Croc

are they gonna re-air it? FOX often did with that show...

Dude whatever no problems... Rodeo is stuck in everyones head out here I mean damn...no better place to drop a few lol

Saw a Ford Five Hundred on Fig last night. Very classy car.

What? I thought it was Miami? Dude I have no idea...let's get our crap together though...

sweet now im def gonna go to LA even if i have to WALK all the way up Fig...

Alright, now I'm thinking this is less of an elaborate hoax and something closer to being real. Good find Northie!

I'm with Northie. I cannot see SAAB styling being successful on Kappa.

dahhhhhh ive been waiting for that show to come back and what do you know i missed it! booooooo

I said it is the worst GM interior on the market. I don't really think it is any better than the GMT-800s, which as far as I'm concerned don't count now that the new ones are almost out. The GMT-800s were released in 1999. The G6 was released in 2004. Again, the concept shines because of its attention to detail, which is the main differentiator between it and the production G6, exterior-wise.

Fair enough...I don't read Motor Trash anyway...but as far as I'm concerned, great sales + upping production = SUCCESSFUL PRODUCT ...despite what any magazine tells you

It is off the GMT-355 because of better off-roading characteristics inherent to that platform. Engine upgrade coming in a year. Selling like hotcakes, so what exactly did GM do wrong?

^^ What he said ^^ No, the G6 doesn't look odd because it is missing any of those elements; it is just that the production version is so half-baked. The concept was great. GM costcutting just got in the way. The real reason so many of you like the G6 is that, yes, the design is cleaner (a good thing), but mainly that all the obvious cost-cutting doesn't bother you. It bothers a great deal of people though. I will go so far to say the G6 interior is currently the WORST GM interior on the market. The materials are just so subpar...it's like the car is telling you "this is what you get if you cannot afford a 9-3"! The G6 really was a missed opportunity. The exterior styling is more attractive than the Malibu...but the cheapo taillamps (really...even the 'bu has jeweled ones!), the very cheapo interior with its ONE piece of alumiplastic.....I mean just wow. The concept was so nice too. I mean c'mon.....there is VERY little about the above picture that would not be feasible for production!

:blink: :blink: G6 isn't design purity...it is design austerity. The exterior is completely bland not because it lacks the "fork marks" down the sides, but because there is hardly ANY detailing on the exterior. No surface interest. The taillamps are flat as can be as they lack a jeweled effect. Granted there is a rub strip and the hood has a couple character lines on it, but the rest of the car just lacks real body lines and anything to hold any interest. As far as telling BV he's too young to remember when Pontiacs looked good, first of all "good" is extremely subjective. Frankly, I think the Firebird/Trans Am models looked good even in their in-your-face, boy-racer glory. I think the 90s Sunfire looked good even though it was a POS Cavalier with better styling. I think the Montana was the best-looking of the U-bodies, and I think it looked good for a minivan. You mention the GP and Bonnie, with which I also agree. I think the 1999 N-body Grand AM looked pretty decent, too. What appeals to a 17 year old is different than a 40-something year old. You shouldn't put down his tastes just because they are different than yours. If you have to say "not to be ___ but..." then you probably shouldn't say it. Because it most likely is "___." ::puts on flamesuit and prepares for bitchy response(s)::

It's the taillights not being jeweled like a 90s Alero or the concept...instead using cheap early 90s plastic... It's the interior with all of its tacky plastic and uncohesive design... and its the lack of small exterior details... all of those contribute to the pathetic production version, with 90% going to the interior, 8% to the rear, and 2% for the exterior details. If the interior didn't suck so much it might be decent. BUT NO.

or maybe they just shouldn't promise them...what's worse, being late? or having a half-baked product at launch? obviously the latter...:rolleyes:

I don't really either. The ole metabolism just can't handle it... Plus, watching drunk people is even better than actually being drunk!

If it's Highlander sized or larger, than it really doesn't compete with the Equinox anymore...now does it?

Exteriors of new and old are pretty similar...so those are unoffensive. Interior looks a little chintzy though.

derr, it was his only open window.

Sombrero's are good. I take mine with skim to keep the calories low..Kahlua ice cream is the best use of Kahlua though... Dragon Sushi? You mean Dragon Rolls? Nothing really exotic about them, just the presentation to make them look like a dragon! I believe they are topped with avocado to achieve the effect. IIRC they are very similar to the Caterpillar roll...sometimes the names have been used interchangeably.

Change mine to suburban

I love urban! Los Angeles is amazing IMO 9million and counting!

Sweet! Nice work, Josh!

Oh c'mon now! Don't stoop to this level! Can we take the high road? Just once?

Damn straight! I don't take kindly to someone being a jackass and then calling ME out for "taking things personally" as if that were the problem of the situation. I will NOT be someone's scapegoat!