Jump to content
Create New...
  • 🚗 Your People Are Here. Get In.

    The internet is full of car content. This is the community.

    Cheers & Gears has been bringing enthusiasts together since 2001. Join the conversation, show off your garage, and find your people.

  • G. David Felt
    G. David Felt

    2026 IONIQ 5 EV Lineup has Major Price Reduction

      As the sun sets on the U.S. EV Rebates program, Hyundai has taken the step to keep EVs selling and with this, is price reductions that are bigger than the Rebate used to be. Check how how big the price reductions are by model.

    Hyundai Motor America reinforced their commitment to EVs in making them more accessible and competitive in today's evolving U.S. EV market. In better alignment with current market dynamics, supporting increased U.S. production volume, Hyundai announced for the 2026 Model year price reductions ranging from $7,600 to $9,800 dollars across the complete model lineup.

    To quote president and CEO of Hyundai North America Randy Parker, “Hyundai is taking bold steps to ensure our award-winning IONIQ 5 remains a top choice for EV buyers, this pricing realignment reflects our commitment to delivering exceptional technology and innovation without compromise.”

    The 2026 lineup has the following changes:

    • Dual amperage Level1 / Level 2 combination charger now included with all models
    • New Sage Silver Matte color
    • Vibrant Ultimate Red and Cosmic Blue Pearl colors available on all models

    Hyundai remains committed to delivering top value and even though the federal rebate has ended, Hyundai will continue to honor the $7,500 rebate on all qualifying purchases and leases of the 2025 IONIQ 5's left in stock.

    Hyundai IONIQ 5 has earned the following awards:

    • World Car of the Year
    • World Electric Vehicle of the Year
    • World Car Design of the Year
    • IIHS Top Safety Pick+
    • Best Electric SUV – U.S. News & World Report
    • Best Tech Powertrain – MotorTrend
    • EV of the Year – Car and Driver
    • Top Pick for New Parents/Suburbanites/Tomorrow Seekers – Newsweek Auto Awards
    • Best Cars for the Money – U.S. News
    • Best Electric Vehicle – Cars.com
    • Wards 10 Best Engines & Propulsion Systems
    • Best Buy Awards – Kelley Blue Book

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Part of this was planned a few years ago. Hyundai moved production of the Ioniq 5 to the U.S. to help with pricing. before tariffs were a thing.  I think the 2026 model year is the first full year of US production.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What makes this so great is that the reduction is more than the IRA Rebate and way better than the idiot Tesla 11% increase in cost with an auto $6,500 Tesla rebate for purchases or leases. Tesla is stupid compared to Hyundai. At least Ford and GM have honored the $7,500 rebates still but kept prices the same. I suspect we will see them drop prices to compete with Hyundai.

    Be interesting to see how Kia and Genesis responds as well as the European companies and the few Japanese options.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A needed cut since this vehicle has been on the market a while.  I wonder if they are making any money on these at that price.  

    But the only way EV's take over is when they get cheaper than gas, this is still more than a Tucson, but the gap is getting closer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    A needed cut since this vehicle has been on the market a while.  I wonder if they are making any money on these at that price.  

    But the only way EV's take over is when they get cheaper than gas, this is still more than a Tucson, but the gap is getting closer.

    EVs in North America better get an even MORE price cut because the Chinese EV makers are on stand-by and ready to flood this market.  All it takes is Canada to eliminate the 100% tariffs on them and Chinese EVs will enter with ease spelling the end for GM and Ford and quite possibly Tesla.  Stellantis could maybe survive via Europe but only in Europe.   KIA could survive as KIA's mother market is not a dumb one like in Trump's America. 

    Its funny to me when anti-EV morons say NOBODY wants an EV.  Yet...the US and Canada have 100% tariffs on them. If NOBODY wants EVs, then why the 100% tariff on them? NOBODY would be buying them anyway regardless if tariffed or not.  Nobody wants EVs, right???!!! 

    But ah.....people DO want EVs. ESPECIALLY if they are of the low-priced variety.  And it seems like the ones that China will offer us WOULD be of the low-priced yet very competent variety.    

    The situation of new car prices in the US, even for ICEV, has reached the point of ridiculousness. And with many jobs being lost daily, the question is, who the hell could afford ANY new car in the US REGARDLESS if ICEV or EV?

    But here in Canada, we are doing well enough.  We are de-coupling from the US in certain areas. In other markets, Canada is side stepping and pivoting away from the US but keeping the US as a partner...for now.  

