Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • G. David Felt
    G. David Felt

    2026 IONIQ 5 EV Lineup has Major Price Reduction

      As the sun sets on the U.S. EV Rebates program, Hyundai has taken the step to keep EVs selling and with this, is price reductions that are bigger than the Rebate used to be. Check how how big the price reductions are by model.

    Hyundai Motor America reinforced their commitment to EVs in making them more accessible and competitive in today's evolving U.S. EV market. In better alignment with current market dynamics, supporting increased U.S. production volume, Hyundai announced for the 2026 Model year price reductions ranging from $7,600 to $9,800 dollars across the complete model lineup.

    To quote president and CEO of Hyundai North America Randy Parker, “Hyundai is taking bold steps to ensure our award-winning IONIQ 5 remains a top choice for EV buyers, this pricing realignment reflects our commitment to delivering exceptional technology and innovation without compromise.”

    The 2026 lineup has the following changes:

    • Dual amperage Level1 / Level 2 combination charger now included with all models
    • New Sage Silver Matte color
    • Vibrant Ultimate Red and Cosmic Blue Pearl colors available on all models

    Hyundai remains committed to delivering top value and even though the federal rebate has ended, Hyundai will continue to honor the $7,500 rebate on all qualifying purchases and leases of the 2025 IONIQ 5's left in stock.

    Hyundai IONIQ 5 has earned the following awards:

    • World Car of the Year
    • World Electric Vehicle of the Year
    • World Car Design of the Year
    • IIHS Top Safety Pick+
    • Best Electric SUV – U.S. News & World Report
    • Best Tech Powertrain – MotorTrend
    • EV of the Year – Car and Driver
    • Top Pick for New Parents/Suburbanites/Tomorrow Seekers – Newsweek Auto Awards
    • Best Cars for the Money – U.S. News
    • Best Electric Vehicle – Cars.com
    • Wards 10 Best Engines & Propulsion Systems
    • Best Buy Awards – Kelley Blue Book

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Part of this was planned a few years ago. Hyundai moved production of the Ioniq 5 to the U.S. to help with pricing. before tariffs were a thing.  I think the 2026 model year is the first full year of US production.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What makes this so great is that the reduction is more than the IRA Rebate and way better than the idiot Tesla 11% increase in cost with an auto $6,500 Tesla rebate for purchases or leases. Tesla is stupid compared to Hyundai. At least Ford and GM have honored the $7,500 rebates still but kept prices the same. I suspect we will see them drop prices to compete with Hyundai.

    Be interesting to see how Kia and Genesis responds as well as the European companies and the few Japanese options.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A needed cut since this vehicle has been on the market a while.  I wonder if they are making any money on these at that price.  

    But the only way EV's take over is when they get cheaper than gas, this is still more than a Tucson, but the gap is getting closer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    A needed cut since this vehicle has been on the market a while.  I wonder if they are making any money on these at that price.  

    But the only way EV's take over is when they get cheaper than gas, this is still more than a Tucson, but the gap is getting closer.

    EVs in North America better get an even MORE price cut because the Chinese EV makers are on stand-by and ready to flood this market.  All it takes is Canada to eliminate the 100% tariffs on them and Chinese EVs will enter with ease spelling the end for GM and Ford and quite possibly Tesla.  Stellantis could maybe survive via Europe but only in Europe.   KIA could survive as KIA's mother market is not a dumb one like in Trump's America. 

    Its funny to me when anti-EV morons say NOBODY wants an EV.  Yet...the US and Canada have 100% tariffs on them. If NOBODY wants EVs, then why the 100% tariff on them? NOBODY would be buying them anyway regardless if tariffed or not.  Nobody wants EVs, right???!!! 

    But ah.....people DO want EVs. ESPECIALLY if they are of the low-priced variety.  And it seems like the ones that China will offer us WOULD be of the low-priced yet very competent variety.    

    The situation of new car prices in the US, even for ICEV, has reached the point of ridiculousness. And with many jobs being lost daily, the question is, who the hell could afford ANY new car in the US REGARDLESS if ICEV or EV?

