Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Tailfin61

Viability Plan reveals chg for LaX

6 posts in this topic

Did anyone else notice that on the LaX page (I believe page 70), that the engine choice for best economy was the 2.4L 4 cylinder? That's the first I've seen of that powerplant for the LaX.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is minimal weight gain over the Malibu, I don't see why not..... but I would prefer the Turbo-Ecotec as the base engine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but I would prefer the Turbo-Ecotec as the base engine.

Agreed. Even if the ouput they go for is not very different from the atmospheric 2.4L, at least it would have a fatter (and flatter!) torque curve.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If there is minimal weight gain over the Malibu, I don't see why not..... but I would prefer the Turbo-Ecotec as the base engine.

The base CX (3.0 DI) weighs in at 3948 lbs.

I would imagine a four-cylinder LaX to be ~200 lbs lighter. The 2010 Equinox (2.4 DI) weighs 3770 lbs, and that gets 21/30 mpg.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only downside is that even with the base engine the reviewers are going to expect GNX like performance and it'll get compared to some irrelevant BMW that costs $20,000 more and has the interior space of a Civic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0