without that." "

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, dfelt said:

    In this car, I would expect nothing but Performance, MPG be damned! They better keep those Turbo's spooling so there is no delay. Nice Job Ford!

    Exactly! It's not like people buy these for a trip to the local Wal Mart or something...

    Still love the looks of this car....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not enough power.

    Too expensive.

    Too heavy.

    I'm sorry, but I don't see this car being the mega hit with the press. Within the next year, there are going to be cars six-figures cheaper that will deliver the same or better performance. 

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is the deal with this car. 

    It is not a mega exotic like the Veyron or La Ferrari. 

    It also is not a lower priced super car like the 458 and Mclaren. It is in  no mans land where it is too expensive to be classed where it should be and not powerful enough and expensive enough to play with the big names. 

    Next we have a Corvette coming that will sell for about 1/3 of the price and will be fitted with a V8 with more power. heck the present car as similar power now. 

    Hmm this is why they are only making a few hundred a year. The exclusivity is about all it really has going for it to expect that price. 

    I still think they should have used a V8 and priced this car to where the last GT was. Sell about 2000 a year and really have a lasting car that you could continue and build on. Also one someone may be more likely to see than a Veyron. 

    In the end it is still a Ford not a Ferrari or a Mclaren. 

    To be fair the media will swoon over it. Kits will put up free car show posters and odds are the BOP will be worked so they win the GTLM class this year for them. But most people with the mean will opt for the bigger exotic name.

    Lets face it. Is it more fun to be known as the guy with the Ferrari or Mclaren or the guy with the Ford?

    This is why Chevy will not go this route as while the Corvette name has a lot of equity it also is know to be a car that can deliver exotic performance, A car that can win Le Mans and a car that is still in the realm of ownership of a large number of people new and used.

    I like the GT but I just see a lot of limitations of benefit for Ford. I just think they got the package right on the last car. I saw one in the JW Gulf colors the other say and that is what it is all about. Heritage but yet in a modern car.  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love the car design, I wonder how long before someone builds a knock off fiberglass kit car for about $50,000. Buy a trashed Corvette, dump the body, spruce up the power-train and drop the fiber glass kit on and boom, Sleeper GT! :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, dfelt said:

    Love the car design, I wonder how long before someone builds a knock off fiberglass kit car for about $50,000. Buy a trashed Corvette, dump the body, spruce up the power-train and drop the fiber glass kit on and boom, Sleeper GT! :P

    It will be a old Fiero with a bad kit and a LT4.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    14 hours ago, hyperv6 said:

    Lets face it. Is it more fun to be known as the guy with the Ferrari or Mclaren or the guy with the Ford?

     

    WHAT YOU PEOPLE ARE ABOUT TO READ, THE RANT DOWN BELOW, WAS STARTED YESTERDAY.

    I NEVER FINISHED IT TO POST IT, BECAUSE I SAID...."PHOQUE IT! NOT WORTH MY TIME!"

    BUT BECAUSE SAUVE DONE HIS RANT, AND I APPLAUD HIM FOR IT, AND THROUGH THE MAGIC OF THIS SITE SAVING POSTS...HERE IS MINE!!!

     

    Well...in this picture

    Ford+GT.jpg

    Id rather the Blue Oval ..

    Mclarens are too stiff to have fun with. They take the speed business waaaay too serious. No passion. No sexiness. Blah! Dry like toast they are.

    The price tag is what makes people go oooooo and aaaaaa over it. Like Bentley cars....

    It aint the speed....because 1990 Japanese sports cars with Twin Turbo V6s could reach 1000 HP with ease and reliability and offer just as much handling prowess....and those Japanese tuned up sports cars have got that passion in spades...

    Sure the latest and greatest Mclaren has a few curves here and there, but they do nothing for me...

    So its the price tag that denotes that "I gotta have it"  feeling.