    In the automotive area, we are quite dependant still and quite in bed with the US.  But, push come to shove, and we may have to drastically de-couple and fast.  And it aint a joke either.  Our politically Provincial leaders, most of them, are SERIOUSLY DEMANDING our Prime Minister to SERIOUSLY take into consideration in eliminating these tariffs we have levied on Chinese EVs to let them in our market.  And Carney, our PM, is REALLY looking into this matter.  Yet again, sometime this week, tomorrow or whatever, he will meet with Trump to discuss the bulsshyte talk of the 51st  State rhetoric and the tariff situation between the US and Canada.  If this talk will go nowhere,  like it probably will lead to nothing... Chineses EVs are THAT much closer in being sold in Canada.   

    Trump likes to lie and suggest Canada is folding, but its the opposite, anytime talks between Carney and Trump fail, another nail in the coffin for the US as Carney then just goes to Europe and makes another trade deal for Canada and the Eurozone.  China will probably be solved before 2026 appears...  

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/6/2025 at 6:39 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    EVs in North America better get an even MORE price cut because the Chinese EV makers are on stand-by and ready to flood this market.  All it takes is Canada to eliminate the 100% tariffs on them and Chinese EVs will enter with ease spelling the end for GM and Ford and quite possibly Tesla.  Stellantis could maybe survive via Europe but only in Europe.   KIA could survive as KIA's mother market is not a dumb one like in Trump's America. 

    Its funny to me when anti-EV morons say NOBODY wants an EV.  Yet...the US and Canada have 100% tariffs on them. If NOBODY wants EVs, then why the 100% tariff on them? NOBODY would be buying them anyway regardless if tariffed or not.  Nobody wants EVs, right???!!! 

    But ah.....people DO want EVs. ESPECIALLY if they are of the low-priced variety.  And it seems like the ones that China will offer us WOULD be of the low-priced yet very competent variety.    

    The situation of new car prices in the US, even for ICEV, has reached the point of ridiculousness. And with many jobs being lost daily, the question is, who the hell could afford ANY new car in the US REGARDLESS if ICEV or EV?

    But here in Canada, we are doing well enough.  We are de-coupling from the US in certain areas. In other markets, Canada is side stepping and pivoting away from the US but keeping the US as a partner...for now.  

    In the automotive area, we are quite dependant still and quite in bed with the US.  But, push come to shove, and we may have to drastically de-couple and fast.  And it aint a joke either.  Our politically Provincial leaders, most of them, are SERIOUSLY DEMANDING our Prime Minister to SERIOUSLY take into consideration in eliminating these tariffs we have levied on Chinese EVs to let them in our market.  And Carney, our PM, is REALLY looking into this matter.  Yet again, sometime this week, tomorrow or whatever, he will meet with Trump to discuss the bulsshyte talk of the 51st  State rhetoric and the tariff situation between the US and Canada.  If this talk will go nowhere,  like it probably will lead to nothing... Chineses EVs are THAT much closer in being sold in Canada.   

    Trump likes to lie and suggest Canada is folding, but its the opposite, anytime talks between Carney and Trump fail, another nail in the coffin for the US as Carney then just goes to Europe and makes another trade deal for Canada and the Eurozone.  China will probably be solved before 2026 appears...  

     

    If there was no tariff on Chinese EVs, the time it would take for Chinese EV's to basically wipe out legacy automakers would only be the time it takes for them to build more factories and produce the cars and ship them across the ocean.  

    I for the most part would like to see 0% tariffs because I think for the most part you let the free market play out and costs are lower for consumers that way.  I get that in some areas you need some minor tariffs, or putting tariffs or sanctions on countries like Iran or Russia just to stop their imports for a war reason.  On Chinese cars, it should probably be 20%, if the domestics can't beat them with a 20% advantage they should be out of business.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    domestics can't beat them with a 20% advantage they should be out of business

    You wanna have Chinese wages in the US too?  One of my clients outsources their helpdesk to the Philippines. I've been involved in the hiring process and what they're paying the outsourcing company (who takes a cut) for a month salary is half what someone would make working in the US at federal minimum wage. I'm sure China is similar.

     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/6/2025 at 3:39 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    EVs in North America better get an even MORE price cut because the Chinese EV makers are on stand-by and ready to flood this market.  All it takes is Canada to eliminate the 100% tariffs on them and Chinese EVs will enter with ease spelling the end for GM and Ford and quite possibly Tesla.  Stellantis could maybe survive via Europe but only in Europe.   KIA could survive as KIA's mother market is not a dumb one like in Trump's America. 

    Its funny to me when anti-EV morons say NOBODY wants an EV.  Yet...the US and Canada have 100% tariffs on them. If NOBODY wants EVs, then why the 100% tariff on them? NOBODY would be buying them anyway regardless if tariffed or not.  Nobody wants EVs, right???!!! 

    But ah.....people DO want EVs. ESPECIALLY if they are of the low-priced variety.  And it seems like the ones that China will offer us WOULD be of the low-priced yet very competent variety.    

    The situation of new car prices in the US, even for ICEV, has reached the point of ridiculousness. And with many jobs being lost daily, the question is, who the hell could afford ANY new car in the US REGARDLESS if ICEV or EV?