    But here in Canada, we are doing well enough.  We are de-coupling from the US in certain areas. In other markets, Canada is side stepping and pivoting away from the US but keeping the US as a partner...for now.  

    In the automotive area, we are quite dependant still and quite in bed with the US.  But, push come to shove, and we may have to drastically de-couple and fast.  And it aint a joke either.  Our politically Provincial leaders, most of them, are SERIOUSLY DEMANDING our Prime Minister to SERIOUSLY take into consideration in eliminating these tariffs we have levied on Chinese EVs to let them in our market.  And Carney, our PM, is REALLY looking into this matter.  Yet again, sometime this week, tomorrow or whatever, he will meet with Trump to discuss the bulsshyte talk of the 51st  State rhetoric and the tariff situation between the US and Canada.  If this talk will go nowhere,  like it probably will lead to nothing... Chineses EVs are THAT much closer in being sold in Canada.   

    Trump likes to lie and suggest Canada is folding, but its the opposite, anytime talks between Carney and Trump fail, another nail in the coffin for the US as Carney then just goes to Europe and makes another trade deal for Canada and the Eurozone.  China will probably be solved before 2026 appears...  

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/6/2025 at 6:39 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    EVs in North America better get an even MORE price cut because the Chinese EV makers are on stand-by and ready to flood this market.  All it takes is Canada to eliminate the 100% tariffs on them and Chinese EVs will enter with ease spelling the end for GM and Ford and quite possibly Tesla.  Stellantis could maybe survive via Europe but only in Europe.   KIA could survive as KIA's mother market is not a dumb one like in Trump's America. 

    Its funny to me when anti-EV morons say NOBODY wants an EV.  Yet...the US and Canada have 100% tariffs on them. If NOBODY wants EVs, then why the 100% tariff on them? NOBODY would be buying them anyway regardless if tariffed or not.  Nobody wants EVs, right???!!! 

    But ah.....people DO want EVs. ESPECIALLY if they are of the low-priced variety.  And it seems like the ones that China will offer us WOULD be of the low-priced yet very competent variety.    

    The situation of new car prices in the US, even for ICEV, has reached the point of ridiculousness. And with many jobs being lost daily, the question is, who the hell could afford ANY new car in the US REGARDLESS if ICEV or EV?

    But here in Canada, we are doing well enough.  We are de-coupling from the US in certain areas. In other markets, Canada is side stepping and pivoting away from the US but keeping the US as a partner...for now.  

    In the automotive area, we are quite dependant still and quite in bed with the US.  But, push come to shove, and we may have to drastically de-couple and fast.  And it aint a joke either.  Our politically Provincial leaders, most of them, are SERIOUSLY DEMANDING our Prime Minister to SERIOUSLY take into consideration in eliminating these tariffs we have levied on Chinese EVs to let them in our market.  And Carney, our PM, is REALLY looking into this matter.  Yet again, sometime this week, tomorrow or whatever, he will meet with Trump to discuss the bulsshyte talk of the 51st  State rhetoric and the tariff situation between the US and Canada.  If this talk will go nowhere,  like it probably will lead to nothing... Chineses EVs are THAT much closer in being sold in Canada.   

    Trump likes to lie and suggest Canada is folding, but its the opposite, anytime talks between Carney and Trump fail, another nail in the coffin for the US as Carney then just goes to Europe and makes another trade deal for Canada and the Eurozone.  China will probably be solved before 2026 appears...  

     

    If there was no tariff on Chinese EVs, the time it would take for Chinese EV's to basically wipe out legacy automakers would only be the time it takes for them to build more factories and produce the cars and ship them across the ocean.  

    I for the most part would like to see 0% tariffs because I think for the most part you let the free market play out and costs are lower for consumers that way.  I get that in some areas you need some minor tariffs, or putting tariffs or sanctions on countries like Iran or Russia just to stop their imports for a war reason.  On Chinese cars, it should probably be 20%, if the domestics can't beat them with a 20% advantage they should be out of business.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    domestics can't beat them with a 20% advantage they should be out of business

    You wanna have Chinese wages in the US too?  One of my clients outsources their helpdesk to the Philippines. I've been involved in the hiring process and what they're paying the outsourcing company (who takes a cut) for a month salary is half what someone would make working in the US at federal minimum wage. I'm sure China is similar.