     

    Ferraris have forgotten how to be sexy. And they have just about sold out and whored out their branding to actually mean anything to me. To fake latte swilling imbeciles who only buy badges...Ferraris work....to connoisseurs like myself....Id rather a vintage Ferrari...

     

    This is where a Ford GT comes in....

    You did mention that a decade ago....those GTs were selling MSRP $150 000.

    In the auctions now...upward $500 000...in a decade...they rose up in value.

    Yes I know...

    Ecoboost V6 with only 640 some odd ponies where Ferraris and Mclarens make 750 or so and there is a Mclaren with Hybrid electric power...

    I understand that.

    But the Ford GT is a car with deep rooted history that embarrassed Ferrari, spanked Ferraris ass!

    At a time when American cars were huge land yachts with gobs of chrome...

    Muscle cars were laughed at because they couldnt turn...well...the Ford GT40 held a big middle finger to that and told Ferrari...and the rest of the world to PHOQUE OFF!!!

    The Corvette was not the one to do that, nor was it the Cobra Daytona, despite both the Vette and Daytona having racing success before the GT40 was even a sperm...

    And the races were not fixed then!

    OK.....so the race was rigged in Ford's favor last year!

    The Vettes a decade ago, when they were winning, laws were put into place to neuter them, the complete opposite...which to me says that at Lemans, and the peeps running Lemans, do like a Ford better than Chevy, telling me Ford has more weight than Chevy...and FERRARI!

    To boot, Duntov wanted a mid-engined Vette from the early 60s.

    GM/Chevy has had cold feet with that since the early 60s....

    Ford has had RUNAWAY success with that mid-engine GT40 brand since the 1960s...

    ALL OVER THE WORLD, PEEPS RESPECT the GT and the GT40...

    THAT IS WHY the previous generation just in a decades time is a sought after collector's car...and the peeps, they keep modifying it to stay relevant...

    Dubai

    34tephg.jpg

    maxresdefault.jpg

    Europe

    maxresdefault.jpg

    A Ford GT is not just a "Ford"

    A Ford GT is just as COVETED AS ANY SPORTS MACHINE AS ANY OTHER!

    This new one is an ecoboosted V6...

    People will find ways to mod it just like they did with the other one...

    Outside the United States of America of all things!

     

    I dont get this negativity at all!

    I was once one of those that HATED the idea of an ecoboost V6 under the hood, actually, I still wished it had the Voodoo under the hood with ONLY 500 some odd horses...

    This new Ford GT, hey....

    it looks a TON better than ANY McLaren, or MODERN Ferrari!

    LaFerrari is sex on wheels, it ought to be, its a Ferrari!

    The Ford GT has passion: the secrecy surrounding its existence is proof of that!

    Its sexy in a retro but very different approach and take to the original!

    Unlike the 2005 model which was a copy and paste and enlarge by 25% type deal! Which was AWESOME for 2005! This new GT exterior is EXCELLENT for 2017!

    There are some exotic technologies in this new one. Yeah, even the engine!

    The 2005 one was just a F-150 lightning truck engine! 

    Debbie Downers . Stop with the depressing shyte!

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    16 hours ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    Not enough power.

    Too expensive.

    Too heavy.

    I'm sorry, but I don't see this car being the mega hit with the press. Within the next year, there are going to be cars six-figures cheaper that will deliver the same or better performance. 

    Money isn't an issue on something like this as it's basically an investment. You won't lose money on it whereas one of its direct competitors is known to depreciate like a son of a bitch in McLarens.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @oldshurst442 I get the underlying premise of your post, and largely agree with it. That however doesn't justify this car's position in my mind. 

    Is the Ford GT a collectible car that enthusiasts the world over respect and put in the same league as Ferrari, Lambo, etc?? Absolutely. Is this car any more special and deserving of a higher price tag than a 458 Speciale, a 675 LT, or Huracan Performante? I find it hard to make a case for it.

