Jump to content
Create New...
  • 💬 Join the Conversation

    CnG Logo SQ 2023 RedBlue FavIcon300w.png
    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has been the go-to hub for automotive enthusiasts. Join today to access our vibrant forums, upload your vehicle to the Garage, and connect with fellow gearheads around the world.

     

  • trinacriabob
    trinacriabob

    Chevrolet Trailblazer AWD Review: One Week Test Drive - Reader Reviews

      When a rental car mix-up left me with a 2023 Chevrolet Trailblazer instead of my first choice, I was surprised by what I found. After a week of real-world driving, here's my honest take on Chevy's compact SUV—the good, the bad, and everything in between.

    I was in a situation where I had rented a car – a category with a trunk – and there weren’t any available.  Their running out of certain categories happens frequently nowadays.  As such, I was assigned a 2023 Chevrolet Trailblazer.

    This didn’t look like any of the Trailblazers I remember.  For one, it was a lot smaller.  It was also badged as AWD.  I assumed there would be a Chevy 1.5L T I-4 under the hood.  Previous Trailblazers of the New Millennium ran with a 4.2 L I-6, possibly the modernized, aluminized version of the same 250 c.i. I-6 of the last century.  A friend bought one of these in the early 2000’s.  I was once given one by a rental agency and its 4.2L I-6 was incredibly smooth, but given how quickly the fuel gauge headed west, I took it back for an exchange within a day.

    Before even settling into the car, I looked under the hood to find a 1.3L T 3-cylinder engine.  Three-cylinder engines have become a lot more prevalent in Europe, even in small SUV-CUV types but typically in econoboxes. 

    As for initial impressions, it looked like the car would be sensible to drive and operate its functions.  This turned out to be true.  The seats are supportive and comfortable enough, together with some attractive stitching, The materials are not high grade, with the same tougher fabric which might be in the Malibu.  In fact, except for some minor differences, transitioning from a Malibu to a Trailblazer is easy.  The width of the cabin, the gauges and switches, and the urethane steering wheel and its controls are similar.  In fact, in the Trailblazer, some things are better.  The touch screen is engaged in the dash, with the center vents above it, providing for excellent dispersion of what the air conditioner was dishing out - which was very cool.  Further down, the cubby for electronic devices is flatter and larger and the outlets and switches are all linearly arranged next to each other for easy use.  Also, with the inherently higher seating position, the view is better and the shifter and console height are in a more user-friendly position.

    The exterior sheet metal shows good taste, and the character lines are nicely done.  The front fascia with its lighting set-up is its strong point.  Even the rear taillamps look good as they wrap the rear corners.

    Returning to mechanical specifications, the transmission was a geared one.  The interwebs and its owner manual revealed this.  If a new Trailblazer is AWD, the transmission is a 9-speed automatic.  If it’s a 2WD, the transmission is a CVT.   

    This is a very utilitarian and practical package, and it couldn’t be described as refined.  However, the engine is not grainy but its rhythmic but not hushed hum is always present.  When pushed, it just hums more audibly.  The engine does what it’s supposed to do.  With around 140 horsepower, this is not a powerplant with which to riskily pass, sprint up long grades, and think it’s a jackrabbit, despite its having a turbocharger.

    The transmission is a “humorous” one.  I can’t think of another word.  There’s the expression “children should be seen and not heard.”  In this Trailblazer, it’s more like “children are heard but not seen.”  As the gearbox marches through its 9 gears, the spool-ups are quick and you hear them, but the unit slushes into the next gear as if it was a CVT and you don’t even feel the shifts.  However, if throttled, you will definitely feel the shifts and, in stop and go driving at lower speeds, it can hunt within the first 3 gears and do it in a jerky way.  However, in composed linear driving, the shifts are seamless but the short intervals for each gear, complete with the “sound effects,” was humorous … at least to me.

    The Trailblazer is a nimble enough vehicle.  It rides fairly smoothly, but can quickly become unsettled.  Its ride quality is not as budget-like as that of the now gone Chevy Spark and Sonic, but not as pleasant as that in the Malibu or even what they were able to accomplish in the final-gen Cruze.  Wind noise is reasonably controlled, but tire and suspension related noises aren’t as effectively soaked up.  The road surface is always being communicated to the cabin, telling you this is not a premium vehicle.  In the CUV-SUV category, I’ve only driven the much larger Chevy Traverse with a 3.6 VVT V6 … and we’re talking two different worlds.

    With the higher seating position, front and side visibility are good.  The thick rear sail panel makes angled rear visibility challenging.  This seems to be the norm in this typology of vehicles.  This unit did not have parking or side traffic sensors, which are much needed, and a few lane changes were more challenging since I like to mix up looking over my shoulder and using the mirrors. 