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/6/2025 at 3:39 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    EVs in North America better get an even MORE price cut because the Chinese EV makers are on stand-by and ready to flood this market.  All it takes is Canada to eliminate the 100% tariffs on them and Chinese EVs will enter with ease spelling the end for GM and Ford and quite possibly Tesla.  Stellantis could maybe survive via Europe but only in Europe.   KIA could survive as KIA's mother market is not a dumb one like in Trump's America. 

    Its funny to me when anti-EV morons say NOBODY wants an EV.  Yet...the US and Canada have 100% tariffs on them. If NOBODY wants EVs, then why the 100% tariff on them? NOBODY would be buying them anyway regardless if tariffed or not.  Nobody wants EVs, right???!!! 

    But ah.....people DO want EVs. ESPECIALLY if they are of the low-priced variety.  And it seems like the ones that China will offer us WOULD be of the low-priced yet very competent variety.    

    The situation of new car prices in the US, even for ICEV, has reached the point of ridiculousness. And with many jobs being lost daily, the question is, who the hell could afford ANY new car in the US REGARDLESS if ICEV or EV?

    But here in Canada, we are doing well enough.  We are de-coupling from the US in certain areas. In other markets, Canada is side stepping and pivoting away from the US but keeping the US as a partner...for now.  

    In the automotive area, we are quite dependant still and quite in bed with the US.  But, push come to shove, and we may have to drastically de-couple and fast.  And it aint a joke either.  Our politically Provincial leaders, most of them, are SERIOUSLY DEMANDING our Prime Minister to SERIOUSLY take into consideration in eliminating these tariffs we have levied on Chinese EVs to let them in our market.  And Carney, our PM, is REALLY looking into this matter.  Yet again, sometime this week, tomorrow or whatever, he will meet with Trump to discuss the bulsshyte talk of the 51st  State rhetoric and the tariff situation between the US and Canada.  If this talk will go nowhere,  like it probably will lead to nothing... Chineses EVs are THAT much closer in being sold in Canada.   

    Trump likes to lie and suggest Canada is folding, but its the opposite, anytime talks between Carney and Trump fail, another nail in the coffin for the US as Carney then just goes to Europe and makes another trade deal for Canada and the Eurozone.  China will probably be solved before 2026 appears...  

     

    What is the 51st state doing making their own trade agreements? ;) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    You wanna have Chinese wages in the US too?  One of my clients outsources their helpdesk to the Philippines. I've been involved in the hiring process and what they're paying the outsourcing company (who takes a cut) for a month salary is half what someone would make working in the US at federal minimum wage. I'm sure China is similar.

     

    I do not, but labor is about 7% of the cost of a car.  You could say 25% tax on Chinese built cars like you have with the Chicken tax and that has seemed to work stopping Euro truck imports.  But the Chinese car companies can also build cars in Mexico, or Brazil or Indonesia or wherever else with lower labor cost than the USA too.

    The idea of tariffs are needed to boost jobs and manufacturing in the USA is a flawed theory though, because ever since April when the tariffs hit, unemployment as gone up and number of manufacturing jobs in the USA has gone down.  It is bad economics.

    We buy clothes, computers, shoes, phones, plastic lawn decorations and all other kind of stuff form Asia because it is lower cost.  I don't think cars should be any different really.  If BYD can sell a $25,000 3-row SUV then more power to them, and let consumers decide if they want to buy that or a $45,000 Traverse and if they perceive the Chevy as better quality then they'll pay the difference just as some people buy clothes at Walmart and some buy at Nordstrom.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/8/2025 at 12:43 PM, G. David Felt said:

    What is the 51st state doing making their own trade agreements? ;) 

    No taxation without representation is what.

    Lutnick  Licknut said of the US/Canada talks a couple of days ago that US first, Canada second for the automotive sector.

    Normally Id have to agree with him in regards for him as an American to protect the US economy.  You cannot blame an American economist vying to protect his country's economic interests.

    Problem is...

