Jump to content
Create New...

Intrepidation

In Hibernation
  • Posts

    22,750
  • Joined

Everything posted by Intrepidation

  1. I thought that was Satty?
  2. Thank NOS or Satty, one of those Owl pictures almost made me fall out of my chair laughing, and thusly I googled it. It seems to be a recurring theme today anyway.
  3. That doesn't seem accurate. I work with flash all the time and FireFox 3 has no issues with it, and neither does IE.
  4. I haven't laughed so much in one day in a long time!
  5. Discuss.
  6. I think we need a thread for this...
  7. GM prepping Saab to stand alone It seems that GM's plan to rid itself of Saab is being put into motion. GM plans to grant Saab control over its finances and decisions. The idea is to make it looks more appealing to potential buyers, and more than just a bunch of Opels in Swedish attire. Follow the jump to learn more about this development. http://www.cheersandgears.com/index.php?sh...c=27803&hl=
  8. Probably while the paddle was spinning to stir the ingredients.
  9. 1.) More unnamed sources, look how accurate those have beens o far. 2.) So what? Chrysler would have access to small car platforms and powertrains, allowing it to quickly develop a competitive small car or cars, for far less than doing it on its own.
  10. I could really go for a warm loaf right now.
  11. Taco Hell
  12. diarrhea
  13. Low funds may keep Converj from seeing production GM's low reserves of cash could hurt the prospects of the Converj concept being green lighted for production. Bob Lutz explains, "Ready to go? Well, first we have to prove to ourselves that we have the money... and then that it's a high enough priority to displace something else, and that we can actually make money on the vehicle, and that there is potential customer interest and so forth. We haven't done any of that work yet." It only seems logical to build it, as it would help offset cost of the Volt and it could be sold at a profit. Follow the jump to get the full story. http://www.cheersandgears.com/index.php?sh...c=27798&hl=
  14. That's what yo momma said.
  15. bahlz
  16. Hmm, a showstopping vehicle that could not only help offset the costs of the Volt but actually make a profit and they are still debating whether or not to build it?
  17. $h!'s done f@#ked up.
  18. General Motors' increasingly empty coffers could consign the Cadillac Converj show car to 'concept only' status. The Detroit Auto Show coupe has been the subject of production rumors since before it rolled onto the stage in Cobo earlier last week, but now Automotive News is reporting that GM may not have enough money to make Converj a reality. AN quotes GM vice chairman Bob Lutz as saying that the Converj is far from a done deal: Our take? The angularly gorgeous Cadillac was designed around the same extended-range Voltec architecture as Chevrolet's forthcoming Volt, itself a spectacularly expensive research and development effort. GM is clearly committed to making the Volt a production reality, and if it ever has hopes of making money on its plug-in hybrid technology, a higher-priced, higher-margin product like from an upper-crust brand like Cadillac would seem like one of the best ways to defray R&D costs. In short, GM may still have to conduct due diligence on the Converj's business case, but if there's any money at all left in the company's bank accounts, we still think the future for the showstopper is a bright one. Given the 2011 date attached to the Volt, we would expect the Caddy to roll into showrooms for 2012. Let's just hope it arrives in showrooms wearing a new name. Source: Autoblog
  19. I'll let you know who after the Superbowl.
  20. Those pictures.. :rotflmao:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search