    3 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    Money isn't an issue on something like this as it's basically an investment. You won't lose money on it whereas one of its direct competitors is known to depreciate like a son of a bitch in McLarens.

    Hahahahaha. :lol:

    I think you need to check Speciale and 675 LT values.... :AH-HA:

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 minutes ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    @oldshurst442 I get the underlying premise of your post, and largely agree with it. That however doesn't justify this car's position in my mind. 

    Is the Ford GT a collectible car that enthusiasts the world over respect and put in the same league as Ferrari, Lambo, etc?? Absolutely. Is this car any more special and deserving of a higher price tag than a 458 Speciale, a 675 LT, or Huracan Performante? I find it hard to make a case for it.

    Well.

    No regular civilian has driven it yet. No journalist.

    Like Suave said though...

    500 units more were added to the final tally because the MYSTIQUE of a Ford GT is DEFINITELY worth the price of admission.

    Now...I will find middle ground with you:

    IT BETTER HAVE SUBSTANCE or the mystique of a Ford GT will die with this model never to command another generation 10-20-30 years down the road. It will die like the Viper died!

    Something that Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, Corvette and even McLaren for a shorter amount of time than the others mentioned have done over the decades to  continue to have people flock to their cars decade after decade. Unlike the aforementioned Dodge Viper!

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    8 minutes ago, oldshurst442 said:

    Well.

    No regular civilian has driven it yet. No journalist.

    Like Suave said though...

    500 units more were added to the final tally because the MYSTIQUE of a Ford GT is DEFINITELY worth the price of admission.

    Now...I will find middle ground with you:

    IT BETTER HAVE SUBSTANCE or the mystique of a Ford GT will die with this model never to command another generation 10-20-30 years down the road. It will die like the Viper died!

    Something that Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, Corvette and even McLaren for a shorter amount of time than the others mentioned have done over the decades to  continue to have people flock to their cars decade after decade. Unlike the aforementioned Dodge Viper!

     

     

    This is true.

    And to clarify, for me it's not a matter of a potential cross-shopper not seeing the value relative to other supercars. Someone who wants one of these is going to buy it regardless.

    It's simply more an issue of "If others can do it, why can't you?" To me, this car needs to be objectively perfect, and subjectively stellar. A 400K car can't be just 'pretty good'. It needs to be likened to the other great modern supercars and be declared to be in the same league as other special models. It can't just be an Americanized 488 or 650S.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Frisky Dingo said:

    @oldshurst442 I get the underlying premise of your post, and largely agree with it. That however doesn't justify this car's position in my mind. 

    Is the Ford GT a collectible car that enthusiasts the world over respect and put in the same league as Ferrari, Lambo, etc?? Absolutely. Is this car any more special and deserving of a higher price tag than a 458 Speciale, a 675 LT, or Huracan Performante? I find it hard to make a case for it.

    Hahahahaha. :lol:

    I think you need to check Speciale and 675 LT values.... :AH-HA:

    McLaren's resale is dog$h!.. I know Ferrari's all tend to hold their value. 

    It doesn't take much shopping around to see the depreciation of Mclarens compared to any Ferrari or GTs.

    Also, because the 675LT is a stripped down/track-ier version of the 650S wouldn't the 650S be more a long the lines of a GT/488 competitor? Or are we comparing to the 675LT because of price?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    22 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    McLaren's resale is dog$h!.. I know Ferrari's all tend to hold their value. 

    It doesn't take much shopping around to see the depreciation of Mclarens compared to any Ferrari or GTs.

    Also, because the 675LT is a stripped down/track-ier version of the 650S wouldn't the 650S be more a long the lines of a GT/488 competitor? Or are we comparing to the 675LT because of price?

    Why on earth would you compare the GT to a standard 650S? :confused0071:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "standard" just means it has a full interior and doesn't have tacked on larger carbon fiber pieces extending off the front and rear of the car. Oh, and 25hp. The 675LT doesn't come with A/C standard either.