    Smoke Oscar Isaac GIF - Smoke Oscar Isaac - Discover & Share GIFs

    ...in the North American automotive industry ( USA/Canada relationship), building and selling cars for the benefit Americans first is kinda deeper than that.  I mean, forget about the close to 100 years of Detroit having factories in Canada and Canadians building the vehicles for Americans.  And forget about Canadian factories building American cars for Canadians. Forget also that...Ford (and Mercury), Chryco, (mostly Dodge) and General Motors (mostly Pontiac) had EXCLUSIVE Canadian specific models that Canadians built in Canadian factories for Canadians BECAUSE of US/Canada treaties...  Yeah...forget that legality once upon a time ago to which those Canadian specific models also helped the US economy GREATLY in many ways...  Forget about all that 100 year history and economical ties.  

    There is a deeper more complex reality that involves Canadian iron ore, steel, aluminium... 

    There is a sad song about a ship that sank in the Great Lakes if anybody cares to listen to it 

    But I digress...

    Drake Sips Tea GIF | GIFDB.com

     

    Anyway...ships like the Tadoussac

    Tadoussac — CANAL

    and the Niagara

    CSL Niagara - From Salt to Iron

     

    hauled Canadian iron ore from Quebec mostly...CHEAP, VERY CHEAP, VERY VERY VERY...VERY CHEAP CANADIAN IRON ORE to Detroit for Detroit to build these gas guzzling beasts where Detroit became the RICHEST city in the United States of America once upon a time ago.  

    Trump said in this meeting hat there will be a satisfactory deal with Canada that Canadians will once again travel to...

    You know...

    Ah Well GIFs | Tenor

     

    Phoque Lutnick  Licknut!!!!

    Phoque Trump!!!

    Phoque the US!!!

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/8/2025 at 7:31 PM, smk4565 said:

    I do not, but labor is about 7% of the cost of a car.  You could say 25% tax on Chinese built cars like you have with the Chicken tax and that has seemed to work stopping Euro truck imports.  But the Chinese car companies can also build cars in Mexico, or Brazil or Indonesia or wherever else with lower labor cost than the USA too.

    The idea of tariffs are needed to boost jobs and manufacturing in the USA is a flawed theory though, because ever since April when the tariffs hit, unemployment as gone up and number of manufacturing jobs in the USA has gone down.  It is bad economics.

     

    That's because the blundering idiot did tariffs wrong.  Tariffs should only be used to protect existing or newly emerging industries, or in cases where a country is dumping products (like China did with solar panels and wind turbine equipment, and will do with batteries). Biden got the tariffs on Chinese EVs right because it paired that with domestic incentives to build those battery factories here. Obama reacted to the Chinese economic threat too late on solar panels and the entire domestic solar panel manufacturing industry got wiped out.  Tariffs can be a useful tool when used with some precision. This is just a big senile orange elephant swinging a wrecking ball. 

    On 10/8/2025 at 7:31 PM, smk4565 said:

    some people buy clothes at Walmart and some buy at Nordstrom.

