Jump to content
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Next Ford Fiesta ST Could Get 3-Cylinder Turbo Power

    Sign in to follow this  

      The next Fiesta ST could drop one-cylinder

    The current Ford Fiesta ST uses a 1.6L EcoBoost four-cylinder. But the next-generation Fiesta ST could be using a turbocharged three-cylinder.

    “We’re seeing more and more of what we can do with the 1.0-litre engine in development and the signs are promising. It’s a great engine – it sounds brilliant and there’s loads of torque when the turbo comes on boost, so we’re looking into things for the next ST,” said Darren Palmer, Ford's head of small cars to Auto Express.

     

    Currently, the most powerful version of the 1.0L EcoBoost three-cylinder produces 138 horsepower. But Ford has been experimenting with the engine to see how much power can be extracted. At the moment, the company has been able to get 202 horsepower.

    “There’s still a huge demand for the ST – we’ve seen that with the current ST200. But we want to offer more, so expect more performance and efficiency,” said Palmer.

    Source: Auto Express

     

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    This isn't VW news...

    Anyway, as long as they keep it quite powerful this thing will still be a blast to drive. I'm yet to drive one but I don't think I've read a bad thing about them.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    5 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    This isn't VW news...

    Anyway, as long as they keep it quite powerful this thing will still be a blast to drive. I'm yet to drive one but I don't think I've read a bad thing about them.

    Quite tempted buy the current model myself.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you note his remarks, he does not state that it would be 1.0L.  

    Fact is, it would be much bigger.  And fewer cylinders is always better, assuming similar displacements.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    44 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

    If you note his remarks, he does not state that it would be 1.0L.  

    Fact is, it would be much bigger.  And fewer cylinders is always better, assuming similar displacements.

    For fuel economy / internal friction.... sure. Not always on balance and revving. (i.e. a 3.0 liter V8 will be smoother and rev faster than a 3.0 liter 4-cylinder assuming the same valvetrain setup) 

    However, even the 5-cylinder engines I've driven have been fairly disappointing on that front (Volvo excepted). All the fuel economy of a V6 with all the power of a N/A 4-cylinder. 

    That said.... I do think the 1.0 Ecoboost is the superior engine in the Fiesta. It's not a smooth as the 4-cylinder, but it has a fun growl. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Compare a 1.5L I4 and I3,

    I3 packages far smaller and easier

    I3 weighs far less

    I3 has far less friction and better FE

    I3 has much bigger bore, which mostly benefits larger valves and more airflow

    I3 GTDI will rev faster and just as smooth

    I3 Structure is stronger (length of crank, gearbox, etc.)

     

    A 1.0L works harder due to less power, and is a bit more NVH, but that cancels out when you have similar displacements/power

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    47 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

    Compare a 1.5L I4 and I3,

     

    I3 packages far smaller and easier

     

    I3 weighs far less

     

    I3 has far less friction and better FE

     

    I3 has much bigger bore, which mostly benefits larger valves and more airflow

     

    I3 GTDI will rev faster and just as smooth

     

    I3 Structure is stronger (length of crank, gearbox, etc.)

     

     

     

    A 1.0L works harder due to less power, and is a bit more NVH, but that cancels out when you have similar displacements/power

     

    I don't disagree with most of those.  I took issue with the "always". 

    Assuming all else equal on an I4 and I3, the 3 won't be as smooth, simple mathematical balance dictates that. Revving faster is also only a maybe... with the bigger bores comes more mass moving in each cylinder. Each time one of those three chunks of mass have to slow down, stop, and change direction there is inertia to overcome.  This is an oversimplification, but each piston will weigh 1/3rd more than in an I-4 (again, all else being equal).  While the total number of piston direction changes happens more often in an I4, the mass of each of those pistons is lower. 

    This is born out historically...generally small V8s rev better than big V6es. Small V6es rev better than big I4s. 

    I like the I-3. I think it has a strong future ahead.... I'm just reluctant to attribute things to it that aren't really there. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 minutes ago, Wings4Life said:

    Humming along on dyno's at the moment.

