Jump to content
Create New...

Sixty8panther

Members
  • Posts

    15,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sixty8panther

  1. WTF??? B!tchslaps all around! A Russian Lada converted into a Horse Trailer. :blink: Found these on the net today, thought I'd share.
  2. I have a soft spot for Achievas since I owned one: (just a concept sketch) I'd love one of these! The center of gravity is a bit high thoughg. :P
  3. No problem Harley. And waht list of Olds. concepts would be complete without THIS:
  4. Great. *sigh* :( Bill Gates should move there and live in the great wall.
  5. Awsome. Tht shade of yellow is to die for!!!
  6. Caprice looks a lot like our Tony. He's such an attention/lap whore. He'll do anythig fopr a pat and scratch between the ears.
  7. Modern day Rabbit Cabrio. I'm not crazy about the fornt end stylign but oevrall it's a cool concept. BTW can we see more pics... of the girls. Seriously.
  8. Crazy and cool. I'm sure they'll make a 572 Boss Hog too. Sick $hit. I'll take a '32 roadster kit car with a twin turbo 454. After all is said and done the weight to power ratio is almost as good but the vehicle still has four wheels and moderate comfort.
  9. To be honest GT1750, I know it was based off of the VW bug, it was made in California as the "Sterling" and also in the UK under the same name. It dates from the early 70s possibly late 60s. A modified Sterling by the name "NOVA" was also made in Australia and So. Afrika... or something like that. I belive productoion was from 1970 to like 1979 wiht a few years missing in the middle there. Although most of these cars retained VW power I've heard of some having Buick 3800s. Like I said I'm no expert, so feel free to tear my hazy memory to bits.
  10. Pushrods Kick Ass!!! Let's see you do beter Acura NSX. http://www.cheersandgears.com/public/style_emoticons//AH-HA_wink.gif
  11. I actually like it. he whole car loks awsome and in thios instance the Pontiac stamp looks good too. IMO.
  12. For christ's sake do you want to talk race engines? This discussion was not about over the top $2,000,000 engines made to run 6 hours between breakdowns. Your mentioning of race engines this or that is irrelevant, we're talking production. Production V8s. Otherwise I'll start talking about the Oldsmobile/Cadillac No.Star's racing success and how a smallblock pushrod Chevy enigne has kicked DOHC hi tech junk at 24 hours of Rolex, LeMans and on the street... <_< IF Honda is SOOOOO damn good at making big powerfull engines why did they now jump at the opportunity to make a production V12 for the fastest street car of all time? Why don't they put their money where their mouth is? Acura should could use a V8. Fu$# it. A poweerful V8 would just be wasted on Front wheel biases AWD or perhaps FWD. Honda is pathetic. Kind of like a nerd who cheats on his math quiz. Yup... and that would be so meaningfull: Next day's headline: Exotic Mid engined two seater with a V10 costing $90,000 beats a 4 passanger Gran Turismo coupe with a I6 for $45,000. It would be as lame as the guy with a Ferrari Enzo who ends up winning against a C6 Z06 by a nose.
  13. Lucerene with a Chevy badge.
  14. I voted: "The current amount infringes on my right to freedom of speech." Just this past weekend I was talking to a really cool black dude. He was a real character. I befriended him at an all day "driving school" event. He drives a black Lincoln LS (V6 wiht a paxton blower and 5-speed) He says he pulled up to a light the other day and the dude behind the wheel of the car next to him is also driving an LS. He gives "Lucky" a dirty look as if: "What's this balck kid doign wiht a new Lincoln?" and Lucky (the black kid) rolls his window down and yells: "What a black guy can't drive a Lincoln? I got mine at the "black store" it was 50% off" And laughs if off wiht a smile.
  15. We can talk about 1000 horsepower Porsche 917s and 1500hp Viper dragsters wiht NOS, twin turbos and powerglide trans... let's not talk race cars. That's irrelevant and stupid. I'm pretty sure I could make a 5.7 SBC pump out 900 natrually aspired Horsepower for short money but it's not in a production car. Honda told McLaren they COULDN'T produce a V12 with the specs they were looking for. It was "impossible" esp. for the budget and deadline. BMW took on the assignment, made a ground up new DOHC V12 and oevrdelivederd the HP while coming ahead f schedule, under wieght and within Budget. Moral of the story: Honda is full of bullcrap and has an inflated ego. Meantime I'd like a M3 so I could embarass a few NSXs at an SCCA meet.
  16. Watermark? That's HOT!!! There's an orange "thing" in my town here in MAss. I think they're pretty ugly but still muchn better lookign than the Ridgeline, Elemant and Scion xA.
  17. At this point even mud seem transparent in comparison. :huh:
  18. Yup, the Oh-four was a nice car but depressing timing wise. :( Here's a cool '54 Cutlass to bring up your spirits. http://www.autoweteran.gower.pl/concept/19...ile_Cutlass.jpg http://local.aaca.org/siraaca/images/corvet18.jpg
  19. Here's one for Razor: http://www.genefeltonrestorations.com/imag...d%20Atlanta.JPG
  20. Mustang: That Cutlass has Mass plates. :) My first car was supposed to be a '85 Cutlass Supreme coupe just like that. Blue on blue on blue. (sky blue & navy blue two tone and a blue interior) My dad junked it without telling me cause the 3800 was runnig rough. :angry: And now some pics. I love vintage photos. :)
  21. Awsome Cobalt. Great stealthy color. I'd never get rid of the Firebird if it was me. Maybe for a 2006 GTO or CTS-V I'd consider it, but never for a Cobalt.
  22. or perhaps Mazda 3?
  23. Sweedish Scissors:
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search