    With the rear seat up, storage space is good … thanks to the Trailblazer’s the boxy shape, and it’s very good with the split rear seat folded forward into the cabin.  It would come in handy to move boxes or a bundle of items.  There was a slot for a rear cover over the storage area, but it was missing.  This is one of the reasons I try to avoid this typology at the rental counter.  The windows are more tinted toward the rear, but I was still not comfortable with that.  The rental agency said ‘but we sell insurance for your personal effects.’  I doubt someone has the time to replace apparel and items that have been purchased over a span of agent while traveling.  Rental agencies don’t do a good job of monitoring this item.  I’m sure that a private owner would keep the retractable cover in its place as needed.

    Inside, while the controls are logically placed, there is no remote hatch or fuel filler release.  However, if the vehicle is locked, the fuel door cannot be opened.  Fuel consumption can vary a lot and the instant fuel mileage readout will clue in the driver to that.  I set the drivetrain to 2WD and “eco” mode, but it still has to lug around AWD hardware.  The readout goes from unimpressive city driving fuel efficiency to very plausible mileage at steady highway cruise.  The 9-speed automatic allows the Trailblazer with AWD to cruise at 65 mph at about 1,900 rpms.  That’s why it can attain the higher fuel mileage, but it took going to 3 cylinders to attain that.

    It was very easy to transition to the Trailblazer from several other Chevrolet models, and especially the Malibu.  Thinking of the similarities and differences, the Trailblazer could almost be viewed as a higher sitting and less refined riding 3-cylinder Malibu turned CUV-SUV.  For a consumer at the intersection of needing the packaging this vehicle provides and its price point, the Trailblazer could make sense.

     

     


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    EXTERIOR PHOTOS

    20240426_145919.thumb.jpg.7a04552bc4ff3f9579e6e93ddb8b67b2.jpg

    The side view shows the more compact shape and the sheet metal accents, attractive alloy wheels, and a roof rack 

    20240426_145931-inked.thumb.jpg.d27f0b1f4f139ae5abb96d622cc8425b.jpg

    The angled rear view shows taillamps which look fairly true-to-form for Chevrolet, but the liftgate is slightly heavy to pull up and push back down ... a person also has to make sure it's fully shut

    20240426_145953-cropped.thumb.jpg.72a498267e90b98845e728c253e2e452.jpg

    The angled front view shows attractive (LED) lighting

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    INTERIOR PHOTOS

    20240426_171324.thumb.jpg.9da6a70987cded67f4027af9376f7369.jpg

    This is what the driver sees upon entering and the light switches are in their own small panel (set to auto)

    20240426_171019.thumb.jpg.ee507f9a56049d22d3dc4b2c1b2448aa.jpg

    This is the view from the passenger's door and this provides a good view of the outlets above and buttons below the cubby space at the front of the console

    20240426_171038.thumb.jpg.0f2f321192fae6413f4a74e5532a3ece.jpg

    The dashboard is very sensibly arranged, easy to learn, and easy on the eyes ... note several push buttons for drive mode, traction, etc. right ahead of the shift lever and various plugs right below the climate control panel.  The touch screen is engaged and the vents above the center stack provide excellent air circulation.

    20240423_095043.thumb.jpg.21c54c89994ad2029090c67f5b36fc95.jpg

    This shows typical Chevrolet gauge graphics, a fuel gauge with graphic bars, and an always useful coolant temperature gauge.  Key lights for driving modes (traction, following distance, etc.) are above the graphic display box between the 2 round gauges.

    20240423_095735.thumb.jpg.68f290ec76e80112dd3a64ffe48593b2.jpg

    This is the typical graphic box in various Chevrolets and, once it has been learned, toggling between trip, vehicle, and eco. becomes easy.  Trip has the most options while eco. rarely needs to be used.  To the left of the odometer is the graphic which shows AWD or 2WD.

    20240426_150114.thumb.jpg.e3aaa709a4c661dffc05ea7e9ebdbeab.jpg

    Cubby hole for phone, outlets for plugs, and push button controls (partial, at the right) sensibly arranged as well as honeycomb hatch to look like it could have been fabric

    20240426_171139.thumb.jpg.969d1c45f42bbca14732773461d49428.jpg

    Rear seat legroom appears to be respectable.  The two-tone effect on the fabric is fairly nice and there are map pockets behind both front seats.

    20240426_181605.thumb.jpg.fbbb5cf6c7da04a567ae30aec9bd2813.jpg

    This shows the rearward view from the driver's seat which would make lane change and parking assists helpful

    20240423_094814.thumb.jpg.7bc6417ec2afbf1c77057299edbb731d.jpg

    The rear seats follow a "60-40" (long running car jargon) split back, a courtesy lamp, and a groove for the rear cover (which was not present in the vehicle)

    20240426_171234.thumb.jpg.ba6c05533346ad054a65eb236874d36a.jpg

    This gives an idea of the cargo space with the rear seats in their upright position as well as 2 usable storage wells at each side of the rear cargo area

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    MECHANICAL PHOTOS

    20240423_094924.thumb.jpg.a199644bad8c27b7cf2fc282ca4cd28e.jpg

    The engine bay is neatly arranged as it typically is in GM products, with dipsticks, reservoirs, and an easy to reach battery ... someone would have had to help me find the turbocharger

    20240426_181834.thumb.jpg.2817da69db7f9b45b0a0967717668b12.jpg

    One can see 3 exhaust manifold passages below the engine shroud

    20240426_181854.thumb.jpg.d0cdcd34e009177ef67bd259ab38c2d3.jpg

    The engine placard says 1.3 liters and long running OBD II diagnostics

    - - - - -

    END OF PHOTOS

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    These are attractive little vehicles *for their class*. I'm slowly seeing more and more of them. 