    Why does the GT have to be compared to the 675LT? It's an honest question.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    FYI has anyone noted the word going around GM bought back the Cerv 1 at Barrett Jackson last week for $1.3m. 

    This a great indication they may be preparing the launch of the C8 Zora. What better car to use to introduce the new car than the first mid engine Chevy Zora himself built and drove. I can see a intro and marketing program using the two cars together. Too bad the Cerv 2 is not for sale. 

    GM should have never let them get away in the first place. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The thing is Mclaren and Ferrari need to sell their supercars to earn a living, Ford doesn't need the GT, they built it around the legacy of the historic win in 1966, and this car truly will be limited.

     

    Mclaren has a whole family of vehicles so does Ferrari. But there is only one GT. 

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 minutes ago, Suaviloquent said:

    The thing is Mclaren and Ferrari need to sell their supercars to earn a living, Ford doesn't need the GT, they built it around the legacy of the historic win in 1966, and this car truly will be limited.

     

    Mclaren has a whole family of vehicles so does Ferrari. But there is only one GT. 

    So much for Ferrari heritage...

    http://ls1tech.com/articles/ferrari-308-ls-swap/

    308gt4TwinTurboLS-4-640x853.jpg

    http://www.lsxmag.com/news/swap-insanity-ferrari-360-gt-powered-by-1000-horsepower-ls-engine/

    dreamg2.jpg

     

    This is about the Ford GT...

    However, this also goes to show you how whoring out your brand does to the respect aspect...

    Like you said Suave, there is only 1 Ford GT...

    And with that being said, I change my mind about the Corvette being its own brand.

    It dont need to be its own brand...people respect it the way it is now...

    Screen-Shot-2012-07-17-at-1.43.57-PM.jpg

    So much so, that newer Porsches and Ferraris prefer the Vette's heart!

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    11 hours ago, oldshurst442 said:

    So much for Ferrari heritage...

    http://ls1tech.com/articles/ferrari-308-ls-swap/

    308gt4TwinTurboLS-4-640x853.jpg

    http://www.lsxmag.com/news/swap-insanity-ferrari-360-gt-powered-by-1000-horsepower-ls-engine/

    dreamg2.jpg

     

    This is about the Ford GT...

    However, this also goes to show you how whoring out your brand does to the respect aspect...

    Like you said Suave, there is only 1 Ford GT...

    And with that being said, I change my mind about the Corvette being its own brand.

    It dont need to be its own brand...people respect it the way it is now...

    Screen-Shot-2012-07-17-at-1.43.57-PM.jpg

    So much so, that newer Porsches and Ferraris prefer the Vette's heart!

     

    LS engine swaps in these auto's are very common in Washington. You have the RIch people buy these auto's till the engines blow and they get rid of them cheap and then others who love the body style but want an easy to work on and cheap to repair engine swap out for an LS. Jeep Wrangler owners do this all the time as do many others due to the ease of fitting a small block V8 into so many various cars, trucks, SUV's.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    23 hours ago, ccap41 said:

    "standard" just means it has a full interior and doesn't have tacked on larger carbon fiber pieces extending off the front and rear of the car. Oh, and 25hp. The 675LT doesn't come with A/C standard either.

    Why does the GT have to be compared to the 675LT? It's an honest question.

    Price.

    Power.

    Purpose.

    Production numbers.