    Well you better get over there to manually shift through all 10 speeds on that DCT... :P

    • Upvote 2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I don't disagree with most of those.  I took issue with the "always". 

    Assuming all else equal on an I4 and I3, the 3 won't be as smooth, simple mathematical balance dictates that. Revving faster is also only a maybe... with the bigger bores comes more mass moving in each cylinder. Each time one of those three chunks of mass have to slow down, stop, and change direction there is inertia to overcome.  This is an oversimplification, but each piston will weigh 1/3rd more than in an I-4 (again, all else being equal).  While the total number of piston direction changes happens more often in an I4, the mass of each of those pistons is lower. 

    This is born out historically...generally small V8s rev better than big V6es. Small V6es rev better than big I4s. 

    I like the I-3. I think it has a strong future ahead.... I'm just reluctant to attribute things to it that aren't really there. 

    There are balance tricks to mitigate it, without adding weight and extensive engineering. You counter externally, and balance as a system, including the mounts.  That's what they did with the 1.0L.   But I am sure you knew that.  But again, with boosted engines, they are both quieter and smoother due to not need to rev.  In general.  Most reviews of the 1.0L praised it's smoothness, quick revving and growl.  

    So again, on a same displacement comparison, 

    smoothness will be similar, as delivered.

    It will be rev happy, even with the bigger bore, and it is stroke that impacts that more than bore size.

    and the growl will be even better, due to bigger bore and chamber.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All of those tricks mean that they aren't equal... which was precisely my point.... all else being equal... an I4 will be better balanced and smoother than an I3.  I'm not discouraging the use of those tricks either... Buick used a few of them in the Encore and it's noticeable that they didn't make it into the Trax.

    I'm very precise with my statements.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tricks?  It’s called balancing a motor.  Something every motor should and does do.  They just approach it different with the I3.  That’s not a ‘trick’ when you tune a system properly, as a system. 

    Precise with your words?

    Not in this case.

    But I think we are both getting a bit mixed up here in our terms. Let’s review:

     An I3 actually vibrates less than an I4, because there is no piston pairing, so some might call it smoother than an I4, especially at higher rpm.  An I4 is actually a bit smoother, but vibrates  more at higher RPM, due to the piston pairing and phasing at 180deg.  An I6 is also paired, but benefits from perfect phase balance of 120.  The I3 has a 240 phase and looks like a Y viewed at the end of the crank. That is closer to an I6 in appearance, than an I4 at 180. And  in total, it’s about counterweight placement and their  phasing.  Or more specifically, the conservation of momentum, or how the piston/rod counterweight is configured to counter the reciprocating and rotating mass.

    And although a powertrain design engineer analyst by trade and certainly know a thing or two about what I speak, I am too humble to state I use precise words. I am human after all, and mistakes happen.

    Edited by Wings4Life

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, Wings4Life said:

    Humming along on dyno's at the moment.

    It's only a fact if it is provable. Otherwise you sound like the other guy who overused that word. 

    Wanna show us some inside news on the new motor?!? NEVER BEFORE SEEN FOOTAGE?!?(not being a smartass but I realize this cannot be done..so maybe that is being a smartass.. well I'm just jokin around. )

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes.. a trick. Active motor mounts are tricks used to hide/tame engine imbalance. So are counter rotating balance shafts. So is active noise cancellation. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    6 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    It's only a fact if it is provable. Otherwise you sound like the other guy who overused that word. 

    Wanna show us some inside news on the new motor?!? NEVER BEFORE SEEN FOOTAGE?!?(not being a smartass but I realize this cannot be done..so maybe that is being a smartass.. well I'm just jokin around. )

    The forum world was busy discussing the new and larger I3 and I4 family from Ford recently, complete with a code project name.  I assumed everyone heard about it. hence my subtle reference to it.  Perhaps you have not heard it here.  

    And normally I would share what I can, but lately, with all the down-talking and rudeness around here, I would rather not.  Why would I.

    Thanks

    Edited by Wings4Life

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, I've heard some of the news from friends at Ford, but I always love to learn more....(and they can only tell me so much)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Wings on cell phone

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Yes.. a trick. Active motor mounts are tricks used to hide/tame engine imbalance. So are counter rotating balance shafts. So is active noise cancellation. 

