Ravenfreak13

Honestly the Sebring isn't bad. The engine compared to other 4 cyl is only behind altima by 2 hp. It's a love it or hate it design, just as the PT Cruiser was when it debuted. It is excellent in the handleing department, it took every sharp turn I threw at it. Sure, some of the interior materials could be better, but there is far worse out there.

If well maintained, saturns can go on for a LONG time.

It definetelly grows on you. You really just have to look at it closly and the styling makes sense. I do agree, certain angles aren't flattering but as a whole, I like it.

the dodge neon was there for people who happend to wander into a dodge showroom and the plymouth was there for people who happend to wander into a chrysler/plymouth showroom.

That's why we leased the Sebring. Chrylser products are due for a major quality boost in almost 3 years. The exact same time that the lease is up. And yea, older saturns have high resale. Our SL1's resale is about $3500.

Sebring is fine to me. Everyone who has seen it loves it. And isnt it selling over 10k per month? Wheres the problem.

This story was on one of those big cable news channels. They said" Ford surprisingly moves up the list. Toyota and Lexus as usual stay on top while all GM brands fail to meet the industry average." HELLO??? Has no one seen the camry and its many problems!?

Interior is shockingly modern considering its a 2000

YAYAYAYAY! BEST CUPHOLDERS GOES TO SEBRING! My cupholders pwn yours!

I have issues with integrated...when it breaks, unintegrated units are simple to take out. You have to remove so much to take out an integrated one. What looks easier to remove?

Didnt someone just complain that integrated is bad? Anyway, I'd rather it not be integrated because there is no room for customization. plus, it makes the dashboard look slabsided.

It's quite depressing that people view honda as quality...what about that Center stack would make you think "strong resale value"

More like a mid-90s compact aftermarket unit.

Everyone knows that cubby holes are just fillers for something that should be there.

I find it quite disturbing that those screen digit styles are still used. At least dot matrix can be configure to suit any text where as the old way certain letters look messed up.

It's probably because their test cars are loaded. Seriously I almost puked when I saw the horridness of the base CR-V's interior. It was even worse put togather then my saturn. Kind of scary for over $20k.

I told you! I like the Sebrings screen. It displays the radio station name, slogan, artist and song thats playing on regular FM radio.

^A $33k SUV...Those screens are unacceptable.

That radio you have shown in the CR-V is not the base unit. This is the base unit which they have. NASTY!

I don't understand the supposed honda "quality". I was in my neighbors new C-RV(they had to dump their mazda 3, since it was a heap)...It was louder and the ride was rougher then our sebring. I am also shocked at the outdated screen displays and the radio unit. How could you put a high tech looking screen in the instrumeent panel and then make the radio screen look like a 1980's alarm clock screen? I was also in another neighbors mothers new pilot. Hard plastic galore and the same ugly radio and temp control screens on the center stack. I am quite shocked at the overblown hype about how great hondas are.

Indeed I did!

YEA SEBRING!!!

They do that just to be able to sell the newest car. This reminds me of circa 2000 Plymouth Breeze

I'll let you know how durable they are in a year.

07 Sebring -4 66 Electra-8 98 Saturn(not sold yet)-4 16!