    What else is there??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By David
      Since Ford Motor Company reported a complete Q4 / 2020 fiscal year report with a loss of $2.8 Billion but a doubling of R&D on EVs to $22 Billion from $11 Billion and a $7 Billion for EV Autonomous driving, the auto reporters are asking this very question: Is this a Shot across gm's bow or is it targeted more broadly across the whole industry as everyone wants to take sales away or greatly slow down Tesla.
      Tesla's valuation appears to be based on investors putting money with new technology seems to be driving changes of the future. 
      gm has now committed to moving into the technology camp with a solid date of when new ICE auto's will no longer be produced as the whole portfolio will change over to EV's. Ford also is now committing to this same strategy. This now makes one wonder about the rest of the auto industry.
      Stellantis CEO did an interview with Forbes that has put cold water on Peugeot coming to the US in the near term future as he wants to invest in the existing US name brands and grow their 12.7% market share. He also said that Stellantis has the manufacturing power and EV technology, but getting it into the hands of everyone is the concern at reasonable prices. Stellantis CEO says this is in the hands of the various global governments as he wants cleaner air and believes diesel the dirtiest of fuels will die off before regular petrol and where dictated by governments such as China and Europe will see a faster change over than other countries. Yet with the change in administration in the US, he says this could move the Stellantis brands to move into the full EV camp at a future date.
      Then we have small countries that have decided to make a major change in moving the country into EVs way sooner than other places and killing ICE sales like Thailand. This will allow local Thai startups to compete for the first time with international companies that also do not have anything in the market yet. 
      With a large range of battery plants coming online over the next 18 months, the move to EVs could happen at a pace that took decades for ICE in the early 1900's.
      So this brings this back to the original question, Is Fords Doubling commitment to EV's and moving ICE into the last generation like GM a shot across GM's bow or a shot at the whole industry to say, look at us, we are moving into a Technology driven auto company and our stock should be much higher like Tesla's.
      Currently gm is valued at just under $80 Billion, Ford is valued at $40 Billion, Tesla is valued at $807 Billion, Toyota is valued at $155.5 Billion, Stellantis is valued at $50.5 Billion, Daimler is valued at $71 Billion, BMW valued at $46 and VW is valued at $90.7 Billion and while there are plenty of other auto companies, one has to wonder what Ford is focused on with the drastic change and speeding up of moving to EVs as a complete global portfolio.
      Sound off and discuss how, what, where and when you think this will have it's big affect.
      Charged EVs | Is Ford’s increase in EV investment a shot across GM’s bow? - Charged EVs
      Stellantis CEO Reveals Peugeot U.S. Fate, Job Security, EV Conflict (forbes.com)
      Future Toyotas, Stellantis, batteries and EVs - the week | Automotive Industry Comment | just-auto (just-auto.com)
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club


      View full article
    • By William Maley
      We've been reporting on Ford's upcoming truck, the Maverick since 2018. The truck would sit underneath the Ranger and become the entry-level model for the brand. Now, we have gotten our best look at what it will look like.
      The Maverick Truck Club forum got its hand on an image showing a prototype Maverick on the line reportedly at Ford's Hermosillo, Mexico plant. Up front, the Maverick borrows some ideas from the Bronco Sport with C-shaped headlights and a horizontal bar splitting the grille. We don't know if Ford is planning to offer any cab configurations aside from the crew-cab seen in the photo.
      Ford did not immediately reply to comment on this when reached out by Roadshow. 
      The Maverick is expected to use the C2 architecture which underpins the new Escape and Bronco Sport. Autoblog speculates there could be two rear suspension setups based on spy shots that show a mule with twist-beam style setup with no rear differential for the front-wheel driver version. A slightly beefier setup might be used for the all-wheel drive version.
      Right now, everyone seems to think that the Maverick could debut as a 2022 model year vehicle.  
      Source: Maverick Truck Club, Roadshow, Autoblog
      Pic Credit: Maverick Truck Club