    But here in Canada, we are doing well enough.  We are de-coupling from the US in certain areas. In other markets, Canada is side stepping and pivoting away from the US but keeping the US as a partner...for now.  

    In the automotive area, we are quite dependant still and quite in bed with the US.  But, push come to shove, and we may have to drastically de-couple and fast.  And it aint a joke either.  Our politically Provincial leaders, most of them, are SERIOUSLY DEMANDING our Prime Minister to SERIOUSLY take into consideration in eliminating these tariffs we have levied on Chinese EVs to let them in our market.  And Carney, our PM, is REALLY looking into this matter.  Yet again, sometime this week, tomorrow or whatever, he will meet with Trump to discuss the bulsshyte talk of the 51st  State rhetoric and the tariff situation between the US and Canada.  If this talk will go nowhere,  like it probably will lead to nothing... Chineses EVs are THAT much closer in being sold in Canada.   

    Trump likes to lie and suggest Canada is folding, but its the opposite, anytime talks between Carney and Trump fail, another nail in the coffin for the US as Carney then just goes to Europe and makes another trade deal for Canada and the Eurozone.  China will probably be solved before 2026 appears...  

     

    What is the 51st state doing making their own trade agreements? ;) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    You wanna have Chinese wages in the US too?  One of my clients outsources their helpdesk to the Philippines. I've been involved in the hiring process and what they're paying the outsourcing company (who takes a cut) for a month salary is half what someone would make working in the US at federal minimum wage. I'm sure China is similar.

     

    I do not, but labor is about 7% of the cost of a car.  You could say 25% tax on Chinese built cars like you have with the Chicken tax and that has seemed to work stopping Euro truck imports.  But the Chinese car companies can also build cars in Mexico, or Brazil or Indonesia or wherever else with lower labor cost than the USA too.

    The idea of tariffs are needed to boost jobs and manufacturing in the USA is a flawed theory though, because ever since April when the tariffs hit, unemployment as gone up and number of manufacturing jobs in the USA has gone down.  It is bad economics.

    We buy clothes, computers, shoes, phones, plastic lawn decorations and all other kind of stuff form Asia because it is lower cost.  I don't think cars should be any different really.  If BYD can sell a $25,000 3-row SUV then more power to them, and let consumers decide if they want to buy that or a $45,000 Traverse and if they perceive the Chevy as better quality then they'll pay the difference just as some people buy clothes at Walmart and some buy at Nordstrom.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/8/2025 at 12:43 PM, G. David Felt said:

    What is the 51st state doing making their own trade agreements? ;) 

    No taxation without representation is what.

    Lutnick  Licknut said of the US/Canada talks a couple of days ago that US first, Canada second for the automotive sector.

    Normally Id have to agree with him in regards for him as an American to protect the US economy.  You cannot blame an American economist vying to protect his country's economic interests.

    Problem is...

    Smoke Oscar Isaac GIF - Smoke Oscar Isaac - Discover & Share GIFs

    ...in the North American automotive industry ( USA/Canada relationship), building and selling cars for the benefit Americans first is kinda deeper than that.  I mean, forget about the close to 100 years of Detroit having factories in Canada and Canadians building the vehicles for Americans.  And forget about Canadian factories building American cars for Canadians. Forget also that...Ford (and Mercury), Chryco, (mostly Dodge) and General Motors (mostly Pontiac) had EXCLUSIVE Canadian specific models that Canadians built in Canadian factories for Canadians BECAUSE of US/Canada treaties...  Yeah...forget that legality once upon a time ago to which those Canadian specific models also helped the US economy GREATLY in many ways...  Forget about all that 100 year history and economical ties.  

    There is a deeper more complex reality that involves Canadian iron ore, steel, aluminium... 

    There is a sad song about a ship that sank in the Great Lakes if anybody cares to listen to it 

    But I digress...

    Drake Sips Tea GIF | GIFDB.com

     

    Anyway...ships like the Tadoussac

    Tadoussac — CANAL

    and the Niagara

    CSL Niagara - From Salt to Iron

     

    hauled Canadian iron ore from Quebec mostly...CHEAP, VERY CHEAP, VERY VERY VERY...VERY CHEAP CANADIAN IRON ORE to Detroit for Detroit to build these gas guzzling beasts where Detroit became the RICHEST city in the United States of America once upon a time ago.  

    Trump said in this meeting hat there will be a satisfactory deal with Canada that Canadians will once again travel to...

    You know...

    Ah Well GIFs | Tenor

     

    Phoque Lutnick  Licknut!!!!

    Phoque Trump!!!

    Phoque the US!!!

