Jump to content
Create New...

Lawmaker: 25% higher CAFE by 2015 not enough


Recommended Posts

Harry Stoffer

Automotive News

June 26, 2008 - 3:21 pm ET

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration's plan to raise fuel economy standards 25 percent over five model years isn't tough enough, a group of lawmakers said today.

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., chairman of a House committee on climate change and energy independence, said high gasoline prices should compel the administration to go even higher.

Markey said pending fuel economy rules should require cars and trucks to average 35 mpg by 2015 -- about 40 percent higher than today.

He and other lawmakers will be making that point in a letter to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Markey said. The agency is receiving comment on proposed fuel economy rules until Tuesday, July 1.

Congress and President Bush in December enacted a law requiring vehicles to average at least 35 mpg -- but not until 2020.

In rules to begin implementing the law in the 2011-15 model years, NHTSA in April proposed that by 2015 cars average 35.7 mpg and trucks average 28.6 mpg -- a combined 31.6 mpg.

The cost-effectiveness of those targets is based on gasoline priced at $2.42 a gallon at the end of that period, administration officials acknowledge.

With gasoline already averaging more than $4 a gallon, Markey called the calculation "absurd."

He made the remarks at the opening of a hearing on the effects of fuel economy standards on gasoline prices.

Tyler Duvall, assistant secretary of transportation, representing the administration, said energy prices are volatile, but many experts expect them to fall in the long term.

Automakers and their allies have called the 35 mpg standard by 2020 difficult but achievable. But some have said the rapid start proposed by the administration in the 2011-15 model years already is too aggressive.

Among others testifying today was Dominique Thormann, senior vice president for finance and administration at Nissan North America Inc.

Thormann reiterated Nissan's plan to have all-electric cars in the market by 2010. He also said that full electrification of the automobile is the only way to achieve the goal of climate scientists to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by mid-century.

That means today's hybrid vehicles represent transitional technology, he added.

Rep. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, ranking Republican on the committee, said Congress should work with the Detroit 3 rather than "providing a forum for a Japanese company."

Link: http://www.autonews.com/article/20080626/A...paign_id=alerts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[sacrasm] yay! this dem from Mass. is a great man! push these very real ideas onto us we await the auto revolution! [/sarcasm]

i hope a prius hits this guy, he doesn't die, and he sees a light.... maybe a camaro speeding at him next. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idiots. $4 a gallon gas makes beating the targets more achievable, as people voluntarily buy smaller, more efficient vehicles. There is no need to change the proposed rules. GM is talking about a 46 mpg compact, a vehicle which would blow past the target, and in the current climate need a second plant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idiots. $4 a gallon gas makes beating the targets more achievable, as people voluntarily buy smaller, more efficient vehicles. There is no need to change the proposed rules. GM is talking about a 46 mpg compact, a vehicle which would blow past the target, and in the current climate need a second plant.

This is one idea that it seems most on this thread are missing. If the price of gas REMAINS in the $4 range, then we might need some enticing to build high-mileage vehicles in four or five years. But if gas prices continue to rise (and $5 a gallon doesn't seem out of the question in the next year or so), reaching the current legislation should be the MINIMUM required just to stay competitive. The market will demand more than the government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search

Change privacy settings