    None of which is used with the 1.0l.

    hence no tricks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Wings on cell phone

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    We've been talking engines...was i rude to an engine?

    Did someone suggest you have been rude.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm all for mechanical entertainment.  I was high on the 1.0 EB in the Fiesta until I realized Ford would only pair it with a car that has plastic wheel covers and no FOG LIGHTS.  Who does that?

     

    Local dealer has a black Focus hatch with the 1.0L and stick on the lot.  Hmmm...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 10/6/2016 at 0:14 AM, daves87rs said:

    Kids are going to blow the damn things up.....

    ...and then struggle to pay for repairs at their crappy $11 per hour retail job.

    2 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    I'm all for mechanical entertainment.  I was high on the 1.0 EB in the Fiesta until I realized Ford would only pair it with a car that has plastic wheel covers and no FOG LIGHTS.  Who does that?

     

    Local dealer has a black Focus hatch with the 1.0L and stick on the lot.  Hmmm...

    Aftermarket alloys and added fog lights and you would be in business.

    ...and it is not like you don't work in a body shop that could order the parts to convert the darned thing...I am sure tapping into the wiring harness could not be that difficult.

    • Upvote 1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By Drew Dowdell
      FORD MOTOR COMPANY SECOND QUARTER 2019 U.S. SALES  SALES BY BRAND Q2 2018 % Year-to-Date % 2019 Change 2019 2018 Change             Ford 624,396 650,303 -4 1,189,670 1,227,422 -3.1 Lincoln 25,940 27,807 -6.7 50,915 50,269 1.3 Total vehicles 650,336 678,110 -4.1 1,240,585 1,277,691 -2.9 SALES BY TYPE             Cars 110,195 140,226 -21.4 208,460 269,020 -22.5 SUVs 215,898 236,258 -8.6 428,984 439,185 -2.3 Trucks 324,243 301,626 7.5 603,141 569,486 5.9 Total vehicles 650,336 678,110 -4.1 1,240,585 1,277,691 -2.9 FORD BRAND             Fiesta 22,173 13,061 69.8 38,116 25,359 50.3 Focus 2,131 40,055 -94.7 12,480 75,101 -83.4 C-MAX 21 2,612 -99.2 38 5,401 -99.3 Fusion 54,668 43,802 24.8 96,351 86,978 10.8 Taurus 2,390 7,893 -69.7 8,121 15,540 -47.7 Police Interceptor Sedan 972 2,123 -54.2 2,871 3,993 -28.1 GT 51 27 88.9 135 67 101.5 Mustang 21,625 23,264 -7 38,542 42,428 -9.2 Ford Cars 104,031 132,837 -21.7 196,654 254,867 -22.8 EcoSport 21,507 17,514 22.8 34,386 23,610 45.6 Escape 72,398 77,277 -6.3 133,100 144,627 -8 Edge 33,314 35,394 -5.9 64,234 68,048 -5.6 Flex 7,206 5,269 36.8 12,763 10,144 25.8 Explorer 35,374 56,674 -37.6 88,680 110,805 -20 Police Interceptor Utility 4,527 9,228 -50.9 13,143 17,901 -26.6 Expedition 21,796 14,484 50.5 43,569 27,934 56 Ford SUVs 196,122 215,840 -9.1 389,875 403,069 -3.3 F-Series 233,787 236,947 -1.3 448,398 451,138 -0.6 Ranger 20,880 0 N/A 30,301 0 N/A E-Series 11,560 11,612 -0.4 22,351 25,505 -12.4 Transit 41,265 41,061 0.5 73,107 71,412 2.4 Transit Connect 10,913 8,816 23.8 19,853 15,454 28.5 Heavy trucks 5,838 3,190 83 9,131 5,977 52.8 Ford Trucks 324,243 301,626 7.5 603,141 569,486 5.9 Ford Brand 624,396 650,303 -4 1,189,670 1,227,422 -3.1 LINCOLN BRAND             MKZ 4,674 5,316 -12.1 8,961 9,675 -7.4 Continental 1,490 2,073 -28.1 2,845 4,478 -36.5 Lincoln Cars 6,164 7,389 -16.6 11,806 14,153 -16.6 MKC 5,956 7,393 -19.4 11,743 12,289 -4.4 Nautilus/MKX 8,187 7,242 13 16,022 13,470 18.9 MKT 1,246 730 70.7 2,488 1,242 100.3 Navigator 4,387 5,053 -13.2 8,856 9,115 -2.8 Lincoln SUVs 19,776 20,418 -3.1 39,109 36,116 8.3 Lincoln Brand 25,940 27,807 -6.7 50,915 50,269 1.3
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Ford of Europe announced Thursday that the company would be laying off around 12,000 employees as part of a global restructuring.  This is on top of the layoffs Ford previously announced earlier this year.  Ford says it will reduce the number of plants in the region to 18 and reorganize its business into three divisions; Commercial, Passenger, and Imports such as the Ford Mustang.
      Most of the positions in Europe will be eliminated via voluntary separation programs and should be completed by the end of 2020. Of the jobs lost, 2,000 will be salary and another 5,000 will be white color positions. 
      Ford is struggling to make its European operations profitable against a backdrop of stagnant sales in the EU.  Ford of Europe says that in future, all new vehicles will come with an electrified version, be that a full EV or a hybrid. 
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      Ford of Europe announced Thursday that the company would be laying off around 12,000 employees as part of a global restructuring.  This is on top of the layoffs Ford previously announced earlier this year.  Ford says it will reduce the number of plants in the region to 18 and reorganize its business into three divisions; Commercial, Passenger, and Imports such as the Ford Mustang.
      Most of the positions in Europe will be eliminated via voluntary separation programs and should be completed by the end of 2020. Of the jobs lost, 2,000 will be salary and another 5,000 will be white color positions. 
      Ford is struggling to make its European operations profitable against a backdrop of stagnant sales in the EU.  Ford of Europe says that in future, all new vehicles will come with an electrified version, be that a full EV or a hybrid. 
       