    Then again, I have no clue if I'm seeing the new Trax or Trailblazers...hahaha. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 5/2/2024 at 6:34 AM, ccap41 said:

    These are attractive little vehicles *for their class*. I'm slowly seeing more and more of them. 

    Then again, I have no clue if I'm seeing the new Trax or Trailblazers...hahaha. 

    Just last week, I saw a few newer Traxes.  They are more sloped in the rear than the Trailblazer and there is no protuding "ridge" over the rear window.  I'd say they are more attractive than the new Trailblazer.  I know next to nothing about them.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    54 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    These seem so cheap to me inside, probably because they are.  They're the new Cavalier.

    Less than zero interest in these, they do sort of look good, but about as exciting as a pre-owned roll of toilet paper.

    On 5/4/2024 at 7:09 PM, trinacriabob said:

    Just last week, I saw a few newer Traxes.  They are more sloped in the rear than the Trailblazer and there is no protuding "ridge" over the rear window.  I'd say they are more attractive than the new Trailblazer.  I know next to nothing about them.

    I want to continue to know less than nothing about them.

    On 5/1/2024 at 11:59 PM, trinacriabob said:

    MECHANICAL PHOTOS

    20240423_094924.thumb.jpg.a199644bad8c27b7cf2fc282ca4cd28e.jpg

    The engine bay is neatly arranged as it typically is in GM products, with dipsticks, reservoirs, and an easy to reach battery ... someone would have had to help me find the turbocharger

    20240426_181834.thumb.jpg.2817da69db7f9b45b0a0967717668b12.jpg

    One can see 3 exhaust manifold passages below the engine shroud

    20240426_181854.thumb.jpg.d0cdcd34e009177ef67bd259ab38c2d3.jpg

    The engine placard says 1.3 liters and long running OBD II diagnostics

    - - - - -

    END OF PHOTOS

    I don't trust these tiny little engines.

    • Agree 1
    • Great Idea! 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Support Real Automotive Journalism

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001, Cheers & Gears has delivered real content and honest opinions — not emotionless AI output or manufacturer-filtered fluff.

    If you value independent voices and authentic reviews, consider subscribing. Plans start at just $2.25/month, and paid members enjoy an ad-light experience.*

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • No, I’m using AI to reverse engineer the garage app and put it into a different app so we can finally move to the new version of the Invison software. This is just a test entry.
    • Name: Last Indian Category: Vehicles Date Added: 2026-02-10 Submitter: Last Indian   Last Indian  
    • February 9th and its place in history ... I always give this one a thought when I look at the calendar. The good: Today is the day that the Boeing 747 first took to the sky in a smooth as butter departure from Paine Field in Everett, WA where it was assembled.  This makes for one helluva "feel good" moment in time. - - - - - The bad: Today is the day that, 55 years ago, Los Angeles had its "famous" Sylmar earthquake.  Clearly, this was the inspiration for the original version of the 1974 film "Earthquake."  The Northridge earthquake took place on MLK Day in 1994 got more coverage because media improved.  The latter quake seemingly did a lot more damage.  Northridge sits in the middle of the San Fernando Valley while Sylmar sits at the top end of the San Fernando Valley, where Los Angeles really thins out and sits at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains foothills.  The commonality is that in both quakes, at least one of the really long concrete overpass connecting the freeways I-5 and CA 14 collapsed.  Every time I've driven under it or next to it, I've remarked that that is one really long span (CA 14 terminating and feeding cars onto I-5 southbound into the Valley and L.A.) - - - - - 1971 high ramp collapses at I-5 and CA-14 1994 high ramp collapses at I-5 and CA-14 (same interchange) The Los Angeles area went 20 years between its 2 major earthquakes.  San Francisco had its historic 1906 quake that turned the then younger city into rubble, not having one again until 1989 - the Loma Prieta earthquake. The most severe fault in the state (the San Andreas) goes through San Francisco, while it crosses where the mountains end and the Central Valley begin some 50 to 60 miles north of Los Angeles. When you grow up around this, you seemingly familiarize yourself with all these facts and figures.
    • Haha.  Well, it's new compared to what the trailer is carrying.  It goes to show how well I (don't) know my BMWs and other foreign cars.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search