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 10/8/2025 at 7:31 PM, smk4565 said:

    I do not, but labor is about 7% of the cost of a car.  You could say 25% tax on Chinese built cars like you have with the Chicken tax and that has seemed to work stopping Euro truck imports.  But the Chinese car companies can also build cars in Mexico, or Brazil or Indonesia or wherever else with lower labor cost than the USA too.

    The idea of tariffs are needed to boost jobs and manufacturing in the USA is a flawed theory though, because ever since April when the tariffs hit, unemployment as gone up and number of manufacturing jobs in the USA has gone down.  It is bad economics.

     

    That's because the blundering idiot did tariffs wrong.  Tariffs should only be used to protect existing or newly emerging industries, or in cases where a country is dumping products (like China did with solar panels and wind turbine equipment, and will do with batteries). Biden got the tariffs on Chinese EVs right because it paired that with domestic incentives to build those battery factories here. Obama reacted to the Chinese economic threat too late on solar panels and the entire domestic solar panel manufacturing industry got wiped out.  Tariffs can be a useful tool when used with some precision. This is just a big senile orange elephant swinging a wrecking ball. 

    On 10/8/2025 at 7:31 PM, smk4565 said:

    some people buy clothes at Walmart and some buy at Nordstrom.

    The catch there is that they're both made in china.   Those on the lower end of the economic ladder who are on the right do have a valid grievance with the way the economy is set up. While they are wrong about its cause, ignoring their needs has clearly resulted in suffering for the rest of us. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Independent Automotive Journalism

    25 years of honest automotive coverage — because someone has to do it.

    Cheers & Gears has never been filtered by manufacturer relationships or driven by algorithm. Just real people, real opinions, and a genuine love of cars. Subscribers keep the lights on and get an ad-light experience starting at $2.25/month.*

    View subscription options

    *A small number of ads feature member-exclusive coupon deals and will still appear.

  • Posts

    • Many Porsche 911 and 718 owners encounter illuminated PADM warning lights, disabled suspension systems and recurring fault codes 001013 & 001023. Most repair shops recommend replacing the entire PADM assembly at a steep cost. The root cause lies in factory sensors whose internal chips are secured only by adhesive; prolonged vibration and high engine heat peel off the glue, damaging chips and distorting signal data to trigger system errors.   Lumistag. supplies upgraded PADM sensors split into two vehicle-specific variants: Type A fits all 911 & 718 models (981,982,991 chassis); Type B exclusively suits 982-platform 718 including 2.0T/2.5T Base and T trim levels.   Abandoning the original glue-fixed design, these sensors adopt mechanically locked chips alongside CNC one-piece aluminum housing for superior heat and impact resistance. Pre-calibrated to OEM specs at factory, they feature plug-and-play installation with no extra coding needed. Replacing only the faulty single sensor clears error alerts and restores normal suspension function, cutting huge expenses from full assembly replacement. https://lumistag.com/
    • American, European and Asian automakers just got put on notice by China. BYD’s $10,300 EV Gets LiDAR While America Still Treats It Like Luxury Tech - Autoblog Only auto's that have LiDAR are going to truly deliver self driving auto's. In a sad note due to INCOMPETENT Idiot47 and his administration as well as the Lemmings of GOP in the House and Senate.  Mercedes-Benz Faces US Sales Ban Over Chinese Ownership Ties | automotive | informed, clearly Mercedes-Benz may be shut out of U.S. market under congressional bill Mercedes-Benz faces sales and production risk in US over Chinese-linked ownership Kiss the 11,000 manufacturing jobs goodbye, plants closed and the estimated 163,000 jobs at parts and supporting companies goodbye if this bill get approved. Another destruction by Idiot47 and his lemmings. Ignorance is destroying America. This is a sexy SUV I would love to drive BYD Gets 100,000 Bookings For A $36,700 Electric SUV Americans Haven't Even Heard Of - Autoblog
    • Welcome to the iCar as Jony Ives was the designer and lead during production. He could not get his iCar produced at Apple and so he got Ferrari to do it in an overpriced way. Ugly as heck, but hopefully the experience of actually driving it is better than the look. @surreal1272 @ccap41 Ferrari should have released the auto as a Concept to get feedback from the public as this iCar is a styling failure. They could have take the Jaguar XJ220 and put in an electric powertrain and been far more successful than this iCar release they did without all the negativity it has generated. Does Ferrari need to go electric? YES Is this the right auto for them? NO Is the software and driving dynamic worthy of a Ferrari? Unknown
    • ITA does not have a 747.  This is just a mock up if they did.  That's a good looking bird.  Alitalia had eight 747s and pulled them shortly after 9/11 because of the drop in air traffic and to cut costs. ITA uses the newer A350 and the updated A330-900neo for long haul flights. I have only flown on them domestically and was real excited to learn that they have added a seasonal Rome to Houston nonstop.  This is all because they have joined Star Alliance as a function of being picked up by Lufthansa.  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search