    • By William Maley
      Jim Hackett's tenure as Ford CEO will be coming to a close on October 1st as he will retire from the position. His replacement is Jim Farley, currently Ford's Chief Operating Officer, a role he took on at the beginning of this year. In a press release, Ford said the two will be working together over the next two months on the transition. Hackett will stay on as "special advisor" for some time after.
      “I am very grateful to Jim Hackett for all he has done to modernize Ford and prepare us to compete and win in the future. Our new product vision – led by the Mustang Mach-E, new F-150 and Bronco family – is taking shape. We now have compelling plans for electric and autonomous vehicles, as well as full vehicle connectivity. And we are becoming much more nimble, which was apparent when we quickly mobilized to make life-saving equipment at the outset of the pandemic,” said Ford executive chairman, Bill Ford.
      Hackett became Ford's CEO in 2017 after the ousting of then CEO Mark Fields. His short tenure brought forth some major and controversial decisions such as Ford killing off most of their passenger car nameplates to focus on trucks and utility vehicles; spending $11 billion in electric vehicles by 2022, and the introductions of the Mach-E, 2021 F-150, and Bronco. He has also dealt with a lot frustration from various groups as The Detroit News outlines,
      Hackett admitted that his tenure did cause a fair amount of friction, but said his efforts are starting to show.
      "I aimed for moving ahead versus just moving fast. Could we aim for a longer-arc kind of reward. In this case, for the three years it takes to get products to market, you're starting to see the fruits of our labor."
      Farley, who has been with Ford since 2007, knows he has a tough road ahead. Aside from realizing the various paths laid out by Hackett, he also has to deal with the issues of the COVID-19 pandemic and hopefully launch two of Ford's key product without any issues.
      Source: Ford
      Press Release is on Page 2


      FORD ANNOUNCES JIM HACKETT TO RETIRE AS PRESIDENT AND CEO; JIM FARLEY TO SUCCEED HACKETT AS COMPANY CONTINUES TRANSFORMATION
      Jim Hackett, who has led Ford Motor Company’s transformation since 2017 as president and CEO, has elected to retire from the company Jim Farley, currently chief operating officer, becomes president and CEO of Ford effective Oct. 1. He was also elected to the Ford board of directors. He will work closely with Jim Hackett on the transition over the next two months Seamless CEO transition underscores strength of Ford’s leadership team, succession planning, and company progress over the past three years, Executive Chairman Bill Ford says DEARBORN, Mich., Aug. 4, 2020 – Ford Motor Company today announced that Jim Hackett, who has led the company’s transformation since 2017, plans to retire from the company. Jim Farley has been named the company’s new president and CEO and will join the board of directors, effective Oct. 1.
      Hackett, 65, and Farley, 58, will work together on a smooth leadership transition over the next two months.
      Under Hackett, Ford moved aggressively into the new era of smart vehicles and drove a deeper focus on customers’ wants and needs. At the same time, Ford improved the fitness of the base business – restructuring operations, invigorating the product portfolio and reducing bureaucracy.
      “I am very grateful to Jim Hackett for all he has done to modernize Ford and prepare us to compete and win in the future,” said Bill Ford, Ford’s executive chairman. “Our new product vision – led by the Mustang Mach-E, new F-150 and Bronco family – is taking shape. We now have compelling plans for electric and autonomous vehicles, as well as full vehicle connectivity. And we are becoming much more nimble, which was apparent when we quickly mobilized to make life-saving equipment at the outset of the pandemic.”
      Farley, an automotive leader with deep global experience and a successful track record, collaborated with Hackett over the past three years to develop and execute Ford’s Creating Tomorrow Together plan to transform Ford into a higher-growth, higher-margin business.
      “Jim Farley matches an innate feel for cars and customers with great instincts for the future and the new technologies that are changing our industry,” Bill Ford said. “Jim’s passion for great vehicles and his intense drive for results are well known, and I have also seen him develop into a transformational leader with the determination and foresight to help Ford thrive into the future.”
      Farley joined Ford in 2007 as global head of Marketing and Sales and went on to lead Lincoln, Ford South America, Ford of Europe and all Ford global markets in successive roles. In April 2019, Farley was chosen to lead Ford’s New Businesses, Technology & Strategy team, helping the company determine how to capitalize on powerful forces reshaping the industry – such as software platforms, connectivity, AI, automation and new forms of propulsion. He was named chief operating officer in February of this year.
      Hackett, who will continue as a special advisor to Ford through March of 2021, said the time is right to pass the mantle of leadership to Jim Farley.
      “My goal when I took on the CEO role was to prepare Ford to win in the future,” Hackett said. “The hardest thing for a proud, long-lived company to do is change to meet the challenges of the world it’s entering rather than the world it has known. I’m very proud of how far we have come in creating a modern Ford and I am very optimistic about the future.
      “I have worked side-by-side with Jim Farley for the past three years and have the greatest confidence in him as a person and a leader,” Hackett said. “He has been instrumental in crafting our new product portfolio and redesigning our businesses around the world. He is also a change agent with a deep understanding of how to lead Ford in this new era defined by smart vehicles in a smart world.”
      Said Farley: “I love Ford and I am honored by the opportunity to serve and create value for Ford’s employees, customers, dealers, communities and all of our stakeholders. Jim Hackett has laid the foundation for a really vibrant future and we have made tremendous progress in the past three years. I am so excited to work together with the whole Ford team to realize the full potential of this great company in a new era.”

