• Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0

    Marchionne Gives His Merger Plans A Rest, Says Next Deal Could Happen After His Retirement


    • FCA's CEO Stops Talking About Mergers, Focuses On the Five-Year Plan

    FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne is giving it a rest when it comes to merger talk. Speaking with Bloomberg, Marchionne says he will focus on growing FCA through 2018. After 2018, Marchionne could retire from the company.

     

    Last year, Marchionne campaigned publicly for a merger of FCA and General Motors. GM's board looked at his proposal in the summer and rejected it. After this, Marchionne backtracked somewhat, saying the merger could generate $30 billion a year in cash.

     

    But now, Marchionne says any chances of a possible GM merge are done.

     

    “I met Mary Barra less than a month ago in Washington. I don’t think I will have another coffee with her. It won’t happen again in the future.”

     

    Of course, the talk of merging with GM must have brought some other companies out of the woodwork? Marchionne explained that he did get proposals, but were deemed not very attractive. He still believes a big merger is possible, but "it will be someone else's duty."

     

    Now with the merger stuff mostly out of his system, Marchionne will focus on finishing the current five-year plan for the company. His overall goal is to increase global deliveries to seven million units a year by 2018. To achieve this, FCA will invest around $52 billion for new products.

     

    Source: Bloomberg

    0


    Sign in to follow this  
    Followers 0


    User Feedback


    So the investment will come from raping the american auto lines and investing in the stupid italian lines that are crap to begin with and should not be resurrected.

     

    In regards to the merger, I am sure Mary told him to pound sand and stop the nonsense. GM has no interest in FCA unless they want to sell Jeep. They might buy Jeep only.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So the investment will come from raping the american auto lines and investing in the stupid italian lines that are crap to begin with and should not be resurrected.

     

    In regards to the merger, I am sure Mary told him to pound sand and stop the nonsense. GM has no interest in FCA unless they want to sell Jeep. They might buy Jeep only.

     

    I don't think they would even buy Jeep.  They would be better off giving GMC some unique off-road product.  i honestly don't see GM buying anything anytime soon wince that is part of what got them in their previous issue.  Also, the Hummer project didn't exactly turn out all that great.  The whole idea of a merger was ignorant anyway.  they don't need a merger, they have tech and new platforms they just need to put the product where it is needed (Dodge, Ram, Chrysler, and Jeep) and send Fiat back home.  I do think Alfa has a possibility though and it gives them a high end to offer new tech that can trickle down to the rest (ala Cadillac and Chevy). 

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So the investment will come from raping the american auto lines and investing in the stupid italian lines that are crap to begin with and should not be resurrected.

     

    In regards to the merger, I am sure Mary told him to pound sand and stop the nonsense. GM has no interest in FCA unless they want to sell Jeep. They might buy Jeep only.

     

    I don't think they would even buy Jeep.  They would be better off giving GMC some unique off-road product.  i honestly don't see GM buying anything anytime soon wince that is part of what got them in their previous issue.  Also, the Hummer project didn't exactly turn out all that great.  The whole idea of a merger was ignorant anyway.  they don't need a merger, they have tech and new platforms they just need to put the product where it is needed (Dodge, Ram, Chrysler, and Jeep) and send Fiat back home.  I do think Alfa has a possibility though and it gives them a high end to offer new tech that can trickle down to the rest (ala Cadillac and Chevy). 

     

     

    Many of us have always felt HUMMER should have been a special package you could put on your GMC. That is the best thing for GM. 

     

    In regards to buying Jeep, Wish I could do a better job at sarcasm. Sorry, the whole jeep thing was a sarcasm comment on my behalf. :P

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    So the investment will come from raping the american auto lines and investing in the stupid italian lines that are crap to begin with and should not be resurrected.

     

    In regards to the merger, I am sure Mary told him to pound sand and stop the nonsense. GM has no interest in FCA unless they want to sell Jeep. They might buy Jeep only.

     

    I don't think they would even buy Jeep.  They would be better off giving GMC some unique off-road product.  i honestly don't see GM buying anything anytime soon wince that is part of what got them in their previous issue.  Also, the Hummer project didn't exactly turn out all that great.  The whole idea of a merger was ignorant anyway.  they don't need a merger, they have tech and new platforms they just need to put the product where it is needed (Dodge, Ram, Chrysler, and Jeep) and send Fiat back home.  I do think Alfa has a possibility though and it gives them a high end to offer new tech that can trickle down to the rest (ala Cadillac and Chevy). 