    The catch there is that they're both made in china.   Those on the lower end of the economic ladder who are on the right do have a valid grievance with the way the economy is set up. While they are wrong about its cause, ignoring their needs has clearly resulted in suffering for the rest of us. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Canada's waterbomber fleet These guys Manitoba's fleet is 40 years old While Quebec's youngest fleet is also at 40 years old while its oldest is 53 years old.     Spain, Greece and France also have the same age range as Quebec's.  The older version which is the CL-215,  is 50 years plus in service for all that use it. They are still flying.  The next gen CL 415 is 30-40 years in service for all fleet users.  Canadair/Bombardier has sold the license to Viking and they are currently working on updating the airplane. It is called the CL 515.   European users are desperately wanting to replace their fleets.  Deliveries of the new CL 515 is said to be in early 2026.  With the water bombers, its not just cycles that put pressure on the sheet metal for metal fatigue. Its the weight of the water itself taking off from a lake. But mostly, when the water gets released.  HUGE amounts of pressure stresses  the structure when the water is released and all that weight that is released instantly and is no more.  
    • I also like black cats. I flew on a 747-400 within the last year or two.  I think it was about 25 years old.  It's an incredible machine.  I'm always a happy camper (without a Subaru) when I'm aboard one. 
    • @A Horse With No Name @oldshurst442 You guys are correct, cycle of take off and landing more than age. I should have expanded myself as my brother inlaw is a manager at Boeing with many patents for his specialty which is the airplane engines on the 737, 757, 777, 787 and the king 747. He has stated that the force of the engines cause fatigue in ALL aircrafts that hit 10 years and depending on the flying they have done, passenger versus freight, while a plane can go 20 or 30 years, many should have a very close inspection at 10 years for corrosion, metal fatigue, etc. Could be one reason some airline companies retire their aircraft after 10 years rather than continue to fly them.  Many things make up the age of an aircraft and years is only 1 little part of it, Force makes up a much bigger part.  Thank you for pointing out what I failed to expand on in my original post.
    • As one who deals with AI daily, building training, coding for data lakes to help others understand their data and what it can do for them, I have come to one reason for turning off copilot, the attempt that it makes over and over in correcting my writing and word use when it does not understand technical terms, legal terms, medical terms and then changes the whole meaning of a sentence due to the changes if I do not catch it. AI bots are great for helping find info on processes and configuration of a product such as our Dell PowerScale OneFS filer or our ObjectScale Object storage devices so that admins can quickly get the instructions on how to configure features. Otherwise, the rest of AI trying to tell me how I should do something makes it annoying and worse yet is the incredible amount of memory / CPU cycles it takes that I would rather use on other things that I do with my computer. Personally, I wish AI bots would not use any resources until I click on it and want it to work, once I close it, it should totally turn off rather than idle in the background listening to you.
    • Yes and ummmmm...no.  Yes.   Metal fatigue is a very real thing in aviation.  Its more about how many times the sheet metal has expanded and contracted  under stress rather than the age of the airplane itself.  10 years is somewhat too young for an airplane to be retired as airplanes are engineered fly double and even triple that age.  Unless of course the airplane in question has taken off, flown and landed enough times that would equal its maximum lifespan in 10 years.   This latest accident, UPS had a 34 year old McDonnel-Douglas MD-11 flying around.  Now...at 34 years of age, this airplane should been of concern... yes.   Like I said, airplanes' lifespans reach 30 years.  Sometimes more than that if maintenance is done properly and rigorously.   Using google and Wikipedia, if fact, 2 months prior, the airplane in question HAD been grounded for 6 weeks because cracks were found in the fuel tanks. Corrosion was also found in the structural beams in its fuselage. Repairs were made.  However, with airplanes, age is not a criteria for maintenance. But hours of flight and "cycles".   A cycle is 1 take-off and 1 landing sequence.  The airplane had logged 21000 and change cycles and the maintenance threshold for what had ultimately failed in the airplane was not due until 28 000 and 29 000 cycles.  Now...at 34 years old, maybe more vigilance was needed... This is how the airplane safety industry works. It takes an accident to amend and/or instate new safety regulations.  Maybe with this accident, NTSB will implement an age criteria too alongside flight hours and cycles.  At age 30 and a more rigorous inspection is to happen and not rely solely on cycles and flight hours.    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPS_Airlines_Flight_2976 The aircraft, N259UP, was a 34-year-old McDonnell Douglas MD-11F with manufacturer serial number 48417. The aircraft was first delivered to Thai Airways International in 1991 with the registration HS-TME,[7] after which it was converted to a cargo aircraft and delivered to UPS Airlines in 2006. It had flown 21,043 cycles and for about 92,992 hours,[8] and was equipped with three General Electric CF6-80C2D1F engines.[9][10][11] The last visual inspections of the left pylon aft mount were performed in October 2021. More rigorous "Special Detailed Inspections" for the mount lugs and wing clevis were not yet due, as the aircraft's 21,043 accumulated cycles were well below the 28,000 and 29,200 cycle thresholds required for those checks. Two months before the crash, it had been grounded for six weeks to repair a cracked fuel tank, and corrosion was later found along two structural beams in the fuselage. The aircraft re-entered service a few weeks before the crash.[12]    
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search