      View full article
  • Posts

    • Supply down + Demand Up = higher prices.... not that hard. Prices for nearly everything are going up. It has nothing to do with BEVs.  It has to do with everything from lumber to microchips being in short supply. Also... prices for used and new gasoline powered vehicles is going up too, so at worst, BEVs are just keeping pace with the industry as a whole. Furthermore, no one gave a date as to when the cost of BEVs would dip below ICEs, so calling that misinformation is substantially premature.  The big, experienced manufacturers like GM and MB have been awoken like a sleeping dragon and the new BEV platforms coming from them are going to be serious entries, not just an electric motor thrown in one of their gasser models with a bunch of laptop batteries in the trunk. As of about 3 years ago, they all started taking BEVs seriously. There will be economies of scale as the cells of a Silverado don't need to be any different in composition than the cells in a Bolt... the only difference will be quantity.  GM will no longer need to build 197 different powertrain combinations, it will be reduced to 10 (if memory serves, it's somewhere in that ballpark of a delta in powertrains). There will no longer be a need for complex 10-speed transmissions. No AWD systems. No exhaust systems. There won't be complex electro-mechanical systems to turn cylinders on and off while driving. There won't be turbo-chargers. There won't be those electronic shutters that close a grille at speed. All of that stuff listed that needs to be engineered and re-engineered every 5 - 7 years will go away. None of that is in place today and no one claimed it would be in place by today, but you have the combined industrial might of GM, Ford, BMW, Mercedes, VW, Hyundai, Telsa, Panasonic, Samsung, LG, and others working on it.
    • On a side note, all of my closest friends recently bought bikes either this year or last year and it REALLY has given me the itch. I just don't have a garage for one yet and couldn't justify spending the money when we have a home to finish and garage to build.. Two of them have some Harley of sorts and two of them have Indians, none of them are my style or anywhere near what I would want to ride. I'm a HUGE fan of the naked sporty bikes.  Something like a Monster 796,  Triumph Street Triple 675, Yamaha MT-09, would be perfect for me
    • ^ Not sure it's that specific; on the Silverado/Sierra, the active safety features package is optional, and costs $890. I do think electronics in general are responsible for most of the recent price escalations. I can easily see calling claims of 'BE's are going to cost the same or less than ICs' as "misinformation".   
    • Yeah, that's probably true for most vehicles.  The big GM (and probably Ford and Chrysler) V8s are probably the exceptions as they just loaf along at 1500 RPM at 65 and dropping below that would lug them.  This BMW doesn't mind being lugged... just twist and go. 
    • I'm a very easy driving person so I have thought every vehicle I've ever driven could use a little taller top gear... If I'm just cruising, I don't need many RPM. I'll downshift(or it'll do it for me) to pass if I really need to. 
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. F&K
      F&K
      (57 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...