Jump to content
  • Greetings Guest!

    CheersandGears.com was founded in 2001 and is one of the oldest continuously operating automotive forums out there.  Come see why we have users who visit nearly every day for the past 16+ years. Signup is fast and free, or you can opt for a premium subscription to view the site ad-free.

  • William Maley
    William Maley
    Sign in to follow this  

    FTC Holds A Workshop On Dealership and Direct Sale Regulations

      FTC Looks At the Dealership Regulations and Direct Sales

    The current laws and regulations concerning how vehicles are sold are, to put it mildly, a complete mess thanks to states having different versions. Experts can't seem to agree whether the current rules are good or bad. One thing that they can agree on is buying a vehicle is an unpleasant experience due to the current regulations.


    The Federal Trade Commission held a workshop yesterday as a possible first step to unravel the mess. The big topic that was covered was in the workshop was direct sales with a variety of people on either side of the argument to make their case.


    For Direct Sales:


    Tesla Motors is leading the charge for doing direct sales to consumers. Todd Maron, Tesla Motor's lawyer argued the traditional model doesn't work for the company as their electric vehicles compete with gas vehicles and dealers would likely not push electric vehicles since they are dependent on sales of gas vehicles.


    Maron went on to say Tesla doesn't offer “insurance products and add-ons” or require regular service work. But the key point Maron said Tesla needs a different store design and location.


    “Our stores are small and in high foot-traffic areas such as shopping malls. When new technology comes out, consumers don’t go to it. You need to bring the technology to consumers,” said Maron.


    Fiona Scott Morton, a professor at Yale University said the FTC should allow "vertical integration" (another way of saying direct sales from automakers) to improve the buying experience.


    For the Franchise System:


    Those standing up for the current system of franchised dealers say intrabrand competition gives consumers a fair price on a vehicle.


    Automotive analyst Maryann Keller said the direct sales model doesn't offer any savings to consumers.


    Peter Welch, the president of the National Automobile Dealers Association said dealership laws help American consumers and only a few states have banned direct sales.


    “Empirical research has demonstrated that intense competition among franchised dealers lowers new-car prices by hundreds of dollars. But the benefits to consumers don’t end there -- they extend to service, warranty work, recalls, and the hundreds of millions of dollars that’s invested in local communities,” Welch went on to say.


    “Independent dealers add an extra layer of credibility in the auto industry. Imagine how much more difficult the General Motors and Chrysler bankruptcies would have been to resolve had the manufacturers had to bear the high costs of the distribution system, too,” said Paul Norman, a partner at Boardman & Clark law firm.


    What Happens Next?


    For the time being, the FTC is taking public comment on direct sales and franchise system till March 4th. After that, we might have an idea of what will happen next.


    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required), Autoblog, FTC Comment Form

    Sign in to follow this  

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Well, from the very beginning Tesla has been a vertically integrated company - more than other automakers.


    But then again, Musk isn't a novice when it comes to dealing with Giants.


    Like how SpaceX rocket launches to orbit are about 2/3 cheaper that the United Launch Alliance, and has more powerful launch vehicles for orbit.


    SpaceX is fully American too. The best quote ever from Lockheed and Boeing was that the DOD's satellite launches were a matter of national security - yet their launch vehicles use rocket engines from Russia...


    Tangent aside -


    But the real issue is that the dealership model has to change. Bolt EVs and Leafs don't need to be serviced for oil changes. No electric car does. And people really would like software patches that are TSBs or recalls for other automakers to just be done over the air.


    There's a cliche out there that people hate dealing with dealers. Get rid of them entirely - there's something there to be gained.


    But the dealer model does employ a ton of people. But it has to match the kind of vehicles people are buying.


    If I told everyone that tomorrow every car will get over 80 mpg, and will never need to have oil changes and that most recalls can be done at home, we'd all deduce that I'm crazy. But that is the present day of electric cars. The future of electric cars will result in a radical shift in the industry. When the product itself is so fundamentally different, the same distribution channels won't work either unless incentives are aligned.


    Right now they aren't - and that's a whole another post on its own.

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

About us

CheersandGears.com - Founded 2001

We ♥ Cars

Get in touch

Follow us

Recent tweets



Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.