Drew Dowdell

The ATS-V could be powered by Jesus on a pogo stick and it still wouldn't sell in Europe.

GM offered DOHCs first that vastly out powered the imports and no one bought them. None of the issues with the Twincam would have been evident until they started hitting 80,000 miles and people neglected the timing belts, so it's only with hindsight that you even would have known an issue with the Twincam existed. Put them in a Chevy, and people bought the 3.1 pushrod. Put them in the the Cutlass and people bought the 4-cylinder or the 2.8 V6. Off the showroom floor Oldsmobile was selling a V6 that would perform with the SHO of the day without all the hype... and no one bought them. GM offered DOHC in the Saturn LS series... it was roughly equal to the Camry and Accord outputs of the day... the cars even had dent resistant panels... and no one bought them. Most LS series Saturns are 4-cylinders GM offered the 3.5 V6 in the Intrigue, still to this day one of the best W-bodies ever built, that Camry and Accord didn't exceed in power till nearly 6 years later..... and no one bought them. People actively chose the 3800 or the 3400 over all these engines. Lesabre and 88 were the best selling full size family cars for years and years... even after Ford and Chrysler moved their full size offerings over to OHC or DOHC. When given the choice, people chose the 3800 over any DOHC entry from GM. When they wanted a performer, they chose the S/C 3800. It wasn't that GM wasn't offering DOHC... it's that the customers were picking the pushrods.... can you blame GM for keeping them in service so long? If the Lumina or Cutlass engine sales had been flipped to 80% DOHC v 20% Pushrod, as opposed to what happened in reality, we'd not be having this discussion today and the 3.6HF would be in it's 4th or 5th generation. As far as getting there first, GM usually has... and then was ignored by the market.

Lately maybe, but I don't think that is a bad thing as there is still a lot of feeling around for who fits where best. However, Chris is leaving OnStar to start his own consulting firm. I can totally get behind that idea.

Chris was with GM for 13 years.

I dunno, a 2.0 diesel with 258 ft-lb from 1700 - 2500 rpm sounds kinda nice. That's more torque than the non-DI 3.6 V6 at any rpm.

GM had me in their blogger events almost the entire day. If I hadn't brought two other guys with me, nothing else would have been covered.

It's on the Canadian website only as a future model

uh, thanks. I'm the one that took that took that shot and posted it in this thread....

It doesn't have to be GM and it doesn't have to even be a trunk release. When I had a Lucerne rental, I parked in the mall parking lot next to a Subaru. When used the Remote Start, the panic alarm on the Subaru went off. When I pressed remote start again, the Subaru's panic alarm shut back off.... I was able to replicate it again right after, so it wasn't like a proximity thing.

You'd probably fit into the back seat better too. I would totally do a CTS Coupe over a Camaro.

Was man nicht haben kann 2011 Chevrolet Orlando January 18th, 2011 Drew Dowdell - CheersandGears.com Media Gallery: 2011 Chevrolet Orlando For those of you who can't read the title, it's German for "What you cannot have". The Chevrolet Germany website went live this week with the build your own page for the 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. At this time, the selectable options are rather limited, but it gives you an idea of what a U.S. version might look like if General Motors ever decided to offer one here. Pricing starts at €21,390 for a 1.8 liter gas engine plus 5-speed manual transmission which works out to a sky high $28,641 using today's exchange rates. Other power train configurations include a 2.0 liter diesel engine with your choice of 6-speed manual, a €1,900 ($2,544) upgrade, or a 6-speed automatic for €3,300 ($4,418). You can have your Orlando in any color you like as long as it's Olympic White. Any of the 6 other available colors require a €490 upcharge. Interior is listed as black mesh cloth only and only one choice of alloy wheels. A Navigation system is available for a relatively reasonable €800 (navigation systems on Opel models appear to be €900 to €1,300 depending on capabilities) Fully optioned up (without extended warranties) the Chevrolet Orlando tops out at €25,980 which works out to an eye popping $34,787. By contrast, the closest GM competitor, the Opel Zafira starts at a lower price and can be optioned up much higher. GM has opted to offer the Orlando in nearly every country except the one where it's namesake is located. In fact, even our friends to the north in Canada will be offered the new Chevy MPV. We still think this car would do well here, however the pricing and options would clearly need to be adjusted for the U.S. market. Related: America Loses out on Chevy Orlando, Canada doesn't GM Cancels plans to sell Chevrolet Orlando in US