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The Ford Puma sold in Europe was once a little coupe based on the Ford Fiesta.   Since coupe sales are dangerously close to zero, when Ford decided to reincarnate the name, it instead brought it back as a crossover coupe version of the Ford EcoSport.
      The new Puma will be powered by a 1.0 liter, 125 horsepower engine with 48-volt mild hybrid setup or a more powerful 155 horsepower system horsepower running through the front wheels.  Diesel options will come later. Under the rear floor is a storage area with a drain plug that Ford calls a Megabox, something probably more appropriate for an F-150. 
      It will come with Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop & Go, Speed Sign Recognition, and Lane Centering. The driver cluster is a full TFT digital display. Sync3 with Android Auto and Apple Car Play are standard. 
      No word yet on whether the Ford Puma will come to the US, but given the crossover craze going on here, we would not bet against it.  If it does come to the US, the direct competition would come from the Mazda CX-3, Hyundai Kona, and Honda HR-V. 
       
       

      View full article
    • By Drew Dowdell
      The Ford Puma sold in Europe was once a little coupe based on the Ford Fiesta.   Since coupe sales are dangerously close to zero, when Ford decided to reincarnate the name, it instead brought it back as a crossover coupe version of the Ford EcoSport.
      The new Puma will be powered by a 1.0 liter, 125 horsepower engine with 48-volt mild hybrid setup or a more powerful 155 horsepower system horsepower running through the front wheels.  Diesel options will come later. Under the rear floor is a storage area with a drain plug that Ford calls a Megabox, something probably more appropriate for an F-150. 
      It will come with Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop & Go, Speed Sign Recognition, and Lane Centering. The driver cluster is a full TFT digital display. Sync3 with Android Auto and Apple Car Play are standard. 
      No word yet on whether the Ford Puma will come to the US, but given the crossover craze going on here, we would not bet against it.  If it does come to the US, the direct competition would come from the Mazda CX-3, Hyundai Kona, and Honda HR-V. 
       
       
  • Social Stream

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Fomonper
      Fomonper
      (39 years old)
    2. Stormin
      Stormin
      (68 years old)
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets

facebook

×
×
  • Create New...