     

     

    Many of us have always felt HUMMER should have been a special package you could put on your GMC. That is the best thing for GM. 

     

    In regards to buying Jeep, Wish I could do a better job at sarcasm. Sorry, the whole jeep thing was a sarcasm comment on my behalf. :P

     

    Gotcha.  Didn't they do a sweet looking 2 door Hummer concept quite a few years ago that would have made a great Wrangler competitor?

    Hummer_HX_NY.jpg

     

    There it is!  Update that with GMC styling and modern interior and I don't think they could keep them on the lot.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Many of us have always felt HUMMER should have been a special package you could put on your GMC. That is the best thing for GM. 

     

     

     

    In regards to buying Jeep, Wish I could do a better job at sarcasm. Sorry, the whole jeep thing was a sarcasm comment on my behalf. :P

     

    Gotcha.  Didn't they do a sweet looking 2 door Hummer concept quite a few years ago that would have made a great Wrangler competitor?

    Hummer_HX_NY.jpg

     

    There it is!  Update that with GMC styling and modern interior and I don't think they could keep them on the lot.

     

     

    Yup that would be awesome in a GMC grilled tweak and have both a monochrome and Denali package version.

     

    Just think put that little 2.8L Duramax engine in it and you have a winner winner chicken dinner.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's amazing what a spinoff of Ferrari and an increasingly firm retirement date will to to temper one's desire to merge companies.

    1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Many of us have always felt HUMMER should have been a special package you could put on your GMC. That is the best thing for GM. 

     

     

     

    In regards to buying Jeep, Wish I could do a better job at sarcasm. Sorry, the whole jeep thing was a sarcasm comment on my behalf. :P

     

    Gotcha.  Didn't they do a sweet looking 2 door Hummer concept quite a few years ago that would have made a great Wrangler competitor?

    Hummer_HX_NY.jpg

     

    There it is!  Update that with GMC styling and modern interior and I don't think they could keep them on the lot.

     

     

    Yup that would be awesome in a GMC grilled tweak and have both a monochrome and Denali package version.

     

    Just think put that little 2.8L Duramax engine in it and you have a winner winner chicken dinner.

     

    Exactly, they could use the Colorado/Canyon platform and give it all the goodies of the ZR2 concept.  Maybe pricey, but I have no doubt they would sell everone they could make.

    0

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

    Guest
    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor




  • Popular Stories

  • Similar Content

    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Europe's 400 Ultra-Fast Charging Network by 2020

      Europe like America has the 3 basic charging standards in play in their fragile network of 2016. These is what we know as the 110, 220 and 440, level 1, 2 and 3 chargers. Yet Europe is not standing by waiting for Tesla or American Auto companies to drive EV auto's. Instead Europe has built the following consortium of Auto companies who have all chosen to contribute an equal amount to building the next generation charger network. VW, GM, BMW, Daimler, FORD, FCA, Hyundai, Volvo and Jaguar Land Rover have choosen to build 400 locations over the next 3 years that will sense and charge up to 350 kW in the period of a quick Coffee break. This is significantly faster and higher than the Tesla 120kW fast charging system. The goal by the European Government is to offer road trip worthy auto's with fast charging to bring less noise and cleaner air to European cities by 2020 and to make the bulk of inner city auto's EV's within 10 years of the fast charging system going live, so by 2030.

      Diamler is wanting to lead the European charge with their 300+ kilometer EV-CUV

      This would seem to show that Tesla has had the desired effect of making a market changing revolution of how companies and governments see the future of transportation.
      Source PM
    • By William Maley
      Sales of Fiat vehicles in the U.S. have been tanking and FCA is making a drastic change to try and reverse this. Automotive News got their hands on documents revealing a new pricing structure that will see Fiat cut the prices on some of their models.
      The base 500 will see a price cut of $2,000 ($14,995 from $16,995). The price doesn't include a $995 destination charge. The big price cuts will come to the 500C lineup as there will now be a $1,495 difference between the cabrio and regular hardtop. A key example is the 500C Abarth which sees its price drop from $26,695 to $21,490 for 2017. Prices for the 124 Spider and 500X remain unchanged.
      A Fiat spokesman declined to comment.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers and Gears

