surreal1272

Along with a side of just basic ignorance.

It is baffling, even today, that folks don't understand the simple physics when it comes to SUVs and CUVs and why they are more at risk to rollovers amid emergency maneuvers. I can't believe it even has to be explained on a car enthusiast site.

So a CT6 with a Camaro nose. Um, no.

I wish I had taken pictures of all the times I hauled just a pure ton of crap in my old Magnum for eight years. Now, to be fair, there were times where the height of certain loads were an issue and made the Magnum useless but the other 98% if the time, it could haul plenty of stuff plus seat five (although four more comfortably). At the time of purchase, back in 2008, the dealership was trying to get me into a 2005 Tahoe for not much more money but with gas being outrageous at the time ($4.49 a gallon in Prescott, AZ at the time, deja vu) and me driving 50 miles round trip to work daily, that was not going to be a good plan for me and I am glad I bought the Magnum instead. It did most of what I needed, day in and day out, without killing me at the pump and was also just a cooler looking ride, in my "not so biased" opinion lol. Wagons have taken $h! rap in this country, all the while folks are just driving tall wagons while thumbing their noses at the mere mention of the word "wagon". It's right up there with "van" for most folks these days and that has never made any sense to me. Alas, yet another car fad.

I am very surprised but eh small bump to the AWD model. I was expecting at least a $5K jump but this is a very smart move by GM/Cadillac since AWD will be very popular in this segment. Still want to see one up close before deciding on the rear section of the car. My big concern is the potential blind spot back there. Otherwise, a solid start in the EV realm for Caddy.

Children continuing to act like children. You should set your bar higher if you are looking for creativity here. Again, I’m not here for creative points on since random thread on the internet. I get paid for my creativity (literally) because I actually create things in real life, not for “creative” posts on the “interwebs”. The sad part is that you think you are actually being creative here when you have said the same things here that you have said before. That’s not “creative”. That’s just the same old, same old. Again, set your bar higher next time

Says the dead horse beater. I have more creativity in my pinky than you have in your entire body but our definition of it clearly differs. What you call “creativity” I call acting like a child. My response wasn’t made for creative points. It was to reflect the asinine nature of your post (and childishness) back at you. Besides, being proud of your “creativity” on the internet is a bit like being the smartest person in “special” class. And you’re right. Nothing I can do. Poor me lol. There is also nothing you can do either. Think about it for more than a minute before posting with another “creative” response.

@ccap41—Say whatever you feel you need to say to make excuses for your endless trolling. It’s not about me being a “hero”. I’m just tired of supposedly grown ass men posting like the thirteen year old trolls they clearly aspire to be. Do anything but accept actual responsibility for your own actions. That’s why you keep trying to deflect to me. An actual adult doesn’t have to do that but maybe I’m putting a little too much faith in your ability to actually be an adult. @ccap41 when he reads that David fits in a Bolt.

Hyperboles and obvious figures of speech aside, you clearly know what I am talking about. Prove me wrong by, oh I don't know, letting it go and dropping this bag non-sense. He has explained himself a dozen times over the years so the only reason for you to keep harping is either A.) You are trolling or B.) You have something inside you that won't let you move on to something more productive here. And I didn't wake up angry. I haven't been here in weeks and when I do, I see the same trolling nonsense by the usual suspects about nonsensical stuff that only matters to him and maybe one other person, end of story. After all, if it REALLY didn't matter, you would not have brought it up in the first place yesterday. Funny how that works huh? In summation, move on. No anger. No nothing. Just move on.

Because it's the truth. Prove us wrong here by midnging your own business (as you pointed out to me) and riding something more constructive to discuss here. You seem to have some secret thing here regarding David and it's a little disturbing, quite frankly.

Follow your own advice regarding how someone fits in a car.

And that, right there, should be the only thing that matters here and should be the end of it but clearly @ccap41 has a damn hard on for you so he can continue on with his stupid little quest to “own” you while not realizing that the only thin skinned one here appears to be him over the last two years of his “does he really fit back there” hissy fits.

Deflect, bait, troll, or whatever else you feel is so damn important to you. Fact is that only TWO people here have had “issues” with David and how he fits in a damn car. My defending him has Jack squat to do with your issues regarding it. Pathetic and childish is what it is and no amount of you deflecting changes that.

And you’re deflecting. Just sayin’. It should be noted that I haven’t spoken to SMK about that in months and it almost always after he has to inject Mercedes into any Cadillac thread but you go on thinking you have some kind of high ground here lol. Meanwhile, you continue on your little two year long crusade over what a man fits in. Again, just sayin’.

@ccap41—Boo freakin hoo. Cry me a damn river over it. All I see is petty trolling since this subject has been discussed a few dozen times now over the last two years. Who gives a rats ass other than you and one other person here? Seriously. You made the bait post about him fitting into a Macan so don’t act like this is something that he brought on here. Just utter horse$h!, to be honest and just beyond petty.

Your first comment about it, right there, with NO mention of back seats. Again, point that finger at yourself before you point it at me. By all means though, keep up your little crusade lol.

You hear yourself right? You have spent the last two years harping about what David claims he can and cannot fit in so the question needs to asked of you. What the FCK is YOUR issue? Is it such a big damn deal that you have to constantly troll him over it? Before you point that finger at me, you might want to start pointing that at yourself next time.

Common sense is not your friend is it? First of all, you didn't state which seat, which is still irrelevant and dumb for the second reason which is that the Porsche I brought up is LARGER than the one you referenced and it still has less LEGROOM room back there than the Bolt (Cayenne 36" vs Bolt 36.5". Now unless you think the SMALLER Macan has more room than the Cayenne, you are just flat talking out of your posterior right now. Your endless beating of this dead horse=useless AF.

Okay, so just ignore the ACTUAL numbers I just provided and continue on with your dumb little crusade. FFS.

I know you're partially joking here but I should point out something. The Bolt has 40.1" of headroom up front while a larger than the Macan (Porsche doesn't even list Macan interior dimensions for some reason) Porsche Cayenne has 39.6". He would have a legit argument against the Macan for that reason alone. Point is, maybe this whole nonsense about what David will and will not fit in should just take a knee.

Just trolling extra hard this week huh? He clearly clarified the custom aspect of it and was stating that frames could be built like this from the start, which would not even begin to be the issue you are making it out to be since he is not referring to that exact frame above, only using it for visual reference. Read his post again and then see why your reply was not even necessary.

Like someone else here, you assumed instead of asking or perhaps just reading a little further down for his more detailed explanation.

So was yours, which was apparently to troll him based on an incorrect assumption. Don’t get salty with me just because you got busted for it.

Maybe the best action would have been to not assume his intent.

He is talking about EVs.