      View full article
    • By William Maley
      Sales of Fiat vehicles in the U.S. have been tanking and FCA is making a drastic change to try and reverse this. Automotive News got their hands on documents revealing a new pricing structure that will see Fiat cut the prices on some of their models.
      The base 500 will see a price cut of $2,000 ($14,995 from $16,995). The price doesn't include a $995 destination charge. The big price cuts will come to the 500C lineup as there will now be a $1,495 difference between the cabrio and regular hardtop. A key example is the 500C Abarth which sees its price drop from $26,695 to $21,490 for 2017. Prices for the 124 Spider and 500X remain unchanged.
      A Fiat spokesman declined to comment.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)
      Pic Credit: William Maley for Cheers and Gears
    • By dfelt
      G. David Felt
      Staff Writer Alternative Energy - www.CheersandGears.com
       
      Tesla / Solarcity merger, Brilliant or Disaster?

      Tesla announced their intent to buy SolarCity and some screamed the sky is falling. Tesla moves forward with offering a complete home solution of Solar panels, battery bank and 220V charging for your Tesla and believes they have the future tied up in a single one stop shopping solution that beats all the other Auto OEMS.

      The merger final vote by Solarcity shareholders is scheduled for Nov 17th 2016. Yet with this deal not done yet, there are many that have divided into two camps, those that think this is brilliant such as reported by Barron's yesterday that ISS one of the largest outside analyst groups that advises shareholders on mergers gave it's blessing to what they believe is an outstanding tie up of two companies that can maximize return on investments. Barron's believes that Tesla has addressed all the concerns that allow for a successful merger of the two companies and a maximizing of complementary products.
      Barron's Story
      One CNBC story feels that this merger might even be a little late. They agree that Solarcity will provide about $1 Billion next year in revenue to the new merged company and add about $500 million in cash to the Tesla corporation over the next 3 years.
      CNBC Story
      Then you have the latest story also from CNBC where a different analyst believes this is nothing but one large mistake and that is due to what he sees as an impossible return on the investment. Yet even with that he also points out to strong supporters such as Ron Baron who ownes 1.5 million shares that see a 30 to 50 times return on the stock due to the merger. 
      CNBC Story 2
      Yet with all this,  “Playing Amish Paradise in my Tesla,” Musk shared with his 5.8 million Twitter followers on Sunday we have the man himself seeing a much simpler life for us all in the new EV world.
       
      So what is your thoughts on this whole merger and the new EV world Musk sees for us all?
       
    • By William Maley
      In 2016, nine brands sold 20 diesel models in the U.S. But in light of the Volkswagen diesel emission scandal, a number from Volkswagen, Audi, and Porsche have been sidelined. But there are diesel models from GM, FCA, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Jaguar, and Land Rover still being offered. But the only 2017 models you can buy at the moment are from Jaguar and Land Rover. Where are the rest? In limbo thanks to a new battery of tests being doing by the EPA.
      Automotive News reports that since last October, the EPA has been subjecting diesel models to new tests to determine if other automakers are pulling any sneaky cheats. The EPA hasn't said anything publicly about the tests aside from them keeping the vehicles and testing them in unpredictable ways. So far, the new tests haven't uncovered any cheating.
      "It is true that diesel vehicles are getting extra scrutiny and that has extended the certification process longer than normal. In general, manufacturers have been supportive of this additional testing and have adjusted their timing to account for the additional test duration," EPA spokesman Nick Conger said to Automotive News.
      Case in point, BMW will not be launching their 2017 3-Series and X3 diesels until the end of the year, with the X5 following in January. Meanwhile, sources at GM tell Automotive News they're awaiting approval for 2017 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon diesels before they start sending them out to dealers. FCA doesn't have any 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee or Ram 1500 EcoDiesels at the moment despite press details saying they would be offered. An FCA spokesman declined to comment to Automotive News - our guess is that FCA is waiting.
      Mercedes-Benz could be the big loser with this extensive testing. The German automaker was planning to sell four diesel models; C-Class sedan, GLC, GLE, and GLS. Mercedes-Benz spokesman Robert Moran tells Automotive News in an email that the priority for the moment is getting the certification for the GLS. Moran declined to say if Mercedes is planning to offer diesel versions of the GLC and GLE. However, the C-Class diesel has been taken off the table due to "product strategy reasons." This model was supposed to go on sale at the beginning of this year.
      Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